From the Departments of Radiology (M.P.C., D.M.B., M.A.D., J.D.L., M.J.C., L.F.A.) and Transplantation (J.N.C., S.A.M.), Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL 32224; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz (R.L.P.,
Citations 14
Procedure-Related Pain During Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsies: A Retrospective Study of Prevalence and Predictive Factors
American Journal of Roentgenology | July 9, 2019 | Volume: 213 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 755-761
AbstractImage-guided, minimally invasive, percutaneous thermal ablation of bone metastases has unique advantages compared with surgery or radiation therapy. Thermal ablation of osseous metastases may result in significant pain palliation, prevention of skeletal-related events, and durable local tumor control. This article will describe current thermal ablation techniques utilized to treat bone metastases, summarize contemporary evidence supporting such thermal ablation treatments, and outline an approach to percutaneous ablative treatment.
Development of a robust MRI fiducial system for automated fusion of MR‐US abdominal images
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | May 22, 2018 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 261-270
AbstractWe present the development of a two‐component magnetic resonance (MR) fiducial system, that is, a fiducial marker device combined with an auto‐segmentation algorithm, designed to be paired with existing ultrasound probe tracking and image fusion technology to automatically fuse MR and ultrasound (US) images. The fiducial device consisted of four ~6.4 mL cylindrical wells filled with 1 g/L copper sulfate solution. The algorithm was designed to automatically segment the device in clinical abdominal MR images. The algorithm's detection rate and repeatability were investigated through a phantom study and in human volunteers. The detection rate was 100% in all phantom and human images. The center‐of‐mass of the fiducial device was robustly identified with maximum variations of 2.9 mm in position and 0.9° in angular orientation. In volunteer images, average differences between algorithm‐measured inter‐marker spacings and actual separation distances were 0.53 ± 0.36 mm. “Proof‐of‐concept” automatic MR‐US fusions were conducted with sets of images from both a phantom and volunteer using a commercial prototype system, which was built based on the above findings. Image fusion accuracy was measured to be within 5 mm for breath‐hold scanning. These results demonstrate the capability of this approach to automatically fuse US and MR images acquired across a wide range of clinical abdominal pulse sequences.