Lasho, Terra L.

Introduction: Germline DEAD-box RNA helicase-1 mutant (DDX41) predisposition syndrome ( DDX41-MT-GPS) is one of the most frequent hereditary predisposition syndromes in adults with myeloid neoplasms (MN-2-5%). Somatic mosaicism involving the unmutated DDX41 allele (e.g., R525H) as a potential mechanism for myeloid evolution has been reported in 39-50% of patients (pts). In addition, given the later age of onset, somatic mosaic states composed of age-related clonal hematopoiesis (ARCH) (e.g., DNMT3A, ASXL1, TET2, and TP53), with reported frequencies less than expected in MDS and AML, have been documented. We conducted this study to define the somatic mosaic landscape in DDX41-MT-GPS . Methods: After approval from the Mayo Clinic IRB the prospective GPS database was queried for pts with DDX41-MT GPS. Germline confirmation was conducted on skin fibroblast-, or hair follicle-derived DNA. Somatic CH testing was conducted using a targeted NGS panel as previously described. Given the high frequency of variants of undetermined significance (VUS), comparisons were made between pathogenic ( DDX41path) and DDX41VUS. Results: We identified 106 pts with DDX41-MT-GPS, of which 83 (78%) met criteria for MN, 16 (15%) for CH/CCUS (clonal cytopenias of undetermined significance), while 7 (6%) were unaffected carriers. Somatic mosaicism in DDX41-GPS patients without MN Sixteen DDX41-MT pts without MN met criteria for CH/CCUS ( DDX41path [n=4] and DDX41VUS [n=12]; median age 69 years (yrs) (range [R], 19-78) ( DDX41path [69 yrs] and DDX41VUS [67 yrs], p=0.85), with a male predilection (75%). Four (25%) pts had somatic DDX41 MT (R525H [n=3] and A376T [n=1]) with median variant allele frequency (VAF) 10.5% (R, 5-27); 2 (50%) pts with germline DDX41path had R525H (VAF; 5% and 13%) and 1 (8%) pt each with germline DDX41VUS had R525H (VAF 5%) and A376T (VAF 27%) somatic variants, respectively. Abnormal cytogenetics (CG) were observed in 2/13 evaluable (15%) pts ([+8 and del20q]) in the germline DDX41path group only (p= 0.05). ARCH co-mutations were observed in 11 (69%) pts, not significantly (NS) different between DDX41path (75%) and DDX41VUS (75%), p= 0.66. Individual co-mutations: DNMT3A (25% vs 16%, p= > 0.99), ASXL1 (25% vs 8%, p=0.71), TET2 (25% vs 8%, p= >0.99), and JAK2 (0% vs 8%, p= >0.99) were NS different between the two groups. Somatic mosaicism in DDX41-GPS patients with MN Eight-three pts met criteria for MN ( DDX41path [n=43] and DDX41VUS [n=40]; median age 67 yrs (range [R], 27-92), with a male predilection (58%). Fifty-four (65%) pts had MDS ( DDX41path [55%] and DDX41VUS [45%], p=0.55) and 29 (35%) had AML ( DDX41path [41%] and DDX41VUS [59%], p=0.65). Overall, 15 (18%) pts had somatic DDX41 MT; 12 (80%) pts with DDX41path and 3 (20%) pts with DDX41VUS (p= 0.003). The median VAF of somatic DDX41 MT was 12% (R, 5-37), NS different between DDX41path (10.5%) and DDX41VUS (12%) (p=0.08). The most common somatic DDX41 MT was R525H (66% [n=10]), significantly associated with DDX41path (9/10 [90%]), p=0.01. ARCH was observed in 17 (20%) pts, significantly higher in DDX41path (76%) compared to DDX41VUS (24%), p= 0.03. Abnormal CG were observed in 10/73 evaluable (14%) pts (-Y [n=2], del 20 [n=3], del 5q [n=2], del 7q [n=1], t (3;8) [n=1] and complex CG [n=1]), higher in DDX41path (70%) compared to DDX41VUS (30%) with p value >0.99. We compared the spectrum of CH between DDX41 MT CH/CCUS and MN pts ( Table 1) and found no difference in the proportion of pts with somatic DDX41 MT (p= 0.52) and ARCH/myeloid MT (p= 0.56). The individual occurrences of DNMT3A (p= 0.49), ASXL1 (p= 0.71), TET2 (p=0.59), JAK2 (p>0.99) and TP53 (p= 0.56) mutations were NS different between the two groups ( Figure 1). Conclusion: We define the somatic mosaic landscape in DDX41-MT GPS and demonstrate that somatic mutations involving the other allele, especially R525H, are seen in ~20% of pts (>80% of R525H present in MN). The frequency and composition of ARCH and myeloid driver mutations was lower than expected for the age of presentation, in comparison to de novo and secondary MDS/AML and occurred more frequently in DDX41path compared to DDX41VUS. Forty-two % (n=41), including 37% with MN, did not have somatic mosaicism, underscoring the fact that mechanisms of leukemia progression remain to be defined in subsets of affected pts.

