Citations 3

Small (< 4 cm) Renal Masses: Differentiation of Angiomyolipoma Without Visible Fat From Renal Cell Carcinoma Using Unenhanced and Contrast-Enhanced CT

American Journal of Roentgenology | November 20, 2015 | Volume: 205 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1194-1202

10.2214/ajr.14.14183 | PMID 26587925

Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Using Endorectal Coil MRI at 3 T: Addition of DWI and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement to T2-Weighted MRI

American Journal of Roentgenology | September 23, 2015 | Volume: 205 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 807-816

10.2214/ajr.14.14275 | PMID 26397329

Update on positron emission tomography for imaging of prostate cancer

International Journal of Urology | September 2, 2013 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 12-23

10.1111/iju.12250 | PMID 23991644

AbstractProstate cancer is the most common non‐cutaneous malignancy among men in the Western world, and continues to be a major health problem. Imaging has recently become more important in the clinical management of prostate cancer patients, including diagnosis, staging, choice of optimal treatment strategy, treatment follow up and restaging. Positron emission tomography, a functional and molecular imaging technique, has opened a new field in clinical oncological imaging. The most common positron emission tomography radiotracer, 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose, has been limited in imaging of prostate cancer. Recently, however, other positron emission tomography tracers, such as 11C‐acetate and 11C‐ or 18F‐choline, have shown promising results. In the present review article, we overview the potential and current use of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging employing the four most commonly used positron emission tomography radiotracers, 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose, 11C‐acetate and 11C‐ or 18F‐choline, for imaging evaluation of prostate cancer.