Rhudy, Lori M.

Introduction Patient dehumanization when caring for critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is commonplace. The Get to Know Me board (GTKMB) has been identified as a valuable tool for promoting humanized care and communication in the ICU; however, its implementation is highly variable. This study aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators influencing consistent implementation of the GTKMB in the ICU. Materials and methods We conducted multidisciplinary focus groups via teleconference with ICU clinicians at a large quaternary care academic medical center. A thematic content analysis was performed to identify key themes and concepts related to GTKMB implementation. Results Thirty-eight clinicians participated across six focus groups, including 10 nurses, 7 physicians, 6 advanced practice providers, 5 rehabilitation therapists (allied health clinicians), 1 respiratory therapist and 1 social worker. Major themes related to barriers and facilitators of GTKMB implementation included, (1) identifying appropriate patients and optimal timing for completing the GTKMB, (2) logistical challenges such as access to the board, visibility and unclear responsibility for completion, (3) the importance of clinician role modeling supporting the board completion, and (4) opportunities to improve the design and functionality of the board itself. Conclusion Although clinicians recognize the GTKMB as a meaningful tool to support humanized care in the ICU, inconsistent implementation limits its potential impact. This study highlights several key barriers and facilitators to its use. Future efforts should focus on targeted quality improvement initiatives to enhance consistent completion and integration of the GTKMB into ICU practice.

Abstract Objective This QI project aimed to enhance pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff’s ability to recognize and compassionately respond to caregiver fatigue (CF), tailoring interventions to the specific needs identified. Methods An interdisciplinary team of healthcare professionals developed and implemented a comprehensive strategy to improve the recognition and management of CF. This QI project included creating educational materials for staff, enhancing unit resources, and introducing targeted interventions. Data collection involved pre- and post-project surveys. Results The program led to significant improvements in PICU staff’s confidence in recognizing and responding to CF, increased availability of unit resources, enhanced staff compassion, and reduced callousness toward others. Conclusions This QI project emphasized the role that structured initiatives and interdisciplinary collaboration can play in addressing CF within the PICU setting. Improvements in staff confidence, compassion, and reduced burnout demonstrate the program’s effectiveness. These findings underscore the value of targeted interventions and provide a valuable framework for further research and can serve as a model for other healthcare units seeking to integrate CF management into comprehensive patient care.

This study aimed to explore contextual elements of the cancer experience that are consistently distressing and/or psychologically traumatic, as well as explore perceptions of Accelerated Resolution Therapy® (ART®) and its influence on the cancer experience. Using a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were completed by 12 participants following the completion of ART. Interview data were analyzed using content analysis to identify major themes and patterns. Four themes included: (a) Cancer as the straw that broke the camel’s back, (b) ART® is different from previous therapy, (c) Don’t need to always be looking in the rearview mirror, and (d) Importance of early psychological intervention. Participants perceived that ART® was different and potentially more effective than other types of therapy they had previously received. Results support the diagnosis of cancer and the cumulative effects of previous life events and cancer-related stressors as traumatic events.

The objective of this manuscript is to present the protocol of a study aiming to test the effects of Accelerated Resolution Therapy® (ART) on pre-loss grief and prolonged grief among older adult family caregivers. This study also aims to better understand predictors of response to ART®, and cognitive processes that occur among grieving individuals following ART®. Design: The study is a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial. Setting: This study takes place at both inpatient and outpatient palliative care and hospice programs at two Mayo Clinic sites. Participants: Participants include older adult ( ≥ 60 years) immediate family members who are primary caregivers of someone with an advanced illness and life expectancy of less than 12 months. Intervention: Participants are randomized to either the ART® intervention group or the attention control group. In the ART® intervention, caregivers engage in imaginal exposure, lateral eye movements, and imagery rescripting via 4 sessions lasting 1-1.5 hours each. The attention control group receives a standard social work intervention, including education, resources, and active listening, which is matched for time and attention. Both interventions will longitudinally follow caregivers from active caregiving into bereavement. Outcomes Measured: The primary outcomes of pre-loss grief and prolonged grief will be measured with the Pre-Loss Grief 12 item (PG-12-R) before the care recipient’s death, and with the Prolonged Grief-13 (PG-13-R) afterwards.

