Alsidawi, Said

Abstract Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia. Although lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is known to be a well-established risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, its role in the development of AF, independent of this association, remains unclear. Methods and results Adult patients from the three Mayo Clinic sites with a baseline Lp(a) and without AF history were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their Lp(a) levels: high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) and low Lp(a) (<50 mg/dL). Survival probabilities free from incident AF were compared between Lp(a) groups, during a follow-up period up to 15 years, using the Kaplan–Meier curve and the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was also conducted. A total of 75 376 patients were included (median age: 55 years, 59% males), with a median follow-up duration of 8.8 (inter-quartile range: 3.4, 14.8) years. Incident AF was detected in 5738 (7.6%) patients. Survival probability free from incident AF was significantly lower in patients with elevated Lp(a) (86%) compared with those with low Lp(a) (88%, log-rank P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis adjusted for potential risk factors of AF showed a statistically significant association of elevated Lp(a) with an 11% increase in AF risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.05–1.18). Conclusion Our study suggests that elevated Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL) is an independent risk factor for incident AF. Future prospective studies are warranted to validate our results and to test if reducing Lp(a) could mitigate the burden of AF.

Abstract Aims Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are known to be mainly genetically determined. However, only scarce data are available on the intra-individual variability of Lp(a) levels across time. Methods and results We included adult patients (≥18 years old) who had baseline and follow-up Lp(a) measurements (between 1997 and 2024) with a minimum of 1 year apart. Patients were categorized into three groups as follows: normal (<30 mg/dL), borderline (30 to 50 mg/dL), and high Lp(a) (≥50 mg/dL). Multivariable logistic regression was conducted to assess the predictors of the intra-individual changes in Lp(a) ≥ 10 mg/dL. A total of 11 669 individuals (median age: 54 years, 60% males) were included in our analysis, with median time between measurements of 4.5 years [interquartile range (IQR): 2.2, 10.6]. The median Lp(a) was 16 mg/dL (IQR: 7, 52) at baseline, compared with 15 mg/dL (IQR: 7, 52) at follow-up. At follow-up, 96.4% of individuals with normal Lp(a) and 89.9% with high Lp(a) remained in their categories, while 51.2% with borderline Lp(a) changed their category. Of the included population, 24.9% had an intra-individual Lp(a) change ≥ 10 mg/dL. Female sex (P < 0.001), history of ASCVD (P = 0.003), statin therapy (P = 0.003), and elevated LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels ≥ 100 mg/dL (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher odds of intra-individual Lp(a) changes ≥ 10 mg/dL. Conclusion Lipoprotein(a) levels were generally stable over time; however, patients with borderline levels may require more than one Lp(a) measurement, especially if they are females, have a history of ASCVD, have elevated LDL-C levels, or are on statin therapy.

Lipoprotein (a) is a complex lipid molecule that has sparked immense interest in recent years, after studies demonstrated its significant association with several cardiovascular conditions. Lp(a) promotes cardiovascular disease through its combined proatherogenic, pro-inflammatory, and prothrombotic effects. While the measurement of Lp(a) has become widely available, effective methods to reduce its concentration are currently limited. However, emerging data from ongoing clinical trials involving antisense oligonucleotides have indicated promising outcomes in effectively reducing Lp(a) concentrations. This may serve as a potential therapeutic target in the management and prevention of myocardial infarction, calcific aortic stenosis, and cerebrovascular accidents. In contrast, the role of Lp(a) in atrial fibrillation, in-stent restenosis, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration remains unclear. This review article aims to thoroughly review the existing literature and provide an updated overview of the evidence surrounding the association of Lp(a) and these cardiovascular diseases. We seek to highlight controversies in the existing literature and offer directions for future investigations to better understand Lp(a)’s precise role in these conditions, while providing a summary of its unique molecular characteristics.

