Lebow, Jocelyn

ABSTRACTObjectiveTo examine the outcomes of a clinical sample of young patients with restrictive eating disorders who received Family‐Based Treatment for Primary Care (FBT‐PC).MethodsParticipants were 134 youth (mean age = 15.7 years) and their caregiver(s). Participants and caregivers completed measures of eating disorder symptomatology, quality of life, and caregiver self‐efficacy.ResultsOf the 134 patients who received at least one session of FBT‐PC, 55.9% completed treatment, 20.1% were followed until they began a higher level of care, and 23.8% were non‐completers. Weekly measures for the full sample were evaluated using intention‐to‐treat analyses. Patient‐reported scores on the ED‐15 improved by −0.1 (SE = 0.02, F (1,133)= 26.4, p < 0.0001) per week, and caregivers' ratings of patient symptoms also improved by 0.85 (SE = 0.2, F (1,133)=13.1, p = 0.0003) per week. Patient's BMI percentile increased by 1.25 points per week (SE = 0.14, F (1,133) = 83.9, p < 0.0001). For patients who completed FBT‐PC, eating disorder symptoms, per patient‐ (M = −1.43, p < 0.0001) and caregiver‐report (M = −1.33 p < 0.0001) decreased significantly from baseline to end of treatment. Patient's quality of life increased significantly from baseline to end of treatment (M = 21.6, p < 0.0001) and caregivers showed significant increases in self‐efficacy (M = 3.41, p < 0.0001, d = 0.856). At the end of treatment, 62.5% of patients with complete data met criteria for full research remission, and 44.6% met criteria for full clinical remission.DiscussionFindings provide preliminary support for FBT‐PC as an effective treatment for youth with restrictive eating disorders. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings in other primary care settings and to understand the durability of treatment effects.

The striking rise in adolescent eating disorders since the severe acute respiratory coronavirus syndrome 2 pandemic has amplified demands for specialty eating disorders services and contributed to protracted delays in care. In the context of these delays, patients are at risk for increased weight loss, medical instability, escalating disease progression and poor prognosis. Primary care providers (PCPs) are frequently the first point of contact for young patients with eating disorders and are often left to bridge the gap while families struggle to establish specialty care. Yet, beyond case detection and medical comanagement, there are no evidence-based guidelines that can assist PCPs to prepare families for treatment, halt disease progression, and begin the lengthy process of weight and nutritional restoration in efforts to reduce medical complications and support a favorable prognosis. We present the case of a 13-year-old girl with a restrictive eating disorder to illustrate how PCPs can use intervention principles and strategies derived from evidence-based eating disorder treatment to successfully manage adolescent patients until they can access specialty treatment. We offer concrete guidelines for decision-making, as well as suggested behavioral and medical interventions for the PCP. With evidence-based tools, PCPs are well-positioned to support young patients with restrictive eating disorders and their family members as they begin the process of recovery from an eating disorder.

AbstractObjectiveThe goal of the current study is to advance efforts to increase the quality of care for childhood anxiety disorder (CADs) through (1) detailing the content of community‐based treatment sessions, (2) exploring the validity of therapist surveys, (3) examining the influence of setting differences, and (4) testing the effects of a technology‐based training on use of nonexposure strategies.MethodsThirteen therapists were randomly assigned to technology‐based training in the use of exposure therapy or treatment as usual (TAU) for CADs. Therapeutic techniques were coded from 125 community‐based treatment sessions.ResultsConsistent with survey responses community therapists spent the majority of session time reviewing symptoms (34% of session time), implementing nonexposure cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT; 36%), and rarely engaged in exposure (3%). An integrated behavioral health setting was associated with greater endorsement of exposure on survey, p < 0.05, although this difference was not significant in session recordings, p = 0.14. Multilevel models indicated that technology‐based training that has been shown to increase exposure, also decreased use of nonexposure CBT techniques (2% vs. 29%, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe study supports the validity of survey‐based findings that community‐based care for CADs consists of non‐exposure CBT techniques. Efforts should be invested in dissemination of within‐session exposure.

