Lasho, Terra L.

Abstract Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a myeloid neoplasm with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). Blast transformation (BT) is a frequent complication of CMML with a 3-year risk of approximately 31%. MPN driver mutations (i.e., JAK2, CALR, MPL) are known to occur in CMML but their impact on overall survival (OS) or BT remains uncertain. Methods The current study was conducted under institutional review board approved minimum risk protocols that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of patient data. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022; 140:1200). For survival analysis, patients were censored at the time of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP Pro 17.0.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and Bluesky Statistics Software (Worldwide Headquarters, Chicago, IL, USA). Results A total of 612 CMML patients were considered (median age 71 years; 68% males). MPN driver mutations (MPNMUT) were detected in 56 (9%) patients, including 43 (77%) with JAK2, 10 (18%) MPL, and 3 (5%) CALR. The median variant allele frequencies were 44% for JAK2 (range, 0.3–100%), 49% for MPL (range, 0.3–97%), and 50% for CALR (range, 20–80%). Age and sex distributions and CMML-1 vs. CMML-2 representation were similar between CMML patients with and without MPNMUT. On the other hand, CMML patients with MPNMUT were more likely to display higher hemoglobin level (p <0.01), platelet count (p <0.01), absolute neutrophil count (p = 0.02) and leukocytosis (≥13 ×109/L; p <0.01); they were also less likely to be red blood transfusion dependent (p <0.01), display platelet counts of <100 ×109/L (p <0.01) or abnormal karyotype (p= 0.03), present with severe anemia (p= 0.03) or harbor NRAS mutation (p = 0.02). Higher Mutational frequencies of SRSF2 (median 53% vs. 41%; p = 0.01), TP53 (median 8% vs. 2%; p = 0.02) and IDH2 (median 13% vs. 4%; p = 0.01) were noted in CMML patients with MPNMUT. During a median follow-up of 23 months (inter-quantile range 11-51 months) for all 612 CMML patients, 402 (67%) deaths, 118 (19%) BT and 108 (18%) ASCT were documented. Of these, 36 (9%) deaths, 18 (15%) BT and 13 (12%) ASCT occurred in patients with MPNMUT. Median OS for the entire group (N=612) was 32 months with 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates of 78%, 58% and 47%, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS between CMML patients with or without MPNMUT (median 41 vs 31 months; p = 0.27). Thrombotic events were reported in 53 (9%) patients after diagnosis of CMML, including 48 venous and 5 arterial events. There was no significant difference in arterial (p = 0.10) or venous (p = 0.76) thrombosis-free survival between CMML patients with or without MPNMUT. Among all 612 patients with CMML, followed for a median of 18 months for living patients, 118 (19%) experienced BT, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year BT rates of 10.8%, 23.1%, and 31%, respectively. Cumulative incidence analysis function (CIF) was calculated in order to assess the BT-free survival while accounting for death as a competing risk; 3-year CIF was 30% for CMML patients with vs. 18% for those without MPNMUT (Gray's test; p = 0.01). This observation was confirmed in univariate analysis of time to BT (HR 1.7; p=0.03) as well as the corresponding multivariable analysis involving other mutations and clinical risk factors: MPNMUT (HR 1.8; 0.036), ASXL1MUT (HR 2.3; p<0.01), DNMT3AMUT (HR 2.6; p<0.01), CMML-2 vs. CMML-1 (HR 3.4; p<0.01), and leukocyte count ≥13 ×109/L (HR 2.0; p<0.01). SRSF2, IDH2, and TP53 mutations did not impact BT. Notably, the aforementioned risk factors for BT, including ASXL1MUT and DNMT3AMUT, were no longer significant when analysis was restricted to patients with MPNMUT. Conclusions The current study suggests a higher risk of BT in CMML patients with MPNMUT, independent of other molecular or clinical risk factors for BT. On the other hand, overall and thrombosis-free survival did not appear to be similarly influenced. The differential impact of previously recognized risk factors for BT in CMML (e.g., ASXL1MUT, DNMT3AMUT, CMML-2, CMML-MP), in the presence (lost significance) vs. absence (remained significant) of MPNMUT was intriguingly noted.

