Titan, Silvia M

Background: Total kidney volume (TKV), a prognostic biomarker in ADPKD, is used to stratify high risk individuals. eGFR measures may carry significant error in ADPKD compared to measured GFR(mGFR). This retrospective study investigates the association between height adjusted TKV (htTKV) and eGFR derived from race-free CKD-EPI equations utilizing creatinine and cystatin C. Methods: eGFR was calculated using 3 race-free CKD-EPI formulas: creatinine-based (CKD-EPI creatinine), cystatin C (CKD-EPI cys), and creatinine-cystatin C (CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C) equations on 697 Mayo Clinic ADPKD patients. Correlations between eGFR and TKV measures were estimated and stratified by MIC class risk groups and CKD. Linear regression models were computed to predict ln(htTKV) from the 3 eGFR data sets. The eGFR measures were compared to iothalamate-based mGFR in a subset of patients (n=50). Results: A correlation between eGFR measures and htTKV (Pearson correlation r of -0.53 to -0.54), varied by MIC stratification. Pearson correlation was -0.47 to -0.48 for MIC 1A and 1B, -0.67 to -0.71 for MIC 1C, and -0.67 to -0.68 for MIC 1D and 1E. All equations were significantly associated with htTKV levels, with similar adjusted beta values (95% CI) of -0.15 (-0.17 to -0.13), -0.14 (-0.16 to -0.12), -0.15 (-0.16 to -0.13), for CKD-EPI creatinine, CKD-EPI cystatin C, and CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C, respectively. Compared to mGFR, the CKD-EPI creatinine-cystatin C equation was the least biased (mean -0.86 (95% CI: -3.09 to 1.37)) versus CKD-EPI creatinine (2.31 (-0.73 to 5.34)) or CKD-EPI cystatin C (-3.54 (-5.86 to -1.21)), and most precise, with 1-P30 of 16% (95% CI 7.2% to 29.1%), compared to 18% (8.6% to 31.4%) for CKD-EPI creatinine, or 20% (10.0% to 33.7%) for CKD-EPI cystatin C. Conclusion: A moderate correlation between eGFR and htTKV associated with MIC stratification. Associations between htTKV and all 3 CKD-EPI equations were similar. CKDEPIcrcys tended to be the least biased and most precise equation when compared to mGFR and may be a reasonable alternative.

BACKGROUND: The performance of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) among patients with heart failure (HF) may be worse than in the general population due to a higher prevalence of confounding factors affecting creatinine and cystatin C. Studies in this area are scarce and not stratified by type of HF. We evaluated the performance of current creatinine and cystatin C equations (eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcrcys) compared with measured GFR (mGFR) among patients with HF stratified by ejection fraction. METHODS: We pulled data on Mayo Clinic patients with an mGFR performed for clinical indications from 2011 to 2023, with serum creatinine and cystatin C measured within 7 days and an echocardiogram performed up to 1 year before the mGFR date. HF was identified by the presence of International Classification of Diseases codes within 1 year before the mGFR and subgrouped into ejection fraction (EF) ≥50% (HFEF≥50%, n=182) or <50% (HFEF<50%, n=115) and compared with no-HF controls (n=1871). CKD-EPI (and EKFC) eGFRcr, eGFRcys, and eGFRcrcys equations were calculated and compared for bias (mGFR minus eGFR) and accuracy (1-P30, proportion of people with ≥30% difference between eGFR and mGFR). CIs were generated by bootstrapping. RESULTS: The HF groups were characterized by older age, higher proportion of males, more diabetes, higher creatinine, and higher cystatin C than controls. In terms of bias, eGFRcr overestimated mGFR to a greater extent in both HF groups compared with controls, whereas eGFRcys and eGFRcrcys showed similar bias in both HF groups and controls. In the HF groups, cystatin C-based equations were more accurate than eGFRcr, particularly within HFEF<50% (1-P30 of 28% and 34% for CKD-EPI eGFRcys and eGFRcrcys, respectively, versus 60% for eGFRcr), whereas eGFRcrcys was more accurate in controls. The CKD-EPI and EKFC equations were overall convergent, showing similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HF, eGFRcr demonstrates inferior performance (more bias and less accuracy) compared with cystatin C-based eGFRs, with this effect being more pronounced in those with HFEF<50%.