Introduction Truncating ASXL1 mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and leukemia free survival (LFS). Conversely, loss-of-function mutations in TET2 are associated with better outcomes, with the ASXL1wt/ TET2mut genotype being associated with the best OS and LFS-rates (Coltro G, et al. Leukemia. 2020). Contemporary CMML prognostic scoring systems - such as the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM; Patnaik MM, et al. Leukemia. 2014) and the CPSS-Molecular Model (CMM; Elena C, et al. Blood. 2016) - do not consider concomitant ASXL1/ TET2 mutational status or mutational VAF. We hypothesized that the ASXL1/ TET2 genotype would better risk stratify patients in comparison to ASXL1 mutations alone, and that this effect would be proportional to the underlying mutational VAF. Methods After IRB approval, we compiled a large (n = 888), molecularly annotated database of CMML patients seen at two US medical centers (Mayo Clinic and MD Anderson) via retrospective chart review. All statistical analyses considered the clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at the time of presentation to the respective institution. Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact or Pearson χ 2 tests and continuous variables by Mann-Whitney U tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Survival was assessed via the Kaplan-Meier method. P-values < 0.05 were considered significant. All statistical calculations were performed using the BlueSky Statistics (v10.3.1) interface for R. Results The median age of the cohort was 71 years (range 20 - 94), 67% were male, 46% had proliferative CMML (pCMML), and 19% had CMML-2. The distribution of low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high-risk patients was 15%, 11%, 32%, and 42% by the MMM and 9%, 23%, 40%, and 28% by the CMM, respectively. The most frequently mutated genes were ASXL1 (45%), TET2 (43%), SRSF2 (41%), and RUNX1 (17%), while 40% harbored at least one RAS pathway mutation ( NRAS 16%, CBL 15%, KRAS 8%, PTPN11 4%, FLT3 2%). The median OS and LFS of the entire cohort were 31.8 months (95% CI 28.4 - 33.5 months) and 28.4 months (95% CI 24.6 - 32.1 months), respectively. Patients were stratified into ASXL1wt/ TET2wt (28%), ASXL1mut/ TET2wt (29%), ASXL1wt/ TET2mut (26%), and ASXL1mut/ TET2mut (17%) genotypes. Those with isolated TET2 mutations had the longest median OS (53.6 months; p < 0.02 for all comparisons) whereas those with isolated ASXL1 mutations had the shortest median OS (20.9 months; p < 0.04 for all comparisons); mutations in neither or both genes performed similarly (p = 0.9224; Figure 1A). The same trend was seen for LFS. We further hypothesized that the ASXL1 or TET2 mutation VAF would be more predictive of outcomes than a binary metric. The respective median VAFs were 37% (quartiles 28% - 45%) and 45% (quartiles 40% - 49%). When treated as a continuous variable, however, there was no correlation between either VAF and OS or LFS by both Pearson linear regression and Cox proportional hazard modeling. Unlike the overall cohort, the ASXL1/ TET2 genotypes did not further stratify patients with pCMML, CMML-2, or those considered high risk by the CMM in Kaplan-Meier analyses, suggesting that the high-risk features inherent in these subgroups outweigh the benefits of the TET2 mutation. In contrast, patients considered high-risk by the MMM were further stratified by the ASXL1/ TET2 genotypes. Incorporating TET2 mutations into the MMM as a protective factor (worth -1.5 points) improved detection of low- (≤ 1 point) and high-risk (≥ 4 points) patients, while intermediate-1 and intermediate-2 coalesced into a single intermediate risk category ( Figure 1B). A similar phenomenon