Abstract Background: Germline predisposition states (GPS), including inherited bone marrow failure syndromes (IBMFS) are seen in 5-10% of individuals with myeloid neoplasms (MN). Given overlap with somatic driver genes, blood, saliva, and buccal swabs are suboptimal specimens for GPS testing in MN; the latter two due to contamination with blood cells(Jerez, 2024). Skin biopsy with fibroblast culture-derived DNA remains the gold standard, but the process is expensive, takes 6-8 weeks to complete, and fibroblast culture failure can occur in some patients with telomere biology disorders. Given the need to rapidly screen donors for HSCT and adjust therapy/conditioning in certain IBMFS, we developed a rapid hematologic germline testing algorithm using hair follicle-derived DNA. Methods The study was conducted after IRB approval through the Mayo Clinic GPS/IBMFS clinic. To perform PCR-based hair follicle testing, we obtained 15-25 hair follicles (bulbs) per patient. The bulbs were placed in a microcentrifuge tube and subjected to a 24-hour digestion and extraction protocol using a modified version of the QIAGEN DNA Purification from Dried Blood Spots protocol. DNA quality was assessed by Nanodrop and Qubit.Testing included either validation of known or suspected germline variants (e.g., RUNX1, DDX41, ETV6), or panel testing (e.g., GPS or IBMFS). Pathogenic variants were validated by repeat testing in a CAP/CLIA certified lab prior to medical decision making. 23 patients underwent whole exome sequencing (WES) in a CAP/CLIA lab, and 13 patients had concurrent germline testing using alternate DNA sources (8 skin biopsies, 1 saliva, 4 buccal swabs). Results Ninety-three patients (49 male, 53%) underwent hair follicle-derived germline DNA testing (median age 63 years). Indications for germline testing included the presence of a suspected variant on somatic testing with variant allele frequency (VAF) between 35%-60% ( n= 66, 71%), patient age <50 years (n=26, 28%), antecedent thrombocytopenia (n=15, 16%), presence of syndromic features (n=4, 4%), patient history of multiple malignancies (n=4, 4%), and positive family history (n=15, 16%). Time to reporting variants after receipt of hair follicle-derived DNA was <14 days. There were zero complications associated with the procedure. DNA quality as assessed by Nanodrop revealed a median nucleic acid concentration of 25.64 ng/μL. The median A260/A280 ratio was 1.86 (range 0.701-2.133) and the median A260/A230 ratio was 1.27 (range -8.193-9.223). DNA quality was insufficient for chromosomal microarray (CMA) assessments. Of 93 patients evaluated, 67 (72%) had ≥1 germline variant, with 3 having >1 germline variant for a total of 72 variants. Pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants identified included: DDX41 (30, 41.7%), TP53 (4, 5.6%), ANKRD26 (4, 5.6%), RUNX1 (4, 5.6%), GATA2 (3, 4.2%), TERT (3, 4.2%), JAK3 (2, 2.8%), SAMD9/SAMD9L (2, 2.8%), ATM (2, 2.8%), and 1 each (1.4%) in BCL2, BCOR, BPGM, CDKN2A, CEBPA, CHEK2, CSF3R, CXCR4, DNMT3A, ETV6, GATA1, MPL, MPO, POT1, PTPN11, RPL5, and SH2B3. In the 13 patients that had concurrent germline testing, results were identical in all cases, except for 1 false negative in a buccal specimen (PTPN11) and 1 case of germline mosaicism, where the TP53 variant was identified in the blood and hair follicle DNA but not in skin fibroblast DNA. After testing, 30 (44.7%) patients had a change in their management plan: 8 (27%) with DDX41-GPS were observed due to known latency of DDX41-mutant MN, 6 (20%) were referred for HSCT based on the germline variant (CEBPA, DDX41, GATA1, GATA2, RPL5, TP53), 6 (20%) were placed on an enhanced surveillance plan for cancer screening (1 ANKRD26, 3 TERT, 2 TP53), 4 (13%) patients undergoing HSCT had related donors removed from consideration as they were carriers (2 DDX41, 1 ANKRD26, and 1 SAMD9), 2 (7%) patients with neutropenia and underlying germline variants (1 ATM, 1 DDX41) had G-CSF therapy discontinued due to concerns for clonal stimulation, and 1 (3%) patient with a germline CDKN2A mutation (hematological diagnosis- CMML) was recommended to avoid radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Conclusion In summary, we validate a rapid and simple hair follicle-derived DNA based germline assessment for patients with hematological disorders and demonstrate a positive impact on clinical care in 44% of patients. We are currently optimizing DNA quality so that germline copy number alterations can be better detected using CMA.

