Back to Authors

Sen, Ayan

0000-0002-8540-4789

Mayo Clinic

Department of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, 85054, United States of America.

Citations 2

Legionella Pneumonia in the Modern Era: Clinical Features and Predictors of Mortality

Clinical Infectious Diseases | February 10, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1093/cid/ciag085 | PMID 41721519

Abstract Background Legionella pneumonia is an important cause of severe pneumonia, yet contemporary data describing its clinical phenotype, diagnostic patterns, and outcomes in the modern era are limited. Methods We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults with laboratory-confirmed Legionella pneumonia across an integrated health system between January 2019 and September 2025. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Severe disease was defined as having a requirement for high-flow nasal cannula, noninvasive ventilation, mechanical ventilation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify predictors of mortality and severe disease. Results There were 344 patients with laboratory-confirmed Legionella pneumonia during the study period. The median age was 66.6 years, and 45.1% were immunocompromised. Most patients required hospital admission (94.2%), with 36.1% admitted to the intensive care unit; 22.7% required mechanical ventilation and 1.5% ECMO. Thirty- and 90-day mortality were 11.9% and 16.6%, respectively. In multivariable analysis, cirrhosis (OR 10.2, 95% CI 2.15–48.3, P = .003), immunocompromised status (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% CI 1.05–4.77, P = .036), age (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.06, P = .031), and lymphopenia at presentation (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.02–4.24, P = .043) were independently associated with increased 30-day mortality. Among patients who were polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or culture positive, urinary antigen testing was positive in only 25.6%. Conclusions Legionella pneumonia was associated with substantial short-term mortality. Cirrhosis, age, immunocompromised status, and lymphopenia at presentation emerged as independent predictors of 30-day mortality, underscoring the importance of host vulnerability in determining outcomes.
An Observational Analysis of a Large Cohort of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia

Open Forum Infectious Diseases | June 28, 2025 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 7 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ofid/ofaf390 | PMID 40708624

Abstract Background Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) is increasingly seen in patients who are non-HIV immunocompromised hosts, yet modern risk factors and outcomes are poorly recognized and defined. Methods A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients who met criteria for proven or probable PCP from 2017 to 2024 across a large academic multicenter health system. The primary outcome was mortality among cohorts, defined by etiology of immunosuppression through univariate and age-adjusted logistic regression. Secondary analyses included trends in annual diagnoses and testing patterns. Results A total of 701 patients met criteria for inclusion, representing one of the largest clinically characterized cohorts of PCP to date. The median age was 65 years (IQR, 54–73) and 62% were male. The most common risk groups were hematologic malignancy (32.2%), solid tumor cancers receiving chemotherapy (22.4%), and autoimmune disease with immunosuppression (17.7%). Annual PCP diagnoses increased at a rate of 15.8% (95% CI, 8.9%–23.2%) in parallel with increased testing. Only 5.4% of patients were receiving prophylaxis at the time of diagnosis. Overall mortality was 20% (95% CI, 17%–23%) and highest in cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio, 6.24; 95% CI, 2.84–13.69; P < .001). Conclusions PCP in the current era affects a broad range of patients who are immunocompromised, with high associated mortality and low rates of prophylaxis. Patients with solid tumors and those with cirrhosis are at particularly high risk of mortality. These findings highlight the need to reassess and redefine PCP prophylaxis guidelines in specific populations and our understanding of who is at risk.