ABSTRACT Background and hypothesis Podocytopathy associated with likely pathogenic/pathogenic variants of Transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily C member 6 (TRPC6) (TRPC6-AP) has been recognized for about 20 years. As a result of its rarity however, the spectrum of clinical phenotypes and genotype–phenotype correlation of TRPC6-AP remains poorly understood. Here, we characterized clinical, histological and genetic correlates of familial and sporadic patients with TRPC6-AP. Methods In this multicentre observational study, an online questionnaire followed by a systematic literature review was performed to create a cohort with comprehensive data on genetic and clinical outcomes [age of onset, clinical presentation, treatment response, kidney biopsy findings and progression to kidney failure (KF)]. Logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan–Meier analyses investigated the associations between genetic variants and disease progression. Results Among 87 families (96 familial and 45 sporadic cases), 31 distinct missense TRPC6 variants (including 2 novel) were identified, with c.2683C&gt;T p.(Arg895Cys) and c.523C&gt;T p.(Arg175Trp) the commonest variants. Proteinuric kidney disease/nephrotic syndrome was the most common clinical presentation (83.7%), while focal segmental glomerulosclerosis was the most common histological finding (89.4%). By 33 (interquartile range 17–40) years, 48.9% (69/141) of patients had progressed to KF. Sporadic TRPC6-AP demonstrated an earlier progression to KF than familial cases (P = .001) and were more likely to present with nephrotic syndrome [odds ratio 4.34 (1.85–10.15); P = .001]. Gain-of-function TRPC6 variants were more frequent in familial than sporadic TRPC6-AP (70.8% vs 44.4%; P = .004). Compared with patients with other TRPC6 variants, patients with TRPC6 p.R175W and p.R895C variants progressed to KF earlier [median kidney survival of 21 years, hazard ratio 2.985 (95% confidence interval 1.40–5.79); and 38 years, hazard ratio 1.65 (95% confidence interval 1.01–2.81), respectively, log-rank P = .005]. Conclusion Our study shows unique clinical and genetic correlations of TRPC6-AP, which may enable personalized care and promising novel therapies.

Key Points Studies on GFR assessment in people with cancer are needed. In this study, the creatinine–cystatin C equations performed better than other equations, and this was observed in solid and hematological cancers. Our findings give support to the preferential use of creatinine and cystatin C–based equations in people with cancer. Background GFR assessment is important in clinical practice with implications for diagnosis, prognostication, and drug dosing. People with cancer are at risk of imprecision in GFR estimation. This cross-sectional study evaluated the performance of various creatinine and cystatin C–based equations in comparison with measured GFR (mGFR) in people with cancer. Methods We retrieved data for all adult patients who had mGFR by urinary iothalamate clearance between 2011 and 2023 at Mayo Clinic and use of an electronic health record diagnosis code for cancer within 2 years before mGFR. The CKD Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), European Kidney Function Consortium, and Cockcroft–Gault equations were computed, along with performance metrics (bias, precision, and root mean square error [RMSE]. Confidence intervals were generated by bootstrapping, and analysis were stratified by solid and hematological cancers. Results From all adults with cancer and mGFR, 1145 had both creatinine and cystatin C available within 7 days of mGFR. Among all equations, the creatinine–cystatin C CKD-EPI equation provided the best performance, with small bias (median, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 3.8) and higher precision (RMSE, 14.5) compared with creatinine-only or cystatin C–only equations (RMSE varying from 16.6 to 20), and this was also true in solid and hematological cancers. The creatinine–cystatin European Kidney Function Consortium equation had a similar performance to CKD-EPI, Cockcroft–Gault showed worst precision (30% of people with errors above 30%), and cystatin C CKD-EPI equation was the most biased, prone to underestimation of mGFR. Conclusions In our cohort of patients with mGFR and cancer, the CKD-EPI creatinine–cystatin C equation performed best for GFR assessment, and this was true for both solid and hematological cancers. Our findings give support for the preferential use of creatinine and cystatin C–based equations instead of creatinine-only or cystatin C–only equations in people with cancer. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2025_03_25_CJASNMar20.3.3252025.mp3