Back to Authors

Zakharia, Yousef

0000-0001-9480-2626

A5049546835 | I4210125099

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Citations 67

SALVO: Single-arm phase II study of ipilimumab and nivolumab as adjuvant therapy for resected mucosal melanoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 4, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 5_suppl | Pages: TPS65-TPS65

10.1200/jco.2020.38.5_suppl.tps65

TPS65 Background: Mucosal melanoma is a rare and, therefore, poorly studied malignancy. Patients with resected primary tumors have a median time to recurrence of 5.5 months. While no one adjuvant therapy is of proven benefit for patients, immunotherapy has shown activity in metastatic mucosal melanoma. Methods: We are performing a single arm, phase II clinical trial through the Midwest Melanoma Partnership/Hoosier Cancer Research Network (6 sites) for resected mucosal melanoma. The primary endpoint is recurrence free survival (RFS), and it will include 36 subjects. Patients must have had an R0 or R1 resection of a mucosal melanoma (sinonasal, anorectal, vulvar, or other), and register within 90 days of surgery. Adjuvant radiation is allowed prior to registration but not required. Therapy consists of ipilimumab (1 mg/kg) and nivolumab (3 mg/kg) IV q3w x 4, then 480 mg nivolumab x 1 year. Statistical power is calculated to be 85% to detect a change in RFS from 5.5 months to 9.5 months, with a one sided alpha of 0.05. Enrollment began Sept 2017, with current participation from 6 large volume centers in the United States, with 17 patients enrolled as of Sept 2019. Full accrual is anticipated to complete by year end 2020. Patients will be followed for RFS and OS. Translational studies will include mutational burden, c-kit, BRAF, NRAS status, and serum markers of immunity -- including soluble PD-L1 and Bim. Clinical trial information: NCT03241186.
A phase I study of vemurafenib and decitabine in metastatic melanoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | April 19, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 9056-9056

10.1200/jco.2015.33.15_suppl.9056

Updates on phase1b/2 trial of the indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase pathway (IDO) inhibitor indoximod plus checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of unresectable stage 3 or 4 melanoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 6, 2018 | Volume: 34 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 3075-3075

10.1200/jco.2016.34.15_suppl.3075

Phase 2 trial of the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod plus checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 9512-9512

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.9512

A phase 1/2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the oral CXCR4 inhibitor X4P-001 in combination with axitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 4510-4510

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.4510

Abstract CT117: Interim analysis of the Phase 2 clinical trial of the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with advanced melanoma

Cancer Research | July 31, 2017 | Volume: 77 | Issue: 13_Supplement | Pages: CT117-CT117

10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-ct117

Abstract Background: The indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a key counter-regulatory mechanism that normally inhibits immune responses when appropriate. In the setting of cancer, IDO pathway-mediated immune suppression is exploited by tumors in order to prevent and defeat anti-tumor immunity. Small-molecule inhibitors of the IDO pathway, such as indoximod, are an increasingly validated class of potential cancer therapeutics. Additionally, pre-clinical tumor models have shown complementary effects with indoximod / anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitor treatment combinations. A clinical trial was developed based upon these data. Methods: Upon successful completion of a Phase 1b dose escalation cohort, metastatic melanoma patients were enrolled in a single arm Phase 2 trial evaluating the addition of indoximod to standard of care checkpoint inhibitors approved for melanoma. Treating physicians were allowed to administer their choice of approved checkpoint inhibitor. The large majority of patients received indoximod with pembrolizumab and this interim report is limited to those patients. Indoximod was administered continuously in 21 days cycles (1200mg po twice daily) concurrently with pembrolizumab (3mg/kg q21 days). Study endpoint is best overall response (objective response rate (ORR) = complete response rate (CR) + partial response rate (PR)) per site reported RECIST criteria. Results: At time of data cut-off, 60 patients had received indoximod /pembrolizumab and were evaluable for response, defined as having at least one follow-up imaging study performed. The ORR was 52% (31/60) with a CRR of 8% (5/60). The combination was well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events (regardless of attribution), occurring in ≥ 20% of subjects, were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, arthralgia, headache, cough, rash, pruritus, and hypertension. The most frequently reported laboratory abnormalities (regardless of attribution), were anemia (17%) and hyperglycemia (17%). Conclusions: The interim analysis of the combination of indoximod and pembrolizumab demonstrates an ORR of 52% which compares favorably with the established ORR for pembrolizumab alone. Updated data to be presented. NCT02073123. Citation Format: Yousef Zakharia, Robert McWilliams, Monaster Shaheen, Kenneth Grossman, Joseph Drabick, Mohammed Milhem, Olivier Rixie, Samir Khleif, Ryan Lott, Eugene Kennedy, David Munn, Nicholas Vahanian, Charles Link. Interim analysis of the Phase 2 clinical trial of the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with advanced melanoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT117. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT117
Axitinib: from preclinical development to future clinical perspectives in renal cell carcinoma

Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery | June 3, 2015 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 925-935

10.1517/17460441.2015.1045411 | PMID 26039031