Gottesman, Rebecca F.

AbstractBackgroundPhysical frailty is associated with increased risk for dementia and other neurologic sequelae. However, the neurobiological changes underlying frailty and frailty risk remain unknown. We examined the association of cerebral white matter structure with current and future frailty.MethodsAtherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Neurocognitive Study participants who underwent 3T brain MRI were included. Frailty status was classified according to the Fried criteria. Cerebral white matter integrity was defined using white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and microstructure, measured using diffusion tensor imaging fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD). Multivariable linear regression was used to relate baseline frailty to white matter structure; multivariable logistic regression was used to relate baseline white matter to frailty risk among participants nonfrail at baseline.ResultsIn the cross-sectional analysis (N = 1 754; mean age: 76 years), frailty was associated with greater WMH volume, lower FA, and greater MD. These associations remained consistent after excluding participants with a history of stroke or dementia. Among participants nonfrail at baseline who completed follow-up frailty assessment (N = 1 379; 6.6-year follow-up period), each standard deviation increase in WMH volume was associated with 1.46 higher odds of frailty at follow-up. Composite FA and MD measures were not associated with future frailty; however, secondary analyses found several significant white matter tract-specific associations with frailty risk.ConclusionThe current study demonstrates a robust association of WMH volume with current and future frailty. Although measures of white matter microstructure were altered in frail individuals, these measures were not generally associated with progression from nonfrail to frail status.

AbstractIntroductionSlower mobility is associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. We examined the interaction of endurance with gait speed on prevalent MCI and dementia.MethodsCross‐sectional multinomial regression in the ARIC cohort (n = 2844 participants; 71 to 94 years; 44% men; 18% Black persons) with cognitive status (normal/MCI/dementia), 4 m gait speed, and endurance (2 minute walk [2MW]).ResultsFaster gait speed (up to but not above 1 m/s) and better 2MW were separately associated with lower dementia risk. Good performance in both (2MW = 200 m, gait speed = 1.2 m/s) was associated with 99% lower dementia (Relative Prevalence Ratio [RPR] = 0.01 [95% CI: 0.0 to 0.06]) and 73% lower MCI, RPR = 0.27 (0.15 to 0.48) compared to poor performance in both (2MW = 100 m, gait speed = 0.8 m/s). Models incorporating a gait speed‐by‐2MW interaction term outperformed gait speed‐only models (P < .001).DiscussionGait speed relationships with dementia diminish at faster gait speeds. Combining endurance with gait speed may yield more sensitive markers of MCI and dementia than gait speed alone.

AbstractBackgroundDementia disproportionately impacts people of color in the U.S.. Whether these disparities are due to differences in vascular risk factors, cognitive reserve, or AD pathophysiology remains unclear.MethodBlack and White participants from four U.S. communities were recruited into the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study at ages 45‐64. Vascular risk factors were evaluated in midlife and at multiple visits over 30+ years, as were markers of cognitive reserve, with expert classification of dementia. In participants with brain MRI, brain volumes were evaluated in association with dementia. In nondemented participants in the ARIC‐PET ancillary study, florbetapir PET scans were used to quantify brain cortical amyloid; differences in levels by race, vascular risk factors, and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) were evaluated.ResultIn 15744 ARIC participants, dementia was more common in Black vs White participants. Although midlife vascular risk factors were related to dementia, the impact of these risk factors on dementia risk and cortical volumes didn’t differ by race. Lower education was nonsignificantly more strongly associated with dementia in Blacks vs Whites, and an APOE e4 allele was more strongly associated with dementia in Whites. In ARIC‐PET (N=322), vascular risk factors from midlife were associated with PET amyloid, without similar associations for late‐life risk factors; these associations did not significantly differ by race. WMH volume was more strongly associated (cross‐sectionally) with PET amyloid in Blacks vs Whites, but differences were not statistically significantly different. Finally, Blacks had an over two‐fold increased odds of elevated florbetapir PET vs Whites, independent of vascular risk factors, demographics, WMH volume, cognitive status, and APOE genotype.ConclusionConsideration of racial disparities in dementia should consider vascular risk, cognitive reserve, and social determinants of health, across the life course. Vascular risk factors do not appear to differentially impact dementia risk or brain amyloid in Blacks vs Whites, but the greater prevalence of these risk factors in Blacks must be considered. Although the A/T/N framework may clarify underlying biology contributing to Alzheimer’s disease, inclusion of these additional factors is needed to understand and reduce racial disparities in dementia rates.

