Hevesi, Mario

Purpose To investigate outcomes among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy (HA‐THA) compared with a matched cohort undergoing primary THA without prior arthroscopy (Only‐THA). Methods Patients who underwent THA after primary hip arthroscopic labral repair from 2009 to 2022 at a single institution were identified. Cases were propensity‐matched 1:4 to primary THA controls by age at THA, sex, body mass index (BMI), surgical approach, and year of surgery. At minimum 2‐year follow‐up, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs)—Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (HOOS‐Pain)—were analyzed. Results Sixty‐two hips (age: 47.5 ± 9.3 years, BMI: 29.7 ± 6.2 kg/m 2 ) were matched to 248 Only‐THA hips (age: 47.9 ± 10 years, BMI: 29.5 ± 5.8 kg/m 2 ). Although both HA‐THA and Only‐THA patients showed significant ( P < .001) postoperative improvements in PROs, HA‐THA patients reported significantly lower postoperative FJS, mHHS, HOOS‐Pain, and inferior Visual Analog Scale pain scores ( P < .001) compared with Only‐THA controls. A cohort‐specific minimal clinical important difference for mHHS was calculated as 9.6 points, with 75.7% of HA‐THA and 87.5% Only‐THA patients achieving this threshold ( P = . 077). At mean 6.6 ± 3.3 years follow‐up, HA‐THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grades 1 reported significantly decreased FJS, mHHS, and HOOS‐Pain compared with HA‐THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grade 2‐3 ( P ≤ .05). HA‐THA patients with Tönnis grade 1 also exhibited worse PROs ( P < .001) compared with Only‐THA controls. Although there were no differences in complication rates between HA‐THA and Only‐THA patients (8% vs. 5%, P = .49), all‐cause reoperation was greater amongst HA‐THA (10% vs. 2%, P = .01). Conclusions Patients undergoing THA after prior hip arthroscopy showed modestly inferior subjective outcomes at mid‐term follow up compared with an age‐matched cohort without prior arthroscopy. Although both groups showed meaningful improvement, a smaller proportion of HA‐THA patients achieved the cohort‐specific MCID for mHHS compared with Only‐THA controls. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Background: Acetabular overcoverage (pincer morphology) has been suggested to be both a source of pain and dysfunction and potentially protective against osteoarthritic change. Purpose: To compare the minimum 5-year clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopic labral repair with a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) of ≥40° as compared with nondysplastic controls with an LCEA of 25° to 40°. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify all patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic labral repair between 2009 and 2019 at a single academic institution. Patients with an LCEA of ≥40° (pincer) were propensity-matched to nondysplastic controls with an LCEA of 25° to 40° on a 1-to-2 basis by sex, age, body mass index, and surgery year. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)—including visual analog scale, Tegner activity score, modified Harris Hip Score, International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12), and Hip Outcome Score were analyzed—as were reoperations and conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Results: A total of 55 patients with pincer morphology (preoperative LCEA: 41.9°± 2.1°) were matched to 110 nondysplastic controls (LCEA: 31.2°± 4.1°), resulting in a total of 165 hips in 163 patients (67% women, mean age: 37.7 ± 9 years). Pincer patients were corrected to a mean postoperative LCEA of 38.7°± 4.1º ( P < .001), with 22 pincer patients having residual overcoverage; namely, a postoperative LCEA ≥40° (range, 40°-45.8°). There were no differences between cohorts regarding intraoperative characteristics—including femoral and acetabular Outerbridge grade—as well as capsulotomy type and the presence of capsular repair ( P ≥ .210). At a mean 8-year follow-up (range, 5.1-13.2), there was no difference in any postoperative PROMs between pincers and controls ( P ≥ .215) and no difference in PROMs between patients with residual overcoverage and pincer patients with a postoperatively normalized LCEA ( P ≥ .291). At final follow-up, 4 patients in the pincer cohort (7%) and 21 controls (19%) converted to THA ( P = .046). Conclusion: Patients with lateral acetabular overcoverage demonstrated similar and satisfactory postoperative PROMs at a minimum 5-year follow-up compared with propensity-matched nondysplastic controls, regardless of whether the LCEA was corrected to <40°. Of note, nondysplastic controls demonstrated a higher rate of conversion to THA, suggesting a potentially chondroprotective role for acetabular overcoverage.

Abstract The lateral and medial meniscus play vital roles in load distribution across the knee joint and in the prevention of knee osteoarthritis. As such, every effort should be made to save and repair the meniscus when possible, as partial and total meniscectomies have been shown to impair the meniscus’ ability to effectively dissipate shock. Recently, an algorithm—coined the “ABCs of meniscal repair”—has emerged as a blueprint for optimizing the success of a meniscal repair. The “ABCs of meniscal repair” refer to anatomic reduction, biologic augmentation, and circumferential compression across the meniscus tear, respectively. In this technique, we describe a modified use of the arthroscopic skid that allows for access to difficult‐to‐reach peripheral meniscal tears while simultaneously aiding in the anatomic reduction of the tear.

