Cha, Yong‐Mei

AbstractBackgroundHis bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological pacing strategy to preserve the electrical synchrony of ventricular conduction and left ventricular (LV) function. Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative physiological pacing technique.ObjectiveTo evaluate cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony comparing LBBP and HBP in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation (AF).MethodsConsecutive patients with symptomatic bradycardia and AF were enrolled from January to June of 2019. The cardiac electrical and mechanical synchrony in different pacing mode were evaluated at baseline and after implantation.ResultsBoth HBP and LBBP were performed in 20 patients. LBBP significantly widened the QRS duration compared with the intrinsic conduction (113.2 ± 14.5 vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .01), while HBP did not (104.5 ± 22.3 vs. 96.5 ± 16.2 ms; p = .12). Both LBBP and HBP patients had similar LV myocardial strain measurements for the mechanical synchrony evaluation without significant change compared with baseline. There was no significant difference in right ventricular synchrony measurement between LBBP and HBP. Compared to HBP, LBBP had less interventricular synchrony (IMVD, 14.7 ± 9.2 vs. 3.1 ± 12.7 ms, p < .01; Ts‐LV‐RV, 37.9 ± 10.7 vs. 18.5 ± 10.8 ms, p < .001).ConclusionsAlthough LBBP's a physiological pacing mode can achieve a similar cardiac electrical and mechanical synchronization when compared to HBP, LBBP results in modest delay in RV activation, and the clinical implication remains to be studied.

AbstractIntroductionThe efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has been widely studied in the medical literature; however, about 30% of candidates fail to respond to this treatment strategy. Smart computational approaches based on clinical data can help expose hidden patterns useful for identifying CRT responders.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the electronic health records of 1664 patients who underwent CRT procedures from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2017. An ensemble of ensemble (EoE) machine learning (ML) system composed of a supervised and an unsupervised ML layers was developed to generate a prediction model for CRT response.ResultsWe compared the performance of EoE against traditional ML methods and the state‐of‐the‐art convolutional neural network (CNN) model trained on raw electrocardiographic (ECG) waveforms. We observed that the models exhibited improvement in performance as more features were incrementally used for training. Using the most comprehensive set of predictors, the performance of the EoE model in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and F1‐score were 0.76 and 0.73, respectively. Direct application of the CNN model on the raw ECG waveforms did not generate promising results.ConclusionThe proposed CRT risk calculator effectively discriminates which heart failure (HF) patient is likely to respond to CRT significantly better than using clinical guidelines and traditional ML methods, thus suggesting that the tool can enhanced care management of HF patients by helping to identify high‐risk patients.

Introduction: As the US population ages and indications for cardiac device implantation expand, there is a concomitant increase in patients undergoing lead removal/extraction (LR/E).. We sought to examine trends in outcomes and complications associated with LR/E. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from a large U.S. commercial insurance database (privately insured and Medicare Advantage patients) identifying all patients undergoing LR/E between 2004 and 2013 with at least one year continuous medical plan enrollment prior to LR/E (to identify baseline comorbidities). Using ICD9 codes and CPT codes, major complications (hemorrhage requiring transfusion, vascular injury, pericardial complications, respiratory complications, cerebrovascular complications, and requirement for cardiac surgery) associated with LR/E and 30-day readmission rates were evaluated. Results: Among 42,878 patients who underwent LR/E (median age of 62 ( 54, 72) years, 70% male); approximately 1 in 40 experienced a major adverse event (2.4%) during the study period. Respiratory complications were the most common complication and 311 patients required cardiac surgery. 30-day readmission occurred in 11.1% of the total population. The most common reasons for readmission were heart failure exacerbation (18.7%) and device related complications (13.2%). Conclusion: The observed complication rates after LE/R in clinical practice are similar to those seen in recent clinical trials and have been relatively stable over the past 10 years.

