Maniaci, Michael J.

Background/Objectives: Hospital-at-home (HaH) programs have emerged as an alternative model to brick-and-mortar (BaM) hospital management of acute conditions such as heart failure, pneumonia, pyelonephritis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation among the others. However, the clinical management of acute pancreatitis in the HaH setting has never been described in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with acute pancreatitis managed in a Mayo Clinic Advanced Care at home (ACH) program. The secondary objective was to describe feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes. Methods: This multistate, multicenter, retrospective descriptive study included 40 unique patients with acute pancreatitis managed at ACH between 13 October 2020 and 1 June 2024. Repeat admissions were excluded from the primary analysis. Results: The most common etiologies were idiopathic (42.5%), gallstone-related (22.5%), and alcohol-related (12.5%). Peripancreatic fluid collections occurred in 17.5%, necrotizing pancreatitis in 10.0%, pleural effusion in 12.5%, and infected pancreatitis in 7.5%. Intravenous antiemetics were administered to 22.5%, intravenous fluids to 62.5%, and intravenous opioids to 7.5%. Median total hospital length of stay was 5.0 days (IQR, 3.0–8.25), including a median of 3.0 days (IQR, 2.0–4.0) in ACH. Four patients (10.0%; exact 95% CI, 2.8–23.7%) were transferred from ACH to BaM care. Seven-day and 30-day readmission rates were 10% (95% CI: 2.8%, 23.7%) and 5% (95%CI: 0.6%, 16.9%), respectively. The 30-day emergency department visit was 0%. Although 30-day mortality was 2.5% (95% CI: 0.0%, 13.2%), in-program mortality was 0%. Conclusions: Among a highly selected group of clinically stable patients meeting the program’s eligibility criteria, management of acute pancreatitis in ACH was feasible and was associated with low observed rates of unplanned escalations and short-term adverse outcomes.

Abstract Background Outcomes of patients with acute pyelonephritis (AP) treated in a hospital-at-home setting have not been comprehensively evaluated in the United States. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults diagnosed with and managed for AP in Mayo Clinic's Advanced Care at Home (ACH) program between July 2020 and January 2025. Collected data included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), genitourinary comorbidities, severity of illness (SOI), and risk of mortality (ROM) scores, as well as pyelonephritis-related complications. Outcomes included length of stay (LOS), escalation of care, and 30-day postdischarge emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and mortality. Results A total of 165 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 years; SOI scores were moderate in 33.3%, major in 52.1%, and extreme in 8.5%. ROM scores were moderate in 30.3%, major in 38.2%, and extreme in 6.7%. Median CCI score was 5, and all patients had preexisting genitourinary conditions. On admission, 30.9% met sepsis criteria, acute kidney injury was present in 47.3%, and bacteremia developed in 33.3%. Median LOS in the ACH program was 3.1 days. Only 4.8% required escalation to a brick-and-mortar hospital. Readmission occurred in 17.0%, and 4.8% had ED visits. No in-program deaths occurred. Conclusions This multicenter retrospective study shows that AP, including cases with high illness severity and complex comorbidities, can be managed safely and effectively in a hospital-at-home setting with careful patient selection and robust infrastructure to support timely escalation when needed.

Abstract Antimicrobial use among hospital-at-home (HaH) patients across three Mayo Clinic sites was evaluated from 2023 to 2024. Nearly three-quarters of patients were administered an antibiotic during HaH admission. Ceftriaxone was the most commonly used antibiotic and respiratory infections were the most common antimicrobial indication. Further investigation into stewardship opportunities is warranted.

Hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is a rare but serious complication of end-stage liver disease that is often refractory to conventional medical and procedural management. This case report describes a 75-year-old woman with HH secondary to cirrhosis from metabolic-associated steatotic liver disease. Her clinical course was marked by recurrent hospitalizations, refractory right-sided pleural effusion, and multiple unsuccessful interventions including diuretics, serial thoracenteses, an indwelling pleural catheter, and chemical pleurodesis. Notably, the persistence of pleural fluid despite resolution of ascites ultimately led to the formation of a thoracic fistula, with pleural drainage volumes exceeding 4 L/day. Further invasive procedures, such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or liver transplantation, were declined by the patient. She was enrolled in Mayo Clinic’s hospital-at-home (HaH) program, where continuous intravenous octreotide was initiated at a dose of 25 mcg/h. This resulted in a significant reduction in pleural output—from over 4000 mL to less than 100 mL daily. After clinical stabilization, the patient transitioned to subcutaneous octreotide and remained clinically stable for over 6 months, with improved quality of life and no significant adverse effects. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of continuous intravenous octreotide infusion for HH administered safely in a home-based acute care setting. This case underscores the potential therapeutic role of octreotide in managing refractory HH and highlights the feasibility of delivering complex cirrhosis-related care through a HaH model with multidisciplinary collaboration. Further research is warranted to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of octreotide in this context and to explore broader application in home hospital environments.

Introduction The Care Hotel is a virtual medicine hybrid model of care implemented at the Mayo Clinic to increase use of enhanced recovery protocols, address hospital capacity and reduce medical costs. This voluntary accommodation offers patients a comfortable environment to receive nursing care postoperatively with in-person daytime monitoring and 24-hour virtual telemonitoring in a hotel setting. This study aims to evaluate postoperative outcomes in patients admitted to the Care Hotel after mastectomy with immediate tissue expander reconstruction compared to standard overnight admission. Methods A retrospective review of the electronic medical record was conducted for patients who underwent mastectomy with immediate tissue expander reconstruction prior to (1/2019–1/2020) and after (7/2021–7/2023) the implementation of the Care Hotel. Postoperative outcomes, including 48-hour ED visit, 48-hour readmission, and 30-day infection, hematoma, seroma, admission, and return to operating room were collected. Results There were 61 patients with 108 tissue expander reconstructions in the hospital admission group and 122 patients with 212 tissue expander reconstructions in the Care Hotel group. The average length of hospital stay was 1.2 days while the average Care Hotel stay was 1.4 days. There were four 48-hour ED visits with 1 admission for 12 hours of observation in the Care Hotel group. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day infection, seroma, hematoma, readmission, need for IR drain procedure or return to operating room between the groups. Conclusions This investigation demonstrates the safety of postoperative virtual telemonitoring and should encourage providers to utilize virtual visit technology in the immediate postoperative time-period.

Abstract Background Hospital‐at‐home programs (HaH) in the United States have evolved to include a virtual‐hybrid delivery model, where all physician encounters are virtual and partnered with a home care team. Objective To examine whether a virtual hybrid HaH program enabled by technology has similar clinical outcomes to traditional brick‐and‐mortar (B&M) hospital care. Methods We conducted a pragmatic trial at three hospitals, randomizing 1150 acutely ill patients requiring hospital care between July 10, 2023, and October 31, 2023 one‐to‐one into two groups: intervention (HaH) and control (B&M). The primary analysis was an intention‐to‐treat non‐inferiority analysis of the primary outcome, which was a composite of 30‐day all‐cause mortality and unplanned readmissions. Secondary outcomes included 30‐day readmission, all‐cause mortality, and patient experience. Results The mean age was 67.8 (standard deviation [SD] 16.3) years, and 52.2% were female. The primary outcome occurred in 99 (17.3%) HaH patients and 114 (19.8%) B&M patients (odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63–1.14, p = .28), meeting the non‐inferiority criterion. Thirty‐day unplanned readmission occurred in 84 (14.7%) HaH patients and 101 (17.5%) B&M patients (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59–1.11, p = .19). Thirty‐day all‐cause mortality occurred in 25 (4.4%) HaH patients and 19 (3.3%) B&M patients (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.73–2.46, p = .35). No HaH patients died while receiving their hospital care at home. HaH program was associated with a higher likelihood of patients reporting feeling extremely comfortable or very comfortable (84.4% HaH; 60.9% B&M, p = .001). Conclusion A hybrid HaH model is a safe and comfortable alternative to traditional B&M hospital care.