Grothey, Axel

522 Background: Metformin inhibits mTOR and downstream pathways involved in cell proliferation and survival by inducing AMPK activation. Although its use has been associated with decreased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC), the effect of metformin on cancer related mortality is unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of published observational studies evaluating metformin use in patients with CRC and its association with overall and CRC-specific survival. Methods: Through a systematic search of PubMed and conference presentations (cut-off: August 2013), we identified 8 observational studies (18,537 total patients with CRC; 6242 CRC patients with DM) reporting the association between metformin use and survival after diagnosis of CRC. Summary hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was estimated using the random effects model, and heterogeneity was measured using the inconsistency index (I2). Results: On meta-analysis, metformin use was associated with a 34% reduction in mortality in CRC patients as compared to non-use (adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.81), albeit with high heterogeneity (I2=66.9%). After exclusion of one study, which contributed to considerable heterogeneity, a 28% reduction in mortality was considered a more conservative, consistent effect estimate (adjusted HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64-0.81), with minimal heterogeneity (I2=16.2%). On restricting analysis only to patients with DM, use of metformin (vs non-use) was associated with decreased all-cause mortality (6 studies; adjusted HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and CRC-specific mortality (3 studies; adjusted HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.50-0.87). Conclusions: Based on meta-analysis of observational studies, the use of metformin in diabetic patients with CRC appears to be associated with reduced all-cause mortality and CRC-specific mortality. Further prospective investigation of metformin’s effect on outcome in CRC patients is warranted.

479 Background: Recent long-term clinical trial follow-up suggests that adding Ox to a fluoropyrimidine (FP) may provide less benefit in adjuvant CC than originally believed (Tournigand JCO 2012). In addition, emerging data on tissue biomarkers such as microsatellite mismatch repair (MMR) and the 12-gene Recurrence Score (RS) suggest these assays may be helpful in better defining treatment benefit, and a new report provides evidence that RS may specifically predict the value of Ox. (O’Connell ASCO 2012) In view of these developments we sought to document current use of adjuvant chemotherapy and physician perceptions about these decisions. Methods: US-based oncologists were recruited to complete a survey and contribute treatment data for their last 3 patients (pts) with stage II disease and last pt with a stage III tumor. Results: 25 gastrointestinal cancer clinical investigators and 77 practicing oncologists participated, providing data from a total of 408 cases (92% treated since 2011). Findings from the 2 groups are similar and are presented in aggregate. A median of 9 and 15 pts annually were evaluated with stage II and III tumors, respectively. Clinicians stated that they require a median of a 5% absolute reduction in relapse rate to use a FP alone and an additional 5% reduction to add Ox. Ox/FP was administered to 95 of 102 pts with stage III tumors (93%) and 85 of 306 pts with stage II disease (28%), particularly to those under age 70 or with T4 tumors (Table). MMR was evaluated in 127 pts (42%) with stage II and 20 pts (20%) with stage III disease. RS was obtained for 46 pts (15%) with stage II tumors, but only 2 pts (2%) with stage III. Conclusions: Adjuvant Ox is employed extensively in spite of the fact that it may provide less benefit than many oncologists report requiring to initiate its use. However, several recent research developments may be laying the groundwork for a change in this treatment practice. [Table: see text]