Introduction: Patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) frequently require implantable cardiac devices. Device infection or malfunction may necessitate lead extraction. Extraction may be challenging due to long lead dwell times, anatomic abnormalities, and prior cardiac surgery. Little is known about extraction outcomes in the CHD population. Methods and Results: This retrospective study included 41 CHD patients and 82 age and gender matched controls that underwent lead extractions at two centers between 2001-2014. Only patients with leads older than 12 months were included. There were 79 leads in CHD patients and 150 in controls. Patients with CHD had a mean age of 39±17 years at extraction and on average their leads had been implanted for 81±84 months, this was not significantly different from the control group. Eighty eight percent of CHD patients had 1 or more cardiac surgeries as compared to only 22% of controls (p<0.001). The number of abandoned leads was also significantly different with 16 abandoned leads in the CHD group and 3 in controls (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in extraction techniques between the groups. Complete extraction was achieved in 94% of patients in both groups. There were no CHD group complications. Control group complications included 3 SVC lacerations requiring sternotomy (one was fatal), and 1 ventricular perforations with tamponade requiring sternotomy. None of these patients had a history of cardiac surgery. The average age of leads in patients with a complication was 15.3 years which was older than the mean lead age seen in the CHD and control populations which was 6.75 and 4.6 years respectively. Conclusions: Lead extraction can be safely performed in patients with CHD. Despite anatomic abnormalities and previous cardiac surgery, the outcome of lead extraction in patients with CHD is comparable to controls. Prior cardiac surgery may lower the risk for extraction complications.

Introduction Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) is commonly used to identify pulmonary vein and left atrial anatomy prior to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (CAAF). Additionally, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is utilized to exclude left atrial/left atrial appendage thrombus (ICT). Whether MDCT alone can be used to exclude thrombus obviating the need for TEE is unknown. Methods All Pts referred for CAAF at Mayo Clinic between March 2004 and October 2006 were included. Clinical data (including CHADS score), 64 slice MDCT (non-ECG gated), TEE and intra-cardiac echocardiograph (ICE) were all performed and recorded. Image data was reviewed independently and blinded. The left atrial appendage (LAA) was defined as fully opacified or underfilled. An underfilled LAA was further interrogated using a region of interest over the filling defect and mean attenuation in Hounsfield Units (HU) were recorded. Results In total 400 Pts (mean age 56 ± 10 yrs; 76% male; EF 56 ± 10 % ) were included. 362 had no ICT by TEE nor filling defect by MDCT. 38 patients had an underfilled LAA in whom ICT was confirmed by TEE in 7. Sensitivity and specificity of MDCT for ICT was 100% and 92% respectively with a NPV of 100%. In 19 Pts with underfilled LAA’s, a mean LAA emptying velocity was found to be significantly reduced at 26 cm/s (6 – 61 cm/s). Those with a thrombus had a mean attenuation value below 70 HU. CHADS2 score was higher (2.0 versus 1.0) in Pts with LAA filling defect versus those without LAA filling defect. All Pts with confirmed thrombus were taking Warfarin. ICT was not seen in any Pts aged <52 yrs with CHADS score ≤1. Conclusions Sensitivity and specificity of MDCT for detection of LAA thrombus is high. LAA filling defects on MDCT correlate with low emptying velocities by TEE and low attenuation value in HU. These data would suggest that in the absence of MDCT filling defect, no further imaging is required. TEE should be utilized prior to CAAF to investigate MDCT filling defects. Multidetector Computed Tomography for the Detection of LAA Thrombus

Background : Lipid lowering therapy reduces mortality in patients with both ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and recently has been shown to decrease ICD shocks. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of recurrent VT in patients with an ICD also reduces shocks following intervention. It is unclear if statin therapy after VT RFA will further impact ICD shock rates. Methods : All patients from 1993–2005 who underwent a RFA procedure for recurrent VT at the Mayo Clinic with an ICD were included. Patient records were extracted for medical and procedural details and all ICD interrogations were reviewed for VT recurrence and therapies. Results: 63 patients (age 62±15 years) were followed over 3.9±3.6 years. Comorbid diseases included: coronary artery disease 37(58%, 34 prior myocardial infarction), ARVD/C 6(10%), nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy 7(11%), moderate-severe valve disease 14(22%), hypertension 34(54%), and hyperlipidemia 35(56%). Ejection fraction was <0.35 in 34(56%). VT was induced in all patients (LV 55 (LVOT 1), RV 8 (RVOT 3) with multiple inducible VTs in 21(33%). VT was noninducible after RFA in 39(62%) patients. Dismissal medications included: statins 19(30%), beta blockers 40(66%), ACE/ARB 37(61%), diuretics 34(55%), and digoxin 23(37%). 5-year overall survival was 63%(95% CI 55–71). Age, diabetes, and renal insufficiency were associated with increased post ablation mortality, with no medication improving survival. 5-year survival free of ICD shocks was 31%(95% CI 24–38). Only statin therapy at discharge was associated with a decreased risk of ICD shocks [5(26%) versus 26(59%), p=0.020]. 7 additional patients received statins during follow-up, but not at discharge, of these 5(71%) had shocks. Conclusion : Statin use at discharge in patients with an ICD undergoing RFA for refractory VT significantly reduced recurrent ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks. Although the mechanism underlying the effects of statins on arrhythmic recurrence early after RFA requires further study, these data support aggressive therapy of the underlying substrate responsible for the VT.

