Gonsalves, Wilson I.

8011 Background: Literature suggests that three or more organ involvement is a contraindication for autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in light chain amyloidosis (AL). Most centers limit transplantation to patients who have no more than two organs significantly involved. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with AL Amyloidosis involving three or more organs and who had ASCT between 1996-2015 at Mayo clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Results: Seventy five patients underwent ASCT with three or more organs involved. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years and 67% were males. The heart was involved in 95%, followed by kidneys (84%). Thirty eight patients (51%) had no induction treatment prior to ASCT. Full dose melphalan (200mg/m2) was given in 45%, and the remaining received a reduced dose (140mg/m2). Overall response rate (hematological) was 75%. The median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.3 and 68.9 months, respectively. The 100-day mortality was 16% and overall forty four patients (59%) died during the follow up period. The most common causes of death were cardiovascular events (32%) and progressive amyloidosis (25%). On multivariable analysis, predictors for PFS were Mayo stage III/IV (RR 3.3, P = 0.0012) and hematological response (≥VGPR, RR 0.4, P = 0.012). An NT-ProBNP level of ≥2000 pg/ml was an independent predictor for shorter PFS (RR 2.6, P = 0.013). Predictors for OS included any hematological response (RR 0.1, P < 0.0001) and Mayo stage III/IV (RR 7, P < 0.0001). When looking at the NT-ProBNP, a level ≥2000 was prognostic (RR 5.5, P = 0.001). Number of organs involved (3 vs. 4-5) was not significant in either PFS or OS. Conclusions: We conclude that the high prevalence of cardiac involvement is the main driver for the poor outcome in patients who have three or more organs involved. Using selection criteria defined for safe transplantation in cardiac amyloidosis should result in low therapy-related mortality independent of the number of organs involved. The concept of considering patients with three organs involved ineligible for stem cell transplantation should be abandoned.

7559 Background: Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare indolent lymphoma commonly treated with rituximab (R)-based therapy. The use of rituximab maintenance (mR) in WM is controversial. We present a case-control study of patients (pts) with WM treated with mR. Methods: Pts evaluated at Mayo Clinic, Rochester with active WM that received mR between 1/2000 & 6/2018 were included. Cases comprised pts who received mR following R-based induction as primary therapy. Cases were matched based on the time of diagnosis in 1:2 ratio with a control group treated with R-based primary induction therapy without mR. Time to event analyses were performed from initiation of R-based induction. Results: Of 776 pts with active WM, 42 (5%) cases received mR and 84 pts were selected as controls. The median follow-up and the proportion of high risk pts were comparable between the two cohorts (Table). Pts in the mR cohort show a trend toward longer time to next therapy (TTNT) and a significantly longer overall survival (OS) compared to the control group (Table). The R-based induction therapies were comparable in the two cohorts (p = 0.6). Median duration of mR was 1.9 yrs (95% CI 1.6-2) and mR was used most frequently every (q) 2 (range 1-6) months. Of the 42 mR pts, 25 (60%) received an R-based combination for induction and 17 (40%) received R monotherapy as induction. Five (12%) pts discontinued mR due to toxicity, infections were reported in 13 pts (31%) during mR therapy and 3 pts (7%) received IVIg infusions for recurrent infections. Conclusions: R-based induction followed by mR demonstrates a longer OS in WM compared to R-treated control population not receiving mR, albeit at a high rate of infections. Despite limitations of a retrospective study, with a heterogeneously treated cohort, these data add to the body of literature supporting Rituximab maintenance. Results from an ongoing randomized controlled trial are awaited. [Table: see text]

7509 Background: Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare lymphoma for which scant comparative data exist to guide frontline therapy. Herein, we compare 3 commonly used regimens in WM: R-Benda, DRC, and BDR in frontline setting. Methods: Patients (Pts) with active WM seen at Mayo Clinic between 2000 & 2018 who received R-Benda, DRC or BDR as primary therapy were included in this retrospective study. Response rates were assessed by Consensus Criteria. All time to event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy, using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The study included 172 pts with active WM (R-Benda, n=67, DRC, n=75, BDR, n=30).The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.7 years (y) (95% CI 3.7-3.0). Baseline characteristics, including IPSS, and time to frontline therapy from WM diagnosis were similar across the 3 cohorts. Clinically relevant endpoints are shown in the Table. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were similar across the 3 groups. Grade 3 neuropathy requiring treatment discontinuation was encountered in 13% pts treated with BDR. 56 pts received subsequent salvage therapy [(10% in R-Benda arm, 44% in DRC arm, & 53% in BDR arm]; 29% pts in the R-Benda arm and 30% pts in DRC arm received a PI-based regimen while 69% pts in the BDR arm received alkylator-rituximab based therapy. Conclusions: Outcomes (MRR, TTNT and EFS) with frontline R-Benda are superior in comparison to frontline DRC or BDR in patients with WM. Clinically relevant endpoints are not significantly different with DRC vs. BDR. The toxicity profile across the 3 groups was comparable. [Table: see text]

