Fahradyan, Vahe

Introduction Hypergranulation tissue (excess granulation tissue) is a common complication following penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV). It often requires repeated treatment with silver nitrate using a speculum to access the neovagina. This study evaluates whether adding betamethasone suppositories to silver nitrate treatment improves the resolution of hypergranulation tissue after PIV. Methods A retrospective chart review was conducted on patients who received supplemental betamethasone suppositories in addition to silver nitrate treatment (betamethasone group) between 01/2023 and 12/2024 and matched to a cohort of patients treated with silver nitrate alone (silver nitrate group). Outcomes, number of treatments, and severity of hypergranulation tissue were compared using t tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Results There were 16 patients in each group, with similar average follow-up times: 8.5 ± 5.5 months (silver nitrate group) and 7.8 ± 4.7 months (betamethasone group) ( P = 0.70). At the most recent follow-up, moderate and severe hypergranulation resolved more often in the betamethasone group (86%, 50%) than in the silver nitrate group (60%, 25%). Patients in the betamethasone group with moderate or severe hypergranulation tissue required fewer median treatments for resolution (2 vs 3.5 and 4 vs 5, respectively). After excluding cases that required cauterization under anesthesia, patients in the betamethasone group were significantly more likely to have resolution of their hypergranulation tissue compared to patients in the silver nitrate group ( P = 0.035). Conclusions Betamethasone is an effective addition to silver nitrate for the treatment of hypergranulation tissue, with our results indicating it can improve resolution and lessen treatment burden in patients' post-PIV.

ABSTRACT Genital lymphedema presents significant challenges in surgical management, with limited effective interventions. This case report explores the use of contrast‐enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubble injection as an alternative adjunct technique for lymphatic mapping in lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) surgery for genital lymphedema. A retrospective chart review approved by our institutional review board was performed for patients with genital lymphedema undergoing LVA surgery between 2020 and 2024. Intraoperative CEUS for lymphatic mapping was used with intradermal injection of microbubble suspension Lumason (Bracco Suisse, Monroe Township, NJ, USA). Data regarding demographics, comorbidities, clinical and operative characteristics, complications, and surgical outcomes were retrieved. Three patients with genital lymphedema who underwent LVA were identified. The first patient was a 34‐year‐old female with recurrent lymphangioma circumscriptum and vesicular drainage. She successfully underwent CEUS‐guided LVA followed by two debulking procedures. The second patient was a 16‐year‐old male with congenital scrotal and lower extremity lymphedema. He had two CEUS‐guided LVAs and subsequent debulking for anterior scrotal swelling, with long‐term reduction in edema. The third patient was a 31‐year‐old female with primary lymphedema of the right lower extremity and genital region. She underwent seven CEUS and indocyanine green lymphography (ICG) guided anastomoses targeting the mons and lower abdomen, resulting in substantial symptomatic and volumetric improvement. CEUS detected target lymphatic vessels in all cases, including cases where ICG imaging failed to identify candidate lymphatic vessels. CEUS with intradermal microbubble injection successfully identified target lymphatic vessels in the preoperative planning for LVA surgery in patients with genital lymphedema.

Background: Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an effective surgical treatment for extremity lymphedema. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography, the traditional standard for imaging lymphatic vessels, has limitations, including difficulty depicting deeper or congested lymphatics and contraindication in iodine hypersensitivity. This study evaluated contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubbles for identifying lymphatic vessels for LVA and compared it with ICG lymphography. Methods: In this single-center retrospective review, intraoperative CEUS with intradermal injection of microbubble suspension (Lumason, Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.) was used in patients before LVA surgery between October 2019 and February 2023. Pre- or intraoperative ICG lymphography was also used to identify target lymphatic vessels. All patients diagnosed with primary or secondary extremity lymphedema who underwent LVA were included. Technical success rate was defined as lymphatic vessels identified by CEUS that led to successful LVAs. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Thirty-two patients underwent LVA surgery, with a mean age of 58.5 ± 13.9 years. CEUS identified lymphatic vessels in all 32 patients, including 7 in whom ICG failed. Two patients with ICG allergy underwent CEUS only. CEUS identified more candidate lymphatics per patient (5.3 ± 4.2) compared with ICG (2.5 ± 2.7). Of the 182 anastomoses, 96 (52.8%) were identified by both CEUS and ICG, 75 (41.2%) by CEUS only, and 11 (6%) by ICG only. Conclusions: CEUS is a promising tool for identifying lymphatic vessels in patients with lymphedema undergoing LVA, particularly when ICG lymphography is inadequate or contraindicated.

