Mosalem, Osama M

Abstract Introduction Pathogenic mutations in POLE/POLD1 lead to decreased fidelity of DNA replication, resulting in a high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), defined as TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb, independent of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status. Methods De-identified records of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) profiled with the Tempus xT assay (DNA-seq of 595-648 genes at 500×) were identified from the Tempus Database. Results Among 9136 CRC samples profiled, the frequency of POLE/POLD1 genomic alterations was 2.4% (n = 217). Copy number loss was the most common genomic alteration (64%, n = 138) of POLE/POLD1, followed by copy number amplifications (18%, n = 40) and short variant mutations (18%, n = 39). The POLE/POLD1 mutated group presented with a higher frequency of TMB-H phenotype relative to wild type (WT; 22% vs. 9%, P < .001), with a median TMB of 127 mut/Mb in the TMB-H POLE/POLD1 subset. The TMB showed a dramatic contrast between POLE/POLD1 short variant mutations as compared to the group with copy number alterations, with a TMB of 159 mut/Mb vs 15 mut/Mb, respectively. Thus, the short variant mutations represented the so-called ultra-hypermutated phenotype. The POLE/POLD1 mutated group, as compared to WT, exhibited a higher rate of coexisting mutations, including APC, ALK, ATM, BRCA2, and RET mutations. Conclusion Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations exhibited significant differences across immunological markers (ie, TMB, MMR, and MSI-H) and molecular co-alterations. Those with short variant mutations represented 18% of the POLE/POLD1 cohort and 0.4% of the total cohort examined. This group of patients had a median TMB of 159 mut/Mb (range 34-488), representing the ultra-hypermutated phenotype. This group of patients is important to identify given the potential for exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract Background The efficacy of pembrolizumab monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients when stratified by MSI-H and/or TMB-H is poorly defined. Additionally, outcomes based on sequencing source (i.e., tissue or liquid biopsy) have not been well described. We sought to assess outcomes of pembrolizumab monotherapy in patients with mCRPC and compare efficacy based on MSI-H and/or TMB-H when identified by tissue or liquid biopsy. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed of mCRPC patients treated at Mayo Clinic with pembrolizumab monotherapy between 2018 and 2023. Objective response rates (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and overall survival (mOS), were determined by RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results Twenty-two patients with mCRPC received pembrolizumab monotherapy for at least 3 cycles for an MSI-H or TMB-H indication. All patients had next generation sequencing (NGS) performed via tissue (n = 11) or liquid (n = 10) biopsy source. The ORR was 50% (27.3% complete response and 22.7% had partial response). The mPFS for TMB 10-14.9 mut/Mb (n = 4), TMB 15-24.9 mut/Mb (n = 6), and TMB ≥ 25 mut/Mb (n = 10) was 2.1, not reached (NR), and NR, respectively (p = 0.0003). The mOS for these same groups was 5.1 months, 20.5 months, and not reached, respectively. Among patients with TMB-H without co-occurring MSI-H or CDK12 (n = 6), none experienced a response and only one patient had stable disease compared to patients with MSI-H (n = 12) for whom the ORR was 75%. Immunotherapy responsive alterations such as ATRX and PTCH1 mutations were frequently noticed among patients who had complete response (CR). Conclusions Our study highlights that MSI-H drives the efficacy of pembrolizumab in mCRPC with better survival outcomes as TMB increases. Clinicians should consider alternative treatment strategies for advanced prostate cancer when TMB-H is present without co-occurring MSI-H or CDK12. This study further demonstrates the utility of liquid biopsy NGS for identifying MSI-H and/or TMB-H disease.

