Advani, Pooja

Background: Thirty-six states, including Florida, have legalized marijuana for medical and/or recreational use, yet how it is used and perceived by persons with cancer is not well understood. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify patterns of use, perceived benefits, and side effects of medical marijuana (MMJ) among cancer patients in Florida. Methods: For this descriptive, cross-sectional study, anyone residing within the state of Florida who was diagnosed or treated for a malignancy within the last five years and had used MMJ was eligible. An online survey containing questions about dosing, side effects, perceived benefits, and barriers to use was used. Descriptive statistics including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations were used to analyze quantitative data. Responses to open-ended questions were coded and categorized. Results: Sleep ( n = 112), pain ( n = 96), and anxiety ( n = 82) were the most common symptoms participants used MMJ to relieve and overall felt it was highly effective. MMJ was well tolerated with a minority (10.3%) reporting any adverse effects. Cost was the most frequent barrier reported by participants (42.8%). A variety of legal, bureaucratic, and system-related barriers were described. Conclusion: Participants perceived MMJ to be helpful in alleviating cancer symptoms. They held negative perceptions of the way MMJ is implemented and integrated into their oncology treatment plan. Enhanced communication and patient/provider education on MMJ are needed to inform patient decision making.

BNCT is a high LET radiation therapy modality that allows for biologically targeted radiation delivery to tumors while reducing normal tissue impacts. Although the clinical use of BNCT has largely been limited to phase I/II trials and has primarily focused on difficult-to-treat malignancies such as recurrent head and neck cancer and recurrent gliomas, recently there has been a renewed interest in expanding the use of BNCT to other disease sites, including breast cancer. Given its high LET characteristics, its biologically targeted and tumor specific nature, as well as its potential for use in complex treatment settings including reirradiation and widespread metastatic disease, BNCT offers several unique advantages over traditional external beam radiation therapy. The two main boron compounds investigated to date in BNCT clinical trials are BSH and BPA. Of these, BPA in particular shows promise in breast cancer given that is taken up by the LAT-1 amino acid transporter that is highly overexpressed in breast cancer cells. As the efficacy of BNCT is directly dependent on the extent of boron accumulation in tumors, extensive preclinical efforts to develop novel boron delivery agents have been undertaken in recent years. Preclinical studies have shown promise in antibody linked boron compounds targeting ER/HER2 receptors, boron encapsulating liposomes, and nanoparticle-based boron delivery systems. This review aims to summarize the physical and biological basis of BNCT, the preclinical and limited clinical data available to date, and discuss its potential to be utilized for the successful treatment of various breast cancer disease states.

TPS610 Background: Several studies demonstrated worsening disease-free survival in patients who failed to achieve complete pathological response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), particularly in HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer. Despite the recent approval of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with residual disease after NAC approximately 12% of patients still develop recurrent and metastatic disease. TPIV100 is a multi-epitope vaccine that includes a pool of 4 degenerate HER2-derived HLA-DR epitopes, which activate CD4 helper T cells, admixed with GM-CSF. In our previous phase I trial this vaccine was shown to be safe in combination with trastuzumab in stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer after completion of standard of care chemotherapy. Furthermore, this vaccine also generated robust long-lasting T-cell immune responses and antibody immunity against HER2. Methods: This trial is a multi-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of TPIV100 in combination with T-DM1 in stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer patients with residual disease after NAC. This trial is currently opened through the ACCRU consortium. Eligible patients include those with stage II-III HER2+ with residual disease, in the breast and/or lymph nodes, after trastuzumab ± pertuzumab-based NAC, with ECOG PS ≤ 2 and adequate organ function. