Guarin Perez, Sergio F

ABSTRACT Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a serious complication of total joint arthroplasty (TJA), with Staphylococcus aureus being one of the most common causative organisms. Irrigation and debridement with component retention (IDCR) is often performed to manage PJI. Antimicrobial treatment that targets S. aureus biofilms on prosthesis surfaces and within bone may be especially helpful when retaining a prosthesis. Phages, viruses that specifically infect bacteria, are a potential therapeutic consideration. Using a biofilm time kill assay in bovine synovial fluid, bactericidal activity of vancomycin or phage K (32 µg/mL and 10 11 pfu/mL, respectively) as well as the combination of phage K (10 10 pfu/mL) and vancomycin (32 µg/mL) was observed against a methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strain. Using a murine PJI model, mice infected with MRSA underwent IDCR followed by phage administration into the joint space with or without systemically administered vancomycin. Mice receiving both phage and vancomycin had significant reductions in MRSA on the prosthesis surface compared to untreated or vancomycin‐treated mice. Phage K showed bactericidal activity in vitro and was active when locally delivered in combination with systemically administered vancomycin in a murine PJI model managed with IDCR.

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) effectively restores mobility, reduces pain, and enhances the quality of life of patients of all ages. Despite its benefits, concerns regarding the long-term effects of high-impact activities and sports on implant longevity require further study. This study investigated the effect of activity level on long-term radiographic wear of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in young patients undergoing THA. Methods: Between 1999 and 2008, 785 patients (909 hips) aged ≤50 underwent primary THA using first-generation HXLPE liners from 4 different vendors with either metal or ceramic heads. Functional activity and participation questionnaires, including the Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS Jr), University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, and High-Activity Arthroplasty Score (HAAS), were surveyed in 2018 to 2019. The response rate was 44%. Radiographic linear wear rates were measured using the ROMAN software in patients who had completed questionnaires and had radiographs taken at least 10 years apart, leaving a final cohort of 249 patients (284 hips). Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the relationship between HXLPE wear rates and activity scores. Results: At the time of the survey, approximately 10% of the patients performed high-impact activities not-recommended by consensus guidelines. The HXLPE linear wear rate was 0.036 mm/year (SD: 0.026). Patients with higher activity levels, as measured on the continuous UCLA/HAAS activity scale, did not exhibit increased wear (β = -0.0009; p = 0.31). Stair climbing was correlated with increased wear rates (β = 0.0066; p = 0.004), whereas walking (β = 0.0005; p = 0.66) and running (β = 0.0017; p = 0.30) were not significantly correlated. Patients performing nonrecommended activities did not show increased wear rates compared with those performing recommended activities (β = 0.0063; p = 0.19). Conclusions: Linear wear rates of first-generation HXLPE were not related to functional activity or participation in high-impact activities. Future research should include longitudinal assessments of activity levels and data on other potential complications related to high-impact sports to provide robust evidence regarding recommended activity level postoperatively. Level of Evidence: Level III , Retrospective Comparative Study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AimsPrevious studies have highlighted differences in the risk of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with either a cemented taper slip (TS) stem or a composite beam (CB) stem. This biomechanical study explored the occurrence of PPF around these stems, and the protective effect of adding a 16-gauge prophylactic calcar or diaphyseal wire to the TS stems to increase the resistance to torque as a potential way to prevent these fractures.MethodsA total of 21 TS stems (eight alone, six with calcar wiring, and seven with diaphyseal wiring placed 2 cm distal to the lesser trochanter) and seven CB stems were cemented into standard sawbones. The peak torque at failure was measured using a servohydraulic test machine, and the fracture location was recorded. An a priori power analysis determined that seven specimens per group were needed to detect a 30 Nm difference with 90% power, assuming a 14.8 Nm SD in peak torque between groups. Comparisons were performed using paired t-tests.ResultsCB stems exhibited a significantly higher mean peak torque at failure (205.3 Nm (SD 26.9)) than TS stems (159.5 Nm (SD 17.4); p = 0.012), calcar-wired TS (148.2 Nm (SD 38.6); p = 0.031), and diaphyseal-wired TS (164.9 Nm (SD 21.5); p = 0.027). This study did not demonstrate that wired-TS stems had a higher peak torque at failure than non-wired TS stems. Additionally, calcar wiring was not found to be stronger than diaphyseal wiring (p = 0.400). Four CB fractures occurred distal to the stem, whereas all TS fractures occurred at the mid-stem, simulating a Vancouver type B fracture. Interestingly, adding the diaphyseal wire shifted the fracture location more distally in four of the seven stems (p = 0.070).ConclusionIn this model, CB stems had greater resistance to torque than TS stems, which may explain the lower risk of PPF. Adding calcar or diaphyseal wires to the TS stems resulted in no significant change in peak torque to fracture. CB cemented stems should be considered in patients at high risk of PPF.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(5 Supple A):32–37.

