Link, Michael J.

Abstract Introduction Neurosurgical anatomy is traditionally taught via anatomic and operative atlases; however, these resources present the skull base using views that emphasize three-dimensional (3D) relationships rather than operative perspectives, and are frequently written above a typical resident's understanding. Our objective is to describe, step-by-step, a retrosigmoid approach dissection, in a way that is educationally valuable for trainees at numerous levels. Methods Six sides of three formalin-fixed latex-injected specimens were dissected under microscopic magnification. A retrosigmoid was performed by each of three neurosurgery residents, under supervision by the senior authors (C.L.W.D. and M.J.L.) and a graduated skull base fellow, neurosurgeon, and neuroanatomist (M.P.C.). Dissections were supplemented with representative case applications. Results The retrosigmoid craniotomy (aka lateral suboccipital approach) affords excellent access to cranial nerve (CN) IV to XII, with corresponding applicability to numerous posterior fossa operations. Key steps include positioning and skin incision, scalp and muscle flaps, burr hole and parasigmoid trough, craniotomy flap elevation, initial durotomy and deep cistern access, completion durotomy, and final exposure. Conclusion The retrosigmoid craniotomy is a workhorse skull base exposure, particularly for lesions located predominantly in the cerebellopontine angle. Operatively oriented neuroanatomy dissections provide trainees with a critical foundation for learning this fundamental skull base technique. We outline a comprehensive approach for neurosurgery residents to develop their familiarity with the retrosigmoid craniotomy in the cadaver laboratory in a way that simultaneously informs rapid learning in the operating room, and an understanding of its potential for wide clinical application to skull base diseases.

Objective: To date, prediction models for estimating risk of acquiring non-serviceable hearing in subjects with observed vestibular schwannoma (VS) have evaluated outcomes primarily based on features at initial diagnosis. Herein, we evaluate the association of rate of hearing decline during the initial period of observation with time to non-serviceable hearing. If significant, rate of hearing decline may inform decision making after an introductory period of observation. Setting: Two tertiary care centers. Patients: VS patients with serviceable hearing who underwent at least three audiograms and two magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies before intervention or being lost to follow-up. The rate of change in pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) was calculated as the score from the second audiogram minus the score from the first audiogram, divided by the duration in months between the two. Main Outcome Measure(s): Serviceable hearing, defined as PTA ≤50 dB HL and WRS ≥50%. Results: Among 266 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 52 developed non-serviceable hearing at last follow-up. Kaplan–Meier estimated rates of maintaining serviceable hearing (95% CI; number still at risk) at 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 years were 97% (95–100; 206), 78% (72–85; 98), 68% (60–77; 39), 60% (50–73; 17), and 44% (29–67; 2), respectively. In a univariable setting, each 1 dB increase per month in the rate of initial PTA change was associated with a 96% increased likelihood of acquiring non-serviceable hearing (hazard ratio [HR] 1.96; 95% CI 1.44–2.68; p < 0.001). Each 1% increase per month in the rate of initial WRS change was associated with a decreased likelihood of acquiring non-serviceable hearing (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66–0.94; p = 0.009). After multivariable adjustment, both rate of PTA change (HR 2.42; 95% CI 1.72–3.41; p < 0.001) and rate of WRS change (HR 0.81; 95% CI 0.67–0.99; p = 0.043) remained statistically significantly associated with time to non-serviceable hearing. Conclusion: Rate of early PTA and WRS decline during the initial period of observation are significantly associated with time to development of non-serviceable hearing. This information may facilitate accurate patient counseling and inform decision-making regarding prospective disease management.

OBJECTIVE Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have been implicated as pathologic actors in phenotypically aggressive vestibular schwannoma (VS), potentially mediated via programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). The authors hypothesized that PD-L1 is a key regulator of the VS immune microenvironment. METHODS Forty-six consecutive, radiation-naïve, sporadic VSs that were subtotally resected at primary surgery were assessed via immunohistochemical analysis, including analysis of CD163 and PD-L1 expression. Pathologic data were correlated with clinical endpoints, including tumor control, facial nerve function, and complications. RESULTS Baseline parameters were equivalent between stable and progressive post–subtotal resection (STR) VS. CD163 percent positivity and M2 index were significantly increased among tumors that remained stable (34% vs 21%, p = 0.02; 1.13 vs 0.99, p = 0.0008), as well as patients with favorable House-Brackmann grade I or II facial nerve function (31% vs 13%, p = 0.04; 1.11 vs 0.97, p = 0.05). PD-L1 percent positivity was significantly associated with tumor progression (1% vs 11%, p = 0.01) and unfavorable House-Brackmann grade III–VI facial nerve function (1% vs 38%, p = 0.02). On multivariate analysis, PD-L1 was independently significant in all models (likelihood ratio 4.4, p = 0.04), while CD163 was dependent in all iterations. CONCLUSIONS In contrast to prior reports, in this study, the authors observed significantly increased levels of M1, CD163 + TAMs in association with VS that progressed after STR. Progressive tumors are characterized by increased PD-L1, potentially highlighting a mechanism of immune evasion that results in TAM deactivation, tumor growth, and further infiltration of anti-tumor immune cells. Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 may offer therapeutic promise, particularly in the setting of disease control after STR.

