Tsuang, Debby W.

Abstract Introduction The severity of REM sleep without atonia, a prodromal biomarker for synucleinopathy-related neurodegenerative disorders, is influenced by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin-norepinephrine retake inhibitor (SNRI) use. This study investigates whether SSRI/SNRIs similarly impacts the severity of Non-REM hypertonia (NRH), a biomarker independently associated with patients broadly characterized with presumed Parkinsonian-spectrum disorders (PSD). Methods In this multi-center study, the relationship between NRH and SSRI/SNRIs was evaluated in PSD patients [Lewy Body/Parkinson Disease Dementia (DLB/PDD=16), Parkinson Disease (PD=16), isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD=19), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP=12)], and non-PSD subjects [Alzheimer Disease (AD=22), mild cognitive impairment (MCI=35), and normal cognition (NC=61)]. Studies were conducted with the Sleep Profiler in all participants. NRH was auto-detected based on persistently elevated electromyographic (EMG) power relative to delta, theta, and sigma bands. Abnormal-NRH was based on a threshold of >5% of sleep time, and weight-averaged by sleep time, in the 75% of studies with two-nights of data. Statistical analyses included multiple logistic regression, Fisher Exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Results Across all 181 records, 38% had abnormal-NRH and 24% used SSRI/SNRIs (P<0.005). No differences were observed in the distributions of NRH for those with NRH-only vs. those with combined NRH and SSRI/SNRI use (n=45, 14.5+/-7.7% versus n=24, 18.6+/-11.6%, respectively; P=0.19). Abnormal-NRH was associated with the PSD versus non-PSD groups (P<0.0001, odds-ratio=14.0) and SSRI/SNRI use (P<0.05, odds-ratio=2.4), but not age and sex. Within the PSD and non-PSD groups, the frequency of abnormal-NRH was 75% vs. 19% (P<0.0001), and SSRI/SNRI use was 32% vs. 19% (P=0.07), respectively. The distributions of abnormal-NRH in the PSD and non-PSD subgroups ranged from PSP=92%, DLB/PDD=81%, PD=56% ,and RBD=74% versus MCI=26%, and NC=16%, AD=14%, respectively. By comparison, distributions of SSRI/SNRI use were DLB/PDD=50%, RBD=42%, PSP=33%, and PD=0% in the PSD subgroups, compared to MCI=34%, AD=23%, and NC=10% in the non-PSD subgroups. Conclusion Abnormal non-REM hypertonia exhibited a very strong association with Parkinsonian-spectrum disorder diagnoses (odds-ratio=14.0) and a relatively weaker association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or serotonin-norepinephrine retake inhibitor use (odds-ratio=2.4), suggesting a finding that reflects an interactive, rather than causal inference. Support (If Any) NIA grants R44AG050326, R44AG054256, P30AG62677 and R34AG56639.

