Renfree, Kevin

Background: While tobacco use is a well-known risk factor for adverse outcomes after carpal tunnel release (CTR), the impact of non-tobacco nicotine products remains unclear. This study evaluated complications in CTR patients with non-tobacco nicotine dependence (NTND) compared with tobacco users and controls. Methods: Patients who underwent CTR with ≥2-year follow-up were identified using a large national database. After 1:1 propensity score matching, patients with NTND (n = 6319) were matched to controls, tobacco users (n = 86 430) were matched to controls, and patients with NTND (n = 6325) were matched to tobacco users. Matching was based on age, gender, Charlson comorbidity index, and comorbidities. Outcomes including 90-day medical complications, infection, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and 2-year revision rates were compared using multivariable logistic regression. Results: Compared with controls, patients with NTND demonstrated higher 90-day medical complication rates (2.4% vs 1.7%; odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04-1.77) and ED visits (10.3% vs 8.1%; OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02-1.32). Compared with tobacco users, patients with NTND had decreased ED visits (10.4% vs 14.2%; OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.66-0.83) and revision surgery (1.9% vs 2.5%; OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.99), with no significant differences in medical complications, infection, or readmissions. Conclusions: Non-tobacco nicotine dependence was associated with increased medical complications and ED visits compared with controls, but decreased ED visits and revision surgery compared with tobacco users. There were no significant differences in medical complications, infections, or readmissions between tobacco users and patients with NTND. These findings underscore the importance of screening for non-tobacco nicotine use during preoperative evaluations for CTR.

Background: Simultaneous carpal tunnel release (sCTR) with emergent forearm fasciotomy in the setting of acute compartment syndrome (ACS) has been reported, but the national incidence and cost of delayed carpal tunnel release (CTR) remain unknown. This large database study aims to evaluate how often sCTR is performed, the frequency of delayed CTR when not performed simultaneously, and the associated costs. Methods: The PearlDiver Mariner database was queried for patients who underwent forearm fasciotomies between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2022. Patients were grouped based on CTR timing: simultaneous, within 2 weeks, 2 weeks to 1 year, 1 to 5 years, or no CTR. Reimbursement data were collected, and patient numbers and costs were analyzed across cohorts. Results: More than half of patients undergoing emergent forearm fasciotomy received sCTR. Among those who did not, 31% required CTR within 1 year and 35% within 5 years. The total cost was highest when CTR was performed within 1 year but not on the same day as fasciotomy. After 1 year, the additional cost of CTR was similar to that of patients who never underwent fasciotomy. Conclusions: This large database study shows that over one-third of patients who did not undergo sCTR at the time of emergent forearm fasciotomy required it within 1 year, incurring significantly higher costs. Including sCTR during initial fasciotomy may reduce delayed care and associated expenses. While these findings suggest that including sCTR during initial fasciotomy may reduce delayed care and expenses, the retrospective design precludes definitive recommendations, and clinical judgment remains essential Level of Evidence: 4

Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1) are approved for type 2 diabetes treatment. Given the link between diabetes-associated metabolic inflammation and increased carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) risk, the aim of this study was to investigate development of CTS in diabetic patients who both were and were not taking GLP-1 therapy using a large claims database. Methods: A retrospective cohort study used a national claims database to identify diabetic patients. Those prescribed GLP-1 therapy were matched to controls by age, sex, comorbidity index, tobacco use, and obesity. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the 2-year CTS incidence, controlling for various health conditions and socioeconomic factors. Secondary analysis also evaluated the rate of carpal tunnel release (CTR) after being diagnosed with CTS. Results: Glucagon-like peptide-1 therapy significantly reduced 2-year CTS diagnosis risk (odds ratio [OR] 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.46-0.52; P < .001). Independent risk factors for increased CTS incidence included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoarthritis, coronary artery disease, depression, hypothyroidism, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Of patients who developed CTS, GLP-1 therapy was associated with increased odds of undergoing CTR (OR 1.23; 95% CI: 1.08-1.41; P = .002). Conclusions: Glucagon-like peptide-1 therapy is associated with decreased CTS risk in diabetic patients—potentially due to improved metabolic health—and increased odds of undergoing CTR once diagnosed. Further research is needed to clarify GLP-1 therapy’s role in reducing nervous system and musculoskeletal disease burden.