Athlete’s heart (AH) represents the heart’s remarkable ability to adapt structurally and functionally to prolonged and intensive athletic training. Characterized by increased left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, enlarged cardiac chambers, and augmented cardiac mass, AH typically maintains or enhances systolic and diastolic functions. Despite the positive health implications, these adaptations can obscure the difference between benign physiological changes and early manifestations of cardiac pathologies such as dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM). This article reviews the imaging characteristics of AH across various modalities, emphasizing echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and cardiac computed tomography as primary tools for evaluating cardiac function and distinguishing physiological adaptations from pathological conditions. The findings highlight the need for precise diagnostic criteria and advanced imaging techniques to ensure accurate differentiation, preventing misdiagnosis and its associated risks, such as sudden cardiac death (SCD). Understanding these adaptations and employing the appropriate imaging methods are crucial for athletes’ effective management and health optimization.

Abstract Background Fabry’s disease, an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, shares cardiac manifestations with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). We underscore the importance of considering Fabry’s disease as a differential diagnosis in HCM patients, highlighting genetic testing’s role in cardiomyopathy evaluation. Case summary Three male patients with left ventricular hypertrophy were initially diagnosed with HCM but were later found to have Fabry’s disease through genetic testing. Atypical features such as renal dysfunction and conduction abnormalities raised suspicion. Genetic testing confirmed diagnosis, guiding tailored management. Discussion Fabry’s disease poses diagnostic challenges due to its resemblance to HCM. Genetic testing enables precise diagnosis and personalized management, especially in cases with atypical presentations. Early recognition and intervention, facilitated by genetic testing, can improve patient outcomes in Fabry’s disease.

Abstract Aims Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has demonstrated its association with atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction. However, its role in the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not clearly established. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between Lp(a) and ISR. Methods and results A retrospective study of adult patients who underwent successful PCI between January 2006 and December 2017 at the three Mayo Clinic sites and had a preprocedural Lp(a) measurement was conducted. Patients were divided into two groups according to the serum Lp(a) concentration [high Lp(a) ≥ 50 mg/dL and low Lp(a) < 50 mg/dL]. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to compare risk of ISR between patients with high Lp(a) vs. those with low Lp(a). A total of 1209 patients were included, with mean age 65.9 ± 11.7 years and 71.8% were male. Median follow-up after baseline PCI was 8.8 [interquartile range (IQR) 7.4] years. Restenosis was observed in 162 (13.4%) patients. Median serum levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in patients affected by ISR vs. non-affected cases: 27 (IQR 73.8) vs. 20 (IQR 57.5) mg/dL, P = 0.008. The rate of ISR was significantly higher among patients with high Lp(a) vs. patients with low Lp(a) values (17.0% vs. 11.6%, P = 0.010). High Lp(a) values were independently associated with ISR events (hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.18–2.37, P = 0.004), and this association was more prominent after the first year following the PCI. Conclusion Lipoprotein(a) is an independent predictor for long-term ISR and should be considered in the evaluation of patients undergoing PCI.

Abstract Aims Doppler mean gradient (MG) can underestimate aortic stenosis (AS) severity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) compared with patients with sinus rhythm (SR), potentially delaying intervention in AF. This study compared outcomes in patients with AF and SR following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and investigated delay in TAVR based on computed tomography aortic valve calcium score (AVCS). Methods and results Patients who underwent TAVR from 2013 to 2017 for native valve severe AS were identified from an institutional database. Baseline characteristics and overall survival were compared between those with SR and AF. There were 820 patients (mean age 81 years; 41.6% females) included in this study. AF was present in 356 patients. Patients with AF were older (82.2 vs. 80.5, P = 0.003) and had a lower MG compared with patients with SR (42.0 vs. 44.9, P = 0.002) with similar indexed aortic valve area (0.4 vs. 0.4, P = 0.17). Median AVCS was higher in AF (males: AF 2850.0 vs. SR 2561.0, P = 0.044; females: AF 1942.0 vs. SR 1610.5, P = 0.025). Projected AVCS, assuming the same age of diagnosis, was similar between AF and SR. Median survival post-TAVR was worse in AF compared with SR (3.2 vs. 5.4 years, log rank P < 0.001). AF, lower MG, higher right ventricular systolic pressure, dialysis, diabetes, and significant tricuspid regurgitation were associated with higher mortality (P < 0.05 for all). Conclusion Older age and higher AVCS in patients with AF compared with those with SR suggest that AS was both underestimated and more advanced at TAVR referral.