Citations 74

Randomized Trials in Oncology Stopped Early for Benefit

Journal of Clinical Oncology | December 28, 2007 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 18-19

10.1200/jco.2007.13.6259 | PMID 18165635

Telecare for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control

Diabetes Care | March 5, 2007 | Volume: 28 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 229-230

10.2337/diacare.28.1.229

Telecare for Patients With Type 1 Diabetes and Inadequate Glycemic Control

Diabetes Care | March 5, 2007 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1088-1094

10.2337/diacare.27.5.1088 | PMID 15111526

OBJECTIVE—To determine the efficacy of telecare (modem transmission of glucometer data and clinician feedback) to support intensive insulin therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Thirty-one patients with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy and with HbA1c >7.8% were randomized to telecare (glucometer transmission with feedback) or control (glucometer transmission without feedback) for 6 months. The primary end point was 6-month HbA1c. To place our findings in context, we pooled HbA1c change from baseline reported in randomized trials of telecare identified in a systematic review of the literature. RESULTS—Compared with the control group, telecare patients had a significantly lower 6-month HbA1c (8.2 vs. 7.8%, P = 0.03, after accounting for HbA1c at baseline) and a nonsignificant fourfold greater chance of achieving 6-month HbA1c ≤7% (29 vs. 7%; risk difference 21.9%, 95% CI −4.7 to 50.5). Nurses spent 50 more min/patient giving feedback on the phone with telecare patients than with control patients. Meta-analysis of seven randomized trials of adult patients with type 1 diabetes found a 0.4% difference (95% CI 0–0.8) in HbA1c mean change from baseline between the telecare and control groups. CONCLUSIONS—Telecare is associated with small effects on glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes on intensive insulin therapy but with inadequate glycemic control.
Summarizing Studies of Diagnostic Test Performance

Clinical Chemistry | February 23, 2004 | Volume: 49 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1783-1784

10.1373/clinchem.2003.024935 | PMID 14578309