PurposeProgression-free survival (PFS) has previously been established as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Because mCRC treatment has advanced in the last decade with extended OS, this surrogacy requires re-examination.MethodsIndividual patient data from 16,762 patients were available from 22 first-line mCRC studies conducted from 1997 to 2006; 12 of those studies tested antiangiogenic and/or anti–epidermal growth factor receptor agents. The relationship between PFS (first event of progression or death) and OS was evaluated by using R2statistics (the closer the value is to 1, the stronger the correlation) from weighted least squares regression of trial-specific hazard ratios estimated by using Cox and Copula models.ResultsForty-four percent of patients received a regimen that included biologic agents. Median first-line PFS was 8.3 months, and median OS was 18.2 months. The correlation between PFS and OS was modest (R2, 0.45 to 0.69). Analyses limited to trials that tested treatments with biologic agents, nonstrategy trials, or superiority trials did not improve surrogacy.ConclusionIn modern mCRC trials, in which survival after the first progression exceeds time to first progression, a positive but modest correlation was observed between OS and PFS at both the patient and trial levels. This finding demonstrates the substantial variability in OS introduced by the number of lines of therapy and types of effective subsequent treatments and the associated challenge to the use of OS as an end point to assess the benefit attributable to a single line of therapy. PFS remains an appropriate primary end point for first-line mCRC trials to detect the direct treatment effect of new agents.

Abstract Purpose: Clinical trials are expensive and lengthy, where success of a given trial depends on observing a prospectively defined number of patient events required to answer the clinical question. The point at which this analysis time occurs depends on both patient accrual and primary event rates, which typically vary throughout the trial's duration. We demonstrate real-time analysis date projections using data from a collection of six clinical trials that are part of the IDEA collaboration, an international preplanned pooling of data from six trials testing the duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, and we additionally consider the hypothetical impact of one trial's early termination of follow-up. Patients and Methods: In the absence of outcome data from IDEA, monthly accrual rates for each of the six IDEA trials were used to project subsequent trial-specific accrual, while historical data from similar Adjuvant Colon Cancer Endpoints (ACCENT) Group trials were used to construct a parametric model for IDEA's primary endpoint, disease-free survival, under the same treatment regimen. With this information and using the planned total accrual from each IDEA trial protocol, individual patient accrual and event dates were simulated and the overall IDEA interim and final analysis times projected. Projections were then compared with actual (previously undisclosed) trial-specific event totals at a recent census time for validation. The change in projected final analysis date assuming early termination of follow-up for one IDEA trial was also calculated. Results: Trial-specific predicted event totals were close to the actual number of events per trial for the recent census date at which the number of events per trial was known, with the overall IDEA projected number of events only off by eight patients. Potential early termination of follow-up by one IDEA trial was estimated to postpone the overall IDEA final analysis date by 9 months. Conclusions: Real-time projection of the final analysis time during a trial, or the overall analysis time during a trial collaborative such as IDEA, has practical implications for trial feasibility when these projections are translated into additional time and resources required.

Abstract Purpose: Polymorphisms in genes involved in the angiogenesis pathway have been investigated as predictive markers for efficacy and tolerability to anti-angiogenesis treatment, such as BEV. This study examines single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VEGF, VEGFR2, and HIF-1α for their potential association with outcome and safety in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with the combined vertical blockade of VEGF signaling (i.e., sorafenib and BEV) as salvage therapy. Experimental procedures: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood for 78/79 evaluable patients in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) Phase II study, N054C (Grothey, et al., ASCO 2010). TaqMan or direct sequencing was used for genotyping VEGF (rs25648, rs3025039, rs2010963, rs1005230, rs833061, rs699947, rs1570360), VEGFR2 (rs2305948, rs2219471, rs2071559, rs1870377), and HIF-1α (rs11549465, rs11549467) SNPs. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used to determine genotype associations with the study's primary endpoint, progression-free rate at 3 months of follow-up, as well as genotype associations with the most common grade 3+ adverse events at least possibly related (AE rels) to treatment (i.e., fatigue, hypertension, skin reaction). Results summary: The presence of a mutant T allele in the 5’ UTR of VEGF (rs25648; C534T) was associated with fewer successes in progression-free rate at 3 month follow-up (Fisher's exact test, p=0.0187). In addition, the presence of a C allele in the promoter region of VEGFR2 (rs2071559, T-604C) was associated with fewer grade 3+ hypertension AE rels (Fisher's exact test, p=0.0101). However, after correcting for multiple comparisons using the method of Benjamini & Hochberg none of the p-values were significant at a 0.05 level. At the same time, no differences were observed between the genotype subgroups and either progression-free rate at 3 months or the most common grade 3+ AE rels for the remaining SNPs that were analyzed, before or after correction. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence that mCRC patients with the VEGF C534T (rs25648) variant may not benefit from combined treatment of sorafenib and BEV, whereas patients with the VEGFR2 T-604C (rs2071559) polymorphism may experience fewer grade 3+ AE rels. Further prospective validation of these SNPs and their association with this treatment combination in mCRC is warranted. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4131. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4131

