Anastasiadis, Panos Z.

Abstract Background: Mutations in RAS is reported in embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS). Upregulation of IGF2/IGF1R axis and IGF2 overexpression is a common finding. Targeting RAS downstream is associated with high toxicity. Combination therapies targeting parallel pathways is necessary to overcome treatment resistance. Dual inhibition of RAS downstream and IGF2/IGF1R axis can be a potential mechanism of targeted treatment. The efficacy of this mechanism was studied using a microcancer 3D exvivo tumor cell viability assay in a KRAS mutant ERMS. Design: Tumor was collected for a high-risk pediatric ERMS patient. Comprehensive genomic analysis, for identification of targetable genomic alterations, was performed by integrating WES, MPseq and RNAseq. Tumor spheroids grown in 3D environment were tested against multiple single drugs and combinations. The tumor viability was assed employing the Cell Titer Glow Luminescent Cell Viability Assay. Results were expressed as nMATP and were shown as drug-response curve exhibiting the ATP concentration changes at Cmax. Results: Genomic findings included an oncogenic KRAS (G12D) mutation. BAY-293 has a partial cell killing response as a single agent. Given to the presence of IGF2 over-expression, IGF2/IGF1R pathway was targeted by linsitinib. Addition of BAY-293 to linsitinib led to enhanced effectiveness of this agent (Table 1). Conclusion: Combination of comprehensive genomic profiling and a laboratory-based 3D micro-cancer model using the patient’s own tumor is an effective way to determine drug efficacy. Targeting RAS pathway by single agents, increases the possibility of resistance. Dual targeting of downstream pathways by MEK and PI3K pathway inhibition is highly toxic, and the clinical usage of this combination is limited. Our results have indicated inhibition of IGF-1R/IGF2 axis in combination with other agents targeting RAS pathway, can be a potential method to address these limitations. ABEL 1. Summary of molecular alterations and targeting methods Molecular alteration Drug Target Kill% at Cmax KRAS (G12D) Mutation BAY-293 RAS-SOS1 interaction 55.3 Trametinib MEK1/2 88.3 Selumetinib MEK1/2 76 Paxalisib PI3K/mTOR 89.7 Samotolisib PI3K/mTOR 92.9 Copanlisib PI3K 95.2 Perifosine AKT 89.2 IGF2 Over-expression Linsitinib IGF-1R/InsR 84.1 BMS-754807 IGF-1R/InsR 67.4 NTRK2 mutation Larotrectinib NTRK 41.9 KMT2D mutation Panobinostat HDAC 85.3 Combinations Kill% at Cmax BAY-293+Selumetinib 100 BAY-293+Samotolisib 100 BAY-293+Paxalisib 99.7 BAY-293+Linsitinib 97.5 Selumetinib+Samotolisib 93.1 Citation Format: Dorsay Sadeghian, Wan-Hsin Lin, James Smadbeck, Alan Panheiter, Michael Barrett, Alexa F. Mccune, Giannoula Karagouga, Sarah Johnson, Ryan W. Feathers, Faye R. Harris, Lindsey Kinsella, Taylor Berry, John Cheville, Panos Anastasiadis, Candace Granberg, Patricio Gargollo, Vasmatzis George. Dual inhibition of RAS and the IGF2/IGF1R pathways: a potential targeting strategy for RAS-mutated embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3391.