AbstractBackgroundNeurodegenerative disease (NDD) is associated with sleep disturbances, including decreased stage N3 and REM sleep and reduced spindle activity. Further, supine sleep position may impact NDD risk by altering glymphatic clearance. This study evaluated conventional and exploratory sleep metrics in the differentiation of subjects with normal cognition (NC) and patients with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD) and alpha‐synucleinopathies (α‐Syn).MethodHome sleep data were acquired across multiple study sites using the self‐applied Sleep ProfilerTM, including 44 NC subjects (age=69+5.0), 22 patients diagnosed with AD (age=75+7.1) and 25 with α‐Syn (Parkinson’s disease=14, Parkinson’s disease with Dementia or Dementia with Lewy Bodies=11; age=69+6.9). Recordings were auto‐staged and technically reviewed, with 86% of the records having two‐night averages. Logistic regression and Mann‐Whitney U tests were used to characterize group differences based on age, conventional sleep metrics (i.e., sleep efficiency, sleep onset (SO), awakenings, percent of sleep time (%) in REM,N1, N2 and N3, and sleep spindles) and exploratory sleep measures [i.e., % supine, % Light N2 (L2=N2 epochs absent of spindles with K‐complexes and/or alpha or EMG (>40 Hz) intrusion), % NREM sleep with hypertonia (NRSH=>4 consecutive epochs with persistently elevated EMG power relative to delta and theta power) and % atypical N3 (AN3=epochs staged N3 with low theta and sigma power relative to delta, alpha, beta and EMG)].ResultAD were older than both NC and α‐Syn patients (p<0.005). Both AD and α‐Syn had lower %REM and greater %supine than NC (p<0.005), and %NRSH was greater in α‐Syn than NC or AD (p<0.005). Based on logistic regression, AD was differentiated from NC based on age, %REM, %L2 (p<0.05) and %supine (p=0.06). α‐Syn was distinguished from NC using both conventional (%N3 and SO, p<0.05) and exploratory sleep metric (%AN3 and %NRSH, p<0.05; %supine, p=0.06). Age (p=0.05) and %NRSH (p<0.01) were the only metrics that differentiated α‐Syn from AD.ConclusionObjective home sleep profiles hold promise for differentiating NDD patients from NC. The sleep metrics that provided the greatest distinction between NDD and NC were %REM, %supine and NRSH, while only NRSH distinguished AD from α‐Syn patients. Further confirmatory studies are underway.

Abstract Introduction Genetic loci for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been identified in whites of European ancestry, but the genetic architecture of AD among other populations is less understood. Methods We conducted a transethnic genome‐wide association study (GWAS) for late‐onset AD in Stage 1 sample including whites of European Ancestry, African‐Americans, Japanese, and Israeli‐Arabs assembled by the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. Suggestive results from Stage 1 from novel loci were followed up using summarized results in the International Genomics Alzheimer's Project GWAS dataset. Results Genome‐wide significant (GWS) associations in single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–based tests ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) were identified for SNPs in PFDN1/HBEGF , USP6NL/ECHDC3 , and BZRAP1‐AS1 and for the interaction of the (apolipoprotein E) APOE ε4 allele with NFIC SNP. We also obtained GWS evidence ( P < 2.7 × 10 −6 ) for gene‐based association in the total sample with a novel locus, TPBG ( P = 1.8 × 10 −6 ). Discussion Our findings highlight the value of transethnic studies for identifying novel AD susceptibility loci.

ABSTRACT As members of the Lewy Body Dementia Association Scientific Advisory Council, we aim to address some of the issues raised in the article titled “Time to Redefine PD? Introductory Statement of the MDS Task Force on the Definition of Parkinson's Disease.” In particular, we suggest that the 1‐year rule distinguishing Parkinson's disease dementia from dementia with Lewy bodies is worth maintaining because it serves an important purpose in clinical practice and clinical and basic science research and when helping the lay community understand the complexity of these different clinical phenotypes. Furthermore, we believe that adding an additional diagnostic label, “PD (dementia with Lewy bodies subtype),” will confuse rather than clarify the distinction between dementia with Lewy bodies and PD or PD dementia, and will not improve management or expedite therapeutic development. We present arguments supporting our contentions. © 2016 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

AbstractBackgroundLate‐onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is heritable with 20 genes showing genome‐wide association in the International Genomics of Alzheimer's Project (IGAP). To identify the biology underlying the disease, we extended these genetic data in a pathway analysis.MethodsThe ALIGATOR and GSEA algorithms were used in the IGAP data to identify associated functional pathways and correlated gene expression networks in human brain.ResultsALIGATOR identified an excess of curated biological pathways showing enrichment of association. Enriched areas of biology included the immune response (P = 3.27 × 10−12 after multiple testing correction for pathways), regulation of endocytosis (P = 1.31 × 10−11), cholesterol transport (P = 2.96 × 10−9), and proteasome‐ubiquitin activity (P = 1.34 × 10−6). Correlated gene expression analysis identified four significant network modules, all related to the immune response (corrected P = .002–.05).ConclusionsThe immune response, regulation of endocytosis, cholesterol transport, and protein ubiquitination represent prime targets for AD therapeutics.