Moussalem, Charbel K

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The artery of Davidoff and Schechter (ADS) is a dural branch of the posterior cerebral artery, supplying the falcotentorial junction. It is not commonly depicted on angiography due to its small size; thus, its visibility is usually indicative of a pathology, such as a dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). Recognizing the ADS as a feeder could be vital in enhancing management success, and understanding its anatomy is important for preventing complications during embolization or microsurgery. We present a scoping review of DAVFs fed by the ADS followed by an illustrative case report encountered at our institution. METHODS: An extensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane databases. The search included the keywords: “Davidoff,” “Schechter,” “Davidoff and Schechter,” “dural branch,” “tentorial branch,” “medial branch,” and “meningeal branch,” in combination with “arteriovenous fistula,” “posterior cerebral artery,” and “superior cerebellar artery.” Only articles published in English or Spanish were included, with no restriction on publication date. Case reports and series were further screened based on best relevance. Data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 16 articles describing 32 cases of DAVFs supplied by the ADS were identified. The most common onset was headache (43.8%), followed by altered mental status (21.2%). Most DAVFs were classified as high grade based on Borden/Cognard scales. Transarterial embolization was the most used treatment (81.3%), achieving complete occlusion in 76.9% of cases. Among patients with complete occlusion, approximately half experienced full resolution of symptoms. In a mean follow-up of 27.4 months (IQR: 30), 2 cases reported complications due to reflux of the embolic agent. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive understanding of the ADS's angioarchitecture is essential to take full advantage of this artery's features in the treatment, mitigating potential complications and optimizing patient outcomes.

OBJECTIVE Surgical site infection (SSI) is a leading cause of morbidity following posterior spine surgery. The optimal choice of skin closure technique depending on patient- and procedure-specific characteristics remains to be elucidated. METHODS The Neurosurgery Enterprise Registry (NER) at Mayo Clinic was queried for patients who underwent posterior spine surgery from 2017 to 2023. Propensity matching was performed to match patients on the basis of the development of SSI and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, race, and comorbidities. Perioperative outcomes were analyzed using data from the NER and medical records. RESULTS A total of 18,842 cases of posterior spine surgery were identified in the NER, and SSI was observed in 154 cases (0.8%). Of these patients, 308 patients were included in the 1:1 propensity score–matched cohort analysis, with 154 patients included in each group. Sutures were used in 224 patients (72.7%) and staples in 84 patients (27.3%) (p < 0.01). Female patients comprised 45.1% of the sutures group and 46.4% of the staples group (p = 0.8). The mean ± SD age was 59.8 ± 15.4 years in the sutures group and 60.8 ± 11.9 years in the staples group (p = 0.6). Fusion was performed in 27.2% of patients in the sutures group and 44% in the staples group (p < 0.01). Multilevel fusion comprised 68.9% of fusion cases in the sutures group and 67.6% in the staples group (p = 0.8). Comorbidities, such as diabetes (p = 0.6), hypertension (p = 0.1), and the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (p = 0.5) and immunosuppressants (p = 0.2), did not differ between groups. Univariate analysis performed in the propensity score–matched cohort showed that SSI was observed in 53.6% of patients in the sutures group and 40.5% in the staples group (p = 0.04). No significant differences were noted regarding 30-day (p = 0.3), 90-day (p = 0.2), and 1-year (p = 0.3) readmissions and 30-day (p = 0.7), 90-day (p = 0.8), and 1-year (p = 0.8) reoperations. On multivariable logistic regression, SSI was not significantly associated with the choice of skin closure technique (p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS After adjustment for spinal fusion, number of fused levels, the use of immunosuppressants, and other risk factors, SSI development was not significantly associated with the use of sutures versus staples following posterior spine surgery in our institution. Additionally, no significant differences were observed regarding baseline characteristics and other perioperative outcomes. The authors’ analysis shows that skin closure technique did not significantly affect SSI rates and other outcomes in these patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Access to the amygdala and hippocampus (A/H) is complex. To address the limitations and invasiveness of traditional approaches, including the Transsylvian, Subtemporal, and Supracerebellar infratentorial approaches, we developed the suprapetrous infratemporal (SPIT) approach. This study describes the nuances of this approach in both cadaveric studies and clinical cases. METHODS: Three unilateral exposures were performed using microscopic and endoscopic methodologies in the SPIT approach. After cadaveric investigation, this approach was successfully implemented in representative clinical cases. RESULTS: The SPIT approach enabled direct access to the inferior A/H, circumventing the requirement for temporal lobe retraction and detachment of the temporal lobe from the dura through a subtemporal route by drilling the upper part of the mastoid, consequently mitigating tension on the vein of Labbé. This enabled a bottom-up view because one would gain with a zygomatic osteotomy and forward projection like a mini-posterior petrosal view by using a transmastoid view, without cutting down the zygomatic arch and opening the dura subtemporally, limiting patient pain and preventing case comorbidity. The SPIT approach was performed in 2 cases of mesial temporal cavernoma presenting with seizures. The lesion was visualized intraoperatively and was successfully removed in these cases. The postoperative course was excellent with no complications, and gross total resection was radiographically confirmed with Engel Class 1a seizure freedom. CONCLUSION: The SPIT approach is a complementary approach for inferior A/H disease, combining the combined middle fossa approach modified for intradural pathology. Limited drilling of the upper aspect of the mastoid with a medial dural opening at the level of the arcuate eminence provides a direct trajectory with minimal brain retraction. Additional research encompassing a larger patient cohort and extended follow-up periods is required to substantiate the advantages of SPIT in the management of inferior A/H lesions.