Jabbour, Pascal

Objective Preclinical studies suggest that robotic carotid artery stenting (CAS) could be superior to manual CAS. However, very limited comparative data exists comparing robotic and manual CAS patients. In addition, no data exists comparing the costs of manual and robotic CAS. Methods All robotic CAS cases at 2 academic neurosurgery centers were retrospectively reviewed and 1:1 propensity matched with manual CAS cases. Personnel costs, supply costs, and total procedure costs were collected in collaboration with hospital administration using time‐driven activity‐based cost‐analysis (TDABC). Results 24 robotic CAS cases were performed between 2019 and 2023. Co‐morbidities and baseline procedural characteristics were well‐matched between robotic and manual cases. Unplanned manual conversion was observed in only one robotic case (4.2%). Robotic CAS complications and outcomes were comparable to manual. Robotic CAS was associated with a significantly increased fluoroscopy time (29.0 vs. 19.2 min.; p<0.001). Robotic procedure time (88.9±18.2 min.) was significantly (p=0.003) higher than manual (68.72±22.4 min.). Health professional costs ($1,589.71±176.92, $1,375.99±233.39, p<0.005), supply cost ($3,918.25±421.20, $2,152.74±1,030.26, p<0.001) and total procedure costs ($5,306.11±608.95, $3,437.56±1,165.67, p<0.001) were greater for robotic CAS. Conclusions With a low rate of technical failure and post‐operative complications, we show robotic carotid artery stenting is safe and feasible in the first multi‐center and largest sample to date. In addition, robotic CAS achieves comparable clinical outcomes. Robotic CAS was associated with increased fluoroscopy time, but fluoroscopy time decreased as operators gained familiarity with the CorPath GRX. Robotic CAS was associated with a greater procedural cost, which was driven by greater personnel and supply costs. Our findings highlight the need for further studies to optimize robotic CAS and reduce its associated costs.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vertebral artery injury (VAI) because of traumatic subaxial cervical spine injury is a rare but potentially devastating condition as it could lead to stroke. The aim of this study was to examine the incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and radiographic predictors of VAI in patients surgically treated for subaxial cervical spine injuries at a tertiary care trauma center. METHODS: This is a retrospective population-based cohort study, including all patients surgically treated for traumatic subaxial cervical spine injuries at the study center between 2006 and 2018. Primary outcomes included mortality and morbidity after the injury. Propensity score matching, survival, univariable, and multivariable analyses were used to study the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Traumatic VAI primarily occurred after high-energy traumas such as motor vehicle accidents and falls from heights. The median age was 64.4 years (47.4-69.1), and 69% were male. In the cohort of patients with subaxial cervical injury, 54% had a spinal cord injury (SCI). In the subgroup with VAI, the frequency of SCI was 66% and a concomitant SCI and VAI were associated with a more severe American Spinal Cord Injury Association Impairment Scale grade ( P = .015). However, after accounting for age, sex, and associated injuries, VAI did not affect postoperative complications, short- or long-term outcomes, or mortality rates. Facet joint dislocation was a unique radiographic predictor of VAI (odds ratio 3.8 [CI 1.42-10.7], P = .009). CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that clinical outcomes of patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries were not negatively affected by the presence of a VAI. Several radiographic factors were associated with VAI; however, only facet joint dislocation remained as an independent predictor of this injury.

