Spychalla, Anthony J.

Background: Microbleeds in the brain have been shown to occur in Alzheimer’s disease (AD), affecting approximately a third of subjects that present with typical dementia of the Alzheimer’s type (DAT). However, little is known about the frequency or distribution of microbleeds in subjects with AD that present with atypical clinical presentations. Objective: To determine whether the frequency and regional distribution of microbleeds in atypical AD differs from that observed in subjects with DAT, and to determine whether microbleeds in atypical AD are associated with age, demographics, or cognitive impairment. Methods: Fifty-five subjects with amyloid-β deposition on Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET who presented with predominant language (n = 37) or visuospatial/perceptual (n = 18) deficits underwent T2*weighted MRI. These subjects were compared to 41 PiB-positive subjects with DAT. Microbleeds were identified and assigned a lobar location. Results: The proportion of subjects with microbleeds did not differ between atypical AD (42%) and DAT (32%). However, atypical AD had larger numbers of microbleeds than DAT. In addition, the topographic distribution of microbleeds differed between atypical AD and DAT, with atypical AD showing the highest density of microbleeds in the frontal lobes. Among atypical AD, number of microbleeds was associated with age, but not gender or cognition. Microbleeds were more common in subjects with language (51%) versus visuospatial/perceptual deficits (22%). Conclusions: Microbleeds are relatively common in both DAT and atypical AD, although atypical AD subjects appear to be at particular risk for developing large numbers of microbleeds and for developing microbleeds in the frontal lobe.

Abstract Introduction Neuroimaging modalities can measure different aspects of the disease process in Alzheimer's disease, although the relationship between these modalities is unclear. Methods We assessed subject‐level regional correlations between tau on [ 18 F]AV‐1451 positron emission tomography (PET), β amyloid on Pittsburgh compound B PET, hypometabolism on [ 18 F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET, and cortical thickness on magnetic resonance imaging in 96 participants with typical and atypical Alzheimer's disease presentations. We also assessed how correlations between modalities varied according to age, presenting syndrome, tau‐PET severity, and asymmetry. Results [ 18 F]AV‐1451 uptake showed the strongest regional correlation with hypometabolism. Correlations between [ 18 F]AV‐1451 uptake and both hypometabolism and cortical thickness were stronger in participants with greater cortical tau severity. In addition, age, tau asymmetry, and clinical diagnosis influenced the strength of the correlation between [ 18 F]AV‐1451 uptake and cortical thickness. Discussion These findings support a close relationship between tau and hypometabolism in Alzheimer's disease but show that correlations between neuroimaging modalities vary across participants.

Background: Despite common pathology, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can have multiple clinical presentations which pathological studies suggest result from differences in the regional distribution of tau pathology. Positron emission tomography (PET) ligands are now available that can detect tau proteins in vivo and hence can be used to investigate the biological mechanisms underlying atypical AD. Objective: To assess regional patterns of tau uptake on PET imaging in two atypical AD variants, posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) and logopenic progressive aphasia (lvPPA). Methods: Eighteen PCA and 19 lvPPA subjects that showed amyloid-β deposition on PET underwent tau-PET imaging with [ 18 F]AV-1451. Group comparisons of tau uptake in PCA and lvPPA were performed using voxel-level and regional-level analyses. We also assessed the degree of lobar tau asymmetry and correlated regional tau uptake to age and performance on clinical evaluations. Results: Both syndromes showed diffuse tau uptake throughout all cortical regions, although PCA showed greater uptake in occipital regions compared to lvPPA, and lvPPA showed greater uptake in left frontal and temporal regions compared to PCA. While lvPPA showed predominant left-asymmetric tau deposition, PCA was more bilateral. Younger subjects showed greater tau uptake bilaterally in frontal and parietal lobes than older subjects, and sentence repetition, Boston naming test, simultanagnosia, and visuoperceptual function showed specific regional tau correlates. Conclusion: Tau deposition is closely related to clinical presentation in atypical AD with age playing a role in determining the degree of cortical tau deposition.

ObjectiveTo use a cluster analysis of [18F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET data to determine how subjects with Alzheimer's disease (AD) vary in the relative involvement of the entorhinal cortex and neocortex, and determine whether relative involvement of these two regions can help explain variability in age and clinical phenotype in AD.MethodsWe calculated [18F]AV‐1451 uptake in entorhinal cortex and neocortex in 62 amyloid‐positive AD patients (39 typical and 23 atypical presentation). tau‐PET (positron emission tomography) values were normalized to the cerebellum to create standard uptake value ratios (SUVRs). tau‐PET SUVRs were log‐transformed and clustered blinded to clinical information into three groups using K‐median cluster analysis. Demographics, clinical phenotype, cognitive performance, and apolipoprotein e4 frequency were compared across clusters.ResultsThe cluster analysis identified a cluster with low entorhinal and cortical uptake (ELo/CLo), one with low entorhinal but high cortical uptake (ELo/CHi), and one with high cortical and entorhinal uptake (EHi/CHi). Clinical phenotype differed across clusters, with typical AD most commonly observed in the ELo/CLo and EHi/CHi clusters, and atypical AD most commonly observed in the ELo/CHi cluster. The ELo/CLo cluster had an older age at PET and onset than the other clusters. Apolipoprotein e4 frequency was lower in the ELo/CHi cluster. The EHi/CHi cluster had the worst memory impairment, whereas the ELo/CHi cluster had the worst impairment in nonmemory domains.InterpretationThis study demonstrates considerable variability in [18F]AV‐1451 tau‐PET uptake in AD, but shows that a straightforward clustering based on entorhinal and cortical uptake maps well onto age and clinical presentation in AD. Ann Neurol 2018 Ann Neurol 2018;83:248–257