ABSTRACTPurposeThis analysis from Avastin® Registries: Investigation of Effectiveness and Safety (ARIES) examined the association between exposure to bevacizumab after disease progression (PD) and postprogression survival (PPS) in bevacizumab‐exposed metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through the application of time‐dependent and time‐fixed analytical methods.MethodsPatients with mCRC who were treated with first‐line bevacizumab and who survived first PD (PD1) were included. A time‐dependent Cox regression model was fitted to assess the effect of cumulative bevacizumab exposure on PPS, while controlling for potential confounders. In addition to support findings from previous studies, a modified intent‐to‐treat (mITT) analysis compared PPS in patients who received bevacizumab beyond disease progression (BBP) with those who did not (No‐BBP).ResultsOf 1550 patients, 1199 survived PD1 and had a median PPS of 13.4 months. Cumulative bevacizumab exposure was associated with improved PPS (p = 0.0040). After adjusting for confounders, the hazard ratios (HRs) for PPS decreased, on average, by 1.2% (range, 1.1–1.3%) with each additional dose of bevacizumab. In the mITT analysis, the median PPS for BBP (n = 438) was 14.4 months vs 10.6 months with for No‐BBP (n = 667). BBP was found to be independently associated with longer PPS in a multivariable Cox regression analysis (HR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–0.97). Protocol‐specified adverse events suspected to be associated with bevacizumab occurred in 13.0% of patients with BBP.ConclusionThis analysis supports the observation that bevacizumab exposure after PD1 is associated with longer PPS in mCRC. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The process of new blood vessel formation, or angiogenesis, has become an important target for therapeutic intervention in many cancers, including metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The growth and metastasis of primary tumors is dependent upon their ability to acquire and maintain an adequate blood supply; however, angiogenesis in tumors is an irregular process leading to chaotic and hyperpermeable vessels that may result in increased intratumoral pressure and poor exchange of macromolecules and oxygen. It has been hypothesized that inhibition of angiogenesis in tumors can both impair the formation of new tumor blood vessels and possibly ‘normalize’ the existing tumor vasculature, causing a more efficient delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapies (CTs). Over the last decade, therapies that target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have become a component of treatment for several cancers. In particular, the combination of bevacizumab with established chemotherapeutic regimens for mCRC has been shown to improve overall and progression-free survival, as well as response rates, over CT alone. Agents that target various members of the VEGF family, as well as signaling by the VEGF receptors and their tyrosine kinase components, are currently under development and evaluation in clinical trials. Integration of these new therapies into the treatment of mCRC will ultimately increase the available therapeutic options for patients. Still, many challenges remain, including identifying and validating relevant biomarkers to guide the optimal use of antiangiogenesis agents.

