Perez, Edith A.

BackgroundThe goal of this study was to assess the impact of trastuzumab on locoregional failure.METHODSThe analysis included 2763 patients with HER2‐positive (HER2+) breast cancer who were randomly assigned to adjuvant doxorubicin (A), cyclophosphamide (C), paclitaxel (T) and trastuzumab (H) (arm A, AC→T [n = 922]; arm B, AC→T→H [n = 988]; arm C, AC→T+H→H [n = 853]). Radiotherapy was given after AC→T concurrently with H. Radiotherapy was given after lumpectomy (L) or after mastectomy (M) with ≥4 positive lymph nodes but was optional for 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes. Locoregional failures at 10 years (LFR10) as first events were compared using competing risk analysis.ResultsThe median follow‐up was 13.0 years. The first site of failure was local‐only in 96 cases, locoregional in 16 cases, regional in 32 cases, and not specified in 2 cases; LFR10 was 4.8% (95% CI 4.1%‐5.7%). LFR10 was 5.5% (95% CI 4.3%‐7.2%), 4.9% (95% CI 3.7%‐6.4%), and 2.8% (95% CI 1.9%‐4.1%) in arms A, B, and C (B vs A: hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, P = .62; C vs A: HR 0.72, P = .12). For estrogen receptor–positive patients, LFR10 was 3.7% (95% CI 2.8%‐4.8%) and for estrogen receptor–negative patients, it was 6.1% (95% CI 5.0%‐7.4%; HR 0.61, P = .004). Local treatment included L+RT (n = 1044 [38%]), M+RT (n = 1025 [37%]), and M (n = 694 [25%]). LFR10 was 6.% (95% CI 5.0%‐7.8%), 3.0% (95% CI 2.1%‐4.3%), and 5.5% (95% CI 4.0%‐7.4%) for L+RT, M+RT, and M, respectively (M+RT vs L+RT: HR 0.43, P < .001; M vs L+RT: HR 0.88, P = .57). For 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes, LFR10 was 6.5% (95% CI 4.8%‐8.9%), 4.1% (95% CI 2.4%‐7.0%), and 4.3% (95% CI 2.9%‐6.5%) in L+RT, M+RT, and M, respectively (M vs L+RT: HR 0.68, P = .14; M vs M+RT: HR 1.2, P = .6).ConclusionLow 10‐year LFRs were seen regardless of trastuzumab use. Differences in local therapy in patients with 1 to 3 positive lymph nodes did not appear to improve local control. Local therapy studies for HER2+ and other tumor characteristics are important as the role of local therapies continues to evolve.

AbstractBackgroundThere are few treatment options for patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM).MethodsWe report a case series of patients with breast cancer and LM treated with intra‐CSF topotecan (TOPO). Outcome was assessed by clinical exam and MRI at baseline, at end of induction (4‐5 weeks), then every 3 months; CSF cytology was determined at baseline and with each treatment.ResultsThirty‐one women [median age, 58 (37‐81); median KPS 60 (40‐100)] received treatment. At baseline, 68% had positive CSF cytology, and 90%, leptomeningeal enhancement on MRI. 84% of patients also received focal RT (not during TOPO) and 77% received concomitant systemic hormonal or chemotherapy. Median number of TOPO treatments was 14.5 (range, 3‐71); median duration of treatment, 11 weeks (1‐176); and median OS, 6.9 months (range, 0.9‐48.8). Patients remaining progression‐free during 4‐6 weeks of induction (81%) had a median OS of 11.5 months (range, 1.8‐48.8). Overall neurologic PFS at 6, 12, and 24 months was 39%, 26%, and 6%, respectively. Clearing of CSF malignant cells for >3 consecutive samples occurred in 10/21 (48%) patients with positive CSF cytology at baseline, remaining clear for a median duration of 15.9 months (range, 1.4‐34.5). Grade 3 adverse events included headache or vomiting (3pts), T2 hyperintensity surrounding the ventricular catheter (2 pts), and meningitis (2 pts).ConclusionsIntra‐CSF TOPO, with focal RT as needed for symptomatic areas of enhancement produced durable clearing of CSF malignant cells in 48% of patients positive at baseline, with promising median PFS and OS.

