Hogan, William J.

Abstract Background: Allogeneic Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is potentially curative therapy for MDS and AML. Although the median age at presentation is >65 years, most patients receiving HCT for these disorders are young (<60years). With the availability of Reduced Intensity Conditioning (RIC) many older patients are able to undergo HCT. The older age group is the most rapidly increasing cohort in CIBMTR registry. We analyzed the outcomes of AML and MDS patients' ≥ 60 years who received allogeneic sibling or unrelated donor HCT at our institution between 2009 and 2014. We also evaluated the influence of patient-, disease-, and transplant related factors on outcomes. Methods: Prospectively collected data available in the BMT databases at Mayo Clinic Florida, Arizona and Rochester as well as individual patient charts were reviewed after IRB approval. Patients with MDS or AML in complete remission at the time of transplant were included; those with active disease, induction failure, or prior transplant were excluded. HCT-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) and the disease risk index (DRI- Armand et al. Blood 2012) was noted. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Associations with survival were explored using single variable Cox-regression modeling and log-rank tests. Results: 80 patients were included; 68 AML and 12 MDS. 31 (39%) were male. Median age 66 years (range 60-75). 33%, 52%, and 13% patients had ECOG status of 0, 1, >2, respectively. Thirty-seven patients (46%) had low or intermediate DRI and 43(54%) had high DRI. Twenty-two (28%), 24 (30%), and 34 (43%) patients had HCT-CI of 0, 1, or >2. There were equal number of sibling and unrelated donors; 85% were full HLA match and 15% with 1 or 2 mismatches; mean age of the donors was 52years (range18-74). Transplant conditioning was fludarabine-containing reduced intensity regimens in 78 (97%), 2 patients received myeloablative conditioning. The source of stem cells was peripheral blood in all patients. A median of 5.87 x10^6 CD34/kg donor cells were infused (range 1.58-10.92 X10^6). All patients received calcineurin inhibitor based GVHD prophylaxis (tacrolimus 56%, cyclosporine 44%); 6 patients also received ATG. The median follow up of survivors was 13 months. Kaplan Meier estimate of overall survival at 100 days, 1 year, and 2 years was 90%, 64%, and 55%. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years was 19.5%, 22.3%, and 27.1%. Relapse free survival at 2 years was 50%. The non-relapse/ treatment related mortality at 6 months, 1 year and 2 years was 11.7%, 15.9% and 15.9%. The rate of acute grade 2-4 GVHD was 30% and chronic GVHD was 39%. Univariate analysis identified secondary disease (compared to de novo) and high DRI(compared to low/intermediate) to be associated with worse mortality - HR 2.54 (1.31-4.93; P = 0.006), and 2.31 (1.13-4.73; P = 0.021), respectively. Probability of overall survival at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years for patients with de novo disease (n=57) vs. secondary disease (n=23) was 87.1% vs. 64.5%, 71.1 vs. 45.6%, and 63.2 vs. 32.6%, respectively; P= 0.006. There was no effect of donor age, donor type or degree of mis-match on the survival. Conclusion: Allogeneic HCT is feasible in older patients with MDS and AML utilizing reduced intensity conditioning regimens with acceptable outcomes that are comparable to published results in younger patients. Patients with high DRI and secondary disease have poorer overall survival as compared to those with de novo disease and low/intermediate disease risk index. These data support other studies that age alone does not negatively influence transplant outcomes. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 3231 Poster Board III-168 Background Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are the preferred graft type for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and mobilization is typically done using growth factor (GF) alone or a combination of chemotherapy (CTX) and GF. The success of mobilization is influenced by several factors such as prior therapy and mobilization strategy. Patients (Pts) failing to mobilize successfully often have GF dose increased and if unsuccessful, mobilization reattempted with chemotherapy + GF or G-CSF (Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor) + GM-CSF (Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor). More recently, plerixafor, a CXCR4 inhibitor, has been found to enhance G-CSF based collection allowing potential early intervention in poor mobilizers. However, this approach requires valid cut-points for peripheral CD34 counts (pCD34) for cost efficient use. Methods We studied 910 first time, G-CSF based PBSC mobilizers