Back to Authors

Patil, Tejas

0000-0003-4389-1010

A5029516360 | I4210134151

Mayo Clinic

University of Colorado Cancer Center

Citations 12

Mesothelioma: Pleural, Version 3.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | August 17, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0038 | PMID 42607715

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of certain sites within the body. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of mesotheliomas. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for evaluation and treatment in patients with pleural mesothelioma. The NCCN Guidelines will continue to be updated annually based on available clinical evidence and panel consensus.
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2026, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 9, 2026 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2026.0017 | PMID 41956107

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable biomarkers.
Landscape of Genomic Mechanisms of Resistance to Selective RET Inhibitors in RET -Altered Solid Tumors: Analysis of the RETgistry Global Consortium

Clinical Cancer Research | January 15, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1157-1168

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4382 | PMID 41537704

Abstract Purpose: Rearranged during transfection (RET) alterations are oncogenic drivers across solid tumors. Selective RET inhibitors (SRI) selpercatinib and pralsetinib have transformed outcomes for patients with RET-altered malignancies. Limited knowledge exists on genomic mechanisms of resistance to SRI. Experimental Design: We established “RETgistry,” a global consortium of patients with advanced RET-altered solid tumors who received SRI and underwent postprogression tissue or plasma biopsies assessed by next-generation sequencing. Frequencies of secondary RET resistance mutations and acquired non-RET gene alterations were determined. Progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) on first SRI were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: RETgistry included 109 patients with RET-altered advanced solid tumors (lung, n = 94; thyroid, n = 15) who underwent 143 post-SRI progression biopsies (tissue, 91; plasma, 52). The median PFS and TTD were 13.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.1–16.6] and 17.3 months (95% CI, 14–20.2), respectively. Secondary RET mutations were detected in 20 (14%) biopsies [lung cancer, 15 (12.4%) and thyroid carcinoma, 5 (22.7%)]. Common acquired off-target alterations involved MET (18.2%; amplification, 15%), TP53 (8.2%), APC (7.6%), KRAS (7.1%), KEAP1 (5.9%), and CDKN2A/B (5.3%). MET alterations were enriched in post-SRI versus pre-SRI specimens (full cohort, 17.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.022; lung cancer, 19.1% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.022). Conclusions: The prevalence of secondary RET mutations after SRI was low, underscoring a greater role for off-target resistance. Recurrent acquired alterations involving tumor suppressor genes or upstream regulators of MAPK and PI3K pathways were identified, most commonly MET amplification. Continued efforts to characterize SRI resistance biology are critical to guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 7.2025

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | September 10, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 354-362

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0043 | PMID 40930154

The NCCN Guidelines for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss recent updates to the NCCN Guidelines, with a focus on systemic therapy options for the treatment of patients with nonmetastatic NSCLC and the corresponding molecular testing considerations.
Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas, Version 2.2025, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines In Oncology

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | June 11, 2025 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 255-269

10.6004/jnccn.2025.0027 | PMID 40499586

Thymomas and thymic carcinomas are rare mediastinal tumors that originate in the thymus. Patients with thymoma may experience symptoms associated with autoimmune paraneoplastic diseases (such as myasthenia gravis), which typically do not occur in patients with thymic carcinoma. The NCCN Guidelines for Thymomas and Thymic Carcinomas provide guidance for the diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance of patients with thymoma and thymic carcinoma. Involvement of a multidisciplinary team with experience treating thymomas and thymic carcinomas is highly recommended.
Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 4.2024

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | May 16, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 249-274

10.6004/jnccn.2204.0023 | PMID 38754467

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for the treatment of patients with NSCLC, including diagnosis, primary disease management, surveillance for relapse, and subsequent treatment. The panel has updated the list of recommended targeted therapies based on recent FDA approvals and clinical data. This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for NSCLC focuses on treatment recommendations for advanced or metastatic NSCLC with actionable molecular biomarkers.
Mesothelioma: Pleural, Version 1.2024

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 18, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 72-81

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0014 | PMID 38503043

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer that originates from the mesothelial surfaces of the pleura and other sites, and is estimated to occur in approximately 3,500 people in the United States annually. Pleural mesothelioma is the most common type and represents approximately 85% of these cases. The NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up for patients with pleural mesothelioma. These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight significant updates to the NCCN Guidelines for Mesothelioma: Pleural, including revised guidance on disease classification and systemic therapy options.
Mesothelioma: Peritoneal, Version 2.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | September 6, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 961-979

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0045 | PMID 37673108

Mesothelioma is a rare cancer originating in mesothelial surfaces of the peritoneum, pleura, and other sites. These NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) focus on peritoneal mesothelioma (PeM). The NCCN Guidelines for PeM provide recommendations for workup, diagnosis, and treatment of primary as well as previously treated PeM. The diagnosis of PeM may be delayed because PeM mimics other diseases and conditions and because the disease is so rare. The pathology section was recently updated to include new information about markers used to identify mesothelioma, which is difficult to diagnose. The term “malignant” is no longer used to classify mesotheliomas, because all mesotheliomas are now defined as malignant.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer, Version 2.2023

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 4, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 340-350

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0020 | PMID 37015337

The NCCN Guidelines for Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) provide recommendations for management of disease in patients with NSCLC. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on neoadjuvant and adjuvant (also known as perioperative) systemic therapy options for eligible patients with resectable NSCLC.
Duration of pemetrexed maintenance therapy with or without pembrolizumab is associated with risk of renal toxicity in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | June 2, 2021 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e21205-e21205

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e21205

e21205 Background: Use of maintenance pemetrexed with pembrolizumab is the standard of care among patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without EGFR or ALK alterations treated with the KEYNOTE-189 regimen. Whether the addition of pembrolizumab to pemetrexed maintenance alters the risk of renal toxicity is not well characterized. Methods: A single center retrospective study was performed. The frequency of acute kidney injury as well as the rates of discontinuation due to renal injury was assessed. Acute renal injury was defined as ≥ 0.3 increase in serum creatinine (sCr) above the upper limit of normal or a rise in sCr ≥ 1.5 times baseline per KDIGO criteria. A Fisher exact test was conducted to compare the rate of renal injury between the two groups. Logistic regression adjusting for performance status, prior lines of treatment, and number of maintenance cycles was performed. Results: We identified 114 patients who received either maintenance pemetrexed or pemetrexed + pembrolizumab. The median number of cycles for the maintenance pemetrexed and pemetrexed + pembrolizumab groups was 5 and 7 cycles respectively. Of these, 41% (47/114) patients developed acute renal injury during their treatment course. Renal injury was seen in 14.3% (5/35) patients who received single agent pemetrexed maintenance and 25% (3/12) who received maintenance pemetrexed + pembrolizumab with no significant difference in the rates of renal injury between both arms (p = 0.403). Among patients who developed acute renal injury, 9% (4/47) permanently discontinued maintenance due to nephrotoxicity. All patients who permanently discontinued therapy received maintenance pemetrexed alone. When adjusting for covariates, ECOG performance status and number of prior lines of therapy did not increase the risk of renal toxicity. Logistic regression analysis identified that the rate of renal injury was significantly associated with the number of maintenance cycles received (p-value = 0.017, OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 - 1.29). The odds of developing renal injury were 1.14 times higher with each additional cycle of maintenance therapy received. Conclusions: Renal injury is common among patients treated with patients receiving maintenance therapy. The addition of pembrolizumab to maintenance pemetrexed did not significantly increase the rate of renal injury. The risk of renal injury appears to correlate with the total number of maintenance cycles received suggesting a cumulative risk of nephrotoxicity over time.