Abstract Background: The intrinsic immune response in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has both prognostic and predictive utility, and immune-related biomarkers are now actionable targets in TNBC. Current modalities for immune profiling are limited by lack of spatial context and precise quantitation. We used quantitative digital spatial profiling (DSP) to 1) characterize the immune architecture of tumoral and stromal regions in TNBC and 2) identify prognostic immune signatures. Methods: From the FinXX trial of adjuvant capecitabine therapy, tumor sections (FFPE) matched for patient characteristics, treatment arm and RFS-based outcome (N=44) were assessed with Nanostring GeoMxTM DSP. Briefly, with 3-plex immunofluorescence (pan-cytokeratin, CD45, CD68 with SYTO-13 dye for nuclei), spatially-defined CD45-enriched or CD68-enriched stromal segments and adjacent tumor segments (N=950) were selected for digital quantitation (NanoString nCounter) of 39 immune proteins (e.g. immune cell profiling proteins: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD11c, CD20, CD56, CD68, HLA-DR, PD-1, PD-L1, Granzyme B), immune drug targets (e.g. VISTA, STING, IDO1), and activation status-related proteins (e.g. ICOS, PD-L2, CD40, CD40L, CD44). Normalized, differentially-expressed (DE) proteins were evaluated, and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify modules of highly co-expressing immune proteins, and association with RFS as a categorical variable was determined. Results: 20 DE proteins in tumor segments were associated with RFS. Among them, those with the highest RFS-associated fold changes (FC) included CD20, CD40, CD56, HLA-DR, Granzyme B, and PD-L2 (FC): 2.1-4.4) (p &lt; 0.05). In contrast, only 4 DE proteins were associated with RFS in stromal segments (Granzyme B, IDO-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2 (FC: 1.5-3.3) (p &lt; 0.05). By WGCNA, 2 tumor-based immune modules [IM1 (lymphocyte infiltration) and IM2 (lymphocyte activation)] were identified based on their co-expression. The top three co-expressed proteins in IM1 were CD4, CD40, and CD45 (r &gt;0.9). The three top co-expressed proteins in IM2 were PD-L1, PD-L2, and Granzyme B (r &gt; 0.85). Together with CD56 expression, IM1 and IM2 comprised a set of 3 intratumoral immune features that associated with RFS. For recurring tumors, all 3 immune features clustered with low scores . Among non-recurrent tumors, two distinct, non-overlapping clusters with inverse characteristics were identified: high IM2, low IM1, low CD56 vs. low IM2, high IM1, and high CD56. Overall, across all 3 immune features, PDL2, CD40 and CD56 expression most strongly associated with RFS. Conclusion: With spatially-defined, precise quantification of immune proteins, we identified 3 immune features, including two distinct immune modules, IM1 and IM2 that correlate with durable RFS. These immune modules of highly co-expressing proteins were associated with RFS only when present in the tumor compartment but not tumor-adjacent, immune cell-rich stroma. Citation Format: Jodi M. Carter, Saranya Chumsri, Yaohua Ma, Xue Wang, Jennifer M. Kachergus, Douglas Hinerfeld, Heather Ann Brauer, Sarah Warren, Heikki Joensuu, Edith A. Perez, Aubrey Thompson. Quantitative digital spatial profiling reveals novel prognostic intratumoral immune signatures in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 1004.