Background: Diabetic patients experience carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) at high rates, have increased symptom severity, and experience prolonged recovery after carpal tunnel release (CTR). This study assessed the association of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1) therapy with postoperative outcomes after CTR in type II diabetic patients with CTS. Methods: Using the PearlDiver database, 25 229 diabetic patients with CTS who underwent CTR and were prescribed GLP-1 therapy were identified and exact matched to 25 229 controls based on age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index, tobacco use, obesity, hypothyroidism, and body mass index where available. Demographic variables and comorbidities were compared between groups using Kruskal-Wallis analyses for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for 90-day outcomes and 2-year CTR revision. Results: Patients on GLP-1 therapy had decreased risk of 90-day medical complications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.96) and hospital readmission (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.77-0.94) of 0.5% and 0.4%, respectively, compared with controls. No significant differences were found in 90-day surgical complications or 2-year revision rates between cohorts. There were no cases of aspiration pneumonia. The GLP-1 cohort had increased odds of higher 90-day total costs of care (OR = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.88-3.15). Conclusions: GLP-1 therapy is associated with reduced risk of 90-day medical complications and hospital readmission following CTR in diabetic patients, suggesting these medications may optimize comorbidity profiles via glucose control preoperatively. Future studies may examine whether GLP-1 therapy is associated with minimum clinically important difference in patient-reported outcome measures for CTS in diabetic patients.

Background: High-quality lateral radiographs with the wrist in neutral (0°) or near neutral (less than 15° flexion or extension) are felt to be important for diagnosing carpal instability using intracarpal angular measurements, but may be unavailable. In addition, radiolunate (RLA) and capitolunate (CLA) measurement angles for defining carpal instability have poor validation. We sought to establish 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for predicted RLA and CLA throughout the arc of wrist motion in normal cadaveric wrists. Methods: Fresh frozen cadaveric upper extremities were secured in a limb positioner. Scaphopisocapitate lateral radiographs were obtained throughout the arc of motion and RLA and CLA, and wrist flexion or extension angles (WA) were measured by a board-certified hand surgeon. Scatter plots of variables were constructed, and correlation coefficients calculated for areas under the curves. Regression equations for predicted RLA and CLA based on WA were developed. Results: Both RLA and CLA correlated strongly with WA for each measurement in both flexion and extension ( r = 0.7-0.8). Linear regression modeling demonstrated a good relationship between RLA ( R 2 = 84%) and CLA ( R 2 = 80%) with WA. Regression equations were constructed to give predicted values for RLA and CLA based on WA and 95% prediction CI. Conclusions: If RLA and CLA exceed 20° with neutral (0°) wrist alignment, it likely represents pathologic carpal alignment. Presented tables demonstrate 95% CI of RLA and CLA throughout the arc of wrist flexion/extension. Values outside of the 95% CI are also likely to indicate pathologic carpal alignment.

AbstractPurposeTo determine whether a 24 MHz transducer significantly improves sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in evaluating flexor tendon repair integrity compared with an 18 MHz transducer.MethodsOne hundred and twelve cadaveric digits were randomised to an intact repair or simulated ‘failed’ repair, and to a two‐ or eight‐strand repair of a flexor digitorum profundus laceration. A blinded sonologist evaluated specimens in static mode using 18 and 24 MHz transducers. Gaps were remeasured after scanning, and final gap width recorded. McNemar's exact test calculated differences between sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, and chi‐squared test to compare sensitivity, specificity and accuracy between number of strands (2 vs. 8) and repair gap (≥4 mm).ResultsThe 24 MHz transducer had higher sensitivity (81 vs. 59%), lower specificity (67 vs. 70%) and higher overall accuracy (74 vs. 64%), than the 18 MHz transducer. The difference for sensitivity was significant (P = 0.011), but not differences for specificity and overall accuracy (P > 0.05). Pearson's correlation (r = 0.61) demonstrated a moderate‐to‐strong positive correlation between measured and true gap sizes. Increased number of suture strands (2 vs. 8) did not impair sensitivity, specificity nor accuracy.DiscussionUltrasound may tend to overestimate gap width, and a slight risk that some intact repairs, or those with small, clinically insignificant gaps may undergo surgical exploration that may not be indicated.ConclusionsA 24 MHz transducer is a more sensitive and accurate transducer for assessing flexor tendon repair integrity and measuring small gaps.

