Chiu, Derek S

Abstract BRCA-associated homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) is present in ~ 50% of high-grade serous carcinomas (HGSC) and predicts sensitivity to platinum-based therapy. However, there is little understanding of why some patients with BRCA-deficient tumors experience unexpectedly poor outcomes. We profiled 154 tumors, enriched for patients with BRCA-deficient tumors that experienced short overall survival (≤ 3 years, n = 42), using whole-genome, transcriptome, and methylation analyses. All but one BRCA-deficient tumor exceeded an accepted HRD genomic scarring threshold. However, patients with BRCA1-deficient HGSC with a more elevated HRD score survived significantly longer. Patients with BRCA2-deficient HGSC and loss of NF1 survived twice as long as those without NF1 loss, whereas PIK3CA or RAD21 amplification defined BRCA2-deficient HGSC with exceptionally short survival. BRCA1-deficient tumors in short survivors had evidence of immunosuppressive c-kit signaling and EMT. In a large HGSC cohort (n = 1,389) including 282 individuals with pathogenic germline BRCA variants (gBRCApv), the location of the mutation within functional domains stratified clinical outcomes. Notably, residual disease after primary surgery had limited prognostic effect in gBRCApv-carriers compared to non-carriers. Our findings indicate that tumor HR proficiency in the context of therapy response and survival is not a binary property, and highlight genomic and immune modifiers of outcomes in BRCA-deficient HGSC.

Abstract Despite homologous recombination (HR) deficiency being an important predictor of survival in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSC), its status is rarely considered in large-scale studies of prognostic signatures and biomarkers. We sought to develop a gene expression-based classifier of HR deficient (HRD) HGSCs, suitable for archival FFPE tumor samples, to determine whether established prognostic markers were dependent on HR status. Using 361 HGSCs from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) where HR status was defined by the genomic gold standard, a HRD score, we trained and tested a ridge penalized logistic regression model. This 218-gene mRNA expression signature was then applied in 6002 HGSCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) consortium to predict the probability of a sample being HRD. In this large cohort of FFPE samples, we sought to understand the relationship between HR and overall survival. Applying Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression modelling, adjusting for age and stratified by stage and study, we examined the relationship between HR status and the PrOTYPE subtype, SPOT prognostic score and other known prognostic markers in HGSC. Our machine learning model was 84% accurate in a held-out subset of the TCGA (n=73). Of the 6002 OTTA HGSCs, 40.4% were predicted to be HRD. These cases were significantly younger, were enriched for early stage (FIGO I/II) and had improved outcomes when compared to HR proficient (HRP) cases (hazard ratio [HZR]=0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.66-0.76, p<2x10-16). A linear increase in survival time was observed as the probability of a sample being HRD increased. HGSCs with >75% likelihood of being HRD had a median 5-year survival of 49.3% (95%CI=46.2-52.6%) which was a 17.7% increase from those with <25% likelihood. Both PrOTYPE and SPOT were significantly associated with survival, independent of HR status (p<2x10-16 and p<2x10-16 respectively). Notably the probability of being HRD was negatively correlated with an unfavorable SPOT score (R=-0.32, p<2x10-16), suggesting that SPOT partially captures the survival advantage of HR deficiency. Several individual biomarkers, assessed in 1248 to 2858 cases, showed HR dependent survival associations. HRD HGSCs with high GMNN expression had significantly improved, long-term outcomes (4-10years, HZR=0.39, 95%CI=0.20-0.78, p=0.01), and may be a marker of exceptional survival, while AR negative HRD cases had poorer outcomes, earlier in disease progression (0-4years, HZR=1.43, 95%CI=1.03-1.98, p=0.03). Significantly poorer prognoses were observed in HRP cases expressing PTEN (HZR=1.39, 95%CI=1.04-1.87, p=0.03), and in HRD cases with high expression of MyD88 (HZR=1.21, 95%CI=1.01-1.45, p=0.04). RB1 and FOXJ1 protein expression, and CD8+ T cell abundance were prognostic irrespective of HR status. Our study contributes to understanding the association between HR and HGSC survival in a statistically powered cohort and demonstrates heterogeneity in outcomes through clinically relevant prognostic signatures and biomarkers. Citation Format: Ashley L. Weir, Derek Chiu, Aline Talhouk, Mike S. Anglesio, Dale W. Garsed, Anna DeFazio, Holly H. Harris, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Andrew Berchuck, Ellen L. Goode, Paul D.P. Pharoah, David Huntsman, David Bowtell, Jen A. Doherty, Nadia M. Davidson, Martin Köbel, Susan J. Ramus. Homologous recombination DNA repair dependent survival associations in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: an Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research; 2025 Sep 19-21; Denver, CO. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(18_Suppl):Abstract nr B046.

