Szarka, Lawrence A.

ABSTRACT Background Treatment options for medically‐refractory faecal incontinence ( FI )—including anorectal biofeedback, dextranomer injection, and sacral nerve stimulation—are limited and outcomes are often suboptimal. Anal or vaginal insert devices are infrequently used. Aims We evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a new anal insert device (StaySure) in patients with FI. Methods Patients with FI for ≥ 6 months and ≥ 4 moderate or large FI episodes during a 4‐week baseline entered a 2–4 week fitting/run‐in period to individualise device size (10 or 13 mm) followed by a 4‐week treatment period. Outcomes included effectiveness, safety, and quality of life (QoL). The primary outcome was the proportion achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in FI frequency. Results Of 124 enrolled patients, 98, 71, and 61 progressed through the baseline, fitting/run‐in, and treatment phases respectively, with few exclusions due to device intolerance. In the intent‐to‐treat cohort of 59 participants (93% women), mean ( SD ) number of days with FI declined from 13.2 (7.0) to 6.3 (6.9), and FI weekly episodes declined from 5.4 (6.9) to 2.1 (5.1) (69% reduction; p < 0.001) with similar results for both device sizes. The primary endpoint was achieved in 76.3% of participants; 54.2% achieved ≥ 75% reduction. The FIQoL overall score increased from a mean ( SD ) of 1.9 (0.6) to 2.3 (0.6) ( p < 0.001), indicating improved QoL . Improvements in FI frequency, FIQoL exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds, confirming clear clinical benefit. No treatment‐related serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions The StaySure anal insert device is safe, well tolerated, and effective in reducing FI in patients with moderate to severe symptoms refractory to conservative therapies. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03898778

AbstractBackgroundHow variations predicted by pharmacogenomic testing to alter drug metabolism and therapeutic response affect outcomes for patients with disorders of gut‐ brain interaction is unclear.AimsTo assess the prevalence of pharmacogenomics‐predicted drug‐gene interactions and symptom outcomes for patients with disorders of gut‐brain interaction.MethodsPatients who were treated in our clinical practice for functional dyspepsia/bowel disorder underwent pharmacogenomic testing. The change in symptoms from baseline to 6 months was compared for patients with variations in CYP2D6 and CYP2C19, which metabolize neuromodulators, and SLC6A4, which encodes the sodium‐ dependent serotonin transporter.ResultsAt baseline, 79 of 94 participants (84%) had at least one predicted major drug‐ gene interaction, and all 94 (100%) had at least one predicted moderate interaction. For the 44 participants who completed a survey of their symptoms at 6 months, the mean (SD) irritable bowel syndrome‐symptom severity score decreased from 284 (71) at baseline to 231 (95) at 6 months (p < 0.001). Among patients taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, the decrease in symptom severity (p = 0.03) and pain (p = 0.002) scores from baseline to 6 months was greater for patients with a homozygous SLC6A4 long/long genotype (n = 30) (ie, increased serotonin transporter activity) than for patients with homozygous short/short or heterozygous long/short genotypes (n = 64). Symptom outcomes were not affected by CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 variations.ConclusionsThe homozygous SLC6A4 long/long genotype confers better symptom resolution for patients with disorders of gut‐brain interaction who take selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors than do the homozygous short/short or heterozygous long/short genotypes.

AbstractBackgroundThe equipment and methods for performing anorectal manometry and biofeedback therapy are different and not standardized. Normal values are influenced by age and sex. Our aims were to generate reference values, examine effects of gender and age, and compare anorectal pressures measured with diagnostic and biofeedback catheters and a portable manometry system.MethodsIn this multicenter study, anorectal pressures at rest, during squeeze, and evacuation were measured with diagnostic and biofeedback catheters using Mcompass™ portable device in healthy subjects. Balloon expulsion time and rectal sensation were evaluated. The effects of age and gender were assessed.ResultsThe final dataset comprised 108 (74 women) of 124 participants with normal rectal balloon expulsion time (less than 60 s). During squeeze, anal resting pressure increased by approximately twofold in women and threefold in men. During evacuation, anal pressure exceeded rectal pressure in 87 participants (diagnostic catheter). The specific rectoanal pressures (e.g., resting pressure) were significantly correlated and not different between diagnostic and biofeedback catheters. With the diagnostic catheter, the anal squeeze pressure and rectal pressure during evacuation were greater in men than women (p ≤ 0.02). Among women, women aged 50 years and older had lower anal resting pressure; rectal pressure and the rectoanal gradient during evacuation were greater in older than younger women (p ≤ 0.01).ConclusionsAnal and rectal pressures measured with diagnostic and biofeedback manometry catheters were correlated and not significantly different. Pressures were influenced by age and sex, providing reference values in men and women.

