LeClair-Visonneau, Laurene

Abstract Study Objectives The body-first Parkinson’s disease (PD) hypothesis suggests initial gut Lewy body pathology initially propagates to the pons before reaching the substantia nigra, and subsequently progresses to the diencephalic and cortical levels, a disease course presumed to likely occur in PD with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD). We aimed to explore the potential association between colonic phosphorylated alpha-synuclein histopathology (PASH) and diencephalic or cortical dysfunction evidenced by non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and wakefulness polysomnographic markers. Methods In a study involving 43 patients with PD who underwent clinical examination, rectosigmoidoscopy, and polysomnography, we detected PASH on colonic biopsies using whole-mount immunostaining. We performed a visual semi-quantitative analysis of NREM sleep and wake electroencephalography (EEG), confirmed it with automated quantification of spindle and slow wave features of NREM sleep, and the wake dominant frequency, and then determined probable Arizona PD stage classifications based on sleep and wake EEG features. Results The visual analysis aligned with the automated quantified spindle characteristics and the wake dominant frequency. Altered NREM sleep and wake parameters correlated with markers of PD severity, colonic PASH, and RBD diagnosis. Colonic PASH frequency also increased in parallel to probable Arizona PD stage classifications. Conclusions Colonic PASH is strongly associated with widespread brain sleep and wake dysfunction, suggesting an extensive diffusion of the pathologic process in PD. Visual and automated analyses of polysomnography signals provide useful markers to gauge covert brain dysfunction in PD. Clinical Trial Name: SYNAPark, URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01748409, registration: NCT01748409

Abstract Study Objectives Isolated REM sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) carries a high lifetime risk for phenoconversion to a defined neurodegenerative disease (NDD) including Parkinson disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy. We aimed to examine iRBD patient values and preferences regarding prognostic counseling. Methods One hundred thirteen iRBD patient participants enrolled in the Mayo Clinic iRBD Patient Registry were sent an email survey concerning their values and preferences concerning NDD prognostic counseling and their experiences following diagnosis with iRBD. Results Of 81 respondents (71.7% response rate), the majority were men (74.0%) with an average age of 65.7 (±9.7) years. Responses indicated a strong preference toward receiving prognostic information about possible future NDD development. 92.5% of respondents felt knowledge concerning personal NDD risk was important, while 87.6% indicated prognostic discussions were important to maintaining trust in their physician. 95.7% indicated a desire for more information, while only 4.3% desired less information regarding their NDD prognostic risk. Most respondents strongly agreed that prognostic information was important to discuss with their family and friends and inform future life planning, and most expressed interest in learning more about future neuroprotective therapies and symptomatic treatments for parkinsonism and dementia. Conclusions Most iRBD patients indicated strong preferences for disclosure of NDD prognostic risk and indicated that prognostic information was important for family discussions and future life planning. Future broader surveys and qualitative studies of clinic-based and ultimately community dwelling iRBD patients’ values and preferences are needed to guide appropriately tailored and individualized prognostic counseling approaches following iRBD diagnosis.