Caples, Sean M.

Abstract Background Early diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment initiation are the cornerstones of sepsis management. There remains an immense interest in exploring the diagnostic and prognostic roles of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the sepsis population. Methods We performed a retrospective multi-center observational study including patients admitted to different Mayo Clinic sites with a diagnosis of sepsis between October 2018 and August 2022. Patients were excluded if they were aged < 18 years, lacked research authorization, or had missing Neutrophil or Lymphocyte count at admission. Data were collected from an existing sepsis database and Mayo Data Explorer (MDE). Categorical variables were summarized as percentages and continuous variables were summarized as medians. Chi-square test for significance, independent sample t-test, and multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard models were performed on IBM SPSS Statistics v28.0. Results Our study cohort consisted of 13968 patients, of which the majority were males (55.9%), Caucasian (91.6%), and non-Hispanic or Latino (94.3%). The median age of the cohort was 71 (60, 80) years, and the median BMI was 27.7 (23.4, 33.3) kg/m2. Among all sepsis patients, 6.0% had a positive blood culture and the most common organisms were E. coli (26.5%), Klebsiella sp. (15.6%), Streptococcus sp. (12.8%) and Staphylococcus aureus (9.9%). 13131 patients (94.1%) survived the hospital stay and 837 (5.9%) did not. There was no difference in mortality based on blood culture positivity status (6.0% vs 6.6%, p=0.41). However, the median NLR was higher among patients with a positive blood culture (16.4 vs. 12.1, p< 0.001) and among non-survivors (14.3 vs 12.2, p< 0.001). NLR did not significantly vary based on the type of organism growing in the blood culture. A multivariate model revealed NLR as an independent predictor of mortality (HR 1.003, 95% CI: 1.000-1.006, p=0.029) after adjusting for comorbidities, baseline clinical and laboratory variables. (Tables 1 & 2) Conclusion Our retrospective multicentric study showed that the Neutrophil-Lymphocyte ratio at admission was higher among bacteremic sepsis patients and non-survivors. Further prospective studies are needed to explore its diagnostic and prognostic utility. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Introduction Nightshifts represent a substantial proportion of time dedicated to working in the inpatient setting, particularly among ICU staff. Our institution implemented a 24/7 in-person ICU attending model more than a decade ago. With practice growth and more than 200 ICU beds across disciplines, there are now at least 8 ICU attendings in-hospital all night. Yet, little is known about attending staff perceptions and desires about night work, so we began an exploratory analysis. Methods An online survey of 13 multiple-choice, slider scale, and open-ended questions were sent via email to critical care staff physicians of different disciplines within our institution. Results 69 out of 150 physicians completed the survey (46% response rate). Half were between 35 and 45 years old; 29% were age 45 to 55 years old. About half self-identified as a morningness chronotype. Most (84%) work 3- or 4-night shifts consecutively. Most viewed night shift work as having a negative influence on their quality of life (48% “somewhat negative” and 22% “very negative”) and on their health (51% “somewhat negative” and 24% “very negative”). Most would choose to work less nightshifts (37%) or none (29%). During nightshift assignments, about half (53%) self-report an average of 5 hours of sleep per 24-hour period; 18% self-report ≤ 4hours. Only 6% reported 7 or 8 hours of sleep. Mitigating strategies utilized during series of night shifts include use of caffeine (78%), naps (66%) and use of sleeping aids (21%). Outside of the nightshift series, more than half (56%) reported no sleep difficulties while 21% reported onset or maintenance insomnia. Conclusion At our large tertiary hospital employing an in-house nightshift model across multiple ICUs, most staff ICU physicians have a negative perception of night shift work on their quality of life and health. The majority of respondents would choose to work less or no night shifts. How self-reports of limited sleep (average 5 hours) per 24-hour period compare to objectively measured sleep duration in this population remains to be determined in the next phase of this study. Support (if any)

