Ranganath, Nischal

ABSTRACT The prevalence of invasive candidiasis caused by non- albicans Candida species is increasing. Candida guilliermondii is an infrequent cause of candidemia but has been associated with decreased susceptibility to triazoles. Clinical data related to the infection with C. guilliermondii are sparse. Our study evaluated the antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) for C. guilliermondii isolates submitted to a reference laboratory over a 12-year period (2012–2023). AST patterns were examined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) and breakpoints. Where isolates were identified from patients treated at our institution, retrospective chart review was performed to describe patient risk factors, treatment approaches, and outcomes associated with C. guilliermondii fungemia. One hundred twelve blood culture isolates of C. guilliermondii were identified, and clinical data were available for 21 fungemic patients. A significant number of isolates (9.8–20.5%) were observed to be non-wild type for various triazoles. All isolates were susceptible to micafungin. A majority (76.2%) of cases of C. guilliermondii fungemia treated at our tertiary care center were hospital-acquired, and two-thirds of patients were immunocompromised at the time of diagnosis. Ten of the 21 patients died within 60 days of fungemia, although mortality was directly or partially attributed to C. guilliermondii fungemia in only four cases (19.0%). Echinocandins may be used for empiric therapy for C. guilliermondii until the results of AST are available. Further research is required to determine appropriate clinical breakpoints for triazoles. IMPORTANCE Our study addresses a significant knowledge gap in the clinical management of this non- Candida albicans species. Our retrospective review includes comprehensive AST data for 112 Candida guilliermondii isolates, which is the largest number of isolates reported from the United States to date. Susceptibility data are supplemented by clinical outcomes, where isolates were identified for patients treated at Mayo Clinic. Key findings from our study include the observation that a notable proportion of C. guilliermondii isolates exhibit non-wild-type profiles for various triazoles. Importantly, all isolates remained susceptible to echinocandins, suggesting their efficacy as first-line therapy in the absence of timely susceptibility results. Furthermore, our study highlights the high mortality associated with C. guilliermondii fungemia in immunocompromised patients, emphasizing the urgent need for optimized treatment strategies.

Abstract Background Recent advances in shotgun metagenomic sequencing (sMGS) for detecting microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in peripheral blood have shown promise across various patient populations. This study evaluates the application of sMGS for diagnosing osteoarticular infections (OAIs), a condition with significant diagnostic challenges. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis on 73 patients suspected of OAIs at the Mayo Clinic from 2019 to 2023, incorporating mcfDNA sMGS (Karius test [KT]) into their diagnostic evaluation. We categorized the clinical impact of KT on OAI diagnoses and management into 4 distinct outcomes. (1) KT was able to confirm an established diagnosis, (2) KT supported noninfectious diseases diagnosis, (3) KT established an unsuspected diagnosis, (4) KT did not add relevant information. Results In our cohort, KT was performed in 73 patients. Among the infected individuals, KT yielded positive results in 22 of 43 (51.2%) cases. Of these 22 cases, 11 (50%) showed agreement with conventional diagnostic workup, whereas in 5 (22.7%) cases, the KT established an unsuspected diagnosis. Native vertebral osteomyelitis diagnosis (P < .001) or OAIs with concomitant presence of endocarditis or endovascular infection (P = .005) were statistically associated with a definite, probable, or possible diagnostic certainty of KT result. Conclusions In complex OAIs, KT enhanced diagnostic accuracy by 11.6%, proving especially beneficial in diagnosing native vertebral osteomyelitis and infections with concurrent endocarditis or endovascular complications. Our findings underscore the utility of KT in the diagnostic workflow for challenging OAI cases, potentially altering clinical management for a significant subset of patients.