Abstract RAS pathway (RASp) mutations induce proliferative features, and promote transformation in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). However, the unique clonal landscape and hierarchy of distinct RASp mutations remain unexplored. To characterize the landscape, architecture, and implications of unique RASp mutations in CMML, we evaluated a cohort of 814 patients with CMML. We identified 461 RASp mutations among 342 patients (42%). N/KRAS and CBL mutations were the most common, frequently involved the P-loop or RING domains, respectively, and frequently appeared as dominant events (63% and 65%, respectively). BRAF, NF1, and PTPN11 mutations spanned throughout the gene structure, and frequently appeared as subclonal events (75%, 64%, and 59%, respectively). CBL mutations frequently occurred in codominance with SRSF2 and multihit TET2, and were enriched for KIT mutations. PTPN11 mutations more frequently co-occurred with SETBP1 and DNMT3A mutations, and were infrequently codominant with TET2 or ASXL1. RASp mutations predicted for shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.07; P = .0075) and leukemia-free survival (LFS; HR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.26-2.20; P = .0011), influenced outcomes of myelodysplastic and TET2 mutant CMML, and cooperated with IDH2 and RUNX1 mutations to induce shorter LFS. These data set the bases for refined genomic classifications of CMML, and underscore the need to develop RAS-directed therapies for patients with CMML.

6579 Background: Treatment strategies in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) are not standardized and include hydroxyurea (HU) and hypomethylating agents (HMA). In a phase 3 study comparing HU and decitabine, in proliferative CMML, response rates were higher for decitabine (56% vs 31%; p<0.01) but overall survival was similar (p=0.67) between the two groups (Itzykson, R. JCO, 2023. 41:1888). In the current retrospective study, we examined the survival impact of different treatment strategies among 457 Mayo Clinic patients with CMML. Methods: The current study was conducted under institutional review board approved minimum risk protocols allowing retrospective patient data collection and analysis. Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022. 140:1200). All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP 17 software. For survival analysis, patients were censored at time of allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Results: A total of 457 patients were considered (median age 72 years; 68% males). 209 patients received CMML-directed therapy: HU (N=102), HMA (N=78; azacitidine 32 and decitabine 46). Responses were adjudicated separately for leukocytosis and anemia; normalization of leukocyte count was achieved in 21% vs. 16 % (p<0.01) for HU vs. HMA and overall response in anemia in 1% vs. 9% (p=0.02), respectively. Overall survival did not appear to be impacted by different treatment strategies at any stage of CMML; (i) treated vs. untreated (p=0.3), (ii) HU vs. HMA for first-line therapy (p=0.3), and (iii) HU/HMAs vs. other drugs as first-line therapy (p=0.1). Blast transformation-free survival (BTFS) was also similar between HU vs. HMA as well as HU/HMA vs. other drugs. In univariate analysis, BTFS was inferior in patients receiving CMML-directed therapy (p<0.01); the particular association (HR 2; 95% CI 1.2-3.3) retained its significance in multivariable analysis that also included other risk factors for BTFS: bone marrow blast ≥10% (HR 4.3), circulating blast ≥2% (HR 2.7), WBC ≥13 x 10 9 /L (HR 1.8), and ASXL1 mutation (HR 1.7). Conclusions: In the current retrospective study that included a large number of patients with CMML, chemotherapy with HU or HMA did not appear to affect overall survival but might have increased the risk of blast transformation. The study also suggests superiority of HU for the treatment of leukocytosis and HMA for anemia. Predictors of blast transformation-free survival (BTFS) in 457 patients diagnosed with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). BTFS Univariable analysis p-value (HR) Multivariable analysis p-value (HR) CMML-directed therapy <0.01 (2.9; 1.8-4.7) <0.01 (2; 1.2-3.3) Bone marrow blasts ≥10% <0.01 (12.4) 0.01 (4.3) Circulating blasts ≥2% <0.01 (5.2) <0.01 (2.7) WBC ≥13 x 10 9 /L <0.01 (2.9) 0.02 (1.8) ASXL1 mut <0.01 (2.1) 0.02 (1.7)

