de Oliveira Souza, Natália Vasconcellos

Background: Pulsatile tinnitus (PT) is frequently caused by venous sinus stenosis and may be associated with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Venous sinus stenting (VSS) directly addresses venous outflow obstruction and has emerged as a therapeutic option; however, outcome data remain heterogeneous. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and durability of VSS for PT and to compare outcomes between IIH-associated and isolated PT. Methods: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception through December 2025 following PRISMA guidelines. Clinical studies reporting PT outcomes after VSS were included. Random-effects meta-analyses of proportions were conducted to estimate pooled rates of overall improvement, complete resolution, and recurrence. Prespecified subgroup analyses compared IIH versus isolated PT. Results: Thirty-two studies comprising 850 patients were included (641 with IIH; 209 with isolated PT). Venous sinus stenosis accounted for 90.3% of treated etiologies. The pooled rate of overall PT improvement was 89.8% (95% CI, 85.5-92.9). Complete resolution occurred in 87.1% (95% CI, 82.5-90.6). Recurrence at last follow-up was 10.9% (95% CI, 8.3-14.2). Improvement and complete resolution rates did not differ significantly between IIH and isolated PT. Recurrence was higher in IIH (12.0%) than in isolated PT (5.7%), without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: VSS is associated with high rates of PT improvement and complete resolution with low recurrence. Recurrence trends appear higher in IIH, suggesting underlying pathophysiology may influence durability.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Embolization is part of multidisciplinary brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treatment, yet safety data for novel liquid embolization agents (LEAs) such as Squid and PHIL remain limited. This study reports complications and outcomes from curative embolization using Onyx, Squid, PHIL, and Glue. METHODS: Adult patients with brain AVMs treated with LEAs from July 2015 to December 2022 were reviewed for intraprocedural technical issues, postoperative hemorrhagic, and ischemic complications. Minor (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) and major complication rate (morbidity/modified Rankin Scale >2), mortality, and 6-month angiographic cure rate were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 135 patients (62.2% male, mean age 41.7 ± 15.1 years) with 206 embolizations (34% Onyx, 18.9% Squid, 17.5% PHIL, 28.2% Glue) were included. Overall, 87.4% procedures were in ruptured AVMs and 84% treated by the transarterial technique (84%). The 6-month angiographic cure rate was 53.3%, higher when nonadhesive LEAs were used than Glue (65.3% vs 17.6%, P < .001). In adjusted analysis, only eloquent location (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4; P = .007) and Glue (OR = 9.1; 95% CI 2.9-28.9, P < .001) were predictors of lower angiographic occlusion rate, whereas size had an inverse correlation (OR = 0.67; P = .019). Technical procedural complications, hemorrhagic, and ischemic rates were 10.2% (2.2% morbidity), 13.1% (3.7% morbidity and 2.2% mortality), and 9.2% (2.2% morbidity, 0% mortality), respectively, regardless of the preferred LEA. Minor, major complications, and mortality rates were 3.7%, 4.4%, and 2.2%, respectively. Hemorrhage was the major contributor to morbidity and mortality, whereas deep venous drainage was an independent predictor of hemorrhage and mortality. CONCLUSION: PHIL and Squid demonstrated complication and angiographic cure rates comparable with Onyx. However, curative embolization of brain AVMs resulted in only moderate angiographic occlusion. Larger multicenter studies with standardized operator protocols, cost-effectiveness assessments, and extended follow-up are warranted to validate these findings.