Jogerst, Kristen M.

Objective: This study investigates Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols’ impact on long-term opioid and sedative use following mastectomy with or without implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR). Background: ERAS protocols for patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBBR are associated with decreased length of stay, increased rate of same-day discharge, decreased postoperative pain, and decreased postoperative opioid requirements. However, less is known about their effect on opioid and sedative use beyond 90 days after surgery. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing mastectomy with or without IBBR at a single institution between January 2013 and December 2019. Mastectomy ERAS protocols were implemented in February 2017, creating 2 groups: pre-ERAS and ERAS. Baseline characteristics and prevalence of chronic opioid and sedative use were compared. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression predicted factors associated with increased odds of chronic opioid and sedative use. Results: A total of 756 patients were evaluated: 405 pre-ERAS and 351 ERAS. Post-ERAS, chronic opioid use decreased in opioid-naive (40% vs 30%, P=0.024) and opioid-tolerant patients (58% vs 37%, P=0.002), with no increase in chronic sedative use. There were decreased odds of chronic opioid use for all ERAS patients (OR=0.57, 95% CI: 0.42–0.76), and of IBBR patients, those receiving subcutaneous implants (OR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.20–0.48). There was increased chronic opioid-use odds if undergoing bilateral surgery (OR=1.54, 95% CI: 1.14–2.08), 2-stage reconstruction (OR=9.78, 95% CI: 5.94-16.09), and for patients with higher PACU pain scores (OR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.03–1.14) or >150 discharge OMEs (OR=2.63, 95% CI: 1.48–4.68). Conclusion: ERAS protocols for mastectomy patients with or without IBR are associated with decreases in chronic opioid use, without concomitant increases in chronic sedative use.

Background The hernia defects that develop in liver transplant recipients tend to be complex. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data to guide post-transplant hernia management. Our goal was to evaluate the outcomes following laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) in liver transplant recipients. Methods A retrospective review of a prospectively kept database of liver transplant patients at a single tertiary healthcare facility was completed. All patients between 2007 and 2020 who underwent LVHR for a hernia at their transplant incision site were included. The primary outcome studied was hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes included time-to-hernia repair, complications, and length of stay (LOS). Results There were 89 patients who met inclusion criteria. 82% were male, mean age was 60 years, and mean body mass index was 30.2 kg/m 2 . 94.4% were on tacrolimus and 36% on mycophenolate mofetil. Median time-to-hernia repair was 16 months with a mean mesh size of 743 cm 2 and length of stay of 3.7 days. None required conversion to an open operation. Postoperative complications included ileus (20.2%), acute kidney injury (11.2%), pneumonia (6.7%), and bleeding requiring re-operation (1.1%). Hernia-related complications included chronic suture site pain (1.1%), seroma requiring intervention (3.3%), surgical site infection (3.3%), nonoperative mesh infection (1.1%), and mesh infection requiring explantation (1.1%). Median follow-up was 23 months. Hernia recurrence occurred in 4.5% and no predictive variables for recurrence were identified. Conclusions Although the hernia defects that develop in liver transplant recipients are complex and their comorbidities significant, LVHR can safely and effectively repair these defects with low rates of recurrence and complications.