8600 Background: The combination of bortezomib, dexamethasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (VDTPACE) was developed as an intense regimen for disease control prior to tandem transplantation for multiple myeloma (MM) in total therapy protocols. The regimen is very effective in this setting, and since has also been used in the relapsed setting. We examined the outcomes of a set of patients undergoing VDTPACE therapy for relapsed MM at our institution. Methods: We identified 71 patients who received VDTPACE for relapsed MM, at Mayo Clinic from 7/2006 to 7/2012. Plasma cell leukemia was excluded. All data was extracted from clinical records. Results: The median age of patients was 59 years (range, 39-80); 48 (67.6%) were male. The median time from diagnosis to initiation of VDTPACE was 38.2 months (range, 2-125). The median number of cycles given was 1 (range, 1-9). The overall response rate after one cycle was 57.1% (14.3% VGPR, 22.2% PR and 20.6% MR) in the 63 patients in whom the response was evaluable. The median overall survival (OS) post-VDTPACE was 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.7-10.9). Eighteen (25.4%) patients went on to autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT), and 7 (9.9%) received matched allogeneic SCT following VDTPACE, and the median OS post-VDTPACE was significantly longer for these groups compared to those who were not transplanted (15.3 and 20.5 months, respectively vs 5 months, p-value <0.001). Thirty eight of 66 (57.6%) patients were rehospitalized after initial admission for infusion therapy for a median duration of 6 days (range, 1-26). The median platelet and red cell transfusions were 4 (range, 0-21) and 5 (range, 0-22) units, respectively. Renal toxicity was seen in 13/62 (21%) patients and 27/65 (41.5%) patients developed neutropenic fever. The median duration to absolute neutrophil and platelet count recovery was 18 (range 12-42) and 27 (range, 12-42) days, respectively. Three (4.2%) patients died within 30 days and 11 (15.5%) within 8 weeks of initiating VDTPACE. Conclusions: VDTPACE is an effective therapy in relapsed MM but is associated with significant morbidity and short-term mortality. It appears to be more effective when followed by an autologous or allogeneic SCT.

8587 Background: Patients (pts) undergoing an auto-transplant (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM) have disease assessment approximately 100 days later. This result may direct decisions of further therapy versus observation. However, some pts continue to experience a decline in their serum or urine monoclonal (M) - protein after day 100 without more therapy. Little is known about the prevalence and significance of this phenomenon. Methods: We identified 903 MM pts who underwent ASCT within 12 months (mos) of diagnosis (Dx) at our institution. Their day 100 post-ASCT M-protein from serum and urine electrophoresis with immunofixation as well as serum free light chains were compared to subsequent values during follow-up. The IMWG criteria were used to evaluate response. Results: Of the pts included, 510 (56%) were male and median age at ASCT was 59 (range 28-76). Median follow up from Dx and ASCT was 82 mos (95% CI; 75 - 86) and 74 mos (95% CI; 70 - 79) respectively. There were 453 (50%) pts seen in follow-up who had not achieved a CR at Day 100 nor initiated on maintenance therapy. Of these pts, 167 (37%) had a further decrease in their M-protein after day 100 at a median of 9.4 mos (95% CI; 8 – 10) post-ASCT. Given the time taken for maximal response, we assessed patients’ clinical response at one year post-ASCT. Compared to patients who did not have further clinical response between day 100 and 1 year, pts experiencing further response had a longer time to next therapy (TTNT) (43 mos vs. 17 mos, P < 0.001) as well as overall survival (OS) (96 mos vs. 62 mos, P < 0.001). Positive predictors for continued response included having an IgG isotype, evolution from a pre-existing MGUS, smoldering myeloma or solitary plasmacytoma and a Day 100 bone marrow plasma cell < 3%. In a multivariate analysis, elevated creatinine at Dx and lack of continued response predicted for shorter TTNT and OS post-ASCT. Older age and high-risk MM by FISH also predicted a shorter OS. Conclusions: In MM pts undergoing ASCT, continued M - protein response was seen in a third of the pts lacking a CR at day 100. This phenomenon appears prognostic and must be considered when interpreting studies evaluating post-ASCT response and the need for further therapy.