with MM (565; 62%), or light chain amyloidosis (345; 38%). Salvage attempts were excluded, as were first attempts using CTX+GCSF, plerixafor or GF combinations. Sensitivity-specificity analysis (ROC) was used to define ideal cut-points for predefined outcomes. We used a CD34 yield of 2 million/kg as the minimum required collection and 4 million/kg as the ideal collection for this analysis. Our current practice is to initiate collection at a pCD34 of 10/uL. Results We first determined the best day 1 pCD34 cutoff for being able to collect at least 2 million/kg PBSC to be 9.2/uL. Among those with ≥9.2/uL, only 1.6% failed to collect at least 2 million compared to 27% among the rest (P < 0.001). These numbers were 1.7% and 25% respectively using the traditional cutoff of 10/uL. We then examined how the pCD34 on day 2 predicted collection, among those failing to reach the current threshold of 10/uL. Among this group, a pCD34 on day 2 of 8/uL was the best cutoff to predict a collection of 2 million/kg. Among those with >8/uL, only 9% failed to collect at least 2 million compared to 48% among the rest (P < 0.001). Among those with day 1 pCD34 < 10, 65% achieved a count of 8/uL on day 2. We then examined what pCD34 on day 1 can best predict a pCD34 ≥ 8 on day 2 and found this to be 5/uL. Among those with day 1 pCD34 ≥ 5/uL, 92% reached day 2 pCD34 ≥ 8 compared to 36% among the rest (P < 0.001).We then determined cutoffs based on ideal targets using only those patients achieving pCD34 count > 10/uL by day 2, since these patients would have started collection without any change in the mobilization technique. We used a maximum of 5 collections to achieve the goal as being ideal, taking into account the most commonly used practice of collecting during weekdays. We examined cutoffs both for a target of 4, 8 and 12 million/kg for one, two or three transplants respectively. Among those with a day 1 or day 2 pCD34 > 10/uL 98% collected 4 million/kg in 5 collections. The best day 1 or day 2 pCD34 predicting a 8 million/kg yield in 5 collections was 21.4/uL and a 12 million/kg yield was 27.9/uL. Among those with day 1or 2 pCD34 ≥ 21.4/uL, 90% collected 8 million compared to 54% among those with pCD34 < 21.4/uL. Similarly, among those with day 1 or 2 pCD34 ≥ 27.9/uL, 79% reached 12 million in ≤ 5 days compared to 17% among those with pCD34 < 27.9/uL (P < 0.001).Finally we examined if poor collection on first day, despite a pCD34 > 10 predicts for poor overall yield. A ratio of day 1 collection (million/kg) to pCD34 day 1 or 2 < 5×104 was highly predictive of failure to get eventual yield of 2 million/kg, with 38% below the cutoff failing to reach the goal compared to 2% for those above the cutoff. Conclusions This study provides an estimate of optimal pCD34 count thresholds for early identification of patients at high risk of collection failure. It is reasonable to use the first or second day pCD34 count, since a substantial proportion of patients will achieve the threshold value by day 2 and have similar outcome as those reaching the threshold by day 1. Based on the results here, interventions such as plerixafor can be considered if pCD34 count is < 5/uL on day 1 or < 9/uL by day 2, to achieve the minimum collection of 2 million/kg. However, in order to achieve the ideal targets, a higher threshold should be considered and the recommendation would be 17/uL, and 28/uL for target of 8 or 12 million respectively. Finally, identification of poor mobilizers after start of collection potentially provides another time point for early intervention, and this needs to be prospectively studied. Disclosures Micallef: Genzyme: Research Funding. Gertz:Genzyme: Research Funding. Kumar:Celgene,Genzyme,Millenium,Novartis,Bayer,: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 2911 Poster Board II-887 BACKGROUND: Pomalidomide (POM) is an immune modulatory drug (IMiD® Immunomodulatory compound) recently shown to improve anemia in subjects with myelofibrosis (MF) in an adaptive phase-2 trial (0.5 mg or 2.0 mg/d with or without prednisone; Tefferi et. al. JCO 2009)). There were no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) observed. No other MF-features (splenomegaly, fibrosis) were identified/improved even at the highest dose. We performed a subsequent dose-escalation trial to determine whether higher doses of POM are effective and well tolerated. METHODS: The trial was classic 3 × 3 design on pts with symptomatic MF (anemia and/or symptomatic splenomegaly). POM was started at dose of 2.5 mg/days (d) for 21 d every 28 d. Dose increased in cohorts by 0.5 mg/d were done if no subject had a DLT (≥grade-4 hematologic toxicity, ≥grade-3 febrile neutropenia or ≥grade-3 non-hematologic toxicity) in cycle-1. Subsequent cohorts were enrolled until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached (dose level before that resulting in DLT in >1 of 6 subjects). In the phase 2 portion, subjects were treated at the MTD, those without response at the MTD after 3 cycles were lowered to the minimal effective dose (MED) of 0.5mg/d. RESULTS: Subjects: 19 subjects with MF were enrolled 06/2008-03/2009. 