Aghazadeh Mohandesi, Nessa

AbstractBackgroundNeutrophilic eccrine hidradenitis (NEH) is a benign neutrophilic dermatosis not well recognized beyond an association with malignancy. Although the disease is commonly reported in adults with malignancy, this association is uncommon in children. The diagnosis of NEH is predominantly based on histologic findings to exclude alternative diagnoses for adults, but biopsy is not usually required for children.MethodsA retrospective study was performed of adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with NEH at three Mayo Clinic sites from January 1, 1992, to January 1, 2022. The aim of this study was to elucidate risk factors for NEH and its clinical characteristics, treatment options, and natural course. Clinical information and pathologic results were collected from health records. Available pathologic slides were reviewed with a dermatopathologist.ResultsOf 47 patients identified, 33 had either histologic or clinical confirmation of the diagnosis; 21 were adults (64%), and 12 were children (36%). Most adults (16/21; 76%) had underlying malignancy and received chemotherapy. Five adults (24%) were classified as having idiopathic NEH, and they were younger and had higher NEH recurrence rates than the other adults. Only one pediatric patient (8%) had underlying malignancy. For 10 children (83%), NEH was preceded by strenuous activity. Initial findings of idiopathic NEH were palmoplantar eruptions for both adult and pediatric patients, whereas malignancy‐associated NEH commonly involved the face and axillae.ConclusionsAmong adults, NEH is commonly associated with malignancy and chemotherapy. Among children, idiopathic NEH occurs primarily after overexertion, and malignancy is highly unlikely to be the cause of NEH.

AbstractBackgroundVEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome is an autoinflammatory disease with frequent cutaneous manifestations.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of all patients with genetically confirmed VEXAS syndrome seen at our institution. Available clinical photographs and skin biopsy slides were reviewed.ResultsCutaneous manifestations developed in 22/25 (88%) patients with VEXAS syndrome. From this group, 10/22 (45%) developed skin involvement before or at the time of other clinical features of VEXAS. Twenty distinct dermatologic presentations of VEXAS from 14 patients were reviewed, and histopathologic patterns were classified as follows: neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis (n = 5, 25%), leukocytoclastic/urticarial vasculitis (n = 4, 20%), urticarial tissue reaction (n = 4, 20%), neutrophilic dermatosis (n = 3, 15%), neutrophilic panniculitis (n = 2, 10%), and nonspecific chronic septal panniculitis (n = 2, 10%). Common systemic findings included macrocytic anemia (96%), fever (88%), thrombocytopenia (76%), weight loss (76%), ocular inflammation (64%), pulmonary infiltrates (56%), deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism (52%), and inflammatory arthritis (52%).ConclusionsCutaneous involvement is a common feature of VEXAS syndrome, and histopathologic findings exist on a spectrum of neutrophilic inflammatory dermatoses.

Abstract Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin inflammatory disease. Dysregulation of innate and adaptive immune systems plays a major role in the pathophysiology of AD. JAKi (Janus Kinase Inhibitors) reduce the production of pro‐inflammatory cytokines and represent a promising novel treatment for AD. To assess and summarize the overall efficacy and safety of topial JAKi in the treatment of AD in adults and pediatrics, a broad search was performed on Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar until 14 June 2022. After screening, 19 studies remained for the final review. The current systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID #CRD42022303321). Topical delgocitinib, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, cerdulatinib and ifidancitinib are effective in treating AD and significantly improve EASI, IGA, pruritus‐NRS score and some other indexes in adults. Moreover, topical delgocitinib was observed to have a great efficacy in the treatment of AD in paediatrics. All topical JAKi showed minimal risk of mild‐to‐moderate adverse effects. Available topical JAKi are effective and safe modalities in treating AD. Nevertheless, further studies with longer duration and head‐to‐head comparative trials are necessary to find the best option with the least adverse effects.