8092 Background: High dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) remain an integral part of the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Despite the introduction of several new drugs, disease relapse remains inevitable and a second SCT often allows continued disease control. Methods: We examined the outcomes in 105 patients (pts) undergoing a second SCT (SCT2) for relapsed MM, from among 1033 pts receiving initial transplant between 1994 and 2009. Patients receiving an allogeneic SCT post SCT2 were not included in the survival analysis. Results: Median (range) age at SCT2 was 60 yrs (35-74) and the time between SCTs was 46 mos (10-130). The median follow-up was 5 yrs from SCT2. The median (range) number of regimens between the two SCTs and from diagnosis was 2 (0-7) and 3 (1-11), respectively. Conditioning regimen was Mel 200 in 85 (81%) pts. Median (range) CD34 cells infused was 4.6 (2.5-25 million/kg). Hospitalization was required for 53 pts (50%), median hospital stay was 7 days.. Median time to ANC of 500 and platelets of 50,000 were 13 and 16 days, respectively. Treatment related mortality was seen in 5 (5%) pts. A partial response or better was seen in 95 (90%) pts, including a stringent CR in 10%, CR in 19%, and VGPR in 21%. Stable disease or progression was seen in 7 pts and 3 pts died prior to disease assessment. The median (95% CI) PFS and OS after SCT2 were 10.4 (8, 14) and 33 (28, 51) mos, respectively. The median OS was not reached and 33 mos respectively, for those obtained a CR and those with <CR, P=0.03. FISH pre-SCT2 was available for 73 pts; the PFS and OS were not affected by the presence of high-risk MM. In multivariate analyses, shorter duration of response to SCT1, higher plasma cell (PC) labeling index at SCT2, more regimens used prior to SCT2 all predicted shorter PFS and OS post SCT2. Lack of CR to SCT2 was also significantly associated with shorter PFS. Conclusions: Second SCT is an effective therapy for eligible pts relapsing after other treatments. It provides a meaningful duration of response and appears to be well tolerated. Pts with longer duration of response to first transplant and those achieving a CR appear to have maximum benefit.

AbstractThe diagnosis of primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) has been made by quantifying circulating plasma cells (cPCs) morphologically on a peripheral blood (PB) smear. However, this technique is not sufficiently sensitive. Multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) provides a readily available and highly sensitive method to identify and quantify cPCs that could complement PB smear assessment. However, an optimal quantitative cutoff for cPCs by MFC to identify pPCL has not been established. Thus, a total of 591 patients newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients who had their PB samples evaluated morphologically by PB smear, and immunophenotypically by MFC prior to beginning therapy were evaluated. The presence of ≥200 cPCs/μL by MFC (N = 25 or 5% of the total population) was chosen to identify patients with ≥5% cPCs by PB smear with a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 77%. For patients with ≥200 cPCs/μL by MFC compared to the remainder of the cohort, the median Time to next therapy (TTNT) was 18 vs 30 months and the median OS was 38 vs 70 months respectively. Thus, MFC assessment of PB can be utilized in conjunction with the morphological assessment of a PB smear to aid in improving the identification of pPCL among NDMM patients.