Abstract Background Identifying and treating patients with acute Q fever who are at an increased risk of progressing to persistent disease is crucial for preventing future complications. In this study, we share our decade-long clinical experience with acute Q fever, highlighting the challenges that clinicians encounter from making an initial diagnosis and performing risk stratification to determining the appropriate prophylaxis regimen and duration. Methods We retrieved records of adult Mayo Clinic patients (≥18 years) with positive Coxiella burnetii serology results between 1 January 2012 and 31 March 2022. Patients with Q fever anti–phase II immunoglobulin G ≥1:256 by indirect immunofluorescence were further analyzed. Results Thirty-one patients were included. Their median age was 58 years (IQR, 50–64), and the majority were men (84%). Acute hepatitis (29%), flu-like illness (25.8%), and pneumonia (16%) were the most common presentations. Thirteen patients (42%) received antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent disease progression, with significant variation in the indications and duration across physicians. The combination of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine was the preferred regimen. Prophylaxis was administered for a median 333 days (IQR, 168–414). Four patients (13%) progressed to Q fever native valve infective endocarditis, with elevated anticardiolipin immunoglobulin G levels being the sole risk factor in 2 cases. The small sample size precluded drawing conclusions on the impact of prophylaxis in preventing disease progression. Conclusions Management of acute Q fever is complicated by the lack of comprehensive clinical guidelines leading to varied clinical practices. There is a critical need for randomized trials to establish robust evidence-based protocols for management.

ABSTRACT Rhodococcus equi is an opportunistic pathogen known to cause pulmonary and extrapulmonary disease among immunocompromised patients. Treatment is frequently challenging due to intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotic classes. While non- equi Rhodococcus spp. are prevalent, their clinical significance is poorly defined. There is also limited data on antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of Rhodococcus infection in humans. We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating clinical characteristics, microbiologic profile, and AST of Rhodococcus infections between June 2012 and 2022 at our tertiary academic medical center. Identification of Rhodococcus spp. was performed by Sanger 16S rRNA gene sequencing and/or matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, and AST was performed by agar dilution. Three hundred twenty-two isolates of Rhodococcus spp. were identified from blood (50%), pulmonary (26%), and bone/joint (12%) sources. R. equi/hoagii, R. corynebacterioides , and R. erythropolis were the most frequently isolated species, with 19% of isolates identified only to genus level. One hundred ninety-nine isolates evaluated for AST demonstrated high-level resistance to amoxicillin/clavulanate, cephalosporins, and aminoglycosides. More than 95% susceptibility to imipenem, vancomycin, linezolid, rifampin, and clarithromycin was observed. Non- equi species showed a significantly more favorable AST profile relative to R. equi . Clinically significant Rhodococcus infection was rare with 10 cases diagnosed (majority due to R. equi ) and managed. The majority of patients received 2- or 3-drug combination therapy for 2–6 months, with favorable clinical response. Significant differences in AST were observed between R. equi and non- equi species. Despite high antimicrobial resistance to several antibiotic classes, imipenem and vancomycin remain appropriate empiric treatment options for R. equi . Future research evaluating mechanisms underlying antimicrobial resistance is warranted.

AbstractIntroductionGram‐negative bacillary bloodstream infection (GN‐BSI) is a frequent clinical challenge among immunocompromised hosts and is associated with a high mortality. The utility of follow‐up blood cultures (FUBCs) for GN‐BSI in this population, particularly in the setting of neutropenia, is poorly defined.MethodsWe conducted a single‐center, retrospective cohort study between the period of July 2018 and April 2022 to investigate the utility of FUBCs and delineate risk factors for positive cultures among neutropenic patients with monomicrobial GN‐BSI. Univariate logistic regression was performed to assess risk factors associated with positive FUBCs.ResultsOf 206 patients, 98% had FUBCs performed, and 9% were positive. Risk factors for positive FUBCs included multidrug‐resistant GN infection (OR 3.26; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–8.72) and vascular catheter source (OR 4.82; CI 1.76–13.17). Among patients lacking these risk factors, the prevalence of positive FUBCs was low (2.8%) and the negative predictive value was 92%. Those with positive and negative FUBCs had similar rates of all‐cause mortality (16.7% vs. 16.6%; p = .942) and microbiologic relapse (11.1% vs. 6.0%; p = .401) within 90‐days of treatment completion. However, positive FUBCs were associated with prolonged hospitalization and longer duration of antimicrobial therapy.ConclusionPositive FUBCs were infrequent in neutropenic patients with GN‐BSI, and their occurrence did not significantly impact mortality or microbiologic relapse. Risk factors for positive FUBCs included multidrug resistant Gram‐negative infection and vascular catheter source. Prospective studies will be necessary to elucidate the benefits and risks of FUBCs when managing GN‐BSI in patients with underlying immune compromise. image