Abstract Purpose: Endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (ENOC) is the second most-common type of ovarian carcinoma, comprising 10%–20% of cases. Recently, the study of ENOC has benefitted from comparisons to endometrial carcinomas including defining ENOC with four prognostic molecular subtypes. Each subtype suggests differential mechanisms of progression, although tumor-initiating events remain elusive. There is evidence that the ovarian microenvironment may be critical to early lesion establishment and progression. However, while immune infiltrates have been well studied in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma, studies in ENOC are limited. Experimental Design: We report on 210 ENOC, with clinical follow-up and molecular subtype annotation. Using multiplex IHC and immunofluorescence, we examine the prevalence of T-cell lineage, B-cell lineage, macrophages, and populations with programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed death-ligand 1 across subtypes of ENOC. Results: Immune cell infiltrates in tumor epithelium and stroma showed higher densities in ENOC subtypes with known high mutation burden (POLEmut and MMRd). While molecular subtypes were prognostically significant, immune infiltrates were not (overall survival P > 0.2). Analysis by molecular subtype revealed that immune cell density was prognostically significant in only the no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtype, where immune infiltrates lacking B cells (TILB minus) had inferior outcome (disease-specific survival: HR, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–14.7; P < 0.05). Similar to endometrial carcinomas, molecular subtype stratification was generally superior to immune response in predicting outcomes. Conclusions: Subtype stratification is critical for better understanding of ENOC, in particular the distribution and prognostic significance of immune cell infiltrates. The role of B cells in the immune response within NSMP tumors warrants further study.

AbstractClear cell ovarian carcinoma (CCOC) is the second most common subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Late‐stage CCOC is not responsive to gold‐standard chemotherapy and results in suboptimal outcomes for patients. In‐depth molecular insight is urgently needed to stratify the disease and drive therapeutic development. We conducted global proteomics for 192 cases of CCOC and compared these with other epithelial ovarian carcinoma subtypes. Our results showed distinct proteomic differences in CCOC compared with other epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes including alterations in lipid and purine metabolism pathways. Furthermore, we report potential clinically significant proteomic subgroups within CCOC, suggesting the biologic plausibility of stratified treatment for this cancer. Taken together, our results provide a comprehensive understanding of the CCOC proteomic landscape to facilitate future understanding and research of this disease. © 2022 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract ARID1A (BAF250a) is a component of the SWI/SNF chromatin modifying complex, plays an important tumour suppressor role, and is considered prognostic in several malignancies. However, in ovarian carcinomas there are contradictory reports on its relationship to outcome, immune response, and correlation with clinicopathological features. We assembled a series of 1623 endometriosis‐associated ovarian carcinomas, including 1078 endometrioid (ENOC) and 545 clear cell (CCOC) ovarian carcinomas, through combining resources of the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis (OTTA) Consortium, the Canadian Ovarian Unified Experimental Resource (COEUR), local, and collaborative networks. Validated immunohistochemical surrogate assays for ARID1A mutations were applied to all samples. We investigated associations between ARID1A loss/mutation, clinical features, outcome, CD8 + tumour‐infiltrating lymphocytes (CD8 + TILs), and DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd). ARID1A loss was observed in 42% of CCOCs and 25% of ENOCs. We found no associations between ARID1A loss and outcomes, stage, age, or CD8 + TIL status in CCOC. Similarly, we found no association with outcome or stage in endometrioid cases. In ENOC, ARID1A loss was more prevalent in younger patients ( p = 0.012) and was associated with MMRd ( p < 0.001) and the presence of CD8 + TILs ( p = 0.008). Consistent with MMRd being causative of ARID1A mutations, in a subset of ENOCs we also observed an association with ARID1A loss‐of‐function mutation as a result of small indels ( p = 0.035, versus single nucleotide variants). In ENOC, the association with ARID1A loss, CD8 + TILs, and age appears confounded by MMRd status. Although this observation does not explicitly rule out a role for ARID1A influence on CD8 + TIL infiltration in ENOC, given current knowledge regarding MMRd, it seems more likely that effects are dominated by the hypermutation phenotype. This large dataset with consistently applied biomarker assessment now provides a benchmark for the prevalence of ARID1A loss‐of‐function mutations in endometriosis‐associated ovarian cancers and brings clarity to the prognostic significance. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Abstract Purpose: Gene expression–based molecular subtypes of high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer (HGSOC), demonstrated across multiple studies, may provide improved stratification for molecularly targeted trials. However, evaluation of clinical utility has been hindered by nonstandardized methods, which are not applicable in a clinical setting. We sought to generate a clinical grade minimal gene set assay for classification of individual tumor specimens into HGSOC subtypes and confirm previously reported subtype-associated features. Experimental Design: Adopting two independent approaches, we derived and internally validated algorithms for subtype prediction using published gene expression data from 1,650 tumors. We applied resulting models to NanoString data on 3,829 HGSOCs from the Ovarian Tumor Tissue Analysis consortium. We further developed, confirmed, and validated a reduced, minimal gene set predictor, with methods suitable for a single-patient setting. Results: Gene expression data were used to derive the predictor of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma molecular subtype (PrOTYPE) assay. We established a de facto standard as a consensus of two parallel approaches. PrOTYPE subtypes are significantly associated with age, stage, residual disease, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and outcome. The locked-down clinical grade PrOTYPE test includes a model with 55 genes that predicted gene expression subtype with &gt;95% accuracy that was maintained in all analytic and biological validations. Conclusions: We validated the PrOTYPE assay following the Institute of Medicine guidelines for the development of omics-based tests. This fully defined and locked-down clinical grade assay will enable trial design with molecular subtype stratification and allow for objective assessment of the predictive value of HGSOC molecular subtypes in precision medicine applications. See related commentary by McMullen et al., p. 5271