11095 Background: Biologic characterization of CTCs is increasingly important in determining metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patient (pt) prognosis and treatment prediction. Combined preliminary results from two earlier metastatic BC NCCTG trials, N0234 & N0336, suggested that the change in CTC mammaglobin (MGB1) gene expression between baseline and two cycles of chemotherapy predicted tumor response (p=0.04). The objectives of this study were to 1) determine CTC gene expression of CK19 and MGB1 before, during, and after treatment in N0436 & N0437 and 2) determine associations between baseline and post-treatment gene expression and treatment response. Methods: CTCs were enriched using CD45-depletion from ∼10ml EDTA blood obtained from metastatic BC pts before, after two cycles, and at end of treatment with either first/second-line irinotecan plus cetuximab (N0436) or first-line paclitaxel poliglumex and capecitabine (N0437). CK19 and MGB1 mRNA levels were determined using quantitative RT-PCR in baseline and serial CTC samples of up to 19 pts from N0436 and 40 pts from N0437. The relative gene expressions were normalized to β2-microglobulin and calibrated to healthy blood using the 2-ΔΔCt algorithm; a value of 2 was defined as positive for the respective marker. Results: CK19+ mRNA was detected in 58% of baseline samples from N0436 (11/19) and N0437 (23/40). MGB1+ mRNA was detected in 32% (6/19) and 38% (15/40) of N0436 and N0437 baseline samples, respectively. CK19+ mRNA was detected in 50% (7/14) and 56% (29/52) of N0436 and N0437 serial CTC samples, respectively. MGB1+ mRNA was detected in 29% (4/14) and 27% (14/52) of N0436 and N0437 serial CTC samples, respectively. Of the 66 serial samples, 27% of samples (18/66) had turned positive from baseline for CK19 or MGB1. CK19 mRNA was detected in 85% (33/39) of MGB1+ mRNA samples but their baseline mRNA levels were not correlated. Conclusions: CK19 mRNA was detected in MBC pts with similar frequencies to the CellSearch imaging system. CK19 was detected at a higher frequency than MGB1. In the majority of cases, MGB1 was co-expressed with CK19. Associations between gene expression and treatment response using Chi-Squared analyses and Cox regression models will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

1020 Background: Trastuzumab-containing regimes have dramatically improved outcome of patients with HER2+ breast cancer. Efforts to improve efficacy and tolerability of combination regimens with this monoclonal antibody are important for patient care. Thus, we conducted a multi-institutional phase II study of a triplet combination in patients eligible to receive either first- or second-line treatment for HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: A phase II study designed to test that the true confirmed response rate (CRR) was at most 45% versus a true CRR of at least 65% was done (March 2005-June 2008). This design required that at least 25/45 confirmed responses in evaluable patients for the treatment to be considered promising. Patients received capecitabine 825 mg/m2 po (days 1–14), vinorelbine intravenously (IV) 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and trastuzumab IV 8mg/kg day 1, week 1, and then 6 mg/kg q 3 weeks. Tissue and blood have been collected for future studies on biomarkers. Results: 47 women were accrued, one patient cancelled participation prior to receiving any study drug, and another had a major protocol violation. 45 patients were evaluable and 30 (67%) achieved a confirmed response, (26 patients, 58% had a confirmed partial response and 4 patients, 9% had a confrimed complete response). Median progression free survival was 11.3 months (95% CI 8.4–23.2 months), median overall survival was 27.2 months (95% CI: 26.6-NA months), and among the 30 responders, the median duration of response time was 15.5 months (95% 7.7–26.1 months). The most common grade 3 events include neutropenia 61%, fatigue 13%, skin reaction-hand-foot 11%, and leukopenia 11%. Alopecia was not noted with this regimen. Conclusions: This triplet combination is effective, safe, and is promising in patients with HER2+ MBC. A phase III study should be conducted to compare the best doublet with this triplet combination whether this would lead to better clinical outcomes. [Table: see text]