Summary: Breast cancer is a common malignancy, and treatment often involves mastectomy. For oncological safety, the anterior and lateral cutaneous branches of the third through fifth intercostal nerves are routinely resected during nipple-sparing mastectomies, leading to loss of nipple sensation. The current gold standard for nipple neurotization uses nerve allografts to connect the nipple with a remaining stump of an intercostal nerve. Despite the convenience of off-the-shelf solutions, this study explored a novel approach using intercostal nerves as autografts or for direct repair to restore nipple sensation. Six patients underwent nipple-sparing mastectomy and opted for nipple neurotization. Three patients underwent neurotization with an intercostal nerve autograft, whereas in 3 patients, long intercostal nerves allowed nipple neurotization directly without the need for an autograft. Meticulous dissection of the intercostal nerves enabled a length of approximately 9 cm (±1.5) per nerve. The acquired nerve length allowed tension-free coaptation of direct nipple neurotization in 3 patients and utilization as an autograft in the other 3 patients. No postoperative complications were observed, whereas sensory outcomes are yet to be evaluated. The study highlighted the feasibility of using intercostal nerves either as autologous intercostal nerve grafts or for direct neurotization. Using an intercostal nerve as an autograft is a cost-effective and time-efficient strategy to avoid the need for an allograft without additional donor-site morbidity. This technique offers a practical and globally accessible solution for improving patient access to state-of-the-art postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Background: Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) entails considerable soft-tissue dissection to the perineal region and involves complex tissue rearrangement. This study examines the role of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway after PIV in reducing opioid use and controlling postoperative pain. Methods: A retrospective study of 50 transfemale patients who underwent PIV at a single institution from June 2021 to January 2023 was completed. The study compared 2 groups of patients who were given different postoperative pain management regimens: group A received standard postoperative analgesics and group B received ERAS. Variables such as postoperative pain scores on the numeric pain rating scale (0–10), use of opioid medication, length of hospital stay, and patient comorbidities were recorded and compared across the 2 groups. Results: The average hospital stay length was 4.92 (±0.85) days. Group A had a slightly longer average stay compared with group B. The average pain level in both groups was 4.25 (SD ±1.51). Group A exhibited a slightly higher average pain level of 4.31 (±1.53), whereas group B exhibited 4.16 (SD±1.51) (P = 0.77). Although pain levels did not significantly vary between the 2 groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in the amount of opioid medication used in group B with a P value of 0.009. Conclusions: ERAS protocol is effective in decreasing opioid usage in the immediate postoperative setting after PIV.

Summary: Prior studies on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography for preoperative mapping before lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery in patients with extremity lymphedema have been limited to using only Lumason and Sonazoid as microbubble contrast agents. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using two other Food & Drug Administration–approved microbubble agents, Optison and Definity, for imaging lymphatic vessels in the upper extremities. Nine female adults with unilateral upper extremity lymphedema anticipating lymphaticovenous anastomosis surgery underwent CEUS lymphography of the unaffected upper extremity randomized to either Lumason, Definity, or Optison. Lymphatic vessels were visualized in all but one case when undilated Definity was used. In the eight upper extremities where lymphatic vessels were visualized, an average of eight intradermal injections of microbubbles were performed in the extremity. Lymphatic vessels could be identified in 57% (36 of 63) of the injections. The effective dilution for each of the microbubble agents is provided. This was the first successful demonstration of lymphatic vessel visualization using either Definity or Optison. Broadening the range of available microbubble agents for CEUS lymphography could improve accessibility to the procedure and provide potentially safer alternatives.