ABSTRACT Background Evaluation and interpretation of the literature on obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) allows for consolidation and determination of the key factors important for clinical management of the adult OSA patient. Toward this goal, an international collaborative of multidisciplinary experts in sleep apnea evaluation and treatment have produced the International Consensus statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (ICS:OSA). Methods Using previously defined methodology, focal topics in OSA were assigned as literature review (LR), evidence‐based review (EBR), or evidence‐based review with recommendations (EBR‐R) formats. Each topic incorporated the available and relevant evidence which was summarized and graded on study quality. Each topic and section underwent iterative review and the ICS:OSA was created and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results The ICS:OSA addresses OSA syndrome definitions, pathophysiology, epidemiology, risk factors for disease, screening methods, diagnostic testing types, multiple treatment modalities, and effects of OSA treatment on multiple OSA‐associated comorbidities. Specific focus on outcomes with positive airway pressure (PAP) and surgical treatments were evaluated. Conclusion This review of the literature consolidates the available knowledge and identifies the limitations of the current evidence on OSA. This effort aims to create a resource for OSA evidence‐based practice and identify future research needs. Knowledge gaps and research opportunities include improving the metrics of OSA disease, determining the optimal OSA screening paradigms, developing strategies for PAP adherence and longitudinal care, enhancing selection of PAP alternatives and surgery, understanding health risk outcomes, and translating evidence into individualized approaches to therapy.

IMPORTANCE: Aggressive fluid resuscitation remains a cornerstone of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines, but there is growing controversy regarding the recommended 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosage. It is contended that, in selected patients, this volume confers an increased risk of volume overload without either concomitant benefit or strong evidence in support of the recommended IV fluid dosage. OBJECTIVES: Assessment of practice patterns and their impact on patient outcomes following the surviving sepsis guidelines for fluid resuscitation. DESIGN: Large, multisite retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The retrospective study included all adult patients who presented to the emergency department at one of 19 different Mayo Clinic sites throughout the Midwest, Southeast, and Southwest from August 2018 to November 2020 with suspected sepsis. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Eight-thousand four-hundred fourteen patients suspected to have sepsis were assessed regarding fluid resuscitation and outcomes among patients receiving 30 mL/kg IV fluid dosing compared with patients who did not. Patient demographics and clinical information were collected via electronic health records. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who received 0–29.9 mL/kg of IV fluid and those who received 30.0+ mL/kg of IV fluid. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of fluid dose on in-hospital death, 30-day mortality, ICU admission after diagnosis, dialysis initiation after diagnosis, ventilator use, vasopressor use, as well as ICU and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: We observed lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day mortality risk in the 30+ mL/kg dosing group. Increased fluid dosage did, however, carry a much greater chance of ICU admission. Most patients (72% after propensity score weighting) in our population received less than 30 mL/kg fluid (based on ideal body weight). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: IV fluid dosing for sepsis resuscitation greater than 30 mL/kg was associated with decreased risk of in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and reduced risk of requiring mechanical ventilation. Our data does ultimately seem to support the SSC recommendation.

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke; however the causal mechanisms are unknown. Understanding etiology of stroke in OSA patients may: (1) aid in ascertaining how OSA exerts its influence in increasing stroke risk, and (2) facilitate tailoring recurrent stroke prevention management strategies in OSA patients. Our study compares stroke subtypes in OSA cases versus controls without significant sleep disordered breathing. Hypothesis: We hypothesized cardioembolic (CE) strokes would occur more frequently in OSA cases than in controls. Methods: Consecutive patients were identified who underwent polysomnography (PSG) at Mayo Clinic and suffered an ischemic stroke within one year after PSG. Patients with an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≤ 10 were classified as controls; AHI > 10 classified as OSA cases. Mechanism of stroke was determined using (1) the Causative Classification System for Ischemic Stroke (CCS) and (2) the phenotype definitions used in the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST). Information on cardiovascular risk factors, neuroimaging, and echocardiography data were collected on each patient. Results: In 53 total subjects, CE strokes were more common among OSA cases (72% vs 33%, p=0.01). Large artery atherosclerosis and small vessel occlusion strokes were more common in controls. Atrial fibrillation (AF) was more frequent in OSA patients (59% vs 24%, p=0.01). Frequency of CE stroke increased with OSA severity. The association between OSA and CE stroke remained significant after controlling for AF (p=0.03, OR 4.5). Echocardiogram data revealed CE stroke risk factors were more frequent in OSA cases (84% vs 52% p=0.02). There were no significant differences between groups for left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume index, or right ventricular systolic pressure. Conclusions: The results demonstrate a strong association between OSA and CE stroke. In OSA patients presenting with cryptogenic stroke, high clinical suspicion for cardioembolism is warranted. This may lead to consideration of further studies (eg, transesophageal echocardiography, Holter monitoring, or extended cardiac monitoring) to identify cardioembolic risk factors such as paroxysmal AF.