Kremers, Walter K

Background Epidemiologic evidence suggests a link between short sleep duration and cardiovascular risk, although the nature of any relationship and mechanisms remain unclear. Short sleep duration has also been linked to an increase in cardiovascular events. Endothelial dysfunction has itself been implicated as a mediator of heightened cardiovascular risk. We sought to determine the effect of 8 days/8 nights of partial sleep restriction on endothelial function in healthy humans. Methods and Results Sixteen healthy volunteers underwent a randomized study of usual sleep versus sleep restriction of two‐thirds normal sleep time for 8 days/8 nights in a hospital‐based clinical research unit. The main outcome was endothelial function measured by flow‐mediated brachial artery vasodilatation ( FMD ). Those randomized to sleep restriction slept 5.1 hours/night during the experimental period compared with 6.9 hours/night in the control group. Sleep restriction was associated with significant impairment in FMD (8.6±4.6% during the initial pre‐randomization acclimation phase versus 5.2±3.4% during the randomized experimental phase, P =0.01) whereas no change was seen in the control group (5.0±3.0 during the acclimation phase versus 6.73±2.9% during the experimental phase, P =0.10) for a between‐groups difference of −4.40% (95% CI −7.00 to −1.81%, P =0.003). No change was seen in non‐flow mediated vasodilatation ( NFMD ) in either group. Conclusion In healthy individuals, moderate sleep restriction causes endothelial dysfunction. Clinical Trial Registration URL : ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 01334788.

AbstractObjectivesUrinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication after kidney transplantation. We aim to determine its impact on allograft function as indicated by several measures such as iothalamate glomerular filtration rate (iGFR), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and creatinine value.MethodsWe performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study to determine the impact ofUTIon kidney allograft outcome.ResultsThe study population consisted of 301 kidney transplant recipients; 84% were living donor transplants. One hundred and one patients (34%) developed at least one episode ofUTIand the incidence ofUTIduring the first year after transplantation was 25%. At the end of the follow‐up, theiGFRwas lower among patients who had developed at least oneUTI(p = 0.044). However,eGFRand creatinine values were not significantly different betweenUTIand non‐UTIgroups.ConclusionWhen kidney function was measured byeGFRand creatinine, there was no significant difference in allograft function between kidney recipients with or withoutUTI. However, when kidney function was measured by nuclear studies, there was a tendency toward impairment in allograft function among patients who developed atleast oneUTIafter transplantation.

Context— Posttransplant quality of life can be significantly affected by personality characteristics identified before transplant. Objective— Although overall quality of life in heart transplant patients improves after transplant, many studies reveal poorer mental health outcomes after transplant. We aimed to determine whether transplant recipients with an optimistic explanatory style had improved quality of life, fewer depressive symptoms, and increased survival. Design— We reviewed 68 patients who had completed a Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory a mean of 2 years before transplant and examined associations between scores on the Optimism-Pessimism scale, survival rates, and results from the Health Status Questionnaire nearly 4 years after transplant. Results— Optimism was significantly associated with higher quality of life even after age (at the time of transplant), sex, depression score before transplant, time from the personality inventory to transplant, and time from transplant to the Health Status Questionnaire were controlled for. Furthermore, a pessimistic explanatory style was significantly associated with self-reported depressive symptoms, even after depression before transplant was adjusted for. Neither optimism nor pessimism was associated with length of survival. Conclusions— Pretransplant patients with a pessimistic explanatory style reported depressive symptoms nearly 5 years later. Furthermore, over the same time span, patients with an optimistic explanatory style described a significantly higher quality of life than the pessimists described.

Abstract:BackgroundThe clinical features and outcome of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) among solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have not been characterized. We performed a retrospective, matched case‐control study to examine potential risk factors.MethodsWe reviewed cases ofPJIamong transplant recipients who were evaluated at the Mayo Clinic between 1989 and 2009. Cases were matched to non‐infected controls based on transplant type, prosthetic joint type, and order of organ transplantation/joint implantation.ResultsAmong 367 patients with both a joint prosthesis and anSOT, there were 12 cases of infection in those receiving immunosuppression. These occurred in 8 renal recipients, 3 liver recipients, and 1 heart transplant recipient. Six subjects had hip and 6 had knee arthroplasty infections. The observed time to prosthesis failure ranged from 0.5 to 148 months after implantation. Gram‐positive bacteria (staphylococci and streptococci) caused the infection in 8 subjects. Two cases were caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria, whereas the remaining 2 cases were culture‐negative in the setting of antimicrobial use. We did not find a statistically significant association between obesity, diabetes mellitus, or antimicrobial prophylaxis (given in the setting of immunosuppression) and development ofPJI. A marginal association was seen betweensurgical site infectionand the risk ofPJI; however, this did not reach statistical significance.ConclusionIn our series, infection was mainly caused by gram‐positive bacterial pathogens, similar to the commonly encountered organisms in the immunocompetent host, although opportunistic pathogens were also isolated.

Background— We investigated the potential of conversion to sirolimus (SRL) as a primary immunosuppressant in attenuating cardiac allograft vasculopathy progression. Methods and Results— Twenty-nine cardiac transplant recipients were converted to SRL 3.8±3.4 years after transplantation with complete calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal. Secondary immunosuppressants (azathioprine or mycophenolate) and steroids remained unchanged. Forty patients (controls) 4.8±4.0 years from transplantation were maintained on CNIs. Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound studies were performed at baseline and 12.1±2.6 months later. Mean plaque (media and intima) volume (PV) and plaque index (PI) (PV/vessel volume percent) increased significantly in the CNI group (1.28±2.86 mm 3 /mm, P =0.004; and 6±8%, P =0.0001) but not in the SRL group (0.1±1.13 mm 3 /mm, P =0.63; and 0.1±8%, P =0.94). In patients enrolled within 2 years after transplantation, the increases in PV (0.06±1.06 versus 1.77±1.65 mm 3 /mm; P =0.0081) and PI (0±9% versus 10±8%; P =0.0145) were smaller in the SRL group (n=11) than in the CNI (n=12) group. In patients enrolled ≥2 years after transplantation, the increase in PI was less in the SRL group compared with the CNI group (0.1±6.5% versus 5±8%; P =0.033), but changes in PV did not differ significantly. Treatment with azathioprine or mycophenolate did not affect PV or PI in either the SRL group (PV: 0.22±0.66 versus 0.05±1.45 mm 3 /mm, P =0.46; PI: 1.5±6% versus −1.6±8.5%, P =0.29) or the CNI group (PV: 1.42±1.39 versus 1.06±2.28 mm 3 /mm, P =0.49; PI: 7.8±8.7% versus 4.8±7.3%, P =0.23). Conclusions— Substituting CNI with SRL as primary immunosuppression attenuates cardiac allograft vasculopathy progression.