Abstract Femoroacetabular impingement with cam morphology that fails nonoperative management can be addressed with hip arthroscopy and cam resection. There exists a wide variation of cam morphology due to various etiologies that can make some cam lesions more challenging to address. A thorough preoperative evaluation and the utilization of a variety of intraoperative techniques can allow for adequate arthroscopic resection of these otherwise challenging cam lesions. In this technique video, we describe a systematic approach for the preoperative assessment of femoroacetabular impingement due to a cam lesion and consideration of different approaches for arthroscopic resection based on cam‐specific morphology.

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage knee osteoarthritis in many patients. In younger patients with predominantly medial compartment disease, high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is performed as a joint-preserving treatment. However, concerns remain regarding potentially compromised outcomes of TKA after previous HTO given the axial deviation, osteotomy site, secondary surgery, previous hardware, and instrumentation. Therefore, this study compared long-term implant survival, revision, and infection rates, and patient-reported outcomes between patients undergoing TKA after HTO and matched TKA-only controls. Methods: Postoperative complications and revision surgeries were prospectively recorded in patients who underwent TKA from 2000 to 2023 at a single academic center. Patients with previous ipsilateral HTO formed the study group and were propensity matched 1:2 to TKA-only patients without a previous osteotomy based on age, sex, and body mass index. Knee Society Scores (KSS) were collected prospectively. Implant survivorship was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The study included 134 HTO-TKA and 268 matched TKA-only patients, with a mean follow-up of 10.5 ± 6.4 years (range: 0-24 years) after TKA. Both groups showed significant postoperative improvements in KSS (p < 0.02) with comparable clinical outcomes (HTO-TKA: 79.0 (6.0), TKA-only: 79.0 (11.8)). Revision arthroplasty rates were 5.2% for HTO-TKA and 4.5% for TKA-only (p = 0.69); the mean time to revision was 8.1 ± 8.7 years vs. 4.4 ± 3.5 years, respectively (p = 0.30). Infection rates were 2.2% and 1.1%, respectively (p = 0.74). Conclusions: Revision and infection rates were comparable between HTO-TKA and matched TKA-only patients, with no statistically significant differences. Our findings demonstrate comparable patient-reported outcomes in both groups. These findings indicate that a previous HTO does not adversely affect TKA implant longevity or clinical outcomes when compared with matched primary TKA patients within the US population. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Abstract Tunnel convergence in multiligament knee surgery remains a technical challenge. Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) femoral sockets/tunnels and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) femoral sockets/tunnels during anatomic posterolateral corner (PLC) reconstructions are particularly vulnerable to convergence. This is secondary to the limited amount of bony real estate available on the lateral distal femur. Previous studies have attempted to define a specific angle to direct the LCL tunnel away from the ACL tunnel. However, inconsistency with ACL femoral socket creation and variability in bony architecture can make this strategy unreliable. This surgical technique describes how to minimize the risk of ACL and LCL tunnel convergence during ACL and PLC reconstructions.

Hip arthroscopy is an increasingly common procedure to treat intra‐articular conditions such as labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement. With the increase in frequency of such procedures, so too are revision arthroscopic hip procedures. Capsular repair in the setting of revision hip arthroscopy can be challenging due to the presence of adhesions and scar tissue formation that obscure tissue planes, suboptimal quality of residual capsular tissue, and the presence of capsular tissue defects. This technical note aims to describe the key surgical principles and considerations of revision hip capsular closure.

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a common injury experienced by basketball players. Surgical management with arthroscopic labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty can lead to successful outcomes for athletes whose nonoperative management fails. Recent studies have demonstrated that athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy in the setting of FAI had favorable return-to-sport (RTS) and sport continuation outcomes. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and RTS rates at minimum 5-year follow-up in basketball players after hip arthroscopy for FAI. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All active basketball players at the recreational, high school, and collegiate levels who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for FAI between August 2009 and December 2019 were identified. Postoperative RTS, revision rates, and surgery satisfaction at final follow-up were evaluated. PROMs were also analyzed as follows: visual analog scale, Tegner Activity Scale, modified Harris Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living, and Hip Outcome Score–Sport. Results: Fifty-three patients (64 hips) were included with a mean ± SD age of 21.2 ± 6.0 years. Most athletes played recreational or high school basketball (85%), while 15% played college basketball. Forty-three patients attempted to return to basketball. Of these patients, 35 (81%) returned to basketball after surgery, with 32 (91%) returning to the same level of play. Patients who returned to basketball had significantly improved outcomes on the modified Harris Hip Score ( P = .006), Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living ( P = .007), Hip Outcome Score–Sport ( P = .004), Tegner Activity Scale ( P = .010), and visual analog scale with use ( P = .041) as compared with those who did not return. High school athletes had decreased odds of RTS when compared with recreational athletes ( P = .01). There was significant improvement in all PROMs from baseline to minimum 5-year follow-up ( P < .05). Conclusion: At minimum 5-year follow-up, basketball players demonstrated durable improvements in PROMs and an RTS rate of 81% after hip arthroscopy for FAI. The majority of athletes returned to the same level of competition. There were significantly improved PROMs in patients who returned to sport versus those who did not. High school athletes had decreased odds of RTS when compared with recreational athletes. However, body mass index, sex, age, alpha angle, and basketball position did not significantly correlate with RTS outcomes.