BACKGROUND: Medicare reimbursement rates have decreased across various specialties but have not yet been studied in colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze Medicare reimbursement trends in colorectal surgery. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ Physician Fee Schedule was evaluated for reimbursement data for the 20 most common colorectal surgery procedures from 2006 to 2020. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Inflation-adjusted annual percentage change, compound annual growth rate, and total percentage change were the outcome measures. A subanalysis was performed comparing the changes in reimbursement between 2006 to 2016 and 2016 to 2020 because of legislative changes that went into effect in 2016. RESULTS: During the study period, the inflation-unadjusted mean Medicare reimbursement rate for the 20 most common colorectal surgery procedures increased by +15.6%. This rise was surpassed by the inflation rate of +31.3%. Consequently, the inflation-adjusted reimbursement rate decreased by –11%. The adjusted reimbursement rates decreased the most at –33.8% for a flexible colonoscopy with biopsy and increased the most at +45.3% for a diagnostic rigid proctosigmoidoscopy. Annual percentage change was –0.79%, and the compound annual growth rate was –0.98%. There was an accelerated decrease in annual reimbursement rates from 2016 to 2020 at –2.23% compared to 2006 to 2016 at –0.22% (p = 0.03). The only procedure that had an increase in adjusted reimbursement rate from 2016 to 2020 was the injection of sclerosing solution for hemorrhoids. LIMITATIONS: Only Medicare reimbursement data were analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare reimbursements for colorectal surgery procedures are decreasing at an accelerating rate. Although this study is limited to Medicare data, it still presents a representation of overall reimbursement changes because Medicare policies have a ripple effect in the commercial insurance market. It is vital to understand the financial trends to be able to structure future patient care teams and to advocate for the sustainability of colorectal surgery practices in the United States. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C136. REEMBOLSO DE MEDICARE EN CIRUGÍA COLORRECTAL: UN PROBLEMA CRECIENTE ANTECEDENTES: Las tasas de reembolso de Medicare han disminuido en varias especialidades, pero aún no han sido estudiado en cirugía colorrectal. OBJETIVO: Analizar las tendencias de reembolso de Medicare en cirugía colorrectal. DISEÑO: Estudio observacional. CONTEXTO: Se evaluó el programa de tarifas médicas de los Centros de Servicios de Medicare y Medicaid para obtener datos de reembolso de los 20 procedimientos más comunes en cirugía colorrectal entre los años 2006 y 2020. PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Variación porcentual anual ajustada por inflación, tasa de crecimiento anual compuesta y variación porcentual total. Se realizó un subanálisis comparando los cambios en el reembolso entre los años 2006 a 2016 y 2016 a 2020 debido a los cambios legislativos que entraron en vigencia en 2016. RESULTADOS: Durante el período de estudio, la tasa media de reembolso de Medicare sin ajuste por inflación para los 20 procedimientos más comunes en cirugía colorrectal aumentó en +15,6 %. Esta suba fue superada por la tasa de inflación del +31,3%. En consecuencia, la tasa de reembolso ajustada por inflación disminuyó un -11%. Lo máximo que disminuyeron las tasas ajustadas de reembolso fue a -33,8% para una colonoscopia flexible con biopsia y aumentaron más a +45,3% para una proctosigmoidoscopia rígida de diagnóstico. El cambio porcentual anual fue -0,79% y la tasa de crecimiento anual compuesto fue -0,98%. Hubo una disminución acelerada en las tasas de reembolso anual de 2016 a 2020 a -2,23 % en comparación con 2006 a 2016 a -0,22% (p = 0,03). El único procedimiento que tuvo un aumento en la tasa de reembolso ajustada de 2016 a 2020 fue la inyección de solución esclerosante para las hemorroides. LIMITACIONES: Solo se analizaron los datos de reembolso de Medicare. CONCLUSIONES: Los reembolsos de Medicare por procedimientos en cirugía colorrectal están disminuyendo a un ritmo acelerado. Aunque este estudio se limita a los datos de Medicare, aún presenta una representación de los cambios generales en los reembolsos, ya que las pólizas de Medicare tienen un efecto dominó en el mercado de seguros comerciales. Es fundamental comprender las tendencias financieras para poder estructurar futuros equipos de atención de pacientes y abogar por la sostenibilidad de las prácticas de cirugía colorrectal en los Estados Unidos. Consulte Video Resumen video en https://links.lww.com/DCR/C136. (Traducción—Dr. Osvaldo Gauto)

Objective: This study aims to define an effective senior resident and understand the process of leadership and nontechnical skill development in the transition from junior to senior surgery resident. Summary Background: General surgery residents are responsible for patient care, technically demanding operations, and diverse care team management. However, leadership skill development for the transition from junior to senior resident roles is often overlooked. Methods: We conducted 15 semi-structured focus groups with surgery residents from an urban, academic institution. Focus group transcripts were inductively coded. Using content analysis and constant comparative methodology, primary codes were refined into categories and organized into higher-level themes. Results: Thirty-three general surgery residents completed fifteen focus groups. Six themes were identified. Three themes describe the process of becoming an effective senior resident: how to define a senior resident's scope of practice, the transition process, and the importance of personal investment. Three themes were identified regarding effective seniors: ideal traits, teachable skills, and the team and patient impact. Conclusions: Surgery residents define an effective senior resident as the team member with the highest level of experience who manages the big picture of patient care. The transition is improved by personal engagement and acknowledgement of the transition. Ideal traits of effective seniors, including emotional intelligence and inherent personality traits, allow a resident to more naturally assume this role; however, teachable skills, such as communication, expectation setting and competence, can be taught to improve one's effectiveness. The actions of a senior resident impact the team and patient care, underscoring the importance of understanding this role.