OBJECTIVE The vertebral column is the most common site for skeletal metastasis, often leading to debilitating pain and weakness. Metastatic cancer has unique genetic drivers that potentiate tumorigenicity. There is an unmet need for novel targeted therapy in patients with spinal metastatic disease. METHODS The authors assessed the effect of verteporfin-induced yes-associated protein (YAP) inhibition on spine metastatic cell tumorigenicity and radiation sensitivity in vitro. Animal studies used a subcutaneous xenograft mouse model to assess the use of systemic intraperitoneal verteporfin (IP-VP) and intratumoral verteporfin microparticles (IT-VP) to inhibit the tumorigenicity of lung and breast spinal metastatic tumors from primary patient-derived tissue. RESULTS Verteporfin led to a dose-dependent decrease in migration, clonogenicity, and cell viability via inhibition of YAP and downstream effectors cyclin D1, CTGF, TOP2A, ANDRD1, MCL-1, FOSL2, KIF14, and KIF23. This was confirmed with knockdown of YAP. Verteporfin has an additive response when combined with radiation, and knockdown of YAP rendered cells more sensitive to radiation. The addition of verteporfin to YAP knockdown cells did not significantly alter migration, clonogenicity, or cell viability. IP-VP and IT-VP led to diminished tumor growth (p < 0.0001), especially when combined with radiation (p < 0.0001). Tissue analysis revealed diminished expression of YAP (p < 0.0001), MCL-1 (p < 0.0001), and Ki-67 (p < 0.0001) in tissue from verteporfin-treated tumors compared with vehicle-treated tumors. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to demonstrate that verteporfin-mediated inhibition of YAP leads to diminished tumorigenicity in lung and breast spinal metastatic cancer cells. Targeting of YAP with verteporfin offers promising results that could be translated to human clinical trials.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary neoplasm of the central nervous system. The location of GBM contributes significantly to patient outcomes, where tumors contacting the lateral ventricles (LVs) have increased expression of stem cell genes, increased incidence of distal recurrence, and decreased overall survival. While the reasons for these findings are not fully understood, we hypothesize they arise due to interactions with the subventricular zone (SVZ), the largest neurogenic niche in mammals. We examined bidirectional signals between GBM cells and neural progenitor cells (NPCs) in vitro and in vivo using a combination of patient-derived intraoperative samples, preclinical animal models, and the methionine tRNA synthetase L274G (MetRS*) nascent proteomic labeling system, which allows for cell-specific proteomics analysis from complex in vivo systems. In co-culture with NPCs, GBM cells increase their viability, proliferation, migration, and expression of malignancy-promoting proteins, including migratory proteins such as TAGLN, PALLD, and STAT1. In vivo, tumor proximity to the SVZ results in increased proliferation, increased expression of stemness markers, decreased survival, and altered tumor-specific proteome. We then examined the reciprocal effect of GBM cells on NPC biology. In vitro and in vivo, GBM cells decreased NPC proliferation and induced decreased neuronal maturation of NPCs. To determine NPC proteomic changes in vivo, we created a transgenic mouse line Nestin-CreERT2; STOPflox R26-MetRS L274G, where upon tamoxifen administration Nestin+ NPCs express GFP and MetRS*. Our results indicate that LV-proximal GBM induces decreased expression of neuronal maturation proteins such as Eml1, VGLUT1, and EAAT2, and an increase in pro-migratory factors such as Lamc1 in NPCs. In conclusion, there are bidirectional proteomic interactions between GBM cells and NPCs that contributes to altered neurogenesis and increased tumor malignancy of LV-proximal GBM. The signaling factors identified in our studies will result in identification of novel therapeutic targets for GBM.

Abstract Diffuse gliomas are aggressive brain tumors that lack effective therapies. Despite advances in the molecular characterization of gliomas, targeted treatments have failed to improve patient outcomes to date. Here, we employed a functional genomics approach to rapidly identify therapeutic vulnerabilities and provide a strategy to individualize patient treatment. Our process combined comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic tumor profiling, custom algorithms and visualization software for data integration, and preclinical 3-dimensional ex vivo models (mcancers) for drug screening to assess response to therapeutic agents targeting specific molecular alterations. A total of 32 cases, including 5 oligodendrogliomas (1 primary and 4 recurrent), 5 astrocytomas (1 primary and 4 recurrent), and 22 glioblastomas (5 primary and 17 recurrent), were included in the study. Immunohistochemistry and integrated genomics confirmed that mcancers maintain key molecular alterations, including mutations, chromosomal rearrangements and focal amplifications, cellularity, and heterogeneity, faithfully recapitulating the original tumor. A total of 119 single drugs and 183 combinations were tested, including a panel of 26-brain penetrant targeted agents (18 single drugs and 8 combinations) that was curated to target common glioma oncogenic pathways and was tested across all cases. A strong correlation was observed between therapeutic vulnerabilities of glioma mcancers to targeted agents (EGFR, MET, PDGFR, HDAC inhibitors, etc.) and clinical experience. Single agent activity of panel compounds in the ex vivo setting was generally poor, with only 35% mCancers exhibiting &gt; 70% growth inhibition at Cmax. In contrast, combination strategies, especially ones including epigenetic drugs, were significantly more effective (affecting 22 out of 32 mCancers), underscoring the molecular complexity of gliomas and the need for clinical trials testing combination treatments. Our data identified a number of novel combination treatments with significant efficacy across glioma subtypes and molecular profiles, suggesting that our functional genomics pipeline can guide treatment selection and inform clinical trial enrollment for gliomas.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive adult brain tumor with no effective therapy. Despite advances on its molecular characterization, targeted therapeutics remain out of reach. This lack-of-progress is largely attributed to molecular and spatial heterogeneity and absence of clinically applicable models to guide patient care. Moreover, as standard surgical resection is aimed at contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor, the molecular landscape and treatment response of the remaining non-contrast enhancing (nCE) component is largely unknown despite its active role in tumor progression and local recurrence. Here, we aimed to identify the functional impact of tumor heterogeneity and to explore therapeutic vulnerabilities of both CE and nCE components. Four tumor regions (two CE and two nCE) from each of five GBM patients were collected under neuronavigation. The resulting tissue was subjected to generation of 3D tumor models (a brain tumor initiating-enriched cell line and a spheroid-based mcancer model) with comparable success in both CE and nCE samples. A panel of 25 brain penetrant drugs (alone and in combination) targeting GBM drivers (i.e. RTK/Ras/PI3K, RB/cell cycle, p53/apoptosis, DNA damage repair, transcription addiction) was developed and used to test for therapeutic vulnerabilities. From each tumor region, 4.5 ± 3.7 (average ± SD) different targeting strategies were identified exhibiting at least 70% growth inhibition at Cmax. Drug response heterogeneity was relatively rare, varied among cases, and was independent of tumor enhancement status. To our knowledge, this is the first study to systemically assess treatment response from both CE and nCE patient-derived GBM models. Ongoing studies include comprehensive genome and transcriptome profiling and pathway analysis from these different tumor regions. We postulate that interrogation of molecular landscapes and vulnerability profiles of both CE and nCE tumor regions, will enable us to personalize and prioritize effective targeted interventions for GBM treatment.

