Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, increasingly arising in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Epigenetic dysregulation, particularly DNA methylation, has been implicated in MASLD-HCC development, yet the roles that the principal DNA methylation precursor metabolites, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) and S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH), play in this association are unclear. Objective: We investigated associations of circulating SAM, SAH, the SAM/SAH ratio, with MASLD-HCC. Methods: In a multi-center pilot case–control study, we evaluated 69 MASLD-HCC cases and 136 cancer-free MASLD controls. Plasma SAM and SAH levels were quantified by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Metabolite levels were categorized as greater than or less than the median based on distribution in controls. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, and type 2 diabetes. Results: MASLD-HCC cases had significantly higher plasma SAM levels (mean 121 vs. 96 nmol/L; p = 0.001) and SAM/SAH ratios (2.09 vs. 1.48; p = 6.42 × 10−7) than MASLD controls. In multivariable-adjusted models, elevated SAM levels (OR≥median vs. <median = 2.76; 95% CI: 1.38–5.72) and higher SAM/SAH ratio (OR≥median vs. <median = 2.30; 95% CI: 1.15–4.73) were associated with higher odds of MASLD-HCC. SAH alone was associated with MASLD-HCC. Conclusions: Higher plasma SAM levels and SAM/SAH ratios are independently linked to MASLD-HCC development. These metabolites might serve as noninvasive markers for HCC risk stratification in patients with MASLD and improve early detection efforts for MASLD-HCC.
Increased risk of mortality by fibrosis stage in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis
Liver fibrosis is the most important predictor of mortality in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Quantitative risk of mortality by fibrosis stage has not been systematically evaluated. We aimed to quantify the fibrosis stage–specific risk of all‐cause and liver‐related mortality in NAFLD. Through a systematic review and meta‐analysis, we identified five adult NAFLD cohort studies reporting fibrosis stage–specific mortality (0‐4). Using fibrosis stage 0 as a reference population, fibrosis stage–specific mortality rate ratios (MRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all‐cause and liver‐related mortality were estimated. The study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses statement. Included were 1,495 NAFLD patients with 17,452 patient years of follow‐up. Compared to NAFLD patients with no fibrosis (stage 0), NAFLD patients with fibrosis were at an increased risk for all‐cause mortality, and this risk increased with increases in the stage of fibrosis: stage 1, MRR = 1.58 (95% CI 1.19‐2.11); stage 2, MRR = 2.52 (95% CI 1.85‐3.42); stage 3, MRR = 3.48 (95% CI 2.51‐4.83); and stage 4, MRR = 6.40 (95% CI 4.11‐9.95). The results were more pronounced as the risk of liver‐related mortality increased exponentially with each increase in the stage of fibrosis: stage 1, MRR = 1.41 (95% CI 0.17‐11.95); stage 2, MRR = 9.57 (95% CI 1.67‐54.93); stage 3, MRR = 16.69 (95% CI 2.92‐95.36); and stage 4, MRR = 42.30 (95% CI 3.51‐510.34). Limitations of the study include an inability to adjust for comorbid conditions or demographics known to impact fibrosis progression in NAFLD and the inclusion of patients with simple steatosis and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis without fibrosis in the reference comparison group. Conclusion: The risk of liver‐related mortality increases exponentially with increase in fibrosis stage; these data have important implications in assessing the utility of each stage and benefits of regression of fibrosis from one stage to another. (H epatology 2017;65:1557‐1565).