Eagan, Tomas Mikal

Abstract Background New insights into community-acquired pleural infection microbiology may enable development of more rapid and accessible diagnostics that can streamline treatment. This study systematically compared molecular approaches for pathogen detection in pleural fluid from patients with such infections. Considering the need for rapid results with minimum hands-on time and test complexity, off-label use of the cassette-based, random-access BIOFIRE Joint Infection Panel (BF-JIP, bioMérieux) with and without supplementary in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays was evaluated. Methods Pleural fluids from 162 subjects from the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota) and Haukeland University Hospital (Bergen, Norway), where molecular tests are routinely used for analyzing pleural fluid, were studied. The performance of the BF-JIP was compared to 16S rRNA gene PCR followed by Sanger and/or next-generation sequencing (16S rRNA gene PCR/sequencing), an in-house PCR panel specifically designed for pleural space infections, and culture. Results The BF-JIP supplemented with 3 in-house PCR assays targeting Fusobacterium nucleatum group, Streptococcus intermedius/constellatus, and Aggregatibacter aphrophilus detected 96.8% of pleural infections, providing complete microbial profiles in 70.1%. In comparison, the detection rate of 16S rRNA gene PCR/sequencing was 92.2%, providing complete microbial profiles in 87.0%. Culture detected bacteria in only 31.9% of pleural fluids, providing complete microbial profiles in 15.3%. Conclusions These results underscore the importance of molecular approaches in diagnosing pleural space infections and demonstrate the feasibility of panel-based PCR-based diagnostics for these sometimes-complex infections. The BF-JIP, designed for testing synovial fluid, could be modified to provide a useful diagnostic for testing pleural fluid.