We sought to develop a survival model in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) that is primarily based on clinical variables and examine additional impact from mutations and karyotype. 457 molecularly-annotated patients were considered. Multivariable analysis identified circulating Blasts ≥2% (1 point), Leukocytes ≥13 x 109/L (1 point), and severe (2 points) or moderate (1 point) Anemia as preferred risk variables in developing a clinical risk Stratification Tool for overall survival (OS), acronymized to "BLAST": low-risk (0 points; median 63 months); intermediate-risk (1 point; median 28 months; HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.0), and high-risk (2-4 points; median 13 months; 5.4, 4.1-7.3); the corresponding 3/5 year OS rates were 68%/53%, 43%/18%, and 12%/1%. BLAST model performance (AUC 0.77/0.85 at 3/5-years) was shown to be comparable to that of the molecular CMML-specific prognostic scoring system (CMML-mol; AUC 0.73/0.75) and the international prognostic scoring system-molecular (IPSS-M; AUC 0.73/0.74). Multivariable analysis of mutations and karyotype identified PHF6MUT and TET2MUT as being "favorable" and DNMT3AMUT, U2AF1MUT, BCORMUT, SETBP1MUT, ASXL1MUT, NRASMUT, PTPN11MUT, RUNX1MUT, TP53MUT, and adverse karyotype, "unfavorable". Molecular information was subsequently encoded in a combined clinical-molecular risk model (BLAST-mol; AUC 0.80/0.86 at 3/5-years) that included the aforementioned BLAST clinical risk variables and a 3-tiered molecular risk score. BLAST and BLAST-mol were subsequently validated by two separate external cohorts. Independent risk factors for blast transformation included DNMT3AMUT, ASXL1MUT, PHF6WT, leukocytes ≥13 x 109/L, and ≥2% circulating or ≥10% bone marrow blasts. The current study proposes an easy to implement, globally applicable, and molecularly adaptive risk model for CMML.

Abstract Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) of indeterminate potential (CHIP), driven by somatic mutations in leukemia-associated genes, confers increased risk of hematologic malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. In blood of healthy individuals, small CH clones can expand over time to reach 2% variant allele frequency (VAF), the current threshold for CHIP. Nevertheless, reliable detection of low-VAF CHIP mutations is challenging, often relying on deep targeted sequencing. Here, we present UNISOM, a streamlined workflow for enhancing CHIP detection from whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data that are underpowered, especially for low VAFs. UNISOM utilizes a meta-caller for variant detection, in couple with machine learning models which classify variants into CHIP, germline, and artifact. In whole-exome sequencing data, UNISOM recovered nearly 80% of the CHIP mutations identified via deep targeted sequencing in the same cohort. Applied to whole-genome sequencing data from Mayo Clinic Biobank, it recapitulated the patterns previously established in much larger cohorts, including the most frequently mutated CHIP genes and predominant mutation types and signatures, as well as strong associations of CHIP with age and smoking status. Notably, 30% of the identified CHIP mutations had &lt; 5% VAFs, demonstrating its high sensitivity toward small mutant clones. This workflow is applicable to CHIP screening in population genomic studies. The UNISOM pipeline is freely available at https://github.com/shulanmayo/UNISOM and https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/biocode/tool/7816.

SummaryGermline variants in DDX41 (DDX41MT‐germline predisposition syndrome [GPS]) are associated with predisposition to haematological malignancies (HM), including lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms (MN). We retrospectively analysed the clinical and molecular features of 195 patients diagnosed and treated at Mayo Clinic with DDX41MT‐GPS. Patients with germline DDX41 pathogenic variants (42.3%) and variants of unknown significance (VUS, 57.6%) were included. The median age was 68.6 years (16.2–93.4). Ninety‐two per cent were Caucasian, 64.1% were male and 30.8% had a family history of HM. There were 92 distinct germline variants among our cohort, and the most common was p.Met1? (15.9%), followed by p.Asp140Glyfs*2 (9.2%). Clinical diagnoses included asymptomatic carriers (10.2%), clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS, 6.1%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (6.7%), myelodysplastic syndrome (40.5%), acute myeloid leukaemia (20.5%), lymphoid neoplasms (9.2%), plasma cell dyscrasias (6.1%) and solid tumours (22.5%). Patients with MN were older (median age 70 vs. 63.5 years) and more likely to be male (M:F ratio 2.3 vs. 1.0) and most patients (78.8%) with MN had a normal karyotype. The most common somatic variants involved DDX41 (34.4%), followed by TET2 (11.2%), DNMT3A (9.6%) and ASXL1 (9.2%). In summary, we have comprehensively described the spectrum of clinical phenotypes within the Mayo Clinic DDX41MT‐GPS cohort.

