Negron, Vivian

Abstract Background: A major issue surrounding the use of therapeutic drugs for the treatment of breast cancer is the eventual development of resistance. Endoxifen, the most potent tamoxifen metabolite, is being developed as a novel endocrine therapy for the treatment of endocrine responsive breast cancer patients. While numerous studies have investigated the process of tamoxifen resistance, no such data exist regarding the mechanism by which cells develop resistance to endoxifen. Here, we describe the development and characterization of a novel endoxifen resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell line and the identification of a specific treatment to effectively target these resistant cells. Methods: MCF7 cells were chronically exposed to concentrations of endoxifen previously demonstrated to be associated with the greatest reductions in estrogen stimulated proliferation and transcription (1000 nM). Changes in the physiological and molecular properties of these cells were monitored during the course of resistance using a wide range of techniques. Results: Following 15 months of endoxifen exposure, an epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced in MCF7 cells, characterized by loss of E-cadherin expression, up-regulation of fibronectin and vimentin expression and increased responsiveness to TGFβ. Resistant cells exhibit a 7-fold increase in their proliferation rates relative to parental cells and display basal like properties (triple negative) due to silencing of ERα , progesterone receptor and CD24 expression. Resistant cells were confirmed to be estrogen insensitive through the use of cell proliferation and gene expression studies. Wound healing and cell migration assays revealed that resistant cells are highly aggressive with a significant level of metastatic potential. Microarray analysis revealed over 7500 genes to be differentially expressed in the resistant cell line relative to parental cells using a 2-fold cutoff, of which only 52 genes (0.7%) were determined to be up-regulated. Interestingly, a number of the most highly altered genes have previously been implicated in the development of EMT and/or resistance including Twist2, IGF binding protein 5, GATA and β-tubulin. Based on the identification of P-tubulin as the most up-regulated gene in resistant cells, 2-methoxyestradiol (2ME2) was recognized as a candidate drug to specifically target this resistant cell line due to it known roles in blocking tubulin polymerization. Indeed, 2ME2 exposure resulted in the induction of apoptosis and significant cell death in vitro. Conclusions: Chronic exposure of MCF7 cells to high concentrations of endoxifen led to induction of EMT with cells that are basal like, estrogen and SERM insensitive, highly TGFP responsive with significantly increased proliferation rates and metastatic potential relative to parental cells. These findings suggest that the mechanisms of resistance to endoxifen may differ from those observed with long term exposure to tamoxifen and have identified 2ME2 as a potentially successful alternative therapy for endoxifen resistant breast cancer cells. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD05-11.

Abstract Background: The role of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) in breast cancer has been studied extensively, and its protein expression is prognostic and a primary determinant of endocrine sensitivity; however, much less is known about the role of ERß. In vitro studies demonstrate a tumor suppressive function for ERß, and we have recently implicated a role for ERα in sensitizing ERα expressing breast cancer cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen. However, the in vivo relevance of ERα remains unclear due to conflicting reports. Here, we provide evidence that some of this controversy may be explained by variability in antibody specificity. In addition, we describe the development and characterization of a novel, highly specific monoclonal antibody and provide data regarding ERα expression in human breast cancers. Methods: Five commercially available ERα antibodies were screened for their sensitivity and specificity using western blotting, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in known ERα negative and positive cell lines as well as in normal human tissue samples. A novel monoclonal ERα antibody (C10) was developed and characterized in the same manner. Following identification of two specific antibodies, ERα expression was assessed in 66 breast tumors collected prior to adjuvant therapy. Samples were scored separately for nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. Results: In depth analysis of commercially available ERα antibodies reveled that the majority were non-specific with substantial cross-reactivity to ERα . Only one commercial antibody (PPG5/10), which solely recognizes full-length ERß, and our newly developed monoclonal antibody, which recognizes full-length and all 4 ERα variants, were determined to be sensitive and specific for ERα expression. These same two antibodies resulted in strong staining for endogenous levels of ERα protein in normal prostate tissue by immunohistochemistry. We further assessed these two antibodies in a set of breast tumors. Preliminary analysis revealed significant differences for ERα positivity between these two antibodies. Based on nuclear staining, 92% of tumors were ERα positive using the PPG5/10 antibody while only 34% were positive with C10. Approximately 50% of all tumors exhibited cytoplasmic staining with both antibodies. Conclusions: Our studies demonstrate that the majority of commercially available ERα antibodies are either non-specific or insensitive for the detection of ERα via immunohistochemistry. The present data call into question the relevance of prior studies which tested the association between clinical outcome and ERα expression and demonstrate the need to further analyze the role of ERα in breast cancer using highly specific and validated antibodies. While both the PPG5/10 and C10 antibodies are highly specific for ERß, the significant discrepancy in nuclear staining between them in breast tumors may be due to changes in epitope availability as a result of post-translational processing. Our newly developed C10 antibody could provide additional discriminatory features which may be useful in predicting response to therapy and/or associations with other clinicopathological factors and such studies are currently underway. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-25.