Abstract Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%–80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.

AbstractBackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend immunomodulators, tocilizumab or baricitinib, for the management of severe coronavirus disease‐2019 (COVID‐19) in patients with increasing oxygen requirements. Given their immunosuppressive effects, there is a concern for higher rates of infection among transplant recipients.MethodsA retrospective cohort study of transplant patients with severe COVID‐19 between April 2020 and January 2022 was performed at the Mayo Clinic. The primary outcome was incidence of secondary infections after COVID‐19 diagnosis. Secondary outcomes were 90‐day mortality, ventilatory days, and thromboembolic events.ResultsA total of 191 hospitalized transplant patients were studied, including 77 (40.3%) patients who received an immunomodulator. Overall, 89% were solid organ transplant recipients, with kidney as the most common transplanted organ (50.3%). The majority (89.0%) required oxygen supplementation on admission, and 39.8% of these patients required mechanical ventilation during the hospital course. There was no significant difference in the incidence of secondary infections between those who received or did not receive an immunomodulator (p = .984). Likewise, there was no difference in 90‐day mortality between patients who received or did not receive an immunomodulator (p = .134). However, higher mortality was observed among patients that developed a secondary infection (p < .001).ConclusionThe use of immunomodulators in transplant patients with severe COVID‐19 was not significantly associated with an increased risk of secondary infections. Secondary infections were associated with higher risk of all‐cause mortality. Future studies of larger cohorts are needed to explore the effect of immunomodulators on survival among transplant patients with COVID‐19. image

Leptotrichia species are anaerobic, Gram-negative bacilli increasingly recognized as pathogens capable of causing invasive infections such as bloodstream infection (BSI), particularly among immunocompromised patients. However, there is a paucity of data regarding epidemiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, optimal treatment, and clinical outcomes among patients with Leptotrichia bacteremia.

Abstract Background Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and midlines are commonly used devices for reliable vascular access. Infection and thrombosis are the main adverse effects of these catheters. We aimed to evaluate the relative risk of complications from midlines and PICCs. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. The primary outcomes were catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) and thrombosis. Secondary outcomes evaluated included mortality, failure to complete therapy, catheter occlusion, phlebitis, and catheter fracture. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results Of 8368 citations identified, 20 studies met the eligibility criteria, including 1 RCT and 19 observational studies. Midline use was associated with fewer patients with CRBSI compared with PICCs (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.15–0.38). This association was not observed when we evaluated risk per catheter. No significant association was found between catheters when evaluating risk of localized thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A subgroup analysis based on location of thrombosis showed higher rates of superficial venous thrombosis in patients using midlines (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.48–3.57). We did not identify any significant difference between midlines and PICCs for the secondary outcomes. Conclusions Our findings suggest that patients who use midlines might experience fewer CRBSIs than those who use PICCs. However, the use of midline catheters was associated with greater risk of superficial vein thrombosis. These findings can help guide future cost-benefit analyses and direct comparative RCTs to further characterize the efficacy and risks of PICCs vs midline catheters.

Abstract The diagnosis of Q fever can be challenging and a high index of suspicion is necessary. Within this case series, we highlight the utility of the microbial cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing or Karius Test in the timely diagnosis and management of acute Q fever.