Background: Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (t-MN) occur after exposure to DNA-damaging agentsincluding cytotoxic chemo and radiation therapy and are associated with dismal outcomes. TP53 and PPM1D (protein phosphatase Mn2+/Mg2+-dependent 1D) mutations (MT) disrupt the DNA damage response and repair (DDR) pathway, are often co-mutated (25-35%), and although enriched in t-MN (20%), can also be seen in age-related clonal hematopoiesis (CH) (5-10%). While progressive genomic instability with biallelic inactivation has been described as a mechanism of MN progression with TP53 MT, similar mechanisms remain to be elucidated for PPM1D MT. We conducted this study to assess the clinical phenotype and outcomes of TP53 and PPM1D co-mutated (PPM1DTP53m) versus PPM1D MT and wild type TP53 (PPM1DTP53wt) CH and MN. Methods: After approval from the Mayo Clinic IRB, the CH and MN databases were queried and 119 pts with PPM1D MT (CH= 26, clonal cytopenia of unknown significance [CCUS]= 64, myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS]=16, myeloproliferative neoplasm [MPN]=8, acute myeloid leukemia [AML]= 5) were identified. We analyzed baseline characteristics, karyotypic changes, somatic mutations, and survival outcomes between the PPM1DTP53m (n= 22) and PPM1DTP53wt (n= 97) groups (gp). Results: Baseline characteristics The median age in years (yrs) was 68.5 (range [R], 43-89) and 71 (R,30-92) in the PPM1DTP53m and PPM1DTP53wt gp (p= 0.65). 22% vs 18% (p=0.78), 58% vs 32% (p=0.03), 9% vs 32% (p=0.01), 7% vs 4.5% (p=&gt;0.99) and 3% vs 14% (p=0.07) pts met criteria for CH, CCUS, MDS, MPN and AML in the PPM1DTP53wt and PPM1DTP53m gp, respectively. Similarly, 19% vs 18% (p=&gt;0.99), 47% vs 32% (p=0.23), 7% vs 36% (p=0.001), 2% vs 0% (p=&gt;0.99) and 2% vs 14% (p=0.04) of pts met criteria for t-CH, t-CCUS, t-MDS, t-MPN and t-AML in the PPM1DTP53wt and PPM1DTP53m gp, respectively. All PPM1D variants were truncating, located in exon 6 of the gene, with median variant allele frequency (VAF) (8% [R,1-64] vs 5.5% [R,2-24], p= 0.10) and number of PPM1D MT (1 [R,1-5] vs 1 [R, 1-3], p=&gt;0.99) being similar between the two gp. While proportion of pts with t-MN were similar between the two gps (77% vs 86%, p= 0.40), cytogenetic (CG) abnormalities (67% vs 31%, p= 0.006), including monosomies (28% vs 2%, p= &lt;0.001) and complex CG (53% vs 4%, p= &lt;0.001) were more frequent in PPM1DTP53m gp compared to PPM1DTP53wt gp, respectively. The median TP53 MT VAF was 14% (R, 1-14); 50% had multi-hit TP53 MT. Somatic mutations in PPM1D MT myeloid neoplasm with and without TP53 MT Somatic co-mutations excluding TP53 were seen in 71% of pts; 73.5% in PPM1DTP53wt and 59% in PPM1DTP53m gp (p= 0.20). Apart from CBL (0% vs 9%,p=0.03), MT involving DNMT3A (20% vs 14%, p= 0.56), TET2 (15% vs. 14%, p= &gt;0.99), IDH1 (6% vs 19%, p= 0.07), splicing factors (8% vs 14%, p=0.08), ASXL1 (11% vs 4.5%, p=0.46), and JAK2 (9% vs 0%,p=0.20) were comparable between PPM1DTP53wt and PPM1DTP53m gps, respectively. The proportion of pts with ≥ 2 somatic co-mutations excluding TP53 MT were numerically higher in PPM1DTP53wt gp (43%) compared to PPM1DTP53m gp (23%) (p= 0.09). In the PPM1DTP53wt gp, other somatic driver mutations included RUNX1 (n= 7 [7%]; CH [n=1], CCUS [n=2], MDS [n=3], MPN [n=1]), NRAS (n=1 [1%]; CCUS), BCOR (n=1 [1%]; CCUS), and PTPN11 (n=1 [1%]; CCUS). Leukemic transformation and survival With a median