1005 Background: B in combination with weekly paclitaxel or docetaxel (D) as 1st-line therapy for MBC has improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with the respective taxane alone in two large Phase III trials. This study investigated the addition of B to standard 1st-line chemotherapy regimens for MBC. Methods: Patients were randomized in 2:1 ratio to receive B + chemotherapy or placebo (pl) + chemotherapy. Prior to randomization, investigators chose capecitabine (Cap) (2000 mg/m2 x 14d), taxane (T) (nab-paclitaxel [260 mg/m2] or D [75 or 100 mg/m2], q3wk), or anthracycline (Ant)-based chemotherapy (q3wk). B or pl was administered at 15 mg/kg q3wk. Key eligibility criteria included MBC or locally-recurrent disease, no prior cytotoxic treatment, ECOG PS 0 or 1, HER2-negative disease and no CNS metastases. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), independent review of PFS, and safety. At progression, all patients were eligible for B with 2nd line chemotherapy. The Cap cohort and the pooled T or Ant (T + Ant) cohort were independently powered and analyzed in parallel using two-sided stratified log-rank test (Cap: 80% power to detect HR=0.75; T + Ant: 90% power to detect HR=0.7). Results: RIBBON-1 enrolled 1237 patients (Cap, 615; T, 307; Ant, 315) from 12/05 to 8/07 in 22 countries with a median follow-up of 15.6 months in the Cap cohort and 19.2 months in the T + Ant cohort. The results are summarized below. OS data are limited with only 33% of events. Safety was consistent with results of prior B trials. Conclusions: The addition of B to Cap, T; or Ant-based chemotherapy regimens used in 1st-line treatment of MBC resulted in statistically-significant improvement in PFS with a safety profile comparable to prior Phase III studies. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

e12000 Sorafenib is a potent multikinase inhibitor approved by the FDA and EMEA for the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. As a single agent, sorafenib has been shown to have activity in pts with BC. Here, we review the TIES program, a compilation of currently ongoing investigator-sponsored phase IIb multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that aim to determine the optimal sequencing of pharmacologic agents for the treatment of BC. All studies will combine sorafenib with first- and/or second-line chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy in pts with HER2-negative metastatic or locally advanced BC, enroll 220 pts, stratify pts by visceral vs nonvisceral disease, allow pts with evaluable and measurable disease, and include pts with treated brain metastases. The primary endpoint of all trials will be progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints will be safety, overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, and time to progression. Some studies will also assess quality of life, pharmacokinetic sampling, and biomarkers. Additional information on four of the trials is shown below (Table). Patient characteristics and accruals will be reported. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

623 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy plays an important role in breast cancer treatment. Unlike patients who undergo surgery followed by adjuvant therapy,there are no established guidelines for surgical management following neoadjuvant therapy. Methods: Surgical practice patterns from 50 patients in N0338 “Phase II trial of Docetaxel and Carboplatin administered every two weeks as induction therapy for Stage II and Stage III breast cancer” were reviewed. The protocol did not mandate surgical therapy leaving the decision to the treating surgeon and patient. Results: 66% of patients underwent mastectomy (M) and 33% underwent breast conservation therapy (BCT). Three (9%) had immediate reconstruction. Eight (24%) underwent contralateral prophylactic M. Residual tumor size did not always impact primary surgical therapy. In the M group 4 (12%) had no residual disease, 15 (45%) < 2cm and 14 (42%) > 2cm; whereas, in the BCT group 1 (6%) had no residual disease, 12 (70%) < 2cm and 4 (24%) > 2cm. Axillary lymph node (ALN) staging varied tremendously. Three (6%) patients presented with palpable lymphadenopathy and proceeded to complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) after chemotherapy (CT). Fine needle aspiration (8) or core needle biopsy (7) of the axilla was performed in 15 (30%) patients before CT; 1 was negative and went on to have sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after CT; 14 (94%) were positive with 13 (86%) going on to ALND and 1 SLNB after CT. Five (10%) underwent SLNB prior to CT. One (20%) was positive and went on to have ALND after CT; 4 (8%) were negative and had no further ALN staging. A total of 19 (39%) had SLNB after neoadjuvant therapy; 13 (68%) were positive and underwent ALND; 1 SLNB failed; 2 of 5 that were negative underwent ALND with 1 having a positive lymph node. Ten (20%) underwent ALND with no pre-operative staging with 8 being positive for ALN metastases. Conclusions: Review of study data from multiple institutions revealed no consistent criteria in selection of surgical intervention for the breast tumor or ALN staging. There remains a need for further research in this area to establish standard practice guidelines. Support from NIH, sanofi-aventis, Amgen, Breast Cancer Research Foundation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