14 had primary MF, 3 post-polycythemia vera MF, and 2 post-essential thrombocythemia MF. Median age was 67 y (range, 43-83 y), 11 were female (58%). 16 had a JAK2-V617F mutation. 11 were RBC-transfusion–dependent (58%). 16 subjects had palpable splenomegaly, median 12.5 cm below the LCM (range, 1-26 cm). Median time since diagnosis was 24 mo (range, 1-173 mo). 15 were considered intermediate-high risk by IWG-MRT IPSS (Cervantes et al, Blood, 2009). Phase-1: 3 subjects each were enrolled at the 2.5 mg/d, 3.0 g/d, and 3.5 g/d mg dose cohorts. A DLT (bone marrow suppression) was seen at the 3.5 mg/d level. 3 additional subjects received 3.0 mg/d level cohort confirming this dose as the MTD. Phase-2: 10 additional subjects were enrolled at the MTD of 3.0mg/d. No improvement in anemia was seen, possibly because of bone marrow suppression. Consequently, the dose was decreased to 0.5mg/d in 7 subjects (2 remain on 3.0mg). 9 subjects remain on POM (all but 2 at 0.5mg/d. 104 cycles have been given (median, 4/ subject; range, 2-11). 10 subjects, all at ≥2.5mg/d discontinued because of lack of response/ withdrawal of consent (N=5), progression (N=4) or unrelated worsening co-morbidities (N=1). Toxicity: Dose-related bone marrow suppression was the main toxicity. 10/19 subjects had grade-3/-4 neutropenia (N=8) and/or thrombocytopenia (=3) and was only observed at doses ≥2.5mg/d. No substantial bone marrow suppression at 0.5m/d. Non-hematologic toxicity was uncommon at any dose level with grade-3 fatigue at 3.0mg/d in 1 subject. Efficacy: There was clinical benefit in 9 subjects. 7 subjects achieved an IWG-MRT response (Tefferi et al, Blood, 2006) including clinical improvement (CI) in anemia (N=6; rbc-transfusion-independence or hemoglobin increase >2g/dL for ≥2 mo) and/or splenomegaly (N=2; ≥50% reduction of palpable component for ≥2 months). 2 subjects had improved anemia below the IWG-MRT CI-threshold. Clinical benefit occurred after a median of 3.8 mo (range, 2.1-9.2 mo), and only after reduction to 0.5mg/d in 7 responders including both with spleen responses. There were 2 responses amongst 11 subjects receiving ≥2.5 mg/d compared to 7 of 8 subjects receiving '1.0mg/d. These responses occurred a median of 1 cycle after dose reduction (1-3 months). Responses were durable: 8 of 9 responders continue on-study. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with myelofibrosis, POM doses ≥2 mg/d are associated with moderate to severe bone marrow suppression. Response occurred at doses ≥2 mg/d primarily after dose reduction to 0.5 mg/d where bone marrow suppression was infrequent. The authors suggest 0.5 mg/d as the preferred doses for a phase-3 trial. Disclosures: Litzow: Enzon: Honoraria, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 3211 Poster Board III-148 Although autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become standard of care for many patients with hematologic malignancies, many patients fail to collect a minimum number of CD34 + stem cells to support high dose chemotherapy and ASCT. Recently, plerixafor, a CXCR4 antagonist, was FDA approved for use in combination with G-CSF for autologous peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in patients with NHL or Multiple Myeloma. In February 2009, we commenced a risk adapted approach to the utilization of plerixafor. The study was restricted to patients mobilized with GCSF alone and patients undergoing chemotherapy primed PBSC mobilization were excluded. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization was commenced with G-CSF at 10 mcg/kg/day. On day 4, a peripheral blood (PB) CD34 count was measured. For patients whose PB CD34 was ≥10/μL, apheresis was commenced the following morning. For patients whose PB CD34 was <10/μL, it was measured again on day 5; if ≥10/μL then apheresis was commenced the following morning. If PB CD34 was <10/μL on day 5, plerixafor (0.24 mg/kg sc) was administered on the evening of day 5 and apheresis was commenced the following day (Group A). In addition, during apheresis, for patients whose collection yield was < 0.5 × 106 CD34/kg, in the absence of instrument failure or problems with the collection procedure, plerixafor was added (Group B). Morning administration of G-CSF and evening dosing of plerixafor continued daily until apheresis was complete. From February to July 2009, 174 mobilization attempts occurred; 27 with chemotherapy and 147 with cytokines alone. The 147 pts who underwent mobilization with cytokines alone are presented here. The underlying diagnosis was as follows: Myeloma 61 pts, NHL 54 pts, Amyloid 17 pts, Hodgkin 10 pts, POEMS 4 pts and 1 pt with a solid tumor. For the entire group the median number of CD34 cells collected was 5.5 × 106 CD34/kg (range 0.1-17). The median number of apheresis was 3 (range 1-12). 