Background: Frequent pivoting, rotation, and deep hip flexion place football players at high risk for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), a leading cause of hip pain in this population. Previous studies have primarily focused on professional National Football League athletes undergoing mixed surgical techniques, including labral debridement. Limited data exist on outcomes in younger, amateur players treated with labral repair. Purpose: To report return to sport (RTS) rates and functional outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up in primarily active high school and college football players undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for FAI. Study Design: Case series, Level of evidence, 4. Methods: All football players who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for FAI between 2010 and 2019 were identified from an institutional database. Collected data included descriptive data, radiographic parameters, surgical details, and reoperations. At a minimum 5-year follow-up, RTS outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), such as the Modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Hip Outcome Score (HOS), were evaluated. Results: A total of 36 hips in 27 male athletes (mean age, 18 years; body mass index, 28.1 kg/m 2 ) were included. The majority of athletes competed at the high school (70%) or collegiate level (26%). Mean preoperative radiographic measurements were as follows: lateral center-edge angle, 31.6°; Tönnis angle, 4.1°; and alpha angle, 61.4°. Femoroplasty and acetabuloplasty were performed in 100% and 86% of cases, respectively. Also, 84% of players returned to football, all at the same or higher level than before surgery. At a mean follow-up of 9.8 years, all PROMs improved significantly from baseline ( P < .002). Outcome scores at follow-up were as follows: mHHS 90.5; HOS-Activities of Daily Living, 94.5; HOS-Sports-Specific Subscale, 91.1; and visual analog scale (VAS) pain with use, 2.3/10; VAS pain at rest, 1.3/10; and surgical satisfaction, 8.5/10. No patients required revision surgery. However, 2 patients (7%) underwent reoperations—including 1 for heterotopic ossification excision and 1 for periacetabular osteotomy. Conclusion: American football players who underwent primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair for FAI achieved excellent long-term outcomes, with high RTS rates at the same or higher levels, and improvements in PROMs and patient satisfaction. Despite favorable outcomes, nonmedical factors, such as graduation, may influence RTS in competitive athletes, particularly at the high school and collegiate levels.

Background: Arthroscopic treatment of excessive acetabular coverage with pincer morphology or coxa profunda can be challenging. In patients with excessive acetabular coverage with nondistractible hips, an outside-in capsuolotomy can be considered to gain safe and efficient intra-articular access to the hip. Indications: The indications for an outside-in capsulotomy include patients with acetabular retroversion, a lateral center-edge angle >40°, coxa profunda or protrusio, or stiff, older male patients who remain hip preservation candidates. Technique Description: The outside-in capsulotomy is performed once it is recognized that traction on the operative extremity will not provide adequate working space for safe intra-articular access. Traction is taken off the operative extremity, and an anterolateral portal is localized to the 12:00 position on the hip joint with the use of fluoroscopy. The camera is then placed in a juxta-capsular location, and a modified anterior portal is created under direct arthroscopic visualization. We then proceed with extracapsular dissection to identify the indirect head of the rectus. An outside-in capsulotomy is then performed parallel to the indirect head of the rectus, approximately 5 mm distal to its insertion on the acetabular rim. Prior to deep completion of the capsulotomy, the hip joint is flexed to 30° to protect the articular cartilage of the femoral head. Once intra-articular access is obtained, traction can be reapplied, and one can proceed with hip arthroscopy in a standard fashion. Results: This technique decreases the traction time needed, given that the capsulotomy is performed without traction applied. Additionally, the amount of force required for hip distraction is decreased once the capsuolotomy has been completed, through usual sectioning of the iliofemoral ligament. The presented technique is both safe and efficacious, with no published difference in complications as compared to standard inside-out access. A published series of patients with severe pincer morphology and lateral overcoverage who undergo hip arthroscopy with outside-in access demonstrates satisfactory postoperative improvements in patient-reported outcome measures. Discussion/Conclusion: The outside-in capsulotomy provides a means for safe access to the hip joint in otherwise limited or nondistractible hips.