Faiman, Beth M

Introduction Talquetamab (Tal) is a bispecific antibody therapy approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM), targeting both GPRC5D x CD3 receptors. Clinical studies demonstrate that Tal creates deep and durable responses, but less is known about the patient experience. This study aimed to explore the experiences of patients from the patient and physician perspectives to help understand what to expect with this first-in-class novel therapy. Methods This qualitative study consisted of two components. First, patients with documented use of Tal were identified and recruited through the HealthTree Cure Hub. Individual patients then took part in 2-hour, semi-structured virtual interviews. Patients were asked to discuss their experiences 1-2 months prior to starting Tal and 4-5 months after beginning therapy. Patients discussed GPRC5D-related symptoms (including oral, skin-related, and nail-related symptoms), overall impact, and satisfaction. Participants were US adults diagnosed with MM who took Tal for at least 4 months, either in a clinical trial or commercial setting. Interviews were conducted February-April 2024. Second, patients and physicians gathered in a facilitated roundtable discussion to review findings and generate ideas for symptom management. The roundtable lasted 2.5 hours and took place in Chicago, IL in May 2024. Results Eight men and 4 women (n=12) aged 52-79 years participated in the interviews. Interviewed participants were mostly white (84%) and college-educated (84%). Seven (58%) received Tal in a clinical trial, and 9 were still receiving Tal. Roundtable participants included 3 patients (2 male, 1 female; all white and college educated), and 3 physicians with Tal experience. In the interviews, patients reported high overall satisfaction, with most (75%) rating their satisfaction an 8 or higher on a 10-point scale. Satisfaction was largely driven by the effectiveness of therapy, with all reporting clinical improvements in their MM disease. Patients reported improvements in their energy/strength and decreased fatigue. They also reported increased physical activities and ability to work, volunteer, or engage in hobbies. Physicians affirmed these findings as consistent with their observations and noted they are also very satisfied with Tal. Oral symptoms such as distorted taste/loss of taste and dry mouth were common with varying severity. Although all interviewees (n=12) reported taste symptoms (typically starting within the first month of therapy), five said their symptoms fully improved (3 after 1 year on treatment, and 2 after stopping treatment), and 4 experienced partial recovery. Ten lost weight, but most (92%) maintained adequate nutrition. Patients and physicians suggested coping strategies including diet modifications, use of strong flavors (e.g., spices, cinnamon), monitoring weight, prioritizing adequate calories, using mouthwashes/lozenges, drinking water while eating, taking small bites, and consuming foods that are easier to swallow. They also noted that it is important to educate patients on expected symptoms before starting the treatment. Skin- and nail-related symptoms were also common but less impactful on quality of life. All patients (n=12) experienced skin- and nail-related symptoms, but most considered these symptoms mild. Skin-related symptoms such as dry skin and skin exfoliation occurred once and typically lasted 1-2 months. Nail symptoms were primarily cosmetic, and the duration varied. Suggested management strategies include skin moisturizers, nail thickeners/hardeners, keeping nails short, and wearing protective gloves. Physicians noted it's helpful to reassure patients that nail loss is not harmful. Overall, GPRC5D-related symptoms were not treatment-limiting, and no patients had to miss a dose due to these symptoms. Patients perceived these symptoms as bearable but noted the treatment was effective at controlling the disease. Conclusions This study described patient experiences and reflected how patients perceive the benefit/risk profile of talquetamab. Symptoms were perceived as bearable and high satisfaction scores were driven by strong clinical effectiveness. Patients and physicians agreed that real-world feedback from patients, practical tips, and management strategies are vitally important for patients and physicians using this novel therapy.