was observed when TET2 was incorporated into the CMM (worth -1 point, yielding low- (0 points), intermediate- (1-2 points), and high-risk (≥ 3 points) groups with median OS of 83 months (95% CI 66.2 - 104.2), 34.3 months (95% CI 31.6 - 38.7), and 17.7 months (95% CI 15.7 - 20.2), respectively. Conclusions Truncating and hypomorphic TET2 mutations are associated with better outcomes in CMML, with the ASXL1mut/ TET2wt genotype being associated with improved risk stratification in comparison to ASXL1 mutational status alone. Counterintuitively, in our data set, this stratification was not impacted by mutational VAF, supporting binary mutational assessments in prognostic models.

Abstract VEXAS (Vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, Autoinflammatory, Somatic) syndrome is a newly identified disease caused by somatic alterations in UBA1 which produce a recalcitrant inflammatory state along with hematologic disturbances. Patients with VEXAS can have a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms and providers should be familiar with the heterogeneity of associated clinical features. While hematologic parameters may be generally non‐specific, peripheral blood features of macrocytosis, monocytopenia, and/or thrombocytopenia coupled with bone marrow vacuolization of erythroid or myeloid precursors should raise suspicion for this condition. Due to an increased mortality, prompt recognition and accurate diagnosis is paramount. Access to testing for confirmation of UBA1 variants is not yet universally available but clinicians should understand the current available options for genetic confirmation of this disease. Treatment options are limited due to lack of prospective clinical trials but cytokine directed therapies such as interleukin‐6 inhibitors and JAK–STAT inhibitors as well as hypomethylating agents such as azacitidine have shown evidence of partial effect. Though cases are limited, allogeneic stem cell transplantation holds promise for durable response and potential cure. The intent of this review is to outline the pathophysiology of VEXAS syndrome and to provide a practical approach to diagnosis and treatment.

The snATAC + snRNA platform allows epigenomic profiling of open chromatin and gene expression with single-cell resolution. The most critical assay step is to isolate high-quality nuclei to proceed with droplet-base single nuclei isolation and barcoding. With the increasing popularity of multiomic profiling in various fields, there is a need for optimized and reliable nuclei isolation methods, mainly for human tissue samples. Herein we compared different nuclei isolation methods for cell suspensions, such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC, n = 18) and a solid tumor type, ovarian cancer (OC, n = 18), derived from debulking surgery. Nuclei morphology and sequencing output parameters were used to evaluate the quality of preparation. Our results show that NP-40 detergent-based nuclei isolation yields better sequencing results than collagenase tissue dissociation for OC, significantly impacting cell type identification and analysis. Given the utility of applying such techniques to frozen samples, we also tested frozen preparation and digestion (n = 6). A paired comparison between frozen and fresh samples validated the quality of both specimens. Finally, we demonstrate the reproducibility of scRNA and snATAC + snRNA platform, by comparing the gene expression profiling of PBMC. Our results highlight how the choice of nuclei isolation methods is critical for obtaining quality data in multiomic assays. It also shows that the measurement of expression between scRNA and snRNA is comparable and effective for cell type identification.