Background: Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery is the most common surgery billed to Medicare by hand surgeons. As such, the purpose of this study was to evaluate trends for CTR surgeries billed to Medicare from 2000 to 2020. Methods: The publicly available Medicare Part B National Summary File from 2000 to 2020 was queried. For both open carpal tunnel release (OCTR) and endoscopic carpal tunnel release (ECTR), the number of procedures and total Medicare reimbursement were extracted. For year 2020, the specialty of the performing surgeon was recorded. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: A total of 3 429 471 CTR surgeries were performed in the Medicare population from 2000 to 2020. For these procedures, Medicare paid surgeons over $1.23 billion. During this period, there was a 101.8% increase in annual CTR procedures (91 130 in 2000, 183 911 in 2020). Further, annual volume of ECTR increased by 456.2%, and accounted for an increasing percentage of total CTR procedures (9.1% in 2012, 25.2% in 2020). The average adjusted Medicare reimbursement per procedure decreased by 1.5% for OCTR, and decreased by 11.6% for ECTR. In 2020, orthopedic surgeons performed 85.1% of CTR procedures. Conclusions: The volume of CTR surgeries among the Medicare population has increased from 2000 to 2020, and ECTR is accounting for a growing proportion of surgeries. When adjusted for inflation, average reimbursement has decreased, with a greater decrease among ECTR. Orthopedic surgeons perform most of such surgeries. These trends are important to assure adequate resource allocation as treating carpal tunnel becomes more common among the aging Medicare population.

Background: Ganglion cysts are benign soft-tissue tumors that are most commonly found in the wrist. Within the wrist, 60% to 70% of ganglion cysts occur on the dorsal side and 20% to 30% occur on the volar side 1 . Although ganglia arise from multiple sites over the dorsal wrist, dorsal ganglia most commonly originate at the scapholunate joint 2,3 . Open excision is the standard surgical treatment for dorsal wrist ganglia. This procedure is considered when symptoms such as pain and range-of-motion deficits begin to impact activities of daily living. Description: Open excision of a dorsal wrist ganglion is commonly performed with the patient under general anesthesia or a regional block. The patient is placed in the supine position, and a tourniquet is applied on the affected upper limb. After outlining the periphery of the palpable ganglion, the surgeon makes a transverse or longitudinal incision over the ganglion. The surgeon then begins a deep dissection, dissecting through the subcutaneous tissue and isolating the ganglion while avoiding any rupture, if possible. Once the cyst has been identified, extensor tendons surrounding the cyst are retracted and the cyst and stalk are mobilized. The cyst and stalk are subsequently excised, and the wound is closed 4 . Alternatives: Alternative treatments for dorsal wrist ganglia include nonoperative interventions such as observation, aspiration, controlled rupture, and injection. Operative treatments include arthroscopic and open dorsal wrist ganglion resections. Rationale: Although nonoperative treatment can produce successful outcomes, the various modalities have been associated with recurrence rates ranging from 15% to 90% 4 . As a result, surgical excision remains the gold standard of treatment and is typically indicated when weakness, pain, and limited range of motion interfere with activities of daily living. Among surgical interventions, arthroscopic excision is a minimally invasive procedure that has become more common because of the reduced scarring and faster recovery 5 . However, open excision, which does not involve complex equipment, is regarded as the standard among surgical treatments. Although the rates of recurrence for arthroscopic versus open dorsal ganglion excision are similar, arthroscopic excision is less effective with regard to pain relief 5,6 . This difference in pain relief could potentially be the result of the neurectomy of the posterior interosseous nerve in an open excision. In contrast, an arthroscopic procedure may provide less relief of pain from the posterior interosseous nerve stump attaching to the scarred capsule 5 . Expected Outcomes: Open excision of a dorsal wrist ganglion is a safe, reliable procedure. The recurrence rate after open excision is similar to that after arthroscopic excision and significantly lower recurrence than that after ganglion cyst aspiration 6,7 . Additionally, not all ganglion cysts can be aspirated. In a retrospective study assessing the risk of recurrence after open excision of ganglion cysts in 628 patients, researchers reported a recurrence rate of 4.1% among the 341 who underwent open dorsal ganglion excision. Furthermore, the authors reported male sex and less surgeon experience as significant risk factors for cyst recurrence 8 . In a study assessing outcomes of open dorsal ganglion excision in 125 active-duty military personnel, researchers reported a recurrence rate of 9%. More notably, the researchers found persistent pain at 4 weeks postoperatively in 14% of the participants. The authors recommended that patients whose daily activities require forceful wrist extension, such as athletes and military personnel, should be counseled on the potential functional limitations and residual pain from open dorsal wrist ganglion excision 9 . Important Tips: When conducting an open excision, it is beneficial to identify the stalk of the cyst, allowing the surgeon to excise the complete ganglion complex and prevent recurrence. For large cysts that adhere to the surrounding soft tissue, it is helpful to rupture the ganglion in order to facilitate an easier deep dissection. Excising the scapholunate interosseous ligament could possibly lead to scapholunate dissociation and instability. The posterior interosseous nerve courses past the 4th dorsal compartment and may be resected during the deep dissection.