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, history of trastuzumab-related cardiac toxicity, myocardial infarction or stroke < 6 months, history of congestive heart failure, autoimmune disease, immunocompromised patients with known HIV or those on chronic steroid, hypersensitivity to GM-CSF, and other active malignancy < 3 years are excluded. TPIV100 or placebo, in combination with GM-CSF, will be given concurrently with T-DM1. To ensure that TPIV100 in combination with T-DM1 is safe, there is a run-in phase with 20 patients treated with the combination. If there is no significant dose-limiting toxicity observed in the run-in phase, the trial will be expanded to the randomized phase II portion, which will include 240 patients. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion with ER/PR as a stratification factor. The primary endpoint is invasive disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoint includes immunogenicity of TPIV100 as assessed by IFN-g ELIspot analysis. Correlative studies include assessment of helper T-cell response distribution (including Th1, Th2, Th17, Tfh), HER2-specific antibody immunity, and HLA genotype. Currently, 20 patients in the run-in phase have been enrolled. Enrollment to the randomized phase II portion is expected to begin in March 2022. Clinical trial information: NCT04197687.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) reduces breast cancer (BC) recurrence risk and improves BC outcomes. However, patients (pts) may refuse ET, potentially impacting their outcomes. However, the exact incidence and factors associated with ET refusal are largely unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of BC pts in the National Cancer Data Base between 2003 and 2017. Demographic, socioeconomic, co-morbidity index and tumor-specific data were compared between BC pts who refused ET versus those who agreed to ET using bivariate and multivariate models. Female pts 18 to 89 years of age with stage I, II, and III were included. Logistic regression was used to determine associations with ET refusal. Results: Among 463,228 pts, the incidence of ET refusal was 5.26% (24, 401). Of these pts, 85% were non-Hispanic White, 7.9% were Non-Hispanic Black, 3.1% non-Hispanic Asian/pacific islander, and 3.6% were Hispanic. A majority (56.9%) had government insurance, and 87.2% were from a metro residential area. Infiltrating ductal carcinoma BC subtype comprised 78% of pts. Most pts were 51-89 years of age (80%), and 20% were 18-50 years of age. On multivariable analysis (Table 1), non-Hispanic black (OR 0.82), non-Hispanic Asian (OR 0.72), and Hispanic (OR 0.84) pts had a reduced odds of refusing ET than non-Hispanic white pts. Pts with government insurance (OR 1.6, p&lt;0.001) and noninsured pts (OR 1.3, p&lt;0.001) had increased odds of refusing ET compared to privately insured pts. Estrogen receptor (ER) -/Progesterone (PR) +, and ER +/PR - had increased odds of refusing therapy (OR 2.9, and 1.1 respectively, p&lt;0.001) than ER +/PR + pts. Patients with positive lymph nodes had reduced odds of refusing ET than those with negative lymph nodes (p&lt;0.001). Additionally, pts with a 2.1-5 cm (OR 0.92) or &gt;5 cm (OR 0.87) tumor size had a reduced odd of refusing ET than those with tumors less than 2 cm (p&lt;0.001). Finally, patients with well-differentiated BC (grade I) had increased odds of refusing ET (OR 1.2, p&lt;0.001) than moderately differentiated (grade II) BC. Conclusions: The incidence of ET therapy refusal is relatively low; however, survival outcomes may be negatively impacted. This is the first study to evaluate specific demographic and disease-specific factors associated with ET refusal, which can inform strategies to improve ET acceptance rate. Table 1.Multivariable Logistic Regression – ET Therapy Acceptance (Referent) vs. Refusal.VariableOR95% CIp-valueAge51 - 89 years18 - 50 years0.940.900.970.001Race/EthnicityWhite Non-HispanicBlack Non-Hispanic0.820.760.88&lt;0.001Pacific Islander Non-Hispanic0.720.660.76&lt;0.001Hispanic0.840.790.87&lt;0.001InsurancePrivateGovernment1.61.521.61&lt;0.001Not insured1.31.181.47&lt;0.001ResidenceMetroUrban0.900.870.87&lt;0.001Rural0.870.780.970.014HistologyInfiltrating ductal carcinomaLobular carcinoma0.840.800.87&lt;0.001Infiltrating duct and lobular carcinoma0.900.850.95&lt;0.001Others1.171.101.24&lt;0.001Positive Nodes01 - 30.620.600.65&lt;0.0014 - 90.610.570.66&lt;0.00110 +0.610.550.68&lt;0.001VariableOR95% CIp-valueER/PR ExpressionER +/PR +ER -/PR +2.92.563.18&lt;0.001ER +/PR -1.11.061.14&lt;0.001Tumor size≤ 2 cm2.1 - 5 cm0.920.880.94&lt;0.001&gt; 5 cm0.870.800.93&lt;0.001GradeIII1.211.181.25&lt;0.001III0.980.951.020.518Charlson-Deyo Score010.940.910.980.00421.070.991.150.071≥31.120.981.280.079 Citation Format: Pooja P Advani, Ricardo Torres Guzman, Francisco Avila Verduzco, Karla Maita, John Garcia, Abdullah Eldaly, Antonio Forte, Aaron Spaulding. Factors associated with endocrine therapy refusal in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-14-16.