67 patients (46%) received plerixafor; 37 patients started plerixafor during mobilization (Group A) and 30 patients during collections due to a poor yield (Group B). 12 pts of the 37 received plerixafor on day 4 because of prior mobilization failure or high risk of mobilization failure and are included in Group A. Table 1 outlines the details of mobilization and collection by groups. By disease category, of the 61 patients with MM, 28 (46%) received plerixafor (8 Group A and 20 Group B). Median apheresis in all the MM pts was 2 (range 1-12) with a total of 6.8 × 106 CD34/kg (2.2-16.7). In the 54 NHL pts, 32 (59%) received plerixafor (24 Group A and 8 Group B). Median apheresis for all pts with NHL was 3 (range 1-7) with a total of 4.6 × 106 CD34/kg (range 0-11.4). Overall, only 7 of 147 (5%) mobilization attempts failed to achieve a minimum of 2 × 106 CD34/kg. This compares to a 22% failure rate prior to institution of this risk adapted approach. In conclusion, implementing this risk adapted approach allows poor mobilizers to be identified promptly and for plerixafor to be initiated during mobilization and collection, thereby reducing the number of mobilization failures. In patients who predictably would not have successful collection based on a PB CD34 <10/μL, addition of plerixafor results in a majority of patients achieving an adequate collection. This risk adapted approach may be more cost effective than reattempting mobilization after a prior failure or utilizing combination G-CSF and plerixafor for upfront mobilization. Table 1. Mobilization and Collection data. All patients N=147 Group A1 N=37 Group B2 N=30 No Plerixafor N=80 PB CD34 day 4 Median 11 0 7 19 Range 0-331 0-7 0-32 0-331 PB CD34 day 5 Median 10 4.5 12 15 Range 0-51 2-9 11-23 9-51 Apheresis Yield Median 5.5 4.4 6.0 6.2 Range 0.1-17 3.1-12.7 3.0-12.2 2-17 Number of Apheresis Median 3 3 5 2 Range 1-12 1-7 4-12 1-8 Days of Plerixafor Median n/a 3 2 n/a Rang 1-7 1-8 1 Group A – Plerixafor initiated prior to apheresis 2 Group B – Plerixafor initiated during apheresis Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background: Obesity is a prevalent health problem and significant heterogeneity is seen in the body weight and BMI among adult patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). At least two critical steps of the SCT are influenced by the body weight. Stem cell collection targets are usually determined based on the actual body weight and conditioning chemotherapy doses are usually determined based on corrected ideal body weight. One could hypothesize that since the stem cells home to bone marrow, the ideal body weight (IBW) being based on the height may be a better indicator of the stem cell numbers required rather than the actual body weight (ABW). Since chemotherapy doses are calculated based on corrected ideal body weight, and the volume of distribution is higher in obese patients, these patients may have decreased drug exposure and hence a higher risk of progression. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the engraftment kinetics and response outcome of 306 SCTs done at our institution between March 1998 and October 2001. These included patients who had undergone SCT for multiple myeloma (46%), NHL (34%), HD (6%) and AL amyloidosis (14%). Body weight, height, stem cell dose and engraftment data was obtained from medical records. The stem cell dose received was calculated based on their ABW as well as IBW and correlated with the time to white cell and platelet engraftment. We also evaluated the effect of BMI on the progression free survival after the stem cell transplant using various cut offs. Results: The mean (range) for the ABW, IBW and BMI were 46.6 kg to 189 Kg; 45.5 kg to 94 kg; and 17.5 to 55.8 respectively. Using logistic regression, we estimated the ability of CD34 cell dose by actual and ideal body weight to predict the likelihood of platelet engraftment (50,000) by day 21 post transplant. The coefficients using both the doses were very similar (.391 for ideal and 0.361 for actual). Using Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC analysis); we determined the stem cell dose cutoff that best predicted for failure to engraft neutrophils by 21 days post transplantation, median CD34 dose by ABW of 3.6 million/Kg and by IBW of 4.2 million/Kg. Similarly, for failure to engraft platelets by day 30 the cutoffs were 2.89 million/Kg by actual