O'Neill, Kimberly

ABSTRACT Objective Little is known about shifting from pediatric to adult‐focused multiple sclerosis (MS) care. This study aims to explore transition of care and follow‐up in the US pediatric‐onset MS (POMS) population. Methods Surveys were distributed to 10 sites in the US Network of Pediatric MS Centers (US NPMSC) about transition‐of‐care practices. A cohort of POMS/clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) at 12 US NPMSC sites was analyzed. The primary comparison was between < 18 and ≥ 18‐years of age. The primary outcome was 1‐ and 2‐year lapse in last follow‐up visit, measured from last recorded database visit to data lock date or, if ≥ 18 years of age, up to 1 year after a patient reached their site's typical transition age, if earlier. Secondary outcomes were baseline factors associated with follow‐up lapse. The model was adjusted for preidentified confounders. Results Compared with < 18 years, age ≥ 18 was associated with greater hazard of 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐up lapse. In POMS/CIS, the estimated hazard was 1.61 for 1‐year lapse (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32–1.97, p < 0.001) and 1.40 for 2‐year lapse (95% CI 1.11–1.76, p = 0.004). In POMS‐only, the estimated hazard was 1.70 for 1‐year lapse (95% CI 1.33–2.18, p < 0.001) and 1.49 for 2‐year lapse (95% CI 1.11–1.99, p = 0.007). Platform injectable disease‐modifying therapy was associated with greater and intravenous with lesser hazard of lapse in follow‐up, while MS was associated with lower hazard than CIS. Conclusion Variable transition‐of‐care practices and barriers were reported by major US POMS centers. Before typical transition age, age ≥ 18 was associated with greater hazard of 1‐ and 2‐year follow‐up lapse than < 18. Developing standardized, targeted transition‐of‐care practices in POMS may be important.

Objective To assess real‐world effectiveness of switching disease‐modifying therapy (DMT) in pediatric multiple sclerosis (MS) and clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) initially treated with platform injectables on disease activity. Methods Of 2615 pediatric‐onset demyelinating disease patients at 12 clinics in the United States (US) Network of Pediatric MS Centers, those with MS/CIS on initial therapy with a platform injectable who switched to another class of platform injectable, oral or infusion DMT were analyzed. Relapse rate was modeled with negative binomial regression, adjusted for preidentified confounders. Results A total of 212 children switched DMT before age 18 (67% female, 95% MS). Ninety‐three switched from injectable to injectable, 76 injectable to oral, and 43 injectable to infusion. Switchers to oral or infusion were older at onset (injectable 12.3 years, oral 13.5 years, and infusion 14.2 years) and switch (injectable 14.6 years, oral 16.0 years, and infusion 15.7 years). Switchers to infusion DMT were more likely to have enhancing lesions (injectable 45%, oral 28%, and infusion 67%). Compared to injectable (annualized relapse rate [ARR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.52–1.48), relapse rates were lower for injectable to oral (ARR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.20–0.57; rate ratio: 0.38, 95% CI = 0.21–0.69) and injectable to infusion (ARR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.09–0.37; rate ratio: 0.21, 95% CI = 0.10–0.44) ( p < 0.001). Adjusted number needed to treat in person‐years to prevent 1 relapse with oral over injectable was 1.84 (95% CI = 1.03–8.69) and infusion over injectable 1.43 (95% CI = 1.00–3.88). Interpretation Switching from platform injectable to oral or infusion compared to other platform injectable DMT led to better disease control in pediatric MS. Long‐term safety data are required. ANN NEUROL 2026;99:715–729