Abstract Background: SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been demonstrated to have robust and durable humoral immune response in healthy individuals. However, their effectiveness in immunocompromised patients, particularly cancer patients, remains less known. Newer data suggests that cancer patients may not mount adequate protective immune response after vaccination. Methods: A retrospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old who had SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody (anti-S Ab) testing after 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines between 12-90 days at Mayo Clinic between January 1, 2021 and May 10, 2021 was performed. The Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) was used to measure the antibody response. Patients with prior COVID-19 infection and patients on immunosuppressive therapy for an indication other than cancer were excluded. Categorical variables were summarized as frequencies (percentages) and continuous variables were reported as median with range. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare continuous variables between groups and Chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. All tests were two-sided with p value &lt; 0.05 considered statistically significant. The analysis was done using R program version 3.6.2. Results: Among 201 patients, 79 had breast cancer, 91 had a hematologic malignancy, 6 had other solid malignancies, and 25 had no history of cancer. All breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy or trastuzumab ± pertuzumab without chemotherapy (n=35) had anti-S Ab titer ≥ 500 U/mL. Patients on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) appeared to have low level of anti-S Ab with 28.6% (n=4/14) had anti-S Ab titer ≤ 500 U/mL. Patients on chemotherapy also had low levels of anti-S Ab with 47% (n=14/30) having anti-S Ab titers ≤ 500 U/mL. When combining breast cancer patients on endocrine therapy alone or anti-HER2 therapy with patients without history of cancer as an immunocompetent group, there was significantly greater proportion of immunocompetent patients (97%) who had anti-S Ab titer ≥ 500 U/mL compared with only 8% of patients with hematologic malignancy and 55% of patients with solid malignancy on chemotherapy or CDK4/6i (p &lt; 0.001). Using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, gender, and vaccine type, patients with solid malignancies and treatment-related cytopenia, including chemotherapy and CDK4/6i, (OR 35.51 [95%CI 8.38-255.25, p &lt; 0.001]) were more likely than immunocompetent patients to have a suboptimal anti-S Ab results ≤ 500 U/mL.Conclusion: A significant number of breast cancer patients on chemotherapies and CDK4/6i had poor humoral responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. While CDK4/6i is not commonly considered as immunosuppressive therapy, breast cancer patients on CDK4/6i appeared to have suboptimal response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Our study also highlights the significance of assessing antibody response after COVID-19 vaccines in these vulnerable patients. Citation Format: Saranya Chumsri, Pooja P. Advani, Tanmayi S Pai, Zhou Li, Marites Acampora, Gina A Reynolds, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Christopher P Marquez, Keith L. Knutson. Antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-23-01.