weight and 3.77 million/kg by ideal weight. Among the individuals with actual body weight more than 25% of ideal body weight (n=122, 40%), we calculated the optimal total CD34 dose required and compared to the actual dose infused using both the cutoff sets (286 million vs. 446 million, P < 0.001 using ANC cutoff and 251 million vs. 446 million using the platelet cutoff, P < 0.001). We then examined the effect of BMI on progression free and overall survival from transplant. The progression free and overall survival post transplant was similar for patients with BMI over 30 kg/m2 compared to those below this cutoff. There was no difference when patients with myeloma or lymphoma were studied separately. Conclusion: This study, as in previous studies, confirms that stem cell dose determined on the basis of ideal body weight is comparable to that by actual body weight in terms of engraftment kinetics. In patients significantly above the ideal body weight, it is reasonable to use a target based on ideal body weight which will allow for collection of less numbers of CD34 cells, thus conserving resources. Among patient undergoing stem cell transplant, the practice of using corrected ideal body weight does not appear to compromise the outcome of stem cell transplant.

Abstract Introduction L-asparaginase therapy results in systemic depletion of antithrombin (AT) and fibrinogen (FG), resulting in thrombotic (TE) and hemorrhagic events (HE). Prophylactic correction of coagulation disturbances have been inconclusive with regard to cost effectiveness, and specifically cost effectiveness of antithrombin concentrate (ATC) replacement has not been evaluated. (Abbott et al, 2009, Mitchell et al, 2003). Currently, AT repletion is recommended for levels less than 60%. (Stock et al, 2012) Several treatment protocols with distinctly different L-asparaginase (LAS) or pegaspargase (PEG) doses complicate the frequency and intensity of ATC replacement. We carried out this study to evaluate the cost effectiveness of ATC replacement, based on our institutional practice. Methods This single center, retrospective, observational study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and conducted at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Consecutive adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of ALL receiving LAS or PEG between January 2000 and October 2012 were evaluated. Patients with hereditary or acquired thrombophilias or pre-existing TE or HE, were excluded. Per institutional guidelines, ATC was administered if levels were less than 70%. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid (CMS) single drug historical pricing guide was utilized for 2000-2004. ATC cost beginning January 1, 2005, was derived from the CMS average sales price, reported quarterly. To adjust for price differences due to regimen utilization trends, each dose was also calculated at the final 2012 cost of 3.05/unit. ATC repletion practices and estimated expenditures were compared between regimens. Results Fifty four patients were treated with LAS or PEG containing regimens. Of these, 47 (87%) received ATC. Twenty-eight patients received LASP, 22 received PEGASP and 4 received both. Distribution across protocols was; CALGB 9111 (n=20, Larson et al, 1998), E2993 (n=13, Goldstone et al, 2008), C10403 (n=9, NLM: NCT00558519), CCG 1941 (n=7, Gaynon et al, 2006) and Augmented HyperCVAD (n=5, Faderl et al, 2005). PEG and LAS dosing schemes are outlined in table 1 . LAS doses were converted to PEG upon specific protocol revision or at discontinuation of LAS availability in 2012. Regimens specified a dose cap with the exception of C10403. A total of 399 LAS and PEG doses resulted in 378 instances of ATC repletion. The reimbursement price of ATC in 2000 was estimated at 1.50/unit U.S. dollars (USD) and 3.04/unit USD by the fourth quarter of 2012. The total estimated average sales price was 2,471,745 USD over the study period. C10403 resulted in the highest median number of PEG doses per patient (n = 5) and a median of 17 ATC doses per dose of PEG. This resulted in C10403 being the most expensive regimen with the median expense for ATC replacement being 118,064 USD (chart 1). This conclusion was also seen after comparing different regimens using the most recent 2012 cost estimates. The overall incidence of TE or HE was 17% and equally distributed between regimens (please see accompanying abstract). Conclusions Repletion of ATC in patients receiving asparaginase containing chemotherapy regimens is very expensive and continues to add to costs at many centers, without clear benefit, especially with regards to TE and HE. A prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trial looking to answer this question is the need of the hour. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematologic disorder that was classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a myelodysplastic/ myeloproliferative overlap disease. Cytogenetic abnormalities have a significant prognostic role in many hematologic neoplasms, but their prognostic value in CMML has been debatable. Recently, monosomal karyotype (MK) has been reported to be a marker of poor prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and primary myelofibrosis, but its value in CMML is unknown. Aim To study MK effect on clinical outcome for patients diagnosed with CMML Method A retrospective study of all cases diagnosed with CMML at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 1994 to 2011 was performed. Only pts with complete cytogenetic analysis at presentation to our institution were included. MK was defined as the presence of ≥ 2 autosomal monosomies or one autosomal monosomy with at least one structural abnormality (Breems et al, JCO 2008). CK was defined as the presence of at least 3 chromosomal abnormalities. Appropriate IRB approval was obtained in accordance with Helsinki declaration. Comparison between groups’ medians was done using Wilcoxon test, while survival estimates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves using JMP V9. Results A total of 262 pts diagnosed with CMML had available cytogenetic data at diagnosis. Median age was 72 years, 176 (67%) were male. Median hemoglobin 10.5 g/dL, white blood cells (wbc) 12 x109/L, platelet 89 x109/L, peripheral blood (PB) blast 0, and bone marrow (BM) blast 4%. CMML2 was seen in 9% while 47% were proliferative (wbc >13). Leukemic transformation was documented in 34 pts (13%). Median overall survival was 513 days. Cytogenetic (CG) analysis was diploid in 167 pts (64%). Trisomy 8 was the most frequent cytogenetic abnormality at 8% (22), followed by complex karyotype (CK) 5% (14), then -7 at 4% (10) and MK 3% (7, six of which were also CK). Comparing pts with diploid CG to other categories indicates: to abnormal CG pts had lower wbc (0.001), PB blasts (p<0.0001), and BM blasts (p=0.0001); to CK pts had lower PB blasts (p=0.003) and higher platelets (p=0.03); to -7 pts had lower wbc (p=0.005), PB blast (p=0.0004), BM blasts (p=0.03) and higher platelets (p=0.03); to +8 pts had lower PB blast (p=0.02) and BM blasts (p= 0.01); no difference was noted when compared to MK. Median OS was statistically significantly worse in MK+ vs MK- (24 vs 527 days, p= 0.002), but not in other comparisons: -7 vs others (250 vs 527 days, p=0.2), CK+ vs CK- (256 vs 527 days, p=0.05), diploid vs others (570 vs 365 days, p=0.1), +8 vs others (312 vs 527 days, p=0.1). Pts with MK+ only or MK+CK+ did worse than CK+ only or other groups (4, 63, 304, 527 days, respectively, p<0.0001). On a multivariate analysis, MK+ (in addition to platelet, BM blast, hemoglobin, and wbc) did have an impact on OS (p=0.0004), while CK+, -7, +8, diploid CG, age, PB blast did not. Conclusion Cytogenetic abnormalities were not frequent findings in pts diagnosed with CMML (36%), but did affect wbc, PB and BM blasts. The most common cytogenetic abnormality was +8 while MK was present at 3% (less than published data in MDS). Only MK predicted statistically significant shorter mOS between all other cytogenetic categories on both univariate and multivariate analysis. This finding needs to be validated by larger cohorts of pts due to its rare occurrence in CMML. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1178 Poster Board I-200 Background: High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) has been shown to be of value in selected patients with malignant lymphoma and multiple myeloma (MM). Both granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GMCSF) and granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) are widely used following stem cell transplantation to support accelerated myeloid recovery and potentially shorten hospital stay. In the recent years, PBSCT is increasingly done in an ambulatory care setting and it is not clear if routine growth factor use has any potential benefit. We undertook this study to compare engraftment kinetics, incidence of febrile episodes, hospitalization duration and other outcomes among transplants done with or without growth factor support Patients and Methods: We included adult patients undergoing PBSCT for myeloma and lymphoma between May 2007 and June 2009 in an ambulatory care setting. Prior to April 2008 (Group-1) all patients received GMCSF 500 mcg/ day starting on day 6 routinely. Since April 2008, there was a shift in clinical practice and routine use of GMCSF was discontinued due to lack of clear evidence regarding benefit. Patients transplanted between April 2008 and June 2009 did not routinely receive GMCSF (Group-2). Typical