Abstract Objective To retrospectively identify patients with VEXAS syndrome (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic syndrome) among male patients with bone marrow vacuolization using a clinically applicable, targeted-screening approach. Methods Bone marrow reports from 1 May 2014 through 18 February 2022 were reviewed for documentation of cytoplasmic vacuolization. Patients with acute leukaemia, lymphoma, metastatic solid tumour, amyloidosis or POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, skin changes) syndrome were excluded, as were those without clinical records available for direct chart review. Cases were rated for suspicion of VEXAS syndrome using a 5-point scale based on the presence of laboratory findings, clinical features and treatment response. Patients with available DNA material and moderate (three patients) or high (four to five patients) suspicion were tested for somatic UBA1 variants associated with VEXAS syndrome. Results A total of 315 reports from 292 unique patients included documentation of vacuolization. Following exclusion criteria, 64 patients underwent direct medical chart review to assess likelihood of VEXAS syndrome, for which 21 patients met moderate to high suspicion. Available DNA was present in eight patients, seven (87.5%) of whom had a pathogenic somatic UBA1 variant consistent with VEXAS syndrome. The distribution of cytoplasmic vacuolization in the bone marrow biopsy reports among patients with VEXAS syndrome were erythroid and myeloid precursors (6/7), erythroid precursors only (1/7) and myeloid precursors only (0/7). Conclusion In this study, the utilization of a clinically applicable targeted-screening approach to test bone marrow specimens (with vacuolization) for the presence of previously undiagnosed VEXAS syndrome resulted in a positive detection rate of 87.5%.

Abstract Purpose: Preclinical studies in myeloid neoplasms have demonstrated efficacy of bromodomain and extra-terminal protein inhibitors (BETi). However, BETi demonstrates poor single-agent activity in clinical trials. Several studies suggest that combination with other anticancer inhibitors may enhance the efficacy of BETi. Experimental Design: To nominate BETi combination therapies for myeloid neoplasms, we used a chemical screen with therapies currently in clinical cancer development and validated this screen using a panel of myeloid cell line, heterotopic cell line models, and patient-derived xenograft models of disease. We used standard protein and RNA assays to determine the mechanism responsible for synergy in our disease models. Results: We identified PIM inhibitors (PIMi) as therapeutically synergistic with BETi in myeloid leukemia models. Mechanistically, we show that PIM kinase is increased after BETi treatment, and that PIM kinase upregulation is sufficient to induce persistence to BETi and sensitize cells to PIMi. Furthermore, we demonstrate that miR-33a downregulation is the underlying mechanism driving PIM1 upregulation. We also show that GM-CSF hypersensitivity, a hallmark of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), represents a molecular signature for sensitivity to combination therapy. Conclusions: Inhibition of PIM kinases is a potential novel strategy for overcoming BETi persistence in myeloid neoplasms. Our data support further clinical investigation of this combination.

VEXAS is caused by somatic mutations in UBA1 (UBA1mut) and characterized by heterogenous systemic auto-inflammation and progressive hematologic manifestations, meeting criteria for myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and plasma cell dyscrasias. The landscape of myeloid-related gene mutations leading to typical clonal hematopoiesis (CH) in these patients is unknown. Retrospectively, we screened 80 VEXAS patients for CH in their peripheral blood (PB) and correlated findings with clinical outcomes in 77. UBA1mutwere most common at hotspot p.M41 (median variant allele frequency/VAF = 75%). Typical CH mutations co-occurred with UBA1mut in 60% of patients, mostly in DNMT3A and TET2, and were not associated with inflammatory or hematologic manifestations. In prospective single-cell proteogenomic sequencing (scDNA), UBA1mutwas the dominant clone, present mostly in branched clonal trajectories. Based on integrated bulk and scDNA analyses, clonality in VEXAS followed two major patterns: with either typical CH preceding UBA1mutselection in a clone (Pattern 1), or occurring as an UBA1mutsubclone or in independent clones (Pattern 2). VAF in PB differed markedly between DNMT3A and TET2 clones (median VAF of 25% vs 1%). DNMT3A and TET2 clones associated with hierarchies representing patterns 1 and 2, respectively. Overall survival for all patients was 60% at 10 years. Transfusion-dependent anemia, moderate thrombocytopenia, and typical CH mutations, each correlated with poor outcome. In VEXAS, UBA1mut cells are the primary cause of systemic inflammation and marrow failure, being a new molecularly defined somatic entity associated with MDS. VEXAS-associated MDS is distinct from classical MDS in its presentation and clinical course.