11033 Background: Breast enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols emphasize multimodal analgesia to decrease pain and expedite home recovery, but variability remains for same-day discharge and pain management. The purpose of this qualitative study is to examine how residents learn and apply breast surgery ERAS protocols, how they conceptualize pain management for breast surgery patients, and what influences their decision to discharge a patient home on the day of surgery. Methods: A semi-structured interview guide was adapted from existing instruments in the pain management qualitative literature. Surgical residents who rotated on the breast surgery service within the previous 12 months were interviewed by a single researcher. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, de-identified, and independently inductively coded by two researchers. A codebook was developed and refined using the constant comparative method until interrater reliability (Cohen’s kappa) reached greater than 0.9. Codes were grouped into coding categories and explored for thematic analysis. Results: Twelve interviews were completed with plastic and general surgery residents. Participants spanned post-graduate years 1-4. Preferred discharge narcotic regimens for mastectomy patients ranged from 5-30 tablets of 5mg oxycodone and participants rarely reported the same quantity. Ultimately, 365 primary codes were collapsed into 26 parent codes, with a Cohen’s kappa of 0.93. Six emerging themes were identified. Three themes describe how participants learned through a mixture of templated care, formal education, and informal experiential learning. Two themes delineate how residents would teach breast surgery ERAS protocols: by emphasizing buy-in and by connecting the impetus behind ERAS with the implementation in daily workflow. One theme illustrates the patient-centered culture and how that impacts postoperative management and same-day discharges. Conclusions: Residents learn breast surgery ERAS and postoperative pain management from imitating their seniors, observing patient encounters, completing templated orders, and translating concepts from other ERAS services, more so than from a formal lecture. When implementing new same-day discharge protocols for mastectomy patients, it is important to consider how informal learning and local culture influence postoperative pain management and discharge rates.

Emergency physician empathy and communication is increasingly important and influences patient satisfaction. This study investigated if there is a need for improvement in provider empathy and communication in our emergency department and what areas could be targeted for future improvement. Patients cared for by emergency physicians with the lowest satisfaction scores were surveyed within 1 week of discharge. Patients rated their emergency provider’s empathy and communication and provided feedback on the patient–provider interaction. Compared to survey responses nationally, our providers fell between the 10th and 25th percentiles for all questions, except question 5 (making a plan of action with [the patient]) which was between the 5th and 10th percentile. Areas most frequently cited for improvement were “wanting to know why” (N = 30), “time is short” (N = 15), and “listen to the patient” (N = 13). Survey percentiles and open-ended suggestions demonstrate a need for providers to give thorough explanations, spend more time with the patient, and demonstrate active listening. These themes can be used to strengthen the provider–patient relationship.

Background Same-day discharge after mastectomy is a recently described treatment approach. Limited data exist investigating whether same-day discharge can be successfully implemented in patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). Methods Patients having mastectomy with IBR from 2013 to 2019 were reviewed. Enhanced recovery with same-day discharge was implemented in 2017. Patient characteristics, oncologic treatments, surgical techniques, and 90-day postoperative complications and reoperations were analyzed comparing enhanced recovery patients with historical controls. Results A total of 363 patients underwent nipple-sparing (214, 59%) or skin-sparing (149, 41%) mastectomy with 1-stage (270, 74%) or tissue expander (93, 26%) IBR. Enhanced recovery was used for 151 patients, with 79 of these patients (52%) discharged same-day. Overall, enhanced recovery patients experienced a significantly lower rate of 90-day complications (21% vs 41%, P < 0.001 ), including hematoma (3% vs 11%, P = 0.002), mastectomy flap necrosis (7% vs 15%, P = 0.02), seroma (1% vs 9%, P < 0.001), and wound breakdown (3% vs 9%, P = 0.05). Postoperative complication rates did not significantly differ among enhanced recovery patients discharged same day. Postoperative admissions significantly decreased after enhanced recovery implementation (100% to 48%, P < 0.001), and admitted enhanced recovery patients experienced a lower length of stay (1.2 vs 1.8, P < 0.001 ). Enhanced recovery patients experienced a lower incidence of ≥1 unplanned reoperation (22% vs 33%, P = 0.01); overall average unplanned and total reoperations did not significantly differ between groups. Conclusions In conjunction with enhanced recovery practices, same-day discharge after mastectomy with IBR is a safe and feasible treatment approach.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate monetary trends from 2000 to 2018 in Medicare reimbursement rates for the most common general surgery procedures. Summary Background Data: A complete understanding of financial trends in general surgery in the United States is lacking. As such, an evaluation of trends in reimbursement rates in general surgery is important for defining the specialty's current and future financial health. Methods: The Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was queried for each of the 20 top codes top in general surgery. The total raw percent change in Medicare reimbursement rate for each procedure from 2000 to 2018 was calculated and averaged. All data was corrected for inflation. Both average annual and total percentage change were calculated based on these adjusted trends. Compound annual growth rate was calculated using the adjusted data. Results: After adjusting all data for inflation, the reimbursement rate for all included procedures decreased by an average of 24.4% throughout the study period. During this time, the adjusted reimbursement rate decreased by an average of 1.4% each year with an average compound annual growth rate of −1.6%. Conclusion: After adjusting for inflation, Medicare reimbursement rates in general surgery have steadily decreased from 2000 to 2018. It is important that these trends are understood and considered by surgeons, healthcare administrators, and policy-makers in order to develop and implement agreeable models of reimbursement while ensuring access to quality general surgery care in the United States.