Background: Open trigger finger release is an elective surgical procedure that serves as the gold standard treatment for trigger digits. The aim of this procedure is to release the A1 pulley in a setting in which the pulley is completely visible, ultimately allowing the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on to glide more easily through the tendon sheath. Although A1—or the first annular pulley—is the site of triggering in nearly all cases, alternative sites include A2, A3, and the palmar aponeurosis 1 . Description: Typically, the surgical procedure can be conducted in an outpatient setting and can vary in duration from a few minutes to half an hour. The surgical procedure involves the patient lying in the supine position with the operative hand positioned to the side. A small incision, ranging from 1 to 1.5 cm, is made on the volar side of the hand, just proximal to the A1 pulley in the skin crease in order to minimize scarring. Once the underlying neurovascular structures are exposed, the A1 pulley is released longitudinally at least to the level of the A2 pulley, followed by decompression of the flexor tendons that were previously impinged on. In order to confirm the release, the patient is asked to flex and extend the affected finger. The wound is irrigated and closed once the release is confirmed by both the patient and surgeon. Alternatives: Aside from an open release, trigger finger can be treated nonoperatively with use of splinting and corticosteroid injection. Alternative operative treatments include a percutaneous release, which involves the use of a needle to release the A1 pulley 2 . Trigger finger can initially be treated nonoperatively. If unsuccessful, surgical intervention is considered the ultimate remedy 2 . Rationale: Because of their efficacious nature, corticosteroid injections are indicated preoperatively, particularly in non-diabetic patients 3 . Splinting is often an appropriate treatment option in patients who wish to avoid a corticosteroid injection 1 . However, if nonoperative treatment modalities fail to resolve pain and symptoms, surgical intervention is indicated 2 . In comparison with a percutaneous trigger finger release, an open release provides enhanced exposure and may be safer with respect to avoiding iatrogenic neurovascular injury 2 . However, in a randomized controlled trial, Gilberts et al. found no difference in the rates of recurrence when comparing open versus percutaneous trigger finger release 4 . Expected Outcomes: With reported success rates ranging from 90% to 100%, the open release of the A1 pulley is considered a common procedure associated with minimal complications 2 . Complications of the procedure were assessed in a retrospective analysis of 43 patients who underwent 78 open trigger releases performed by 1 surgeon. In that study, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 28% and a major complication rate of 3% 5 . Specifically, the 2 major complications noted by the authors were a synovial fistula and a proximal interphalangeal joint arthrofibrosis. In a larger study that included 543 patients who underwent 795 open trigger releases, the authors reported a minor complication rate of 9.6% and major complication rate of 2.4% 6 . Furthermore, the most common complications involved persistent stiffness, swelling, or pain. In that analysis, the authors suggested that sedation, male gender, and general anesthesia may be associated with greater risk 6 . Important Tips: At the discretion of the surgeon, a longitudinal, transverse, or oblique incision is made directly on top of the tendon at the level of the metacarpophalangeal joint, which is the preferred incision site because it provides maximal accessibility to the A1 pulley. Local anesthesia is preferred because it allows the patient and surgeon to confirm the release immediately. If conducting an open trigger release on the thumb, the surgeon should identify and protect the radial digital nerve, which courses directly over the A1 pulley. Acronyms and Abbreviations: MCP = metacarpophalangeal

This annotation reviews current concepts on the three most common surgical approaches used for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: dorsal, volar, and lateral. Advantages and disadvantages of each are highlighted, and the outcomes are discussed. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1329–1333.