Barnidge, David R.

AbstractBackground: Parathyroid hormone (PTH) assays able to distinguish between full-length PTH (PTH1–84) and N-terminally truncated PTH (PTH7–84) are of increasing significance in the accurate diagnosis of endocrine and osteological diseases. We describe the discovery of new N-terminal and C-terminal PTH variants and the development of selected reaction monitoring (SRM)-based immunoassays specifically designed for the detection of full-length PTH [amino acid (aa)1–84] and 2 N-terminal variants, aa7–84 and aa34–84.Methods: Preparation of mass spectrometric immunoassay pipettor tips and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometric analysis were carried out as previously described. We used novel software to develop SRM assays on a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Heavy isotope-labeled versions of target peptides were used as internal standards.Results: Top-down analysis of samples from healthy individuals and renal failure patients revealed numerous PTH variants, including previously unidentified aa28–84, aa48–84, aa34–77, aa37–77, and aa38–77. Quantitative SRM assays were developed for PTH1–84, PTH7–84, and variant aa34–84. Peptides exhibited linear responses (R2 = 0.90–0.99) relative to recombinant human PTH concentration limits of detection for intact PTH of 8 ng/L and limits of quantification of 16–31 ng/L depending on the peptide. Standard error of analysis for all triplicate measurements was 3%–12% for all peptides, with <5% chromatographic drift between replicates. The CVs of integrated areas under the curve for 54 separate measurements of heavy peptides were 5%–9%.Conclusions: Mass spectrometric immunoassays identified new clinical variants of PTH and provided a quantitative assay for these and previously identified forms of PTH.

Abstract Background: Immunoassays specific for 1–84 parathyroid hormone (PTH) reportedly reflect the bioactivity of PTH; however, PTH immunoassays can be susceptible to interference by cross-reacting PTH fragments. In addition, these assays currently lack standardization. A methodology using immunocapture purification with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) detection, along with a stable isotope–labeled internal standard, may help address these issues. Methods: We isolated 1–84 PTH from 1 mL serum by immunocapture on a 6.5-mm polystyrene bead. The immobilized PTH was digested in situ and analyzed by LC-MS/MS. For quantification, we used the selected reaction monitoring response from the N-terminal tryptic peptide 1–13 PTH (1SVSEIQLMHNLGK13). Results: The linear range of the assay was 39.1–4560 ng/L, and the limit of detection and limit of quantification were 14.5 ng/L and 39.1 ng/L, respectively. The intraassay CVs ranged from 6% to 11%, and the interassay CVs ranged from 7% to 17%. Interference by PTH fragments 1–44 PTH, 7–84 PTH, 43–68 PTH, 52–84 PTH, 64–84 PTH, and PTH-related protein (PTHrP) was ≤1% to ≤0.001%. Method comparison of LC-MS/MS vs the Roche Cobas® immunoassay yielded Deming fit of LC-MS/MS = 1.01x immunoassay – 13.21. The mean bias by Bland–Altman plot was −9.4%. Conclusions: In patients with hyperparathyroidism, the immunocapture in situ digestion LC-MS/MS method can provide accurate and precise PTH results compared with immunoassay.

Abstract Background: Urinary albumin excretion is a sensitive diagnostic and prognostic marker for renal disease. Therefore, measurement of urinary albumin must be accurate and precise. We have developed a method to quantify intact urinary albumin with a low limit of quantification (LOQ). Methods: We constructed an external calibration curve using purified human serum albumin (HSA) added to a charcoal-stripped urine matrix. We then added an internal standard, 15N-labeled recombinant HSA (15NrHSA), to the calibrators, controls, and patient urine samples. The samples were reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. The concentration of albumin in each sample was determined by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and linear regression analysis, in which the relative abundance area ratio of the tryptic peptides 42LVNEVTEFAK51 and 526QTALVELVK534 from albumin and 15NrHSA were referenced to the calibration curve. Results: The lower limit of quantification was 3.13 mg/L, and the linear dynamic range was 3.13–200 mg/L. Replicate digests from low, medium, and high controls (n = 5) gave intraassay imprecision CVs of 2.8%–11.0% for the peptide 42LVNEVTEFAK51, and 1.9%–12.3% for the 526QTALVELVK534 peptide. Interassay imprecision of the controls for a period of 10 consecutive days (n = 10) yielded CVs of 1.5%–14.8% for the 42LVNEVTEFAK51 peptide, and 6.4%–14.1% for the 526QTALVELVK534 peptide. For the 42LVNEVTEFAK51 peptide, a method comparison between LC-MS/MS and an immunoturbidometric method for 138 patient samples gave an R2 value of 0.97 and a regression line of y = 0.99x + 23.16. Conclusions: Urinary albumin can be quantified by a protein cleavage LC-MS/MS method using a 15NrHSA internal standard. This method provides improved analytical performance in the clinically relevant range compared to a commercially available immunoturbidometric assay.

AbstractBackground: Zn-α2 glycoprotein (ZAG) is a relatively abundant glycoprotein that has potential as a biomarker for prostate cancer. We present a high-flow liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for measuring serum ZAG concentrations by proteolytic cleavage of the protein and quantification of a unique peptide.Methods: We selected the ZAG tryptic peptide 147EIPAWVPEDPAAQITK162 as the intact protein for quantification and used a stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptide with this sequence as an internal standard. Standards using recombinant ZAG in bovine serum albumin, 50 g/L, and a pilot series of patient sera were denatured, reduced, alkylated, and digested with trypsin. The concentration of ZAG was calculated from a dose–response curve of the ratio of the relative abundance of the ZAG tryptic peptide to internal standard.Results: The limit of detection for ZAG in serum was 0.08 mg/L, and the limit of quantification was 0.32 mg/L with a linear dynamic range of 0.32 to 10.2 mg/L. Replicate digests from pooled sera run during a period of 3 consecutive days showed intraassay imprecision (CV) of 5.0% to 6.3% and interassay imprecision of 4.4% to 5.9%. Mean (SD) ZAG was higher in 25 men with prostate cancer [7.59 (2.45) mg/L] than in 20 men with nonmalignant prostate disease [6.21 (1.65) mg/L, P = 0.037] and 6 healthy men [3.65 (0.71) mg/L, P = 0.0007].Conclusions: This LC-MS/MS assay is reproducible and can be used to evaluate the clinical utility of ZAG as a cancer biomarker.