Objective: The etiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in patients with jugular paraganglioma (JP) whose tumors lack inner ear fistulae or vestibulocochlear nerve involvement is unknown. Recent literature has proposed that occlusion of the inferior cochlear vein may be causative. Herein, we assess the association between radiologic involvement of the cochlear aqueduct (CA) and the development of SNHL. Study Design: Blinded, retrospective review of imaging and audiometry. Setting: Tertiary center. Patients: Adults with JP. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measures: Asymmetric SNHL was assessed continuously as the difference in bone conduction pure-tone average (BCPTA) between ears and as a categorical variable (≥15 dB difference at two consecutive frequencies, or a difference in speech discrimination score of ≥15%). Involvement of the CA was considered present if there was evidence of medial T2 fluid signal loss, contrast enhancement, or bony erosion/expansion. Results: Of 30 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 15 (50%) had asymmetric SNHL. CA involvement was observed in 87% of patients with asymmetric SNHL compared with 13% in those with symmetric hearing (p = 0.0001). Univariate analysis demonstrated that age, sex, and tumor volume were not associated with asymmetric SNHL. The median difference in BCPTA between ears in patients with CA involvement was 21.3 dB HL compared to 1.2 dB HL in those without CA involvement (p < 0.0001). Regression analysis demonstrates that enhancement within the CA is associated with a BCPTA difference of 19.4 dB HL (p = 0.0006). Conclusions: Cochlear aqueduct involvement by JP is associated with SNHL in the absence of inner ear fistula, vestibulocochlear nerve involvement, or brainstem compression. Correlation with operative findings or histopathologic evidence of tumor involvement may validate this intriguing imaging finding.

Objective: Previous research has shown that tumor growth during observation of small-to-medium sized sporadic vestibular schwannomas (VSs) occurs almost exclusively within 3 to 5 years following diagnosis. This has led some to consider ending surveillance after this interval. This study seeks to characterize a cohort of patients with tumors that exhibited late growth. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Adults with sporadic VSs who initially elected observation with serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Linear tumor growth was measured in accordance with AAO-HNS reporting guidelines. Delayed growth was defined as growth ≥2 mm in linear diameter that was first detected 5 years or more from the initial MRI. Results: From a total of 361 patients, 172 experienced tumor growth during the interval of observation. Fourteen of these 172 patients (8.1%) experienced late growth occurring at 5 years or beyond. Among patients with delayed growth, the fastest growth rate after extended quiescence was 1.33 mm/yr, and the longest delay before tumor growth detection was 11.1 years. Additional treatment was recommended for six (42.9%) of the patients with delayed growth. Of 68 tumors that remained in the IAC, 11 (16.2%) demonstrated delayed growth. Of 66 tumors that presented in the CPA, 2 (3.0%) demonstrated delayed growth. Initial size was larger for tumors demonstrating early growth compared with those with delayed growth. For tumors within the IAC, those with early growth had a significantly higher median growth rate than those with delayed growth (1.40 vs. 0.45 mm/yr, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Delayed growth encompassed 8.1% of growing VSs and 3.9% of all observed tumors. Patients with delayed growth exhibited slower growth rates compared with those who were diagnosed with growth early in their observation course. These findings support the need for lifelong surveillance of untreated VSs given the possibility of clinically significant delayed growth. Increasing the time interval between MRI studies after 5 years is a reasonable concession to balance practicalities of cost and convenience with risk of delayed of tumor growth.

OBJECTIVESphenoorbital meningioma (SOM) is a unique skull base tumor, characterized by infiltrative involvement and hyperostosis primarily of the lesser wing of sphenoid bone, with frequent involvement of the orbital compartment. SOM often manifests with proptosis and visual impairment. Surgical technique and outcome are highly variable among studies reported in the literature. The authors present a single-surgeon experience with SOM.METHODSA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional database was performed. A blinded imaging review by 2 study team members was completed to confirm SOM, after which chart review was carried out to capture demographics and outcomes. All statistical testing was completed using JMP Pro version 14.1.0, with significance defined as p < 0.05.RESULTSForty-seven patients who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2017 were included. The median age at surgery was 47 years (range 36–70 years), 81% of patients were female, and the median follow-up was 43 months (range 0–175 months). All operations were performed via a frontotemporal craniotomy, orbitooptic osteotomy, and anterior clinoidectomy, with extensive resection of all involved bone and soft tissue. Preoperatively, proptosis was noted in 44 patients, 98% of whom improved. Twenty-eight patients (60%) had visual deficits before surgery, 21 (75%) of whom improved during follow-up. Visual field defect other than a central scotoma was the only prognostic factor for improvement in vision on multivariate analysis (p = 0.0062). Nine patients (19%) had recurrence or progression during follow-up.CONCLUSIONSSOM is a unique skull base tumor that needs careful planning to optimize outcome. Aggressive removal of involved bone and periorbita is crucial, and proptosis and visual field defect other than a central scotoma can improve after surgery.

