McCarter, Stuart J.

Abstract Predominant limbic degeneration has been associated with various underlying aetiologies and an older age, predominant impairment of episodic memory and slow clinical progression. However, the neurological syndrome associated with predominant limbic degeneration is not defined. This endeavour is critical to distinguish such a syndrome from those originating from neocortical degeneration, which may differ in underlying aetiology, disease course and therapeutic needs. We propose a set of clinical criteria for a limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome that is highly associated with limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy but also other pathologic entities. The criteria incorporate core, standard and advanced features, including older age at evaluation, mild clinical syndrome, disproportionate hippocampal atrophy, impaired semantic memory, limbic hypometabolism, absence of neocortical degeneration and low likelihood of neocortical tau, with degrees of certainty (highest, high, moderate and low). We operationalized this set of criteria using clinical, imaging and biomarker data to validate its associations with clinical and pathologic outcomes. We screened autopsied patients from Mayo Clinic and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohorts and applied the criteria to those with an antemortem predominant amnestic syndrome (Mayo, n = 165; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, n = 53) and who had Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change, limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy or both pathologies at autopsy. These neuropathology-defined groups accounted for 35, 37 and 4% of cases in the Mayo cohort, respectively, and 30, 22 and 9% of cases in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort, respectively. The criteria effectively categorized these cases, with Alzheimer’s disease having the lowest likelihoods, limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy patients having the highest likelihoods and patients with both pathologies having intermediate likelihoods. A logistic regression using the criteria features as predictors of TDP-43 achieved a balanced accuracy of 74.6% in the Mayo cohort, and out-of-sample predictions in an external cohort achieved a balanced accuracy of 73.3%. Patients with high likelihoods had a milder and slower clinical course and more severe temporo-limbic degeneration compared to those with low likelihoods. Stratifying patients with both Alzheimer’s disease neuropathological change and limbic-predominant age-related TDP-43 encephalopathy from the Mayo cohort according to their likelihoods revealed that those with higher likelihoods had more temporo-limbic degeneration and a slower rate of decline and those with lower likelihoods had more lateral temporo-parietal degeneration and a faster rate of decline. The implementation of criteria for a limbic-predominant amnestic neurodegenerative syndrome has implications to disambiguate the different aetiologies of progressive amnestic presentations in older age and guide diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and clinical trials.

Abstract Introduction Quantitative rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RSWA) recorded during polysomnography (PSG) represents loss of normal REM sleep atonia. RSWA is the neurophysiologic signature of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Visually scored RSWA is a candidate biomarker for synucleinopathies. However, visual RSWA scoring requires expert scoring, limiting widespread application. We comparatively analyzed RSWA in DLB and iRBD using the automated Ferri REM Atonia Index (RAI). Methods We quantitatively analyzed the RAI in 17 DLB and 20 iRBD patients, compared to 20 controls using Hypnolab Software for Sleep Analysis (SWS Soft, Colognola ai Colli, Italy). PSG data were converted to European Data Format (.EDF), and the submentalis surface electromyogram (EMG) signal was notch-filtered at 60 Hertz and rectified. Automatically calculated RAI scores were comparatively analyzed across groups (DLB, iRBD, controls) using Kruskal Wallis H tests for group comparisons, and regression analyses determined relationships between diagnosis, age, and sex. Logistic regression ROC determined optimal RAI for distinguishing iRBD from DLB. When interpreting RAI, lower values represent greater amounts of RSWA, and higher values represent more normal REM atonia. Results Median age was no different between DLB (72.6 years), iRBD (69.4 years), and controls (68.0 years). The DLB group consisted of 16 men and one woman, the iRBD group had 18 men and 2 women, and controls were comprised of 16 men and 4 women. Median RAI was lowest in DLB (0.32), intermediate in iRBD (0.84) and highest in controls (0.96), indicating a gradient in RSWA amounts from DLB patients (highest) to controls (lowest). Regression demonstrated diagnosis independently predicted RAI, controlling for age and sex (adjusted R2=0.64, p=0.0001). The RAI that optimally distinguished iRBD from DLB was 0.48 (specificity 85%, sensitivity 76%, AUC=0.88). Conclusion The RAI demonstrated a clear gradient throughout the Lewy body spectrum; highest (indicating lowest RSWA amounts) in controls, intermediate in iRBD, and lowest (indicating greatest RSWA) in DLB. The RAI is a promising, time efficient and broadly applicable candidate biomarker for DLB and iRBD. Automated quantitative RSWA could be a valuable tool for deep phenotyping throughout the Lewy body disease spectrum. Support (if any) This study was supported by: U01NS100620, R34AG056639, U19AG071754, and P30AG62677.