INTRODUCTION: In younger men, in whom organic prostate disease is uncommon, the etiology of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) is frequently unclear. Studies suggest that in this young cohort voiding phase dysfunction is more common than storage phase dysfunction or normal urodynamics. Abnormal pelvic floor muscle relaxation, which can result in constipation, could potentially result in voiding dysfunction also. To date, no studies have investigated the relationship between posterior pelvic floor dysfunction and LUTS in young men. METHODS: Men who had undergone both anorectal manometry and uroflowmetry (i.e. had lower gastrointestinal and urinary symptoms) between October 2012 and September 2018 were identified. Patients >40 years old were excluded to reduce the likelihood of prostate disease. Clinical data was extracted from the electronic health records. Descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 47 identified patients, 13 were excluded due to a history of neurogenic bowel/bladder, urethral/anal surgery or significant neurological disease. The mean age and standard deviation (SD) of the 34 men analyzed was 30 ± 6 years. Twenty patients demonstrated an abnormal balloon expulsion test (BET). The median (and interquartile range [IQR]) number of LUTS was 1.5 (1-2). An abnormal BET was not associated with symptoms of nocturia, hesitancy, incomplete emptying or the total number of LUTS (2 vs 1, P = 0.6). An abnormal balloon expulsion test was associated with a lower maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax, 14 vs 29 mls/sec, P < 0.001) but not flow duration (34 vs. 27 seconds, P = 0.2), residual urine volume (55 vs. 43 mls, P = 0.7) or urine volume (300 vs. 301 mls, P = 0.5). No correlation was seen between anal pressures at rest or during simulated evacuation and maximum urinary flow rate. No correlation was found between functional constipation and Qmax, LUTS or abnormal uroflow. No relationship between rectal sensory thresholds and urinary symptoms was identified. CONCLUSION: In this study of young men undergoing both anorectal manometry and uroflow, pelvic floor dysfunction was not associated with specific LUTS but was associated with a clinically significant reduction in maximum urinary flow rate. However an objective diagnosis of functional constipation was not associated with urologic abnormalities. Further studies will be needed to prospectively characterize this cohort and to identify whether PFD-associated LUTS and reduced flow respond to biofeedback therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to characterize upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms and associations in individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM) who had undergone evaluation of gastric emptying (GE) and accommodation (GA) at a referral center. METHODS: From the Mayo Clinic Rochester electronic medical records of adults with diabetes types 1 and 2 (DM1 and DM2) evaluated between January 1997 and December 2015, we extracted demographics, UGI symptoms, current medications, treatments for diabetes, GE solids by scintigraphy, GA by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), and diabetes complications. We compared subgroups with delayed (GE at 2 h <25% or GE at 4 h <75%), rapid (GE at 1 h > 35%), and normal GE, as well as reduced (<428 mL) and normal GA. RESULTS: We reviewed 108 patients (60.2% females, median age 49.0 years). Overall, 71.3% had DM2; one-third of these were insulin dependent and had fairly well-controlled diabetes (median HbA1c 6.7% (IQR 6.2; 7.9)). Manifestations of diabetic triopathy (peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy) were uncommon at presentation with UGI symptoms. Nausea was the most common symptom (80.6%). There were single or combined GE (total 56%: rapid in 37%, slow in 19%) and GA (total 39%) abnormalities; there was normal GA and GE in 28%; 40.3% of the DM2 patients had accelerated GE at 1 h. GE at 1 h is associated with nausea/vomiting, and fasting gastric volume is associated with bloating. CONCLUSIONS: Among referred diabetic patients with UGI symptoms, GE and GA testing identifies potential targets for individualizing treatment and avoidance of empirical trials for the 28% with no disturbance of GE and GA.