OBJECTIVE Preclinical studies suggest that robotic carotid artery stenting (CAS) could be superior to manual CAS. However, very limited comparative data exist for patients who have undergone robotic versus manual CAS. In addition, no data exist comparing the costs of manual and robotic CAS. METHODS All robotic CAS cases at two academic neurosurgery centers were retrospectively reviewed and 1:1 propensity matched with manual CAS cases. Personnel costs, supply costs, and total procedure costs were collected in collaboration with hospital administration by using time-driven activity-based cost analysis. RESULTS A total of 24 robotic CAS operations were performed between 2019 and 2023. Comorbidities and baseline procedural characteristics were well matched between robotic and manual cases. Unplanned manual conversion was observed in only 1 robotic case (4.2%). Robotic CAS complications and outcomes were comparable to manual. Robotic CAS was associated with a significantly increased fluoroscopy time (29.0 vs 19.2 minutes; p < 0.001). Robotic procedure time (88.9 ± 18.2 minutes) was significantly (p = 0.003) longer than manual time (68.72 ± 22.4 minutes). Health personnel costs ($1589.71 ± $176.92 vs $1375.99 ± $233.39, p = 0.005); supply costs ($3918.25 ± $421.20 vs $2152.74 ± $1030.26, p < 0.001); and total procedure costs ($5306.11 ± $608.95 vs $3437.56 ± $1165.67, p < 0.001) were greater for robotic CAS. CONCLUSIONS In the first multicenter study and largest sample to date, the authors show that robotic CAS, with a low rate of procedural failure and postoperative complications, is safe and feasible. In addition, robotic CAS achieves comparable clinical outcomes to manual CAS. Robotic CAS was associated with increased fluoroscopy time, but fluoroscopy time decreased as operators gained familiarity with the CorPath GRX system. Robotic CAS was associated with a greater procedural cost, which was driven by greater personnel and supply costs. Robotic CAS failed to show superiority to manual CAS. These findings set a foundation for randomized controlled trials of robotic CAS, and also highlight the need for further studies to optimize robotic CAS and reduce its associated costs.

BACKGROUND: The EXCELLENT registry aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the EMBOTRAP Revascularization Device in an all-comer population in a real-world setting, with a focus on the composition of retrieved clots. METHODS: EXCELLENT is a prospective, global registry of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with EMBOTRAP as the first-line mechanical thrombectomy device conducted at 34 sites (25 sites contributing clot) from September 2018 to March 2021, utilizing core imaging and central histology laboratories blinded to clinical data, independent 90-day modified Rankin Scale assessment and Clinical Events Committee. RESULTS: After screening 3799 patients, a total of 997 subjects (mean age, 70.0±14.2 years; 51.8% women; 19.7% non-White) were included. The first-pass modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b rate was 64.5% (623/966), first-pass mTICI ≥2c was 39.1% (378/966), and final mTICI ≥2b was 94.5% (931/985). A total of 427/912 (46.8%) patients achieved a 90-day modified Rankin Scale of 0 to 2 or ≤baseline. Embolization to a new territory occurred in 0.2% (2/984), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours in 1.6% (16/997). The 90-day mortality was 19.1% (175/918). Device- and/or procedure-related serious adverse events occurred in 5.9% (54/912) through 90 days. The mean RBC percentage of retrieved clots was 45.62±21.372. Among patients who achieved mTICI ≥2b with the first pass, 15.7% (52/331) and 9.7% (32/331), respectively, had RBC-poor (<25%) and RBC-rich (>75%) clots. Patients with no clot retrieved in any procedural pass had a lower percentage of hyperdense or susceptibility vessel sign on baseline imaging (58.9% versus 74.7%; P <0.001), pointing to a potential preprocedure indicator of challenging clot. CONCLUSIONS: The EXCELLENT registry informs real-world practices in mechanical thrombectomy and sheds light on the range of clots effectively retrieved by current technology. This is the first report of detailed patient characteristics where mechanical thrombectomy maneuvers failed to remove any clot material. Although the composition of nonretrievable clots cannot be assessed histologically, the results support the notion that no retrieval may be correlated with imaging findings suggesting clots lower in RBC. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT03685578.