539 Background: An increased baseline sHER-2 concentration is an indicator of poor prognosis in the metastatic and adjuvant settings of HER-2+BC. This study evaluated the levels of sHER-2 during treatment and at time of recurrence in N9831. Methods: Aims were to describe sHER-2 levels during treatment and at time of recurrence in patients (pts) randomized to Arms A (standard chemotherapy) and C (standard chemotherapy with concurrent trastuzumab). Baseline serum samples of 1506 pts from both arms along with 86 recurrence serum samples were analyzed for sHER-2 (ng/mL). In addition, 556 serial samples were obtained in 148 patients over the treatment period. Median follow up was 4.5 years. Statistical methods included repeated measures linear models, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, and Cox regression models. Results: Analyzing serial sHER-2 levels during treatment, mean log sHER-2 remained constant in Arm C (estimated slope = 0.004, p = 0.44) while the estimated increase per month was 0.026 (on log e scale) for Arm A (p = 0.0003). Based on the linear model at 18 months, the mean log sHER-2 was 2.98 (95% CI: 2.87–3.09) and 2.55 (95% CI: 2.40–2.70) for Arms A and C, respectively. Among pts with disease recurrence, sHER-2 levels increased in Arm A from baseline to time of recurrence (mean = 72.9, median = 1.7, p =0.005) while sHER-2 levels remained unchanged in Arm C (mean = 9.2, median = -0.9, p = 0.65). While all 86 recurrence patients had baseline sHER2 levels <50, 24% (15/63) of Arm A patients had very high recurrence sHER-2 levels (≥50) as compared to 9% (2/23) on Arm C (p=0.10). Patients with recurrence sHER-2 levels ≥15 had shorter survival time following recurrence with 3 year overall survival of 51% compared to 76% for the <15 sHER-2 group (HR = 2.77; 95% CI: 1.20–6.43, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Based on serial specimens during treatment, the concurrent trastuzumab arm (C) had constant sHER-2 levels, whereas the standard chemotherapy arm (A) had increasing sHER-2 levels. In arm A, recurrence sHER-2 levels increased significantly from baseline while recurrence sHER-2 levels did not change in arm C. Additionally, pts with high sHER-2 levels at recurrence had shorter overall survival following recurrence. Partial support: CA25224, CA114740 , Genentech, Siemens, and the BCRF. [Table: see text]

e11527 Background: 118 Her2 positive invasive carcinomas were retested centrally at the Mayo Clinic for Her2 status confirmation prior to inclusion in Mayo Clinic Cancer Research Consortium study RC0639 phase II study of cardiac safety and tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with lapatinib for resected Her2+ breast cancer (MCCRC RC0639). Methods: Central confirmatory methods were immunohistochemical (IHC) Dako HercepTest on a Dako Autostainer using the manufacturer's recommendations and HercepTest kit epitrope retrieval kit and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) using Vysis PathVysion probe kit. Test results are interpreted using ASCO/CAP guidelines (IHC >30%, Her2:CEP 17 ratio >2.2). Results: There is local and central test 3+ IHC concordance in 48 of 53 tumors (agreement 90.6%) and FISH amplification in 29 of 33 tumors (agreement 87.9%), improved or similar results using identical methods to results in NCCTG N9831 adjuvant trial (n=1063, 81.6% IHC; n=813, 88.1% FISH). Of 92 centrally tested 3+ IHC positive tumors, 88 (95.7%) were FISH amplified. 5 centrally tested patients interpreted as Her2 positive by pre-ASCO/CAP guidelines (IHC >10%; HER2:CEP17 ratio >2) are Her2 ineligible using ASCO/CAP guidelines. IHC not confirmed centrally was reviewed by a second pathologist in 16 of 118 specimens. IHC concordance between two central pathologists was 10/16 (62.5%) in negative or equivocal (≤30% IHC staining) specimens; 7/10 (70%) with two reader agreement were FISH amplified and 4/6 (66%) with disagreement were FISH amplified. Conclusions: Concordance in IHC and FISH results between local and central labs is similar or improved since N9831. New ASCO/CAP Her2 testing guidelines change eligibility based on Her2 status in 4.2 % of patients. Equivocal IHC results falling between pre- and post- ASCO/CAP IHC positive thresholds (>10% and <30% IHC strong staining) are only partially resolved by repeat IHC review and/or FISH testing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.