Abstract Background Nausea, vomiting, and constipation ( OIC ) are common adverse effects of acute or chronic opioid use. Naloxegol (25 mg) is an approved peripherally active mu‐opiate opioid receptor antagonist. Aim To compare the effects on pan‐gut transit of treatment with codeine, naloxegol, or combination in healthy volunteers. Methods We conducted a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, single‐center, parallel‐group study in 72 healthy opioid‐naïve adults, randomized to: codeine (30 mg q.i.d.), naloxegol (25 mg daily), codeine and naloxegol, or matching placebo. During 3 days of treatment, we measured gastric emptying ( GE ) T 1/2 , colonic filling at 6 hours ( CF 6), colonic geometric center at 24 and 48 hours, and ascending colon emptying ( ACE ) T 1/2 . Key Results Participants were 59.7% women, median BMI 25.0 kg/m 2 , and median age 33.8 years. Codeine significantly retarded GE T 1/2, CF 6, overall colonic transit, and ACE T 1/2 . There was significant difference ( P = .026) in GE T 1/2 between codeine (144.0 min [ IQR 110.5‐238.6]) and naloxegol (95.5 min [89.1‐135.4]). There was a significant overall group difference in CF 6 ( P = .023), with significant difference ( P = .019) between codeine (11.0% [0.0‐45.0]) and naloxegol (51% [18.8‐76.2]). However, no significant differences were found between codeine‐treated participants concomitantly receiving placebo or naloxegol. Conclusions and Inferences Short‐term administration of naloxegol (25 mg) in healthy, opioid‐naïve volunteers does not reverse the retardation of gastric, small bowel, or colonic transit induced by acute administration of codeine. Further studies with naloxegol at higher dose are warranted to assess the ability to reverse the retardation of transit caused by acute administration of codeine in opioid‐naïve subjects.

The amylin analog pramlintide delays gastric emptying in type I diabetics. The effects of multiple doses of pramlintide and the mechanism of action in non-amylin-deficient humans are unknown. We investigated the effects of pramlintide on gastrointestinal and colonic transit and on the plasma pancreatic polypeptide response to the meal in a parallel-group dose-response study with subjects randomized to placebo, or 30 or 60 μg (tid, sc) of pramlintide. Pramlintide delayed gastric emptying [half-time ( t½): 112 min (SE 8.7 min), 169 min (SE 12 min), or 177 min (SE 25 min) after placebo or 30- or 60-μg pramlintide treatment, respectively; P = 0.033]. Pramlintide did not significantly affect small bowel or colonic transit. Pancreatic polypeptide concentrations in the first postprandial hour were lower with pramlintide than with placebo ( P < 0.01 for drug effect). An inverse correlation was observed between mean pancreatic polypeptide concentrations in the first postprandial hour and gastric emptying t½[Spearman correlation coefficient ( Rs) = 0.48; P = 0.044]. Pramlintide at 30 and 60 μg delays gastric emptying in healthy humans without affecting small bowel or colonic transit. Vagal inhibition is a potential mechanism of the effects of pramlintide on gastric emptying.

To characterize α2-adrenergic control of motor and sensory functions of gastrointestinal tract and colon, we studied dose-related effects of clonidine (placebo or up to 0.3 mg po) by random assignment in 55 healthy humans. Gastrointestinal transit was measured in all subjects; in 35, we assessed colonic compliance, tone, and sensations of gas and pain during phasic distensions. Clonidine did not significantly alter gastrointestinal or colonic transit, but it increased colonic compliance and reduced fasting tone without altering colonic response to a meal. Clonidine significantly reduced aggregate sensation to distensions overall and had significant linear dose-related sensory effects at 8- and 24-mmHg distensions. Effect on pain (including dose-response relationship) was due to 0.3-mg dose for distensions at 24 mmHg. We confirmed that clonidine relaxes fasting colonic tone and reduces sensation of pain. In this study, gut transit was not altered by clonidine, and novel dose-response characteristics and clonidine's effect on gas sensation are provided. Doses as low as 0.05 mg may be effective and potentially useful in reducing colonic tone and gas sensation.