Abstract Structural discovery of guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) protein complexes is likely to become increasingly relevant with the development of new therapeutics targeting small GTPases and development of new classes of small molecules that inhibit protein‐protein interactions. Syx (also known as PLEKHG5 in humans) is a RhoA GEF implicated in the pathology of glioblastoma (GBM). Here we investigated protein expression and purification of ten different human Syx constructs and performed biophysical characterizations and computational studies that provide insights into why expression of this protein was previously intractable. We show that human Syx can be expressed and isolated and Syx is folded as observed by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy and actively binds to RhoA as determined by co‐elution during size exclusion chromatography (SEC). This characterization may provide critical insights into the expression and purification of other recalcitrant members of the large class of oncogenic—Diffuse B‐cell lymphoma (Dbl) homology GEF proteins. In addition, we performed detailed homology modeling and molecular dynamics simulations on the surface of a physiologically realistic membrane. These simulations reveal novel insights into GEF activity and allosteric modulation by the plekstrin homology (PH) domain. These newly revealed interactions between the GEF PH domain and the membrane embedded region of RhoA support previously unexplained experimental findings regarding the allosteric effects of the PH domain from numerous activity studies of Dbl homology GEF proteins. This work establishes new hypotheses for structural interactivity and allosteric signal modulation in Dbl homology RhoGEFs.

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) C156S is an engineering variant of VEGF-C that has the potential to promote lymphangiogenesis, activating on VEGF receptor (VEGFR) 3, without promoting angiogenesis (i.e., not acting on VEGFR-2). We conducted a systematic review of publications assessing the use of this growth factor in lymphedema treatment. We hypothesized that VEGF-C156S specificity for VEGFR-3 was an important differential for the lymphangiogenesis promoted by it. Methods and Results: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review of the published literature on PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Clinical Answers. Eligibility criteria included articles reporting data on the use of VEGF-C156S in lymphedema treatment. We excluded articles that investigated physiology action of VEGF-C156S and articles that focused on other therapies. From 304 potential articles found in the literature, four studies fulfilled the study eligibility criteria. To date, all studies about this growth factor have been experimental. The effect of VEGF-C156 on lymph node transfer was investigated in half of the experiments. Interestingly, delivery of VEGF-C156S was mostly performed through viral gene transfer, but injection (subcutaneously or intravenously) of it as a protein (liposomal or nonliposomal) was also investigated by one author to assess drug bioavailability. Conclusions: Although authors reported promotion of lymphangiogenesis, VEGF-C156S was correlated with lymphatic hyperplasia or nonstatistically significant lymphangiogenesis compared with controls. Scientific evidence about the use of VEGF-C156S in lymphedema treatment is still limited. However, authors have shown that its lymphangiogenic effect is inferior to VEGF-C.

Despite advancements in cancer therapy that have occurred over the past several decades, successful treatment of advanced malignancies remains elusive. Substantial resources and significant efforts have been directed toward the development of novel therapeutic modalities to improve patient outcomes. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging tools with unique characteristics that have attracted great interest in developing effective anticancer treatment. The original attraction was directed toward selective replication and cell-specific toxicity, two unique features that are either inherent to the virus or could be conferred by genetic engineering. However, recent advancements in the knowledge and understanding of OVs are shifting the therapeutic paradigm toward a greater focus on their immunomodulatory role. Nonetheless, there are still significant obstacles that remain to be overcome to enhance the efficiency of OVs as effective therapeutic modalities and potentially establish them as part of standard treatment regimens. In this review, we discuss advances in the design of OVs, strategies to enhance their therapeutic efficacy, functional translation into the clinical settings, and various obstacles that are still encountered in the efforts to establish them as effective anticancer treatments.