AbstractBackgroundPrior evidence has suggested associations between hearing loss and smaller brain volumes particularly in the temporal lobe where the primary auditory cortex is located, probably due to changes in cortical organization associated with reduced auditory stimulation. Evidence regarding associations of central auditory processing with brain volumes is relatively limited. The study aims to investigate cross‐sectional associations of central auditory processing with brain volumes in older adults.MethodWe studied 587 cognitively normal (Mini‐Mental State Exam ≥23 if high school degree or less and ≥25 if above high school degree) older adults (mean age: 77±4 years, 56% female, 17% black), including 426 with hearing loss from the Aging and Cognitive Health Evaluation in Elders (ACHIEVE) baseline (2018‐19), which is an ancillary randomized controlled trial of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study and 161 with normal hearing, comparable age and cognitive status from the ARIC Visit 6/7 (2016‐17/2018‐19). Brain volumes were measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans and were transformed to z‐scores. Central auditory processing was measured by the Quick Speech‐in‐Noise (QuickSIN) test. Total scores range from 0 to 30 with lower scores indicating worse speech‐in‐noise performance. Multivariable‐adjusted linear regression was used to estimate cross‐sectional differences in standardized brain volumes associated with differences in QuickSIN score. Models adjusted for age, sex, race, education, cohort, body mass index, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, stroke, intracranial volume, and pure‐tone average.ResultEvery 5‐point decrease in QuickSIN score (worse performance) was associated with smaller volumes of the temporal lobe (‐0.07SD, 95% CI: ‐0.13, ‐0.01). QuickSIN score was also associated with subregions of the temporal lobe related to auditory processing, memory and emotion, including amygdala (‐0.13SD, 95% CI: ‐0.21, ‐0.04), middle (‐0.08SD, 95% CI: ‐0.15, ‐0.00) and superior temporal gyri (‐0.08SD, 95% CI: ‐0.15, ‐0.01).ConclusionPoorer central auditory processing was associated with smaller temporal lobe volumes, including but not limited to subregions important for auditory processing. The ongoing collection of ACHIEVE data with longitudinal MRI data will facilitate understanding of association between hearing loss and brain atrophy as well as the potential promising effects of hearing treatment in mitigating brain aging.

AbstractBackgroundImaging‐based markers of cerebrovascular disease are associated with adverse health events, including incident dementia. However, only infarcts ≥3mm are typically considered in clinical and research settings. Recent evidence demonstrates that smaller infarcts in individuals during mid‐life, particularly when co‐occurring with larger infarcts, may be clinically relevant to cognitive decline, incident stroke, and stroke mortality. We aimed to determine if there was a similar compounding of risk for incident dementia among those with both smaller and larger infarcts at midlife.MethodThe ARIC study is a multi‐site longitudinal cohort study which began in 1987. At visit 3 (1993‐95), brain 1.5T MRI scans were completed in 1881 participants with self‐reported Black/White race and no history of stroke (Mean age=62.9±4.9, 40% Male, 50% Black). Infarcts were identified on T2 and proton density weighted images, with smaller infarcts defined as those <3mm and larger infarcts defined as ≥3mm. All participants were followed prospectively for incident dementia using a combination of medical record surveillance, telephone interviews, in‐person assessments, and expert adjudicated dementia status at three in‐person exams (2011‐2013, 2015‐17, 2018‐19). Cox regression was used to determine the association between infarct group [none(referent), smaller only, larger only, both] and incident dementia adjusted for age, sex, education, site‐race, APOE4, and competing risk of mortality.ResultAmong 1881 participants, 539 incident dementia cases were identified over 25 years of follow‐up. 1611 participants were infarct‐free, 50 participants had only smaller infarcts, 185 had only larger infarcts, and 35 participants had both. Compared to those with no infarcts, participants with both smaller and larger infarcts were over 2.5 times more likely to develop dementia [Hazard Ratio(HR)=2.61; 95% Confidence Interval(CI)=1.44, 4.72]. Associations were in similar directions but had wider and indeterminate confidence intervals when comparing the smaller infarcts only (HR=1.22; 95%CI=0.70, 2.13) or larger infarcts only (HR=1.27; 95%CI=0.92, 1.74) to the no infarct group. Of the 35 participants with both smaller and larger infarcts, all but two either died or developed dementia.ConclusionA midlife infarct burden including both smaller and larger lesions may represent a vulnerability to dementia beyond the risk conferred by either smaller or larger infarcts alone.