Determining whether retrograde ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction is through the AV node (AVN) or an accessory pathway (AP) is critical for successful ablation of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). With introduction of ventricular extrastimuli (VEST), retrograde right bundle branch block (retro RBBB) may occur and result in abrupt VH interval prolongation. We hypothesized when retrograde conduction is via an AP, VA interval change is less than VH interval change, whereas with retrograde AVN conduction, VA interval change is equal to or greater than VH interval change. We retrospectively reviewed the electrophysiology (EP) studies of patients undergoing ablation for AVNRT (n=55) or AVRT (n=50). The intracardiac electrograms were reviewed for induction of retro RBBB and change in VH and VA intervals during VEST. Parahisian pacing, decremental pacing, arrhythmia diagnosis and ablation outcomes were reviewed. All results were found to be reproducible between two independent observers with inter and intra observer reliability scores of 1.00 for identification of retro RBBB and greater than 0.85 for measurement of VH and VA intervals. Of 105 patients, 84 (80%) had evidence of induced retro RBBB during VEST. The average VH interval increase with induction of retro RBBB was 53.7 ms for patients with retrograde AP conduction and 54.4 ms for patients with AVN conduction (p=ns). The average VA interval increase with induction of retro RBBB was 13.6 ms with AP conduction and 70.1 ms with AVN conduction (P < 0.001). All patients with a greater VH than VA interval change had a final diagnosis of AVRT and those with a VH change less than VA change had AVNRT, yielding sensitivity and specificity of 100%. Using a cutoff of 50 ms for change in VA interval with onset of retro RBBB to diagnose AVNRT accurately identified AVNRT in 100% and AVRT in 95%. Induction of retro RBBB during VEST is common during EP studies for SVT. The relative change in the VH and VA intervals during retro RBBB accurately differentiates retrograde AVN from retrograde AP conduction with strong predictive accuracy. The use of retro RBBB based intervals is a useful technique facilitating the diagnosis of SVT in the EP laboratory, even in the absence of inducible tachycardia.

AbstractBackgroundOptimal timing of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) re‐implantation following device removal due to infection is undefined. Multinational guidelines reflect this and include no specific recommendation for this timing, while others have recommended waiting at least 14 days in cases of CIED related infective endocarditis (CIED‐IE). The current work seeks to clarify this issue.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed institutional data at Mayo Clinic, Minnesota of patients aged ≥ 18 years who developed CIED‐IE from January 1, 1991 to February 1, 2016. CIED‐IE was defined as echocardiogram reported device lead or valvular vegetation. Regression analyses were used to relate the risk of clinical outcomes to the interval between CIED removal and re‐implantation and the location of vegetations.ResultsA total of 109 patients met study inclusion criteria. A majority (68.8%) of patients were men and the median age was 68.0 years. Transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was performed in 95.4% of patients, with valve vegetations detected in 33.9% (n = 37). Survival analysis comparing patients in whom device re‐implantation was < 14 days vs. ≥14 days, and further categorized by those with and without valve vegetation, showed a significant difference (P = 0.028); patients with valve vegetation and reimplantation interval < 14 days had the lowest (58.7%) 12‐month survival. When adjusted for valve vegetation, longer time interval for reimplantation trended toward increased hospital length of stay (P = 0.079).ConclusionOur findings suggest that the recommended 14‐day delay between CIED extraction and re‐implantation in CIED‐IE patients is associated with a survival benefit, but longer length of hospital stay following re‐implantation.