Abstract Background: We have previously demonstrated that endoxifen is the most potent tamoxifen metabolite responsible for eliciting the anti-estrogenic effects of this drug in breast cancer cells expressing ERα (Wu, Hawse et al. Cancer Res 2009;69:1722). These studies support the clinical findings which demonstrate that women with genetically impaired CYP2D6 metabolism have significantly reduced endoxifen levels and a higher risk of breast cancer recurrence. More recently, data has emerged from several laboratories suggesting that expression of ERβ in breast tumors leads to increased benefits from tamoxifen therapy. However, the role of ERβ in mediating endoxifen action has yet to be explored.Methods: Using U2OS osteosarcoma cells, as well as Hs578T and MCF7 breast cancer cells, stably expressing ERβ, we examined the effects of endoxifen on ERβ protein levels by western blotting, ERβ transcriptional activity by real-time RT-PCR, and on ERβ inhibition of breast cancer cell growth through the use of proliferation assays.Results: We have discovered that endoxifen stabilizes ERβ protein, unlike its targeted degradation of ERα, and induces ERα/ERβ heterodimerization in a concentration dependent manner. We have also found that endoxifen is a more potent inhibitor of estrogen induced gene expression in MCF7 cells stably expressing ERβ. Concentrations of endoxifen that mimic patients with impaired CYP2D6 activity (20-40 nM) do not significantly alter E2-induced cell proliferation in MCF7 cells expressing only ERα. However, these concentrations of endoxifen significantly reduce the estrogen induced proliferation rate of MCF7 cells expressing ERβ.Conclusions: Our data demonstrate that endoxifen stabilizes ERβ protein, induces ER heterodimerization and more potently inhibits the actions of estrogen in breast cancer cells expressing ERβ. The presence of ERβ sensitizes cells to the anti-estrogenic effects of endoxifen and growth inhibition occurs at substantially lower endoxifen concentrations (20-40 nM) than in cells that express only ERα (100 nm). Our data suggest that tamoxifen therapy may be beneficial even in patients with reduced CYP2D6 metabolism when ERβ is expressed. These studies also suggest that the increased effectiveness of tamoxifen therapy in patients whose tumors express ERβ may be due to the effects of endoxifen. Finally, these findings underscore the need to further elucidate the role of ERβ in the biology and treatment of breast cancer. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 405.