Abstract Background: There is an urgent need to improve clinical trial (CT) enrollment of breast cancer (BC) patients (pts), especially from unrepresented minorities. In this regard, our study aims to better understand the characteristics and factors associated with CT enrollment to inform strategies to enhance CT accrual rates. Method: We included 1,308,767 female pts from the National Cancer Data Base diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 with known ER, PR, and HER2 status. Demographic, socioeconomic, Charlson-Deyo Score (CDS) and BC specific data were compared between CT versus non-CT enrolled pts for initial therapy. Comparisons were assessed by Chi-square test. Logistic regression was utilized to determine associations between characteristics and CT enrollment. Odds ratios (OR) and p-values are reported for each group. Results: A total of 1797 pts (0.14%) were enrolled in CT for initial BC therapy. Focusing on the CT group, majority of pts were non-Hispanic White (W;(78.2%), followed by non-Hispanic black (AA;12.2%); Hispanic (H; 5.6%); and non-Hispanic Asian (A; 4%). Most pts (29.3%) were in 50-59 age quartile. TNBC pts formed 22% of CT pts and non-TNBC were 78%. Most pts were from academic centers (54%), followed by comprehensive community cancer (CCC; 23.5%), community cancer (3.9%) and integrated network cancer (INC; 5.6%) programs. Most had private insurance (70%) versus government insurance (27%) and others (3%). Stage IV pts were only 10% of the CT group while most pts (41%) had Stage II BC. CDS of 0 was noted in 90% pts while 1.3% pts had CDS of 2 or more. Most CT pts traveled &lt; 50 miles from treatment center (88.5%), and only 1.2% CT pts traveled 200 or more miles. Most CT pts resided in areas with highest literacy rate (30%) while 15% were from areas with lowest literacy rate. In multivariable model, non-white pts were less likely than Whites to be enrolled in CT (OR 0.81, p&lt;0.05). The odds of CT enrollment in 40-49, 50-59 and 60-69 age quartiles were 3.5, 2.7 and 2.3 times respectively that of pts 70 years or older (p&lt;0.001). TNBC pts were 1.9 times more likely to be enrolled in CT than non-TNBC pts (p&lt;0.001). Academic center pts were 3 times more likely (p&lt;0.001) while INC program pts were less likely than CCC pts to be enrolled (OR 0.7, p=0.006). Pts with government insurance and other insurance were less likely to enroll in CT (OR 0.74, and 0.55, p &lt;0.001 and p=0.003, respectively) compared to private insurance. The odds of a patient with stage II, III, IV BC enrolling in CT was about 2, 3.5 and 4 times higher than a stage I pt (p -&lt;0.001). Pts with CDS 1 (OR 0.8, p=0.025) or 2 or more (OR 0.5, p=0.002) were less likely than CDS 0 pts to be enrolled. Pts who traveled 50-99 or 100-199 miles from the treatment center conducting CT, were 1.9 (p&lt;0.001) and 1.5 times (p&lt;0.05) more likely to be enrolled while those with &gt; 200 miles were less likely (OR 0.75, p=0.442). The group of pts who belonged to a residential area with the highest literacy rate (&lt;6.3% of no high school diploma) were 1.4 times more likely to accrue in CT (p&lt;0.001) than those with high school diploma rate between 6.3 and 10.8%. Compared to metro areas, pts from rural areas were less likely to be enrolled (OR 0.5, p=0.04) as was a lower median income &lt; $40,227 (OR 0.77, p= 0.016).Conclusion: CT enrollment is poor for initial therapy of BC treatment. We identify several modifiable factors including sociodemographics which are associated with BC pts not getting treated on CT. There are other factors that are non-modifiable, e.g., disease stage but may point to the need for more CT development in these areas. Addressing these disparities would lead to improved CT enrollment and overall advancement in BC management landscape. Citation Format: Pooja P Advani, Aaron Spaulding, Alexander Hochwald, Mizba Baksh, David Hodge, Saranya Chumsri, Shanada Monestime, Sikander Ailawadhi. Clinical trial enrollment for initial therapy of breast cancer: Exploring factors associated with poor accrual and significant disparities [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-15.