Abstract Background: COVID-19 causes significant morbidity and mortality, albeit with considerable heterogeneity among affected individuals. It remains unclear which host factors determine disease severity and survival. Given the propensity of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) to promote inflammation in healthy individuals, we investigated its effect on COVID-19 outcomes. Methods: We performed a multi-omics interrogation of the genome, epigenome, transcriptome, and proteome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from COVID-19 patients (n=227). We obtained clinical data, laboratory studies, and survival outcomes. We determined CH status and TET2-related DNA methylation. We performed single-cell proteogenomics to understand clonal composition in relation to cell phenotype. We interrogated single-cell gene expression in isolation and in conjunction with DNA accessibility. We integrated these multi-omics data to understand the effect of CH on clonal composition, gene expression, methylation of cis-regulatory elements, and lineage commitment in COVID-19 patients. We performed shRNA knockdowns to validate the effect of one candidate transcription factor in myeloid cell lines. Results: The presence of CH was strongly associated with COVID-19 severity and all-cause mortality, independent of age (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.45-8.36, p=0.005). Differential methylation of promoters and enhancers was prevalent in TET2-mutant, but not DNMT3A-mutant CH. TET2-mutant CH was associated with enhanced classical/intermediate monocytosis and single-cell proteogenomics confirmed an enrichment of TET2 mutations in these cell types. We identified cell-type specific gene expression changes associated with TET2 mutations in 102,072 single cells (n=34). Single-cell RNA-seq confirmed the skewing of hematopoiesis towards classical and intermediate monocytes and demonstrated the downregulation of EGR1 (a transcription factor important for monocyte differentiation) along with up-regulation of the lncRNA MALAT1 in monocytes. Combined scRNA-/scATAC-seq in 43,160 single cells (n=18) confirmed the skewing of hematopoiesis and up-regulation of MALAT1 in monocytes along with decreased accessibility of EGR1 motifs in known cis-regulatory elements. Using myeloid cell lines for functional validation, shRNA knockdowns of EGR1 confirmed the up-regulation of MALAT1 (in comparison to wildtype controls). Conclusions: CH is an independent prognostic factor in COVID-19 and skews hematopoiesis towards monocytosis. TET2-mutant CH is characterized by differential methylation and accessibility of enhancers binding myeloid transcriptions factors including EGR1. The ensuing loss of EGR1 expression in monocytes causes MALAT1 overexpression, a factor known to promote monocyte differentiation and inflammation. These data provide a mechanistic insight to the adverse prognostic impact of CH in COVID-19. Citation Format: Moritz Binder, Terra L. Lasho, Wazim Mohammed Ismail, Nana A. Ben-Crentsil, Jenna A. Fernandez, Minsuk Kim, Susan M. Geyer, Amelia Mazzone, Christy M. Finke, Abhishek A. Mangaonkar, Jeong-Heon Lee, Kwan Hyun Kim, Vernadette A. Simon, Fariborz Rakhshan Rohakthar, Amik Munankarmy, Susan M. Schwager, Jonathan J. Harrington, Melissa R. Snyder, Nathalie M. Droin, Eric Solary, Keith D. Robertson, Eric D. Wieben, Eric Padron, Nicholas Chia, Alexandre Gaspar-Maia, Mrinal M. Patnaik. Enhancer deregulation inTET2-mutant clonal hematopoiesis is associated with increased COVID-19 severity and mortality [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 806.