ABSTRACT: Background: When adolescents present with symptoms of unexplained weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite, eating disorders (EDs) are commonly on the list of differential diagnoses. However, the relationship of these symptoms to other psychiatric disorders is often less clear. Methods: Using the Rochester Epidemiology Project database, a retrospective cohort study of adolescents (13–18 years) with billing diagnoses of weight loss, underweight, or loss of appetite was conducted between January 2005 and December 2017. Patients who presented with conditions commonly associated with weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite (e.g., cancer) were excluded. This study sought to examine the proportion of patients who received ED and psychiatric diagnoses within 5 years of the index visit and patient characteristics associated with these diagnoses. Results: Of 884 patients diagnosed with symptoms of unexplained weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite, 662 patients (M age = 15.8; SD = 1.6; 66.0% female) met study criteria. Within 5 years of the index visit, the lifetime prevalence of all psychiatric disorders was 70% (n = 461) and of EDs was 21% (n = 141). For both psychiatric disorders and EDs, sex and race were significantly associated with receiving a diagnosis within 5 years. Decrease in body mass index (BMI) percentile was associated with receiving an ED diagnosis, whereas the highest historical BMI percentile was associated with receiving a psychiatric diagnosis. Conclusion: Patients presenting with symptoms of unexplained weight loss, underweight, or poor appetite are at risk not only for EDs but also for other psychiatric disorders that may require further assessment and follow-up.

Abstract Background: To describe the process of developing an evolving database for Mayo Clinic primary care patients who screen positive for depression. The databases will support a broad use of these data for current and future quality improvement and research efforts. The description of their development will serve as an example for other institutions attempting to create similar data resources. Methods: The adult database (patients aged ³ 18) has data from 2007 and the adolescent database (patients aged 12 to < 18) from 2011. To be included, a patient had to be eligible for collaborative care model as a primary care patient with at least moderate symptoms of unipolar depression. The patient did not have to be enrolled in collaborative care model. The main domains of measurement are demographics, social determinants of health, mental health and substance abuse conditions, other comorbidities, interaction with collaborative care model, and questionnaire results. The data is being continuously updated as new data becomes available. Results: The adult database currently includes 117,619 unique patients with a mean age of 44.7 years, and is 66.4% female, and 88.1% non-Hispanic white. The adolescent database includes 14,684 unique patients with a mean age of 14.8 years, is 66.7% female, and 79.7% non-Hispanic white. Conclusions: These large, longitudinal, and evolving databases are a key step towards developing a learning environment to improve quality of care and conduct population-based research for patients with depression in primary care settings.

AbstractBackgroundIntegrative Cognitive Affective Therapy (ICAT) is an empirically supported treatment for bulimia nervosa (BN) in adults. However, it is unclear whether a modified version, Integrative Cognitive Affective Therapy–Adolescent (ICAT‐A) is feasible and beneficial for adolescents. This study evaluated the feasibility of ICAT‐A for adolescents with BN or subthreshold BN.MethodsEight adolescents with BN or subthreshold BN (mean age = 16.1) were enroled in the study. At baseline and end of treatment, adolescents who participated in ICAT‐A completed the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and self‐report measures of eating disorder symptoms, depression, anxiety, self‐esteem and functional impairment.ResultsRetention for the intervention (75%) suggests that the majority of participants found the intervention acceptable. Although all treatment completers participated in the clinician‐administered assessment (EDE), compliance with end of treatment self‐report questionnaires was compromised by the COVID‐19 pandemic, which occurred during the treatment course of the majority of the sample. At the end of treatment, all 6 adolescents who completed the ICAT‐A intervention were in full eating disorder remission based on EDE scores, with large effect sizes identified for reductions in EDE global scores (d = 2.71), objective binge episodes (d = 0.91), subjective binge episodes (d = 1.06) and compensatory behaviours (d = 1.72).ConclusionResults suggest that ICAT‐A is a feasible treatment that has promise for the treatment of adolescents with BN. Future studies are necessary to establish the efficacy of ICAT‐A for adolescent BN.

Many health care providers struggle with if- and how-to discuss weight with their pediatric patients. This study used one-on-one interviews with primary care providers (n = 20) to better understand their: (1) perception of risks associated with talking about weight with pediatric patients, (2) commitment to adhering to best practices of pediatric weight management, and (3) approaches to mitigate perceived risks. Providers felt concerned that discussing weight with children during clinic visits may have unintended negative impacts. Despite perceived risks, providers continued regular BMI screening and weight-focused conversations, but took care with regard to language and approach with the goal of mitigating perceived risks. Findings suggest that pediatric primary care providers perceive that engaging in weight-related discussions with their patients has the potential to lead to negative, unintended consequences. Future research is needed to understand if weight-focused conversations should be avoided altogether or if there are approaches that can effectively mitigate risks.