Abstract Background: This study reports incidence, timing, characteristics, and surveillance imaging of mammographic axillary adenopathy following COVID-19 vaccination. As COVID-19 immunizations continue, with possible booster vaccines upcoming, this study offers timing considerations and potential follow-up recommendations for breast imaging after vaccination. Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients (pts) who received at least one COVID-19 vaccine prior to screening (SM) or diagnostic mammography (DM) at Mayo Clinic Florida between January 15 to May 31, 2021. Vaccine-related information was queried by mammography technologists. Adenopathy was assessed by interpreting radiologists and follow-up studies were collated. Mammogram adenopathy included single enlarged node, multiple enlarged nodes, and adenopathy with soft tissue stranding. Ultrasound adenopathy included mildly prominent nodes with preserved fatty hila to rounded nodes with apparent loss of a fatty hilum. Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher’s exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association between days from vaccine and adenopathy. Results: Of 2349 pts, 34 (1.4%) had adenopathy (DM=6; SM=28) and 3 (0.1%) were symptomatic. Presence of axillary symptoms was associated with abnormal imaging (p&lt;0.001) with an odds ratio of 33 in multivariable model. Median time after vaccine for pts with adenopathy was significantly shorter at 14 days compared to 33 days for pts without adenopathy (p&lt;0.001). Incidence of adenopathy decreased as days from vaccine increased (3.4% for 0-14 days, 2.1% for 15-28 days, and 0.4% for &gt; 28 days, p&lt;0.001). After adjusting for being symptomatic, days from vaccine still had a significant impact on finding mammographic adenopathy (for each day after vaccine, OR=0.96, p&lt;0.001). No significant difference was seen based on age (p=0.66), vaccine brand (p=0.66), vaccine dose (p=0.18). ROC analysis to identify a cutoff value for presence/absence of adenopathy was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81) at 22.5 days following vaccination. Additional imaging with mammogram and/or ultrasound was requested for 31 pts. These included no follow-up (n=4, 12.9%), repeat ultrasound with or without mammogram in 1-3 months (n=26, 83.9%), and biopsy (n=1, 3.2%, pt with ipsilateral breast cancer with negative results, presumably vaccine induced). To date, all pts who underwent surveillance imaging demonstrated normalization of lymph node appearance. The median time for abnormal imaging related to adenopathy to return to BI-RADS 1 or 2 was 84 (range 13-157) days. Conclusion: The incidence of COVID-19 vaccine-induced adenopathy in this study (1.4%) appeared to be lower than self-reported axillary swelling in COVID-19 vaccine trials (16%) but is still higher than the reported incidence of adenopathy on an otherwise normal SM (0.02-0.04%). The incidence of adenopathy decreased significantly over time and was not present in most pts 28 days after the vaccine. In patients with abnormal adenopathy, followup imaging showed resolution of vaccine-induced adenopathy in most patients by 3 months. Adenopathy(N=34)No Adenopathy (N=2315)P valueAge0.66N342314Median (Range)63.5 (35.0, 83.0)64.0 (30.0, 94.0)Q1, Q351.5, 72.555.0, 71.0Exam type&lt;0.001DM6 (13.3%)39 (86.7%)SM28 (1.2%)2276 (98.8%)Symptomatic&lt;0.001Missing032Yes3 (23.1%)10 (76.9%)No31 (1.3%)2273 (98.7%)Vaccine brand0.66Missing119mRNA-127319 (1.7%)1117 (98.3%)BNT162b214 (1.2%)1138 (98.8%)Other0 (0.0%)41 (100.0%)Vaccine dose0.18Missing0181st9 (2.2%)409 (97.8%)2nd25 (1.3%)1888 (98.7%)Days from vaccine&lt;0.001Median (Range)14.0 (1.0, 91.0)33.0 (0.0, 239.0)Q1, Q38.2, 20.816.0, 61.0Days from Vaccine&lt;0.0010-1418 (3.4%)519 (96.6%)15-2811 (2.1%)513 (97.9%)&gt;285 (0.4%)1283 (99.6%) Citation Format: Kristin Robinson, Santo Maimone, Pooja P Advani, Zhuo Li, Denise Gococo-Benore, Neda Qosja, Ashita Mummareddy, Ahmed M Ashai, Annamaria Wilhelm, Robert Maxwell, Martha Wasserman, Neema Patel, Andrey Morozov, Saranya Chumsri. Incidence and time to resolution of axillary adenopathy on mammography after COVID-19 vaccination [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-03-19.

Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a dose-limiting side effect of chemotherapy for which no prevention or cure exists. Cancer and cancer treatments can adversely affect nutritional status. Nutrition may play a role in development of CIPN, yet the relationship between nutrition and CIPN is not well understood. Common laboratory values measuring various aspects of nutrition (hemoglobin/hematocrit, vitamin B12, calcium, and magnesium) may be associated with CIPN. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the empirical evidence surrounding the relationship between laboratory measures of nutrition and CIPN among persons with cancer who received neurotoxic chemotherapy drugs. We conducted an extensive review of the literature to identify articles that evaluated relationships between laboratory measures of nutrition and CIPN. A total of eleven articles satisfied the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Participants in the studies had breast or colorectal cancer, lymphoma or multiple myeloma and were receiving a variety of neurotoxic drugs. Hemoglobin/hematocrit, vitamin D, albumin, and magnesium were associated with CIPN. The quality of the studies ranges from fair to good. Evidence suggests that low levels of the above-mentioned tests could be associated with CIPN but additional research is needed.