AbstractTo minimize periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) risk, some clinicians prescribe extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Given the limited evidence supporting EAP, we sought to evaluate impact of prophylactic antibiotic duration on PJI risk in a murine TJA model. A titanium prosthesis was implanted into the proximal tibia of 89 mice and inoculated with 102 colony forming units (cfu) of Staphylococcus aureus Xen36. Control mice (n = 20) did not receive antibiotics. Treated mice received either 24 h (n = 35) or 4 days (n = 34) of cefazolin prophylaxis. Cultures were obtained from the prostheses, tibia, femur, and knee tissues 3 weeks after surgery. All mice in the control group developed PJI. Both prophylaxis regimens reduced the rate of PJI relative to the control, with only 2/35 mice in the 24‐h cohort (p < 0.0001) and 1/34 in 4‐day cohort developing PJI (p < 0.0001). CFU counts from the prostheses, bone and knee tissues were reduced for the 24‐h and 4‐day prophylaxis cohorts relative to the control (p < 0.0001 for both). There was no difference in rates of PJI or CFU counts between the two prophylaxis cohorts (p = 0.58). Prophylactic cefazolin profoundly reduced rates of PJI in a murine model of TJA in which all control animals developed PJI. Extending cefazolin prophylaxis duration from 24 h to 4 days did not result in improved PJI rates or decreased bacterial loads in infected cases. While these results strongly support use of antibiotic prophylaxis for TJA, EAP did not appear to add benefit in the described mouse model.

AimsDual-mobility (DM) components are increasingly used to prevent and treat dislocation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Intraprosthetic dissociation (IPD) is a rare complication of DM that is believed to have decreased with contemporary implants. This study aimed to report incidence, treatment, and outcomes of contemporary DM IPD.MethodsA total of 1,453 DM components were implanted at a single academic institution between January 2010 and December 2021: 695 in primary and 758 in revision THA. Of these, 49 presented with a dislocation of the large DM head and five presented with an IPD. At the time of closed reduction of the large DM dislocation, six additional IPDs occurred. The mean age was 64 years (SD 9.6), 54.5% were female (n = 6), and mean follow-up was 4.2 years (SD 1.8). Of the 11 IPDs, seven had a history of instability, five had abductor insufficiency, four had prior lumbar fusion, and two were conversions for failed fracture management.ResultsThe incidence of IPD was 0.76%. Of the 11 IPDs, ten were missed either at presentation or after attempted reduction. All ten patients with a missed IPD were discharged with a presumed reduction. The mean time from IPD to surgical treatment was three weeks (0 to 23). One patient died after IPD prior to revision. Of the ten remaining hips with IPD, the DM head was exchanged in two, four underwent acetabular revision with DM exchange, and four were revised to a constrained liner. Of these, five (50%) underwent reoperation at a mean 1.8 years (SD 0.73), including one additional acetabular revision. No patients who underwent initial acetabular revision for IPD treatment required subsequent reoperation.ConclusionThe overall rate of IPD was low at 0.76%. It is essential to identify an IPD on radiographs as the majority were missed at presentation or after iatrogenic dissociation. Surgeons should consider acetabular revision for IPD to allow conversion to a larger DM head, and take care to remove impinging structures that may increase the risk of subsequent failure.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(5 Supple B):98–104.