AbstractLearning Objectives:After completing this course, the reader will be able to:Identify the components of the “postembolization syndrome”: elevated liver function tests, right upper quadrant pain, nausea and vomiting, and fever.Distinguish the postembolization syndrome from rare complications of embolization that would merit an extended hospitalization.CME This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.comBackground.There is scant evidence to guide the management of patients after hepatic artery embolization (HAE). We examined length of stay (LOS), laboratory patterns, medication usage, morbidity, and mortality of patients hospitalized after HAE for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.Methods.Data were abstracted retrospectively from electronic medical records on LOS, liver function tests (LFTs), i.v. antibiotics, analgesia, peak temperature, bacteremia, hepatic abscess formation, carcinoid crisis, and metastatic burden on cross-sectional imaging.Results.In 2005–2009, 72 patients underwent 174 HAEs for carcinoid and islet cell tumors. The median LOS was 4 days (range, 1–8 days). There was no correlation between peak LFTs and tumor burden. Declines in LFTs were not uniform before hospital discharge; 25%, 37%, 30%, 53%, and 67% of patients were discharged before their respective aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and total and direct bilirubin levels began to decline, with no readmissions for acute hepatic failure. The median i.v. analgesia dose was 60 mg oral morphine equivalents (range, 3–1,961 mg). Pre-HAE i.v. antibiotics were administered in 99% of cases; post-HAE fever occurred in 37% of patients, with no documented bacteremia. One patient developed a hepatic abscess after HAE. There were two carcinoid crises. The single in-hospital death was associated with air in the portal veins.Conclusions.The duration and intensity of in-hospital care following HAE should be managed on an individual basis. A downward trend in LFTs is not required before discharge. Modest use of i.v. analgesia suggests that many patients could exclusively receive oral analgesics. Given the rarity of serious complications, hospital stays could be shortened, thereby reducing costs and nosocomial risks.

Abstract We have demonstrated that crosstalk between the Hedgehog-GLI-GLI and EGFR signaling pathway exists and contribute to pancreatic tumorigenesis. This interaction can be abrogated by targeting both pathways simultaneously and results in a synergistic antitumor effect in vitro and in vivo in pancreatic tumor models. Based on these results we have undertaken a phase I trial of GDC-0449 (an orally administered Hedgehog pathway inhibitor) and erlotinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor to: 1) determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of GDC-0449 combined with erlotinib in unresectable solid tumors; 2) describe the adverse events associated with this treatment combination; 3) describe the responses of this treatment combination; and 4) to assess the effect of the erlotinib and GDC-0449 combination on selected biomarkers in circulating tumor cells (CTCs), tumor biopsies, and FDG-PET in a cohort of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer patients treated at the MTD. During the dose escalation portion of the trial, eligible patients receive GDC-0449 150 mg p.o. daily and erlotinib 50, 75, 100, or 150 mg daily p.o. at dose levels 1, 2, 3, and 4 respectively. Eligibility criteria include: histologic proof of solid tumors that are unresectable, not amenable to any other standard therapies, or patient refused standard therapy,; ANC ≥> 1500/μL; PLT ≥> 100,000/ μL; Total bilirubin ≤< upper limit of normal (ULN); AST ≤< 3 x ULN; Creatinine ≤< 1.5 x ULN; Hemoglobin ≥> 9.0 g/dL; INR within normal limits (Cohort II [MTD Cohort] only); ECOG performance status (PS) 0, 1 or ≤ 2. For the MTD cohort, only patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas without prior systemic therapy for metastatic disease and tumor amenable to biopsies are eligible. Toxicity assessment is performed at each 28-day treatment cycles and response assessment every second treatment 28 day cycle. 12 patients have been entered-pancreas (3), colorectal (3), neuroendocrine (2), scc anus (2), gallbladder (1), thymoma (1). No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reported at dose level 4. At the MTD, up to 20 patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer will be entered to assess the biologic effect of GDC-0449+erlotinib. Pre- and post- treatment biopsies of metastases and FDG-PET will be performed. Weekly collection of CTCs will be undertaken and immunofluorescence microscopy of total & phosphoMAPK, EGFR, AKT, PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2, and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) of PATCHED1, GLI1, and its target genes (BCL-2, BFL-1/A1, 4-1BB) will be performed. In addtion, total & phosphoMAPK, EGFR, and AKT, as well as PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2 by immunohistochemistry and Q-PCR of PATCHED1, GLI1, BCL-2, BFL-1/A1, 4-1BB will be analyzed in tumor biopsies. Supported by CA69912, CA136526 and CA102701. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1807.