e24104 Background: There is a high rate of anemia present in cancer patients and anemia is also a common referral to a hematologist. Symptomatic anemia can significantly impair an individual’s functional status so identifying its cause is essential for improving quality of life. Correction of nutritional deficiencies, like iron, B12, and folate deficiency can improve hemoglobin counts, prevent recurrent PRBC transfusions, and can often resolve the anemia. In a busy academic hematology oncology practice, we hypothesize that it is easy to overlook performing a basic nutritional evaluation especially in the setting of other causes for anemia such as chemotherapy, hemolysis, blood loss, chronic kidney disease, and other disorders. We aim to evaluate the frequency of anemia workup in the hematology and oncology division at our academic institution. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all hematology oncology patients seen in our clinic who received a blood transfusion in 2021. All patients were 18 years old or order and received at least one-unit PRBC transfusion as an outpatient. One “transfusion event” was defined as any number of PRBC transfusions on a single day and any subsequent transfusions within a 90-day periods. A single patient, therefore, can have multiple distinct transfusion events. We analyzed whether patients received a “basic” anemia evaluation, defined as checking ferritin, iron saturation, B12, and folate levels within 3 months before or after the first transfusion, and whether a discrepancy in practice patterns exists between different hematology oncology subspecialties. Results: At the interim analysis, we identified 368 transfusion events for 275 patients. Those events were ordered by providers (physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant) in the following subspecialties: oncology (n = 20), malignant hematology (n = 18), classical hematology (n = 3), and fellow-in-training (n = 5). A basic anemia workup was missing in 58% (84 of 146), 27% (49 of 183), 23% (8 of 35), 40% (2 of 5) in the above groups respectively. For patients with macrocytic anemia defined as mean corpuscular volume (MCV) > 100 fL, 48% (38 of 79) did not have B12 or folate levels checked within 3 months before or after a transfusion event. For patients with MCV < 80 fL, 47% (14 of 30) did not have ferritin or iron saturation checked within 3 months before or after a transfusion event. Conclusions: We observed a high percentage of cancer and non-malignant hematology patients who did not receive a basic anemia evaluation within three months before or three months after a blood transfusion. A higher percentage of patients with solid tumors patients who required PRBC transfusions did not receive a basic anemia evaluation in a timely manner. Our study identified an area of quality improvement and need for intervention that can easily be overlooked in a busy academic hematology oncology practice.

e14576 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid malignancies. ICI appears particularly effective when tumors exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) status. Although the response is typically quite good in this setting, there are scenarios where benefit is less than anticipated. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs in patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancers with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients (pts) with PM from primary MSI-H/dMMR cancers treated with immunotherapy between 2010 and 2022 at Mayo Clinic. Data was collected to include pt demographics, tumor characteristics, pathology, tumor markers, imaging, mutational profile, and previous and subsequent treatments. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), defined as objective response rate (RECIST v1.1 criteria) or stable disease. Results: Forty-six pts with MSI-H/dMMR and PM treated with ICIs. Most of our cohort were female (61%) with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years. Colorectal cancer was the most common primary site (69.6%), followed by endometrial (6.5%). Most pts received treatment with PD-1 antibodies as second-line therapy following systemic chemotherapy. DCR of the PM was 71.6 % (n= 13 PR, 9 CR, and 9 SD), with a median duration of response of 12.6 months. Thirteen pts (28.4%) had progressive peritoneal disease on ICI with a median PFS of 2.2 months. Ascites was a poor prognosticator and predicted a lack of benefit from ICI (HR 6.6, 95% CI=2.24-19.9, p= 0.006). Mucinous and signet ring histology were common in pts with peritoneal progression (61.5%); however, this was not statistically significant (HR=1.6; 95%CI= 0.4383 to 3.899, p 0.5). Multivariate analysis for the presence or absence of BRAF and/or RAS mutations was not statistically significant in predicting response. Neither was the specific MMR gene mutation(i.e., MLH1 or PMS2). Interestingly, discordant responses between the peritoneum and other sites of metastasis to immunotherapy were seen in 13 pts (28.4%), primarily as primary peritoneal progression compared to other tumor sites. Conclusions: In our cohort, the DCR of metastatic peritoneal disease in MSI-H/dMMR tumors was approximately 71%. The presence of ascites was identified as a poor prognosticator in this setting and was associated with a lack of response/benefit from ICIs. Histologic subtype (i.e., mucinous/signet ring) did not show statistical significance in predicting ICI response. The subpopulation with discordant response to ICI suggests that peritoneal immunobiology may differ from other sites. Further research on immunotherapy response in the peritoneum is needed for this special subset of pts.