conditioning regimen for lymphoma was BEAM (BCNU, Etoposide, Cytosine Arabinose, Melphalan) and for multiple myeloma was melphalan 200mg/m2. Patients' demographics details, indication for PBSCT, duration of neutropenic fever, hospital stay, and neutrophil and platelet engraftment were collected from electronic medical records. Neutrophil engraftment is defined as the first day of 2 consecutive days when ANC was > 0.5 × 109/L and platelet engraftment is defined as first of 7 consecutive days on which patient's unsupported platelet count was greater than 20× 109/L. Results: A total of 309 were included in this study, 126 (40%) patients in group-1 (69 with MM, 57 with lymphoma) and 183 (60%) in group-2 (100 with MM, 83 with lymphoma). In group-1, 73 (58%) and in group-2 130 (71%) were male patients. Median age was 59 (29-74) years in group 1 and 58 (24-76) years in group-2. Patients in group 1 received a median of 3.65 (1.1-8.7) versus 4.37 (1.1-9.54) CD34+ x106/kg in group 2 (P =0.005). Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 12 (95% CI 12, 12) for group-1 and 14 (95% CI; 13-14) for group-2 (Kaplan Meier analysis; log rank P < 0.0001). Median estimated time to platelet engraftment was 14 days (95% CI; 13, 15) for group 1 and 13 days (95% CI; 13-13) for group 2 (Kaplan Meier analysis; log rank P 0.007). In group-1 98 (78%) patients developed febrile episodes compared to 117(64%) in group-2 (P = 0.009). Median duration of fever was 2 days (range, 1-8) in group-1 compared to 1 day (range, 1-8) in group-2 (P = 0.0003). The median (range) duration of hospital stay was 7 (1-40) days for group-1 compared to 8 (2-56) days for group-2 (P=NS). There was no significant difference in mortality between these two groups. Conclusion: Routine use of granulocyte growth factors is associated with a shorter time to neutrophil engraftment, but associated with a delay in platelet engraftment. The longer time to neutrophil engraftment without growth factor use does not translate into any increase in frequency of febrile episodes. On the contrary, higher number of febrile days is seen with use of growth factors, likely explained on the basis of drug fever. No difference in the frequency of engraftment syndrome or treatment related mortality was seen. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract BACKGROUND: We have previously reported on the therapeutic value of low-dose thalidomide in combination with prednisone (THAL-PRED) for the treatment of both anemia and thrombocytopenia in MMM (Blood2003;101:2534), with response rates of 62% and 75% for each cytopenia respectively. Alkylators have long been shown to have palliative benefit in MMM, however are used judiciously as long-term use could increase likelihood of leukemic transformation. Additionally, oral cyclophosphamide has been shown to synergize with thalidomide and steroids in the treatment of myeloma (Garcia-Sanz et. al. Leukemia2004;18:856–863). In the current study, we investigated the value of adding oral cyclophosphamide to THAL-PRED for MMM (TPC). METHODS: Study eligibility criteria included a histologically confirmed diagnosis of MMM and either severe anemia (hemoglobin < 10 g/dL) or symptomatic splenomegaly. Protocol treatment was initiated with 50 mg of oral thalidomide (THAL) daily, oral cyclophosphamide (CTX) 25 mg daily for three months, and a three month prednisone taper starting at 0.5 mg/kg/day for the first month followed by a 50% reduction for the second months and a further 50% reduction for the third and final month of treatment with prednisone. Patients with a demonstrable clinical response after three months were able to remain on thalidomide alone as maintenance. Responses were assessed by the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria for MMM clinical responses (Tefferi et. al. Blood 2006; epub May 2006). RESULTS: 13 patients were enrolled to the trial (median age 73 years, range, 46–80; 7 males). Six patients (46%) completed the planned three cycles (i.e. 12 weeks) of treatment, the remaining seven patients discontinued treatment early for the following reasons: progression (n=3), patient choice (n=2), other medical problem (n=1) and died on study (n=1). After the initial 3 months of treatment, 3/13 (23%) patients evidenced a response (n = 1) or stable disease (n = 2) and continued on an additional three months of THAL alone. At enrollment, nine patients (69%) were anemic (8 of whom (62%) were red cell transfusion dependent). Ten patients (77%) were at least moderately thrombocytopenic (platelet count < 100 x 109//L). Eight patients (62%) had palpable hepatomegaly/splenomegaly, and five patients (38%) had severe constitutional symptoms (night sweats). According to IWG-MRT criteria for MMM the best responses observed from therapy was a CI (clinical improvement) in 2 individuals (one each for anemia (1/9 patients (11%); and thrombocytopenia (1/10 patients (10%)). No clear responses in organomegaly or constitutional symptoms were observed. The regimen overall was well tolerated with toxicities in excess of grade 2 all being related to myelosuppression (anemia (n=2), neutropenia (n=2), and thrombocytopenia (n=3)). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study of combination therapy with thalidomide-prednisone-cyclophosphamide in patients with MMM strongly suggests that the addition of the alkylator cyclophosphamide largely negates the clinical benefits of THAL-PRED. This observation supports the potential immunologic mechanism of THAL-PRED benefit in MMM, and cautions against potential combinations of immunological and cytotoxic therapy in this disorder.

Abstract Background: Treatment-related AML (t-AML) accounts for 10 to 20% of all AML cases and carries an especially poor prognosis (Kayser et al. 2011, Godley et al. 2008). Patients diagnosed with t-AML are likely to have abnormal cytogenetic profiles with chromosome changes that are predictive of an aggressive malignancy, poor response to therapy, and decreased overall survival(Smith et al. 2003). The simultaneous use of multiple chemotherapeutic agents of different classes makes it increasingly difficult to predict risk for developing t-AML and determining disease course. An updated analysis of predictive factors for t-AML is needed so clinicians can more accurately inform patients of their prognosis. The aim of this study was to classify t-AML according to primary malignancy, previous chemotherapy exposure, and cytogenetic profile. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients that were diagnosed with AML at Mayo Clinic from 7/1/1990 to 5/13/2015 was performed following IRB approval. AML patients found to have a previous malignancy treated with chemotherapy were classified as t-AML. Chemotherapeutics were classified as alkylating agents, antimetabolites, anti-tubulin agents, and topoisomerase II inhibitors. Patients diagnosed with a myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative disorder prior to development of AML were excluded from this study. Previous chemotherapy exposures, duration of chemotherapy exposure, complete blood count, chromosome abnormalities, and survival data were collected for t-AML cases. Cytogenetic changes were classified as favorable, intermediate, and adverse according to the system used by Kayser et al. 2011. JMP 10.0 was used for statistical analysis. Results: Out of 584 patients, 64 patients (11%) had a primary malignancy that was treated with chemotherapy prior to being diagnosed with AML. The most common primary malignancies were breast cancer (31%), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (27%), colorectal cancer (8%), and Hodgkin lymphoma (8%). Laboratory findings showed median hemoglobin 9.6 g/dL (4.7-13.8), median white blood cells 3.2 x109 (0.6-126), median platelets 50x109 (3-320), median peripheral blood blasts of 8% (0-91), and median bone marrow blasts 38% (1-94). 95% of patients diagnosed with t-AML had been previously treated with an alkylating agent. Additional exposure to an anti-metabolite trended towards a more adverse cytogenetic profile (χ2=5.0, p=0.08) but there was not a statistically significant decrease in overall survival (KM analysis, p=0.31). The median overall survival for patients diagnosed with t-AML was 10.2 months compared to 19.2 months for patients with de-novo AML (KM analysis, p=0.04). Adverse cytogenetic profiles were associated with decreased survival (KM analysis, p <0.0001). However, there was no difference in overall survival between patients with t-AML that had intermediate cytogenetics and those with de-novo AML (KM analysis, p=0.36). None of the chemotherapy classes other than antimetabolites were associated with poor cytogenetics or survival when combined with an alkylating agent. Conclusion: Over half of all patients classified as having t-AML in this study received prior chemotherapy for breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cytogenetic classification of t-AML into favorable, intermediate and adverse groups is useful in predicting disease course. Interestingly, t-AML patients with intermediate risk cytogenetics had similar overall survival to patients with de-novo AML. This suggests that the poor outcomes observed in patients with t-AML is predominantly due to the subset with adverse cytogenetics. Thus, cytogenetic analysis remains the best indicator of overall survival regardless of chemotherapy exposure. Additional work is needed to delineate the risk associated with the aforementioned chemotherapy classes. Disclosures Al-Kali: Celgene: Research Funding.