Background Acute ischemic stroke arising from medium vessel occlusions (MeVO) poses substantial challenges in treatment and management. This study aims to elucidate the outcomes and factors contributing to achieving excellent recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] 2c–3) versus successful recanalization (mTICI 2b) in patients with MeVO stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods We conducted a multinational study analyzing data from the MAD‐MT (Multicenter Analysis of Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions: Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy) registry, encompassing 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe, collected between September 2017 and July 2023. The study included acute ischemic stroke patients with MeVO treated with MT, with or without intravenous thrombolysis, who achieved mTICI 2b–3 post‐MT. Results Among 1463 patients with successful recanalization (mTICI 2b–3), 523 achieved mTICI 2b recanalization, and 940 achieved mTICI 2c–3. Distal occlusions exhibited higher odds of excellent recanalization compared with proximal MeVO vessel occlusions (odds ratio, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.17–2.15; P = 0.003). Cardioembolic stroke pathogenesis was associated with a higher likelihood of excellent recanalization (1.67; 95% CI, 1.07–2.59; P = 0.018). Patients achieving mTICI 2c–3 recanalization demonstrated lower initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores, significant improvements in postprocedural National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale shift, and a higher percentage of favorable 90‐day outcomes compared with those with mTICI 2b. However, no significant difference in 90‐day mortality rates was observed. Conclusion This study underscores that among patients with MeVO stroke with successful recanalization (mTICI 2b–3) there is higher likelihood of achieving excellent recanalization (mTICI 2c–3) in distal occlusions and cardioembolic pathogenesis. mTICI 2c–3 scores post‐MT correlate with improved clinical outcomes compared with mTICI 2b, affirming the superiority of excellent recanalization over successful recanalization in patients with MeVO stroke. Further prospective studies and randomized controlled trials are warranted for validation.

Abstract Background: Despite the proven effectiveness of endovascular therapy (EVT) in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) involving anterior circulation large vessel occlusions, isolated posterior cerebral artery (PCA) occlusions (iPCAo) remain underexplored in clinical trials. This study investigates the comparative effectiveness and safety of EVT against medical management (MM) in patients with iPCAo. Methods: This multinational, multicenter propensity score-weighted study analyzed data from the Multicenter Analysis of primary Distal medium vessel occlusions: effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy (MAD-MT) registry, involving 37 centers across North America, Asia, and Europe. We included iPCAo patients treated with either EVT or MM. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days, with secondary outcomes including functional independence, mortality, and safety profiles such as hemorrhagic complications. Results: A total of 177 patients were analyzed (88 MM and 89 EVT). EVT showed a statistically significant improvement in 90-day mRS scores (OR = 0.55, 95% CI = 0.30–1.00, p = 0.048), functional independence (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 1.02–6.20, p = 0.045), and a reduction in 90-day mortality (OR = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.03–0.54, p = 0.006) compared to MM. Hemorrhagic complications were not significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: EVT for iPCAo is associated with better neurological outcomes and lower mortality compared to MM, without an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications. Nevertheless, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the study’s observational design. The findings are hypothesis-generating and highlight the need for future randomized controlled trials to confirm these observations and establish definitive treatment guidelines for this patient population.

OBJECTIVE The Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device was approved to treat wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. The device is designed as an intrasaccular flow disruptor covering aneurysm widths up to 10 mm. Although prior studies combined all aneurysm sizes, it is known that aneurysms behave differently in response to endovascular treatment based on their size. Therefore, the authors’ objective was to identify ideal middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm width and neck sizes most suitable for WEB treatment. METHODS The WorldWideWEB consortium is a large multicenter retrospective database that analyzes intracranial aneurysms treated with the WEB device. In this study, all unruptured MCA bifurcation aneurysms with available measurements were included. Cutoff values based on aneurysm width and neck in relation to aneurysm occlusion status were measured using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Propensity score matching (PSM) was then used to compare treatment outcomes between aneurysms smaller and larger than the cutoff value for both width and neck size. RESULTS The ideal cutoff values for MCA bifurcation aneurysm width and neck were 6.1 mm and 4.6 mm, respectively. On PSM, 87 matched pairs were compared based on width size (≤ 6.1 mm and > 6.1 mm), and 77 matched pairs were compared based on neck size (≤ 4.6 mm and > 4.6 mm). There was a significant difference in adequate aneurysm occlusion between aneurysms smaller and larger than those cutoff values for both widths (93% vs 76%, p = 0.0017) and neck sizes (90% vs 70%, p = 0.0026). The retreatment rate was also significantly higher for larger aneurysms in both parameters. CONCLUSIONS This study shows that MCA bifurcation aneurysms ≤ 6.1 mm in width and ≤ 4.6 mm in neck size are significantly better candidates for WEB treatment, leading to improved occlusion status and reduced retreatment rate, which are important considerations when using WEB devices.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to develop and validate a prediction score for futile recanalization (FR) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) for patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). METHODS: Patients with anterior circulation LVO with low ASPECTS (<6) who underwent successful EVT (modified treatment in cerebral ischemia score ≥2b) from Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry were retrospectively analyzed. FR was defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores ≥4 despite successful EVT. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of FR, and they were used to create a clinical score. The performance of the score was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS: Of 219 patients, 170 and 49 patients were randomly assigned to the training and validation cohort, respectively. Independent predictors of FR identified in the training cohort were used to construct the SNAP score: site of occlusion (middle cerebral artery = 0, internal carotid artery = 1), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission (≤10 = 0, 10 to 19 = 1, ≥20 = 2), age (<75 = 0, ≥75 = 2), and prestroke mRS score (0-3). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of the SNAP score in the training and validation cohorts showed areas under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.86) and 0.79 (95% CI 0.65-0.92) for predicting FR, respectively. A SNAP score ≥5 had a positive predictive value of 92.1% [95% CI 78.8%-97.3%] for FR. CONCLUSION: The SNAP score may be useful in predicting FR after EVT in low-ASPECTS patients with LVO. It can provide patients, family members, and physicians with reliable outcome expectations among patients with acute ischemic stroke with large infarcts.

