Smith, Wendy M.

Purpose: To describe a case of locally invasive conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) refractory to plaque radiotherapy. Case Description: A 69-year-old man presented with a recurrent conjunctival tumor after 6 previous cycles of topical 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy and excisional biopsy showing invasive SCC with positive margins. There was a mild anterior chamber reaction. By the time of repeat excisional biopsy, the conjunctiva had ulcerated with underlying scleralysis associated with histopathologic evidence of scleral involvement by SCC. After subsequent tectonic scleral patch grafting, plaque radiotherapy was applied after which the disease appeared to be controlled for 9 months. The eye then developed progressive conjunctival ulceration and scleralysis with progressive ectropion. Exenteration was performed, revealing locally invasive SCC into palpebral conjunctiva, ciliary body, and choroid. Conclusions: Conjunctival SCC can be locally invasive with destruction of the globe, despite plaque radiotherapy. Clinicians should be suspicious of invasive diseases in cases of ocular surface squamous neoplasia that are poorly responsive to topical chemotherapy. Associated anterior chamber cell and progressive scleralysis should also raise concern for invasive malignancy.

ABSTRACT Intraocular lymphomas, including vitreoretinal and choroidal lymphoma, can simulate the clinical presentation of other benign and malignant ocular diseases resulting in diagnostic delays. Multimodal imaging features can raise early clinical suspicion to support appropriate subspecialty referrals and treatment for patients affected by these conditions. This review synthesises current evidence on the diagnostic and prognostic value of characteristic imaging features of these rare malignancies. Findings are reviewed based on imaging modality, including fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence, fluorescein angiography, indocyanine green angiography, optical coherence tomography angiography, and ultrasound. We emphasise discriminative biomarkers that heighten suspicion for either vitreoretinal or choroidal lymphoma, as well as key findings to discriminate between lymphoma and alternative diagnoses. We further describe longitudinal changes in multimodal imaging features that can facilitate tracking disease progression or treatment response. By consolidating modality‐specific findings, this review aims to facilitate early referral and accurate diagnosis of these rare malignancies.

ABSTRACTBackgroundBlau syndrome is a rare, autosomal dominant granulomatous disease caused by mutations in the NOD2/CARD15 gene. While the classic triad of arthritis, dermatitis, and uveitis is well known, the full range of cutaneous manifestations remains underexplored.ObjectiveTo expand the understanding of cutaneous findings in Blau syndrome, correlate these findings with NOD2 variants, and evaluate treatment outcomes across organ systems.MethodsA retrospective review of medical records from January 1999 to January 2024 identified 14 patients with Blau syndrome supported by the presence of NOD2 variants. Clinical data on dermatological features, genetics, and treatment responses were analyzed and categorized into specific and non‐specific cutaneous findings.ResultsOf the 14 patients with Blau syndrome, 85% (12/14) demonstrated skin involvement. Specific findings included lichenoid or granulomatous papules and nodules (50%, 6/12), while non‐specific findings (83%, 10/12) were more diverse, including dermatitis (6/10), chronic urticaria (5/10), ichthyosiform eruptions (4/10), vasospastic disorders (5/10), and oral/genital ulcers (2/10). Skin biopsies in three patients with specific findings revealed non‐caseating granulomas. Genetic analysis identified multiple NOD2 variants, though no clear genotype–phenotype correlation was observed. TNF‐alpha inhibitors demonstrated efficacy in controlling ocular and joint disease.ConclusionBlau syndrome presents with a broader spectrum of cutaneous findings than previously recognized. These findings highlight the importance of dermatological evaluation and a multidisciplinary approach to optimize diagnosis and management.

A patient with cytomegalovirus viremia who underwent kidney transplant developed floaters in both eyes that did not improve after painful intravitreal injections of foscarnet and ganciclovir. What would you do next?

To determine the frequency, characteristics, and clinical course of ophthalmic side effects associated with systemic BRAF inhibitor therapy. Medical records of patients taking BRAF inhibitors for the treatment of systemic malignances at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 01/01/2010 to 08/30/2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Of 901 patients, 14 (1.6%) patients experienced an ophthalmic side effect. Mean age at presentation of the side effect was 60 years (median 59, range 50–80) and 11 (79%) were male. The most common side effect was uveitis in 7 (50%) patients, followed by dry eye in 4 (29%) patients, and central serous chorioretinopathy in 2 (14%) patients, with singular cases of cranial nerve VI palsy and conjunctival edema. A comparison between individual BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib vs. dabrafenib vs. encorafenib) revealed that patients taking encorafenib had a shorter interval to any ophthalmic adverse event (mean 55.6 vs. 9.8 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.03) and were the only patients to experience documented dry eye syndrome (DES) in this series. Outcomes were known in 13 (93%) patients, and ophthalmic adverse effects resolved or were controlled without discontinuing therapy in 10 (77%). Uveitis was successfully treated with topical corticosteroids in 4 patients, while 3 patients with refractory uveitis (2 with panuveitis and 1 with unspecified uveitis) required discontinuation of BRAF inhibitor therapy. Ophthalmic adverse events related to systemic BRAF inhibitor use are rare, with estimated frequency of 1.6%. Most events can be treated with local ophthalmic therapy. BRAF inhibitors provide life-saving therapy, and their discontinuation should be avoided.

Purpose: To examine the impact of physician face mask use on the rates and outcomes of postinjection endophthalmitis. Methods: A multicenter retrospective, comparative cohort study comparing endophthalmitis rate and visual acuity of eyes that developed endophthalmitis after antivascular endothelial growth factor injections at Mayo Clinic Rochester (MCR) and at Mayo Clinic Health System sites depending on physician masking. Results: A total of 164,824 injections were performed at MCR and Mayo Clinic Health System sites. Of these, 66,098 injections were in the no mask group and 98,726 injections were in the mask group. Overall, there were no differences in the rates of infectious endophthalmitis in the no mask versus mask cohorts (overall: no mask: 20 cases [0.0303%] vs. mask: 41 cases (0.0415%); P = 0.24; infectious: no mask: 12 cases [0.018%] versus mask: 13 cases [0.0132%]; P = 0.42). At MCR alone, there was a significant reduction in infectious endophthalmitis between the no mask versus mask groups (no mask: 9 cases [0.0297%] versus mask: 2 cases [0.003%]; P < 0.001). Only 2 cases of infectious endophthalmitis occurred at MCR after the face mask policy was implemented (1 in 30,000 injections). At presentation and at 6 months, the average visual acuity was similar for patients who developed endophthalmitis between the no mask versus mask groups. Conclusion: Physician face mask use did not affect the rate or outcome of postinjection endophthalmitis. However, there was a significant reduction at MCR after masking along with other quality improvement measures, including performance of injections in a dedicated procedure room and preparation of patients by nurses, that led to a low rate of endophthalmitis.