Background: The current commonly used regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) utilize steroids (dexamethasone or prednisone) in various combinations: bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd), bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd), daratumumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) and daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (DVMP). However, steroid therapy may be associated with various adverse effects, including, but not limited to mood changes, insomnia, hypertension, hyperglycemia, osteoporosis, adrenal suppression, muscle weakness, and increased risk of opportunistic infections. A recent trial demonstrated improved tolerability of a regimen (Rd-R) involving an abbreviated course of dexamethasone, without compromising the efficacy in patients with intermediate-fit NDMM (Lorocca A., et al., ASH 2018). We designed a phase 2 clinical trial to examine the safety and efficacy of daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody in combination with an all-oral regimen of ixazomib, a proteasome inhibitor, lenalidomide, an immunomodulatory drug, and modified dose dexamethasone (IRd). Patients and Methods: NDMM patients with measurable disease and adequate organ function were enrolled, irrespective of their transplant eligibility. The primary objective was to determine the rate of complete response (CR) to daratumumab-IRd. Treatment consisted of daratumumab, 16 mg/kg, weekly for two cycles, every other week during cycles 3-6 and then every 4 weeks, ixazomib, 4 mg days 1, 8, 15, lenalidomide, 25 mg days 1-21, and dexamethasone upto 40 mg intravenously weekly for no more than two cycles, followed by use only as a prophylactic premedication for daratumumab-associated infusion reactions. Myeloma risk stratification was assessed by cytoplasmic immunoglobulin fluorescence in-situ hybridization (cIg FISH) analysis. Results: Overall, 40 patients were accrued, with data available on all patients for analysis at the cutoff date of July 19, 2019. The median age at enrollment was 64.5 (33-81) years; 37.5% were female. Eight (20%) patients were high risk by FISH. The median number of cycles was 6 (2-11) and the median follow up was 6.1 (2-11.7) months. Among 40 patients who had received at least 2 cycles of therapy, responses were attained rapidly; at the end of cycle 2, 88% patients achieved at least a partial response and 33% at least a very good partial response (VGPR) that improved to 52% at the end of 4 cycles among 29 patients who had completed at least 4 cycles. The overall best confirmed response rate among all 40 patients (Figure 1) was 95%, including 10% stringent CR, 5% CR and 23% near CR (13% VGPR excluding nCR). Stem cell collection was completed in 17 patients so far, all of whom required filgrastim and plerixafor. The median CD34+ cell count was 7.7 (range 2.9-11.6) million/kg . All patients were alive and 39 (97.5%) patients were progression-free at last follow up. Four (10%) patients proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation off study, per patient and/or investigator discretion (1 in CR, 2 in PR, 1 with progressive disease). Overall, 224 cycles have been administered across the study, with dose reduction/ hold required in a subset of patients; ixazomib (10%), lenalidomide (20%), daratumumab (0%) and dexamethasone (13%); the most frequent reasons for dose adjustment were skin rash and hematologic toxicities. A grade 3 or higher adverse event, at least possibly attributed to the study drugs, was observed in 40% of patients; hematologic in 30% (lymphopenia 25%, neutropenia 15%, thrombocytopenia 5% and anemia 2.5%) and non-hematologic in 18% of patients (hyperglycemia 8%, diarrhea 5%, infections 5%, ileus 2.5%, maculopapular rash 2.5%, and fatigue 2.5%). Updated results with additional 6 months of follow up and minimal residual disease assessment related data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion: Our early results suggest that the combination of daratumumab, ixazomib, lenalidomide and modified dose dexamethasone is well-tolerated, with excellent activity, and does not adversely impact stem-cell mobilization in patients with NDMM. Disclosures Kapoor: Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Research Funding; Cellectar: Consultancy. Gertz:Spectrum: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Prothena: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Ionis: Honoraria. Dingli:alexion: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Rigel: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Leung:Takeda: Research Funding; Prothena: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Aduro: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Omeros: Research Funding. Dispenzieri:Pfizer: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Intellia: Consultancy; Akcea: Consultancy; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding. Lacy:Celgene: Research Funding. Kumar:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Daratumumab in combination with Ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the management of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

AbstractWe evaluated bone marrow minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in 44 patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis using next generation flow cytometry (sensitivity ≥1 × 10−5; median events analyzed: 8.7 million, range: 4.8 to 9.7 million). All patients underwent MRD testing in 2 years from start of therapy (median: 7 months). The overall MRD negative rate was 64% (n = 28). The MRD‐negative rate after one‐line of therapy was 71% (20/28). And, MRD negative rates were higher with stem‐cell transplant as first‐line therapy (86%, 18/21) vs chemotherapy alone as first‐line treatment (29%, 2/7), P = .005. The MRD negative rate amongst patients in complete response was 75% (15/20), and in very good partial response, 50% (11/22). There were two patients in partial response/rising light chains (with renal dysfunction) who were MRD negative. There were no differences in baseline characteristics of MRD negative vs MRD positive patients, except younger age amongst MRD‐negative patients. Patients with MRD negativity were more likely to have achieved cardiac response at the time of MRD assessment, 67% (8/12) vs 22% (2/7), P = .04. Renal response rates were similar in both groups. Progression free survival was assessed in the 42 patients achieving CR or VGPR. After median follow‐up of 14 months, the estimated 1‐year progression free survival in MRD negative vs MRD positive patients was 100% (26 patients, 0 events) vs 64% (16 patients, five events), P = .006, respectively. MRD assessment should be explored as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials and MRD risk‐adapted trials may help optimize treatment in AL amyloidosis.

Key PointsPatients with an abnormal sFLC ratio because of LC suppression have outcomes similar to those with a normal ratio. sFLC ratio has prognostic value in patients achieving CR who have an absence of clonal BMPCs assessed by MFC.