Suh, Sang Hyun

Objective Several definitions have been proposed to distinguish the daughter sac when treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms. The aim of this study was to evaluate interobserver variability of aneurysm morphology, including the daughter sac, using criteria from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) and the Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysm Study of Japan (UCAS). Materials and methods After approval by the institutional review board, we analyzed three morphological features (daughter sac, lobulation, and irregular margin) from the ISUIA and UCAS using angiographic images from 102 saccular aneurysms. Four independent readers interpreted each morphological criterion using dichotomized scales (existence or not). The κ statistic was used to measure interobserver agreement, and κ>0.6 was considered substantial agreement. Results For discrimination of the daughter sac, interobserver agreement among the four readers was substantial using the UCAS criteria (k=0.626 for two-dimensional (2D) and 0.659 for three-dimensional (3D) images) but not for the ISUIA criteria (k=0.487 for 2D and 0.473 for 3D images; significant difference). Irrespective of the images used, pairwise pooled κ values for the UCAS were >0.6, except for one case (score of 0.54 between readers A and B). Regarding the proportion of positive reads, there was a significant difference between reads for the daughter sac using the UCAS and ISUIA criteria. Conclusions For discrimination of the daughter sac, the UCAS definition showed a higher reliability than the ISUIA. However, a further prospective study is necessary to validate this definition as the treatment standard for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Background and Purpose— Although thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b/3 has been regarded as a successful angiographic outcome, the definition or subclassification of TICI 2 has differed between the original (o-TICI) and modified TICI (m-TICI). We sought to compare interobserver variability for both scores and analyze the subgroups of the TICI 2. Methods— Five readers interpreted angiographies independently using a 6-point scale as follows: grade 0, no antegrade flow; grade 1, flow past the initial occlusion without tissue reperfusion; grade 2, partial reperfusion in <50% of the affected territory; grade 3, partial reperfusion in 50% to 66%; grade 4, partial reperfusion in ≥67%; grade 5, complete perfusion. Readings using this scale were then converted into o-TICI and m-TICI score. Statistical analysis was performed according to TICI 2 subgroups. Results— Interobserver agreement was good for the o-TICI and m-TICI scores (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.73 and 0.67, respectively). Our grade 3 (partial perfusion with 50% to 66%) occupied 19% of total readings, which would have been classified as grade 2a in o-TICI, but as 2b in m-TICI. The m-TICI was more likely to predict good clinical outcome than o-TICI (odds ratio, 2.01 versus 1.63, in reads with TICI 2b/3 versus 0/2a). Conclusions— Both TICI scales showed good agreement among readers. However, the variability in partial perfusion thresholds leads to different grading in ≈20% of cases and may result in significantly different rates of accurate outcome prediction.