In this qualitative study, we explored perspectives of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and their families on the Get to Know Me board (GTKMB). Of the 46 patients approached, 38 consented to participate. Of the 66 family members approached, 60 consented to participate. Most patients (26, 89%) and family members (52, 99%) expressed that GTKMB was important in recognizing patient's humanity. Most patients (20, 68%) and families (39, 74%) said that it helped to build a better relationship with the provider team. 60% of patients and families commented that the GTKMB was used as a platform by providers to interact with them. Up to 45 (85%) of the family members supported specific contents of the GTKMB. In structured interviews (11 patients, 7 family members), participants additionally commented on ways providers used the GTKMB to communicate, support patient's personhood, and on caveats in interacting with GTKMB. Critically ill patients and families found the GTKMB helpful in preserving personhood of patient, fostering communication, and building relationships with clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines and research results emphasize the need for dyadic interventions targeting psychosocial outcomes such as depression, anxiety, social function, physical function, and health-related quality of life. Resilience interventions have been proposed as one strategy to influence these outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this observational pilot study was to determine the feasibility and acceptability of the Resilient Living program among persons with stroke or brain tumor (BT) admitted for comprehensive acute inpatient rehabilitation and/or their family caregivers. A secondary aim was to gather preliminary data to assess the effects of the program on quality of life, stress, anxiety, physical function, sleep disturbance, fatigue, resilience, dyadic coping, and caregiver role overload. METHODS: The Resilient Living program is a psychosocial intervention with a focus on building resilience skills. Feasibility and acceptability outcomes were assessed at the end of the study. Quantitative outcome measures were collected at baseline, 12 weeks, and 6 months post the intervention. RESULTS: Eight patients and eight caregivers completed the study. The intervention was feasible with this population. Participants found the intervention useful and appreciated the flexibility of an online program; however, finding time to engage in it was challenging. Recruitment of eligible patients with acquired brain disorders and their caregivers as a dyad was challenging. CONCLUSION: The study confirms prior research suggesting that interventions targeting resilience are feasible, but larger studies with more rigorous methods are needed to appreciate the influence of resilience interventions in persons with brain disorders and their caregivers. Further research is needed to identify the characteristics of those most likely to benefit from resilience interventions and the optimal timing of such interventions.

BACKGROUND: Acquired brain injury (BI) is associated with negative mental health outcomes for both people with BI, their caregivers (CG), and patient-CG dyads, which may be mitigated through increased resilience. However, little is known regarding the efficacy of resilience interventions focused on CGs of individuals with BI, as well as dyads, which may be instrumental for positive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence of the efficacy of resilience interventions focused on CGs and/or dyads of individuals with BI. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL with Full Text, Scopus, SCIE, and ESCI was conducted. Each title and abstract were screened by two authors independently. Each full text review, study data extraction, and study quality assessment was performed independently by two authors. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. RESULTS: Out of 11,959 articles retrieved, 347 full text articles were assessed for review and 18 met inclusion criteria for data extraction and quality assessment. Resilience interventions were stratified into 5 different categories based on the type of intervention. CONCLUSION: This systematic review suggests that dyadic/CG resilience interventions may improve mental health related outcomes, but conclusions were limited secondary to heterogenous outcomes and lack of a standardized resiliency construct. Future efforts are compulsory to create a standardized resiliency construct and associated outcomes focused on persons with BI, their CGs, and dyads.

Background Nursing handoff is a communication activity with a high risk for loss or omission of information. Efforts to improve handoffs include standardization of the processes and content of handoff communications. Objectives To examine nurses’ perspectives on the structure and organization of change-of-shift handoffs. Methods A qualitative descriptive approach was used to conduct a secondary analysis of focus group data. Thirty-four nurses from 4 critical care units participated in focus groups. Results Three themes emerged: handoff elements are defined by practice and culture; a clear, consistent, identified structure supports handoff; and personal preferences can disrupt handoff. Conclusions A standardized approach to handoff based on unit and organizational needs will be more successful than a broad mandate of content and organization. Individual preference is prevalent and strongly influences the information conveyed and the structure of handoff communication.

Background: Delay in seeking treatment for symptoms of atrial fibrillation (AF) represents a missed opportunity for early treatment that is critical for reducing serious complications of AF such as stroke and heart failure. Delays ranging from a few days to years after symptom onset have been reported. Little is known about the symptom experiences and cognitive behavioral responses that differentiate those who seek treatment early after symptom onset from those who delay treatment-seeking. Purpose: This study compared symptoms and cognitive behavioral responses of early and late (up to 24 hours versus greater than 24 hours after symptom onset) treatment seekers with symptoms of AF. Methods: A descriptive design was used. Participants (N = 150) were recruited from a Midwest academic medical center. Data regarding 1) type and character of symptoms 2) cognitive and behavioral responses to the symptoms and 3) time from symptom onset to seeking treatment were collected using a structured interview. Independent t-tests for continuous variables and Chi-square tests for categorical variables were used to compare treatment seeking groups. Results: Participants were 51% female, with a mean age of 66.5 SD = 11.1) years. Early treatment seekers (n = 27) were more likely to experience a rapid heartbeat (p <.01), unremitting symptoms (<.001), report fear associated with symptoms (p = .005), and appraise symptoms as very serious (p <.001). They were less likely to believe symptoms could be self-managed (p <.001). Late treatment seekers (n = 123) were more likely to experience fatigue and dyspnea as primary symptoms (p≤ .01), report intermittent symptoms (p <.001), attribute symptoms to stress (p ≤ .02), deconditioning (p <.001), or lack of sleep (p = .009), and take a “wait and see” approach to managing symptoms (p <.001). There were no differences between early and late treatment seekers for age, sex, marital status, education level, and history of coronary artery disease or heart failure. Conclusions: Symptom type and characteristic, and cognitive behavioral responses of early treatment seekers differed from those of late treatment seekers. Experiencing a rapid heartbeat and unremitting symptoms may have helped participants form a cognitive appraisal and behavioral response conducive to early treatment-seeking. Experiencing intermittent symptoms less identifiable with a cardiac origin may have hindered development of cognitive appraisals and behavioral responses that promote early treatment- seeking. Education to promote early treatment-seeking for symptoms should include information about the diverse type and characteristics of symptoms of AF.