Summary: Lymphedema following oncologic intervention can cause significant lifelong morbidity for patients in whom conservative management fails. The associated swelling, discomfort, pain, and recurrent cellulitis greatly diminish quality of life. Surgical procedures, including suction-assisted lipectomy, lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), and vascularized lymph node transfers, show effectiveness in both volume reduction in affected extremities and symptom relief. However, the success of procedures like LVA is dependent on effective preoperative lymphatic mapping to identify suitable vessels for anastomosis. Traditional superficial lymphatic mapping uses near infrared fluorescence indocyanine green (ICG) imaging. Moreover, recent advances in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) lymphography increased lymphovenous bypass target identification for LVA in the extremities.7 CEUS lymphography uses microbubbles as a contrast-enhancing agent injected intradermally into the affected extremity with subsequent identification of superficial collecting lymphatic vessels using ultrasound. Although a recent report noted an uptick in severe and critical adverse drug reactions to an ultrasound contrast agent injected intravenously in stress echocardiography, adverse drug reactions associated with ultrasound contrast-enhancing agents in body ultrasound are rare. The safety profile and potential complications from CEUS lymphography in the lymphedema population have yet to be fully characterized. In this case report, the authors present the first cutaneous adverse drug event following a secondary exposure to the contrast used for CEUS imaging. Mechanisms and justifications for an immune-mediated process are explored, and a review of similar manifestations in other related contrast applications is discussed.

Abstract Background Implant-based breast augmentation is a gold standard procedure for transfeminine patients to create a more feminine-appearing chest. In many cases, ancillary procedures are performed simultaneously to achieve an optimal aesthetic result. Objectives To determine the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing feminizing gender-affirming breast surgery in a single academic institution. Methods A retrospective electronic chart review of feminizing gender-affirming breast surgery patients at Mayo Clinic, Rochester from 2017 to 2022 was conducted. Patients demographics and surgical outcomes were gathered. A survival analysis was performed to obtain the time-to-event complication rate. Results Over 5 years, 46 patients (92 breasts) were included. The mean age was 39 years (SD ±15), and most had an above-normal Body Mass Index (58.7%). Thirty (65%) had previous gender-affirming surgeries. The mean implant volume was 289 ml (SD ±95; 140 - 520). Most implants were placed in a subglandular plane (81%) with an inframammary fold incision (91.3%). All implants used were smooth round cohesive silicone gel implants. Ancillary procedures were performed in thirty-two patients (69.57%). Eight patients presented complications (4 major vs 4 minor) in a median postoperative follow-up of 372 vs 392 days; at 1-month follow-up, the probability of a complication to have occurred is 2.17% (95% CI: 0–6.3%) vs 5% (95% CI: 0–11.5%) and at 1 year is 10.21% (95% CI: 0–20.9%) vs 12.5% (95% CI: 0–23.4%) ​which remain the same up to 4 years. Conclusions Breast augmentation with implants is a safe procedure to achieve feminization of the breast with a low rate of complications.

Abstract Context Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals have greater access to genital surgery (GS) with improved insurance coverage and access to trained surgeons and interdisciplinary gender-affirming providers. Objective To determine perioperative medical and behavioral health outcomes in transfeminine (TF) individuals undergoing GS, with use of a specific gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) algorithm based on individualized risk factor assessment. Methods In this retrospective observational cohort study, we collected preoperative and postoperative data from 183 TF individuals at a single tertiary referral center from 2017 to 2022, grouping patients by those who continued estradiol (Group 1) vs those who had temporarily discontinued estradiol for 2 to 6 weeks preoperatively (Group 2). Data included clinical and biochemical assessment, GAHT regimens, validated behavioral health measures, and postoperative complications. Main outcomes included venous thromboembolism (VTE) incidence, non-VTE postoperative complication incidence, and change in behavioral health assessments. Results The majority of individuals continued estradiol perioperatively (Group 1; 138 [75.4%]). Individuals who temporarily held estradiol preoperatively (Group 2; 45 [24.6%]) were statistically older (P < .01), had higher incidence of cardiometabolic comorbidities (P < .01), and higher Caprini scores (P < .01). Group 1 was statistically more likely to use oral estradiol (P < .01). One episode (0.05%) of VTE occurred (Group 1). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications or behavioral health measures between groups. Conclusion An individualized algorithm for preoperative hormone management for TF GS resulted in perioperative continuation of GAHT for the majority of individuals without significantly increasing the risk for postoperative surgical complications, while maintaining stable behavioral health measures perioperatively.