Back to Authors

Shih, Ya‐Chen Tina

0000-0001-7290-3864

A5071831846 | I161318765

Mayo Clinic

University of California, Los Angeles

Citations 4

An essential goal within reach: attaining diversity, equity, and inclusion for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute journals

JNCI Cancer Spectrum | October 9, 2023 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/jncics/pkad063 | PMID 37806772

An essential goal within reach: attaining diversity, equity, and inclusion for the Journal of the National Cancer Institute journals

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | October 9, 2023 | Volume: 115 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1115-1120

10.1093/jnci/djad177 | PMID 37806780

A flexible quasi‐likelihood model for microbiome abundance count data

Statistics in Medicine | August 22, 2023 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 25 | Pages: 4632-4643

10.1002/sim.9880 | PMID 37607718

In this article, we present a flexible model for microbiome count data. We consider a quasi‐likelihood framework, in which we do not make any assumptions on the distribution of the microbiome count except that its variance is an unknown but smooth function of the mean. By comparing our model to the negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM) and Poisson GLM in simulation studies, we show that our flexible quasi‐likelihood method yields valid inferential results. Using a real microbiome study, we demonstrate the utility of our method by examining the relationship between adenomas and microbiota. We also provide an R package “fql” for the application of our method.
Methods and Study Design for Cancer Health Economics Research: Summary of Discussions From a Breakout Session

JNCI Monographs | April 14, 2022 | Volume: 2022 | Issue: 59 | Pages: 95-101

10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac013 | PMID 35788374

AbstractThe legitimacy of findings from cancer health economics research depends on study design and methods. A breakout session, Methods and Study Design for Cancer Health Economics Research, was convened at the Future of Cancer Health Economics Research Conference to discuss 2 commonly used analytic tools for cancer health economics research: observational studies and decision-analytic modeling. Observational studies include analysis of data collected with the primary purpose of supporting economic evaluation or secondary use of data collected for another purpose. Modeling studies develop a parametrized structure, such as a decision tree, to estimate hypothetical impact. Whereas observational studies focus on what has happened and why, modeling studies address what may happen. We summarize the discussion at this breakout session, focusing on 3 key elements of high-quality cancer health economics research: study design, analytical methods, and addressing uncertainty.