Abstract Introduction Meta-analytic studies support that insomnia is a risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia, but limited accounting of confounders reduces their validity. Further, it is unclear whether these associations are driven by specific insomnia phenotypes. In this study, we aimed to assess the relationship between insomnia and longitudinal global cognitive decline in community-dwelling older adults after considering self-reported sleep duration changes and other important characteristics. Methods From the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) cohort, we identified all (age>=50yo) cognitively unimpaired participants at baseline without comorbid neurological disease with at least two previous comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. Participants with at least two occurrences of insomnia ICD diagnosis (by EMR and Rochester Epidemiological Project data) at least 30 days apart were classified as having insomnia, and those without any instance of diagnosis were considered negative for insomnia. Changes in sleep duration were assessed using the question #16 of BDI-2 and categorized in reduced sleep (yes/no). We fit mixed-effect regression models to assess whether insomnia was associated with standardized global cognitive scores, after adjusting for age, sex, education, APOEe4, composite cardiovascular and metabolic conditions scores, anxiety/depression, reduced sleep, OSA (ICD diagnosis), alcoholism (CAGE≥2), and pain (NSAIDs use). Number of cognitive assessments and time from baseline were included as both fixed and random effects. Multiple interactions (e.g. insomnia*reduced sleep) were included. A backward stepwise procedure maintaining the hierarchical principal for interactions was utilized to reach the most parsimonious models. Results 3063 participants (50.24% males, aged 70±9.73 at baseline) were included. Insomnia alone was not associated with a decrease in global cognition, but when combined with subjective reduction in sleep duration at baseline it was associated with a -0.19 (95% CI: -0.32, -0.07; interaction p=0.01) reduction in global cognitive scores. This was equivalent to approximately 3 additional years of age or 6 cardiometabolic comorbidities at baseline. The effect size was greater than those associated with baseline cognition for having any APOE e4 allele (-0.12) and alcoholism (-0.15). Conclusion Insomnia with reduced sleep duration phenotype is a potentially modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline in older adults. Further studies with objective sleep measures are necessary for objective confirmation. Support (if any) NIA/NIH

AbstractBackgroundQuantitative rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RSWA) recorded during polysomnography (PSG) represents loss of normal REM sleep atonia. RSWA is the neurophysiologic signature of REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Visually scored RSWA is a candidate biomarker for synucleinopathies. However, visual RSWA scoring requires expert scoring, limiting widespread application. We comparatively analyzed RSWA in DLB and iRBD using the automated Ferri REM Atonia Index (RAI).MethodWe quantitatively analyzed the RAI in 12 DLB and 20 iRBD patients, compared to 20 controls using Hypnolab Software for Sleep Analysis (SWS Soft, Inc, Colognola ai Colli, Italy). PSG data were converted to European Data Format (.EDF), and the submentalis surface electromyogram (EMG) signal was notch‐filtered at 60 Hertz and rectified. Automatically calculated RAI scores were comparatively analyzed across groups (DLB, iRBD, controls) using Kruskal Wallis H tests for group comparisons, and regression analyses determined relationships between diagnosis, age, and sex. Logistic regression ROC determined optimal RAI for distinguishing iRBD from DLB. When interpreting RAI, lower values represent greater amounts of RSWA, and higher values represent more normal REM atonia.ResultMean age was older in DLB than in iRBD or controls (72.6 vs. 68.7 vs. 66.5 years). All 12 DLB participants were men, the iRBD group had 18 men and 2 women, and controls were comprised of 16 men and 4 women. Mean RAI was lowest in DLB (0.46), intermediate in iRBD (0.71) and highest in controls (0.96), indicating a gradient in RSWA amounts from DLB patients (highest) to controls (lowest) (Figure). Regression demonstrated diagnosis independently predicted RAI, controlling for age and sex (adjusted R2 = 0.49, p = 0.0001). The RAI that optimally distinguished iRBD from DLB was 0.46 (specificity 85%, sensitivity 58%, AUC = 0.75).ConclusionThe RAI demonstrated a clear gradient throughout the Lewy body spectrum; highest (indicating lowest RSWA amounts) in controls, intermediate in iRBD, and lowest (indicating greatest RSWA) in DLB. The RAI is a promising, time efficient and broadly applicable candidate biomarker for DLB and iRBD. Automated quantitative RSWA could be a valuable tool for deep phenotyping throughout the Lewy body disease spectrum.