Abstract Estrogen-induced Syrian hamster tumors in the kidney represent a useful model to gain insight into the role of estrogens in oncogenic processes. We provided evidence that early tumor foci in the kidney arise from interstitial ectopic uterine-like germinal stem cells, and that early tumor foci and well-established tumors are highly aneuploid (92–94%). The molecular mechanisms whereby estrogens mediate this process are unclear. Here, we report that estrogen treatment induced significant increases in Aurora A protein expression (8.7-fold), activity (2.6-fold), mRNA (6.0-fold), and Aurora B protein expression (4.6-fold) in tumors, compared with age-matched cholesterol-treated kidneys. Immunohistochemistry revealed that this increase in Aurora A and B protein expression was essentially confined to cells within early and large tumor foci at 3.5 and 6 months of estrogen treatment, respectively. Upon estrogen withdrawal or coadministration of tamoxifen for 10 days, a 78% to 79% and 81% to 64% reduction in Aurora A and B expression, respectively, were observed in primary tumors compared with tumors continuously exposed to estrogens. These data indicate that overexpressed Aurora A and B in these tumors are under estrogen control via estrogen receptor α. Aurora A coenriched with the centrosome fraction isolated from tumors in the kidney. Centrosome amplification (number and area/cell) was detected in early tumor foci and large tumors but not in adjacent uninvolved or age-matched control kidneys. Taken together, these data indicate that persistent overexpression of Aurora A and B is under estrogen control, and is coincident with centrosome amplification, chromosomal instability, and aneuploidy, and represent an important mechanism driving tumorigenesis. [Cancer Res 2007;67(7):2957–63]

Abstract Hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)] compounds are established human lung carcinogens. The carcinogenicity of Cr(VI) is related to its solubility, with the most potent carcinogens being the insoluble particulate Cr(VI) compounds. However, it remains unknown why particulate Cr(VI) is more carcinogenic than soluble Cr(VI). One possible explanation is that particulates may provide more chronic exposures to chromate over time. We found that aneuploid cells increased in a concentration- and time-dependent manner after chronic exposure to lead chromate. Specifically, a 24-hour lead chromate exposure induced no aneugenic effect, whereas a 120-hour exposure to 0.5 and 1 μg/cm2 lead chromate induced 55% and 60% aneuploid metaphases, respectively. We also found that many of these aneuploid cells were able to continue to grow and form colonies. Centrosome defects are known to induce aneuploidy; therefore, we investigated the effects of chronic lead chromate exposure on centrosomes. We found that centrosome amplification in interphase and mitotic cells increased in a concentration- and time-dependent manner with 0.5 and 1 μg/cm2 lead chromate for 120 hours, inducing aberrant centrosomes in 18% and 21% of interphase cells and 32% and 69% of mitotic cells, respectively; however, lead oxide did not induce centrosome amplification in interphase or mitotic cells. There was also an increase in aberrant mitosis after chronic exposure to lead chromate with the emergence of disorganized anaphase and mitotic catastrophe. These data suggest that one possible mechanism for lead chromate–induced carcinogenesis is through centrosome dysfunction, leading to the induction of aneuploidy. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(8): 4041-8)

Earlier studies of invasive breast tumors have shown that 60–80% are aneuploid and ≈80% exhibit amplified centrosomes. In this study, we investigated the relationship of centrosome amplification with aneuploidy, chromosomal instability, p53 mutation, and loss of differentiation in human breast tumors. Twenty invasive breast tumors and seven normal breast tissues were analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with centromeric probes to chromosomes 3, 7, and 17. We analyzed these tumors for both aneuploidy and unstable karyotypes as determined by chromosomal instability. The results were then tested for correlation with three measures of centrosome amplification: centrosome size, centrosome number, and centrosome microtubule nucleation capacity. Centrosome size and centrosome number both showed a positive, significant, linear correlation with aneuploidy and chromosomal instability. Microtubule nucleation capacity showed no such correlation, but did correlate significantly with loss of tissue differentiation. Centrosome amplification was detected in in situ ductal carcinomas, suggesting that centrosome amplification is an early event in these lesions. Centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability occurred independently of p53 mutation, whereas p53 mutation was associated with a significant increase in centrosome microtubule nucleation capacity. Together, these results demonstrate that independent aspects of centrosome amplification correlate with chromosomal instability and loss of tissue differentiation and may be involved in tumor development and progression. These results further suggest that aspects of centrosome amplification may have clinical diagnostic and/or prognostic value and that the centrosome may be a potential target for cancer therapy.