AbstractAimWe investigate if periodontal disease is prospectively associated with cerebrovascular and neurodegenerative markers of dementia and Alzheimer's pathology.Materials and MethodsN = 1306 participants (Visit 5 mean age = 76.5 [standard deviation = 5.4] years) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study with completed dental exams at Visit 4 underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging scans at Visit 5 while N = 248 underwent positron emission tomography scans. Participants were classified as edentulous or, among the dentate, by the modified Periodontal Profile Class. Brain volumes were regressed on periodontal status in linear regressions. Cerebrovascular measures and β‐amyloid positivity were regressed on periodontal status in logistic regressions.ResultsPeriodontal disease was not associated with brain volumes, microhaemorrhages, or elevated β‐amyloid. Compared with periodontally healthy individuals, odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for all‐type infarcts were 0.37 [0.20, 0.65] for severe tooth loss and 0.56 [0.31, 0.99] for edentulous participants.ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, periodontal disease was not associated with altered brain volumes, microhaemorrhages, or β‐amyloid positivity. Tooth loss was associated with lower odds of cerebral infarcts.

AbstractIntroductionMotoric cognitive risk (MCR), a clinical syndrome characterized by slow gait speed and subjective cognitive complaints, has been associated with dementia risk. The neuropathological features underlying MCR remain poorly understood.MethodsThe Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) community‐based cohort study classified participants using standardized criteria as MCR+/– and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)+/– at study baseline (2011–2013). We examined the 5‐year dementia risk and baseline brain structural/molecular abnormalities associated with MCR+ and MCI+ status.ResultsOf 5023 nondemented participants included, 204 were MCR+ and 1030 were MCI+. Both MCR+ and MCI+ participants demonstrated increased dementia risk. The pattern of structural brain abnormalities associated with MCR+ differed from that of MCI+. Whereas MCI+ was associated with comparatively smaller volumes in brain regions vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease pathology, MCR+ status was associated with smaller volumes in frontoparietal regions and greater white matter abnormalities.DiscussionMCR may represent a predementia syndrome characterized by prominent white matter abnormalities and frontoparietal atrophy.

Background White matter abnormalities are a common feature of aging and Alzheimer disease, and tend to be more severe among Black individuals. However, the extent to which white matter abnormalities relate to amyloid deposition, a marker of Alzheimer pathology, remains unclear. This cross‐sectional study examined the association of white matter abnormalities with cortical amyloid in a community sample of older adults without dementia and examined the moderating effect of race. Methods and Results Participants from the ARIC‐PET (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities‐Positron Emission Tomography) study underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging, which quantified white matter hyperintensity volume and microstructural integrity using diffusion tensor imaging. Participants received florbetapir positron emission tomography imaging to measure brain amyloid. Associations between measures of white matter structure and elevated amyloid status were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Among 322 participants (43% Black), each SD increase in white matter hyperintensity volume was associated with a greater odds of elevated amyloid (odds ratio [OR], 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03–1.83) after adjusting for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors. In race‐stratified analyses, a greater white matter hyperintensity volume was more strongly associated with elevated amyloid among Black participants (OR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.15–3.50), compared with White participants (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.89–1.89). However, the race interaction was not statistically significant ( P interaction=0.09). We found no association between white matter microstructure and elevated amyloid. Conclusions The results suggest a modest positive relationship between white matter hyperintensity and elevated amyloid in older adults without dementia. Although the results indicate that this association is nonsignificantly stronger among Black participants, these findings will need to be confirmed or refuted using larger multiracial cohorts.