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a reliable procedure to treat medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). The reported survivorship of UKA has varied in the literature 3–7 . In part, the higher failure rates of UKA seen in registries could be related to the caseload and experience of the reporting surgeon 8 . The introduction of techniques that make procedures more reliable, especially in the hands of inexperienced surgeons, can decrease the rate of failure. With the Oxford UKA implant (Zimmer Biomet), the recommended surgical technique involves cutting the tibia first, followed by the femoral preparation. However, a technique that allows for preparation of the femur first, as well as the use of the femoral component as a reference for the tibial cut, may reduce the common technical errors seen with the procedure. We have utilized the femur-first technique in cases of medial Oxford UKA. Description: The femur-first method outlined in the present article does not require any unique instruments beyond what is supplied by the manufacturer. Before beginning, the femoral positional guide needs to be decoupled from its base. To start, the intramedullary guide is introduced approximately 1 cm anterior and medial to the intercondylar notch. Once the femoral osteophytes are removed, the surgeon identifies the center of the femoral condyle and marks it. The posterior tibial cartilage is then removed with a saw to facilitate the placement of the appropriately sized femoral spherical guide. The size of the femoral component is determined by selecting the implant that aligns best with the width of the femoral condyle. The femoral drill guide is detached from its base because there is not enough space for the base, as the tibia has not yet been resected. The decoupled femoral guide is connected to the intramedullary rod, allowing the precise positioning of the femoral component in approximately 10° of flexion relative to the femoral sagittal plane and drilling of the 2 peg holes. The posterior condylar resection guide is impacted into position, and the osteotomy of the posterior condyle is made. The distal femur is then milled with use of a number-0 spigot, and the femoral component trial is positioned into place. The femoral condyle is “resurfaced” with the femoral component, which restores joint obliquity and the natural height, a critical element of the femur-first technique. Following this, the 1-mm (size-dependent) spherical gauge is placed around the femoral component trial. The tibial guide is secured with the G-clamp and a number-0 resection block, and is pinned into place. We recommend swapping the number-0 cutting guide for a +2 when making the cut in order to avoid over-resection. Recutting is advised if a minimum 3-mm feeler gauge does not adequately occupy the flexion space. The final step is to balance the flexion and extension gaps in the usual fashion. Alternatives: The alternative technique is a traditional tibia-first approach, in which tibial resection is performed prior to femoral resection. As described in the original manufacturer’s manual, the tibial cut is accomplished with use of a number-0 cutting guide, and the tibial rotation is based on the axis formed by the anterior superior iliac spine and knee center, irrespective of the femoral condyle. Rationale: The femur-first technique is advantageous in several ways. When performing the femoral cut first, the surgeon can better align the drill guide at the center of medial femoral condyle. This will result in the femoral component being positioned more in line with the coronal plane of the femoral condyle. Additionally, the tibial resection is made with the femoral trial in place; therefore, the depth of resection can be more accurate, potentially avoiding excessive bone resection. Finally, with the femoral trial in place, the surgeon can judge the rotation and medial-lateral position of the tibial component more precisely, hence lowering the possibility of bearing spin-out, impingement, and dislocation or unexplained pain. Expected Outcomes: The femur-first technique is a bone-preserving procedure that results in thinner bearings when compared with a tibia-first approach 1 . The femur-first approach also improves radiographic outcomes, including femoral coronal, femoral sagittal, and tibial sagittal alignments, while tibial coronal alignment does not differ. There is an early trend toward improved 5-year survivorship with the femur-first (98%) versus tibia-first (94%, p = 0.35) techniques. There has been no significant difference reported in Knee Society Scores between techniques. Important Tips: Perform a preliminary cut of the posterior tibial cartilage in order to allow insertion of the femoral drill guide under the femoral condyle. Make sure the femoral drill guide lies in the center of the marked medial femoral condyle. Align the tibial sagittal cut with the femoral component trial in order to avoid bearing impingement. Be conservative in the tibial cutting by utilizing a +2 cutting guide (since the coupling is performed with the intramedullary guide in place, which drives the tibial guide distally). Acronyms and Abbreviations: UKA = unicompartmental knee arthroplasty FF = femur-first M-L = medial-lateral AP = anteroposterior PA = posteroanterior ASA = acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) BID = bis in die, twice a day PT = physical therapy TF = tibia-first FCA = femoral coronal angle FSA = femoral sagittal angle TSA = tibial sagittal angle IM = intramedullary OA = osteoarthritis