Abstract Abstract 5045 Observation remains the standard approach to patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and asymptomatic multiple myeloma (AMM) who lack end-organ impairment characteristic of symptomatic MM. Institution of early MM therapy has not been shown to improve survival or alter the natural progression of the disease. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2) inhibitors inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis in drug resistant MM cell lines. 23 asymptomatic adult patients with a serum monoclonal protein >1g/dL, from Cleveland Clinic, Mayo Clinic, or University of Arkansas Medical Center between August 2005 and April 2008 were randomized to either celecoxib or placebo in a double-blind, 1:1 fashion. The primary end point was change in the monoclonal protein concentration after 6 months. Correlative biomarkers, including IL6 and IL-6R, CD4/CD8+ T-cell ratios, and beta-2 microglobulin, were examined before and after treatment. Celecoxib had no significant effect on the median monoclonal protein concentration, which went from a median of 1. 44 to 1. 65 g/dL with placebo and 2. 42 to 2. 24 g/dL with Celecoxib (p=0. 36), or on any of the analyzed correlative markers (all p-values >0. 34). One patient's monoclonal protein concentration increased on placebo, but he did not require treatment for symptomatic MM. There were no adverse events of Grade 2 or higher. Celecoxib was well tolerated in contrast to previous reports when given in higher doses and in combination with thalidomide. Although accrual was limited we conclude that celecoxib has no clinical or immunologic effect on high risk asymptomatic plasma cell disorders. This study does not support using celecoxib for preventing progression to symptomatic MM. Future studies on progression of MGUS to symptomatic MM would require more patients and a longer follow-up period. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Celecoxib for chemoprophylaxis. Hussein:Celgene: Employment. Reu:Celgene: Research Funding.

Background:The treatment paradigm for multiple myeloma (MM) has evolved rapidly following new drug approvals and combinations. These improvements have the potential to improve outcomes for patients, but only if specialists in hematology/oncology (hem/oncs) have up‐to‐date knowledge on selection of treatments, prevention and management of adverse events (AEs), and comfort with emerging clinical trial data.Aims:We sought to determine if a curriculum of online continuing medical education (CME) activities could improve hem/onc knowledge and competence in treating patients with MM.MethodsThis analysis included hem/onc data from a MM curriculum spanning over 4 years, with 54 activities. For each year of the curriculum, an expert panel identified knowledge/competence gaps to be addressed through CME. Within the analysis, assessment questions were grouped into learning topics and the average for pre and post‐education was calculated for 2016‐2018 of the curriculum for each topic. The analysis elucidated the impact of the curriculum on narrowing gaps in knowledge/competence using a pre/post design. Statistical significance was assessed using a chi‐square statistic (P < .05 level).Results:As of December 2018, the curriculum had reached 33,699 US hem/onc learners and 2144 participated in the outcomes assessment. Treatment Selection: The curriculum significantly improved hem/onc knowledge/competence over time for selecting treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM (pre/post: 2016, 41%/51%, P < .001; 2018, 48%/64%, P < .001). Managing AEs: The curriculum led to sustained knowledge gains for hem/oncs over time related to managing treatment‐related AEs in patients with MM (pre/post: 2016, 39%/53%, P < .001; 2018, 80%/84%, P = .427). Knowledge of Clinical Trial Data: Activities within the curriculum also significantly improved hem/onc knowledge of clinical trial data for consolidation and maintenance therapy (pre/post: 2016, 63%/76%, P < .001; 2017, 68%/74%, P < .05; 2018, 62%/76%, P < .001). Potential Patient Impact: The reach of Medscape Oncology CME has a large impact on how US hem/oncs treat patients with MM. Of all hem/onc specialists with MM diagnostic encounters, 64% are members of Medscape. Additionally, 70% of all high decile (deciles 7‐10) hem/onc specialists with MM diagnostic encounters are members of Medscape. Based on the number of learners for the curriculum and the average number of patient encounters, this education has the potential to impact 33,894 MM patient encounters.[IQVIA Data]Summary/Conclusion:This analysis shows that online CME, as part of a sustained educational curriculum, using various formats (video, text, panel discussion, case‐based) can significantly improve the knowledge and competence of hem/oncs in multiple areas related to MM. Statistically significant gains in knowledge and competence selecting treatment for R/R MM were seen even with the introduction of new clinical evidence in this area. The analysis also shows the potential impact on patients and the large reach that is achievable with online education. As new therapies and combinations of treatments continue to change practice, additional education is needed to aid hem/oncs in staying abreast of new data, managing AEs, and tailoring therapy selection for individual patients with MM.