Background Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon cerebral lesions that can cause significant neurological complications. Surgical resection is the gold standard for treatment, but endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) are viable alternatives. Objective To compare the outcomes of endovascular embolization versus SRS in the treatment of AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III. Methods This study combined retrospective data from 10 academic institutions in North America and Europe. Patients aged 1 to 90 years who underwent endovascular embolization or SRS for AVMs with Spetzler-Martin grades I–III between January 2010 and December 2023 were included. Results The study included 244 patients, including 84 who had endovascular embolization and 160 who had SRS. Before propensity score matching (PSM), complete obliteration at the last follow-up was achieved in 74.5% of the SRS group compared with 57.8% of the embolization group (OR=0.47; 95% CI 0.26 to 0.48; P=0.01). After propensity score matching, SRS still achieved significantly higher occlusion rates at last follow-up (78.9% vs 55.3%; OR=0.32; 95% CI 0.12 to 0.90; P=0.03). Hemorrhagic complications were higher in the embolization group than in the SRS group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance after PSM (13.2% vs 2.6%; OR=5.6; 95% CI 0.62 to 50.47; P=0.12). Similarly, re-treatment rate was higher in the embolization group (10.5% vs 5.3%; OR=2.11; 95% CI 0.36 to 12.31; P=0.40) compared with the SRS group. Conclusion Our findings indicate that SRS has a significantly higher obliteration rate at last follow-up compared with endovascular embolization. Also, SRS has a higher tendency for fewer hemorrhagic complications and lower re-treatment rate. Further prospective studies are needed.

Background A higher number of recanalization attempts reduces the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke secondary to large vessel occlusion (LVO). We assessed the impact of switching EVT techniques after a failed first pass on procedural and clinical outcomes. Methods This multicenter international study, conducted between January 2013 and December 2022, included patients undergoing EVT for anterior circulation LVO (internal carotid artery or M1 segments) with failed first pass recanalization. Propensity score matching identified a 1:1 matched cohort of patients in whom EVT technique was changed after a failed first pass and those with the same technique repeated. The primary outcome was successful recanalization at second attempt defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) score of 2B or higher. Secondary outcomes were 90-day modified Rankin Score (mRS) and postprocedural hemorrhage. Results Among 2167 patients, converting to an alternative technique after a failed first pass was associated with higher odds of successful recanalization (adjusted OR (aOR)=1.5, p=0.041), and higher odds of mRS 0–2 at 90 days (aOR=1.6, p=0.005) without additional risk of symptomatic hemorrhage (p=0.379). Using a propensity score matched cohort of 490 patients, technique conversion at second attempt increased odds of successful recanalization at second attempt (aOR=1.32, p=0.006) and 90-day mRS 0–2 (aOR=1.38, p=0.008). Conclusions Early conversion to an alternative EVT technique after a failed first pass recanalization in patients with AIS is associated with better technical success and clinical outcomes.