AbstractBackground/ObjectivesPediatric lichen planus (LP) is rare with variable prevalence and atypical presentations compared to adults. Data on LP are lacking for the pediatric population in the United States. We present demographics, presentations, and treatments for a pediatric LP cohort.MethodsWe reviewed 26 patients diagnosed with LP at 20 years or younger. Treatment responses were defined as no response, partial response, and complete response.ResultsDemographics included 54% females and median diagnosis age of 16 years (range 6–20). Most patients presented with cutaneous LP (65%), with fewer having associated oral (23%), nail (7.7%), or genital (3.8%) involvement. Some had cutaneous‐only LP (38%) or strictly mucosal LP (oral‐only 19% and genital‐only 15%). LP lesions were pruritic (50%), painful (19%), and/or asymptomatic (35%). Complete/partial responses occurred with medium‐potency topical corticosteroids in cutaneous (n = 7; 64%), oral (n = 3; 75%), and genital LP (n = 3; 100%), with high/ultra‐high potency topical corticosteroids in oral LP (n = 6; 86%), and with topical calcineurin inhibitors in genital LP (n = 2; 100%). Side effects were clobetasol‐related oral candidiasis and biopsy‐related penile depressed scar. Most patients with available follow‐up achieved remission (n = 17; 81%).ConclusionsPediatric LP usually presents in adolescence with cutaneous involvement and is symptomatic. However, patients frequently can have oral, genital, or nail lesions or may be asymptomatic, so they need thorough examinations and follow‐up. Long‐term remission is common due to treatment or natural disease course. Medium‐potency corticosteroids are recommended for cutaneous, oral, and genital LP. Various other local and systemic therapies exist with successful treatment responses.

BACKGROUND Ibrutinib, an irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been associated with an increased risk of bleeding. There is a paucity of data on the risk of bleeding in patients on ibrutinib undergoing dermatologic surgery. OBJECTIVE To determine the frequency of bleeding complications associated with ibrutinib in patients undergoing dermatologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective, single-center, case–control study of patients on ibrutinib undergoing skin surgery between January 2013 and March 2020 compared with sex, disease, and age-matched control patients undergoing cutaneous surgeries. RESULTS A total of 75 surgeries performed on 37 case patients and 116 surgeries performed on 64 control patients were included. Ibrutinib was associated with a statistically significant increased rate of bleeding events (6/75 [8%] vs 1/116 [0.8%], p -value = .02). Compared with ibrutinib patients who did not have a bleeding event, those on ibrutinib who suffered bleeding were all men, older (mean age 82.7 vs 73.0, p -value= .01), and had lower mean platelet counts (104.0 vs 150.5 K/μL, p -value = .03). CONCLUSION Ibrutinib may be associated with increased risk of bleeding in patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly older men with lower platelet levels and on multiple anticoagulants. Transient discontinuation of ibrutinib should be considered for dermatologic surgeries.

Background: Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis (APD) is a rare hypersensitivity disorder characterized by recurring dermatologic manifestations during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle in women. Well-defined clinical and diagnostic criteria, outcomes measurements, and standard treatments are lacking. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of adult patients (older than 20 years at the time of diagnosis) with APD. Results: Fourteen patients were included with mean age of clinical onset of 34.3 ± 7.7 (range 24-54) years. There was a delay of 3.9 ± 5.5 (range 0.4-20) years between the onset of disease symptoms and diagnosis. The onset of APD was after exposure to exogenous progesterone in 9 of 14 patients. Progesterone skin test was performed in 9 patients and 6 were positive. Patients frequently presented with urticaria (9/14, 64.3%) and dermatitis (4/14, 28.6%). Continuous combined oral contraceptives (4/14, 28.6%), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (3/14, 21.4%), and hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (2/14, 14.3%) were the most common attempted treatments with reliable outcomes. Conclusions: APD is a rare disorder which lacks universal diagnostic measures and criteria, contributing to a significant delay in diagnosis. Large-scale multicenter studies are needed to develop accurate tests, establish diagnostic criteria, and define treatment outcomes.