OBJECTIVERadiation dose to the cochlea has been proposed as a key prognostic factor in hearing preservation following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). However, understanding of the predictive value of cochlear dose on hearing outcomes following SRS for patients with non-VS tumors of the lateral skull base (LSB) is incomplete. The authors investigated rates of hearing loss following high-dose SRS in patients with LSB non-VS lesions compared with patients with VS.METHODSPatients with LSB meningioma or jugular paraganglioma and serviceable pretreatment hearing who underwent SRS treatment during 2007–2016 and received a modiolus dose > 5 Gy were included in a retrospective cohort study, along with a similarly identified control group of consecutive patients with sporadic VS.RESULTSSixteen patients with non-VS tumors and a control group of 43 patients with VS met study criteria. Serviceable hearing, defined as American Academy of Otololaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery class A/B, was maintained in 13 non-VS versus 23 VS patients (81% vs 56%, p = 0.07). All 3 instances of hearing loss in non-VS patients were observed in cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas. Non-VS with preserved hearing had a median modiolus dose of 6.9 Gy (range 5.7–19.2 Gy), versus 7.4 Gy (range 5.4–7.6 Gy) in those patients with post-SRS hearing loss (p = 0.53). Sporadic VS patients received an overall median modiolus point-dose of 6.8 Gy (range 5.4–11.7 Gy).CONCLUSIONSThe modiolus dose threshold of 5 Gy does not predict hearing loss in patients with non-VS tumors undergoing SRS, suggesting that dosimetric parameters derived from VS may not be applicable to this population. Differential rates of hearing loss appear to vary by pathology, with paragangliomas and petroclival meningiomas demonstrating decreased risk of hearing loss compared to CPA meningiomas that may directly compress the cochlear nerve similarly to VS.

Abstract BACKGROUND Surgical resection is typically cited as the optimal treatment of patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II arteriovenous malformation (AVM). OBJECTIVE To report our experience with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II AVM. METHODS A prospectively maintained registry was reviewed for patients with nonsyndromic Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II AVM having SRS from 1990 to 2011. Patients with <24 mo of follow-up or prior radiotherapy/SRS were excluded, resulting in a study population of 173 patients. Actuarial analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was performed with excellent outcomes (obliteration without new deficits) as the dependent variable. RESULTS Median post-SRS follow-up was 68 mo (range, 24-275). AVM obliteration was achieved in 132 (76%) after initial SRS. Eleven additional patients achieved obliteration after repeat SRS for an overall obliteration rate of 83%. The rate of obliteration was 60% at 4 yr and 78% at 8 yr. Post-SRS hemorrhage occurred in 7 patients (4%), resulting in 3 minor deficits (2%) and 1 death (<1%). Radiation-induced complications occurred in 5 patients (3%), resulting in minor deficits only. One hundred and thirty-seven patients (79%) had excellent outcomes at last follow-up. CONCLUSION SRS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with Spetzler-Martin Grade I-II AVM. Selection bias is likely a contributing factor to explain the superior outcomes generally noted in reported series of microsurgery for patients with low grade AVM.

Objective: The treatment paradigm for jugular paraganglioma (JP) has changed considerably over time with the wider adoption of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). To the best of the authors’ knowledge, there are no published studies that use validated patient-reported outcome measures to ascertain quality of life (QoL) outcomes following SRS for JP when used in single or combined modality treatment regimens. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Adult patients with JP treated with primary SRS or SRS following primary surgery between 1990 and 2017. Interventions(S): Surgery and/or Gamma Knife SRS. Main Outcome Measures: Global and treatment-related QoL and differences in QoL based on treatment approach. Results: Sixty-nine surveys were distributed and a total of 26 completed surveys were received (38% response rate). Among respondents, the median age at SRS was 53 years and 16 of the 26 patients (62%) were female. Median follow-up was 97 months. Nineteen patients (73%) were treated with primary SRS or staged SRS following intentional subtotal resection (STR; hereafter referred to as “staged SRS”), while the remainder (n = 7, 27%) were treated with SRS for recurrent JP. Median physical and mental health QoL PROMIS-10 T-scores regardless of treatment strategy were 39.8 and 38.8, respectively, while median SF36 physical and mental component subscores were similar to national averages and non-tumor controls. When comparing general physical and mental health QoL scores, there was no significant difference between patients treated with primary or staged SRS and those treated with SRS for recurrent JP. However, age-adjusted swallowing function among patients treated with primary or staged SRS was better than in those patients treated with SRS for recurrent JP (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Patients treated with primary or staged SRS for JP tend to exhibit better swallowing outcomes than those treated with SRS for recurrent JP. However, the majority of overall and disease-specific quality of life measures were not different between groups. Based on the low incidence of new cranial neuropathy following SRS, it is likely that initial surgical morbidity is the primary contributor to this outcome. Disease-specific overall quality of life measures, akin to those already used for other benign skull base tumors, are necessary to better gauge physical and mental health outcomes following treatment for JP. Though limited by small sample size, this represents the first study to gauge QoL outcomes following treatment for JP.