follow up of 6.43 months (mo) (R, 0.23-36.4), median overall survival (mOS) in mo among high-risk MDS/AML (16.4 vs 15.0, p= 0.66) and CHIP/CCUS pts (35.79 vs 26.28, p= 0.93) was similar between PPM1DTP53wt and PPM1DTP53m gps, respectively. CHIP/CCUS pts harboring multiple vs single PPM1D MT had an inferior mOS (23.9 vs 36.7 mo, p= 0.05). Three (2.5%) MDS pts underwent AML transformation; 1 (1%) and 2 (10%) in PPM1DTP53wt and PPM1DTP53m gp, respectively (p= 0.07). Conclusions In our study, 18% of pts had concurrent TP53 and PPM1D MT (82% t-MN), with the PPM1DTP53wt genotype being more frequent in CCUS, while the PPM1DTP53m genotype was more frequent in MN. The PPM1DTP53m genotype had a higher frequency of CG abnormalities, including complex CG. Survival outcome was inferior and comparable in PPM1D MT MN with or without TP53 MT. While 73.5 % of the PPM1DTP53wt gp had somatic driver MT and 31% had karyotypic abnormalities, 22% had no additional MT or CG changes (all CH/CCUS), underscoring the need to understand how PPM1D MT contribute to hematopoietic dysfunction and MN.

Background: The majority of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) harbor somatic mutations with the most frequent being TET2 (56%), SRSF2 (42%), and ASXL1 (41%) (Leukemia 2020;34:1407). The prognostic relevance of mutations in CMML has been studied extensively with consistent observations suggesting favorable survival impact from TET2 and unfavorable from DNMT3A, ASXL1, NRAS, and SETBP1 mutations. Among the latter, DNMT3A mutation stands out as being the strongest predictor of inferior overall (OS) and leukemia-free (LFS) survival (AJH 2017;92:56). The current study was inspired by observations from exploratory analyses of a large Mayo Clinic CMML cohort. Methods: The current retrospective study was conducted under an institutional review board approved minimum risk protocol that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of data from patient records (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Scottsdale, AZ; and Jacksonville, FL). Mutations were screened by multi-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS). Diagnostic criteria were according to the International Consensus Classification (Blood 2022; 140:1200). Conventional statistical methods were employed for comparisons of groups and survival analysis (JMP Pro 17.0.0 software SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results: Exploratory analysis of a well-characterized cohort of 398 Mayo Clinic patients with CMML suggested an unusually long median survival of 96 months for 7 patients harboring PHF6 mutation vs. 27 months for those without the mutation. A subsequent institutional database search focusing on PHF6-mutated CMML identified 20 more cases, expanding the total number of study patients to 418, including 27 PHF6-mutated cases. PHF6 mutations clustered with (co-mutation frequency) TET2 (93%) and less likely to be co-mutated with TP53 (0%), PTPTN11 (0%) and SF3B1 (0%) mutations. PHF6-mutated patients often presented with thrombocytopenia (platelet count &lt;100 x 10(9)/L; 85% vs. 51% in PHF6 wild-type cases; p&lt;0.01). Median time from initial presentation with thrombocytopenia to CMML diagnosis was 4 years (0-14 years). In order to isolate the prognostic impact of PHF6 mutation without associated DNMT3A mutation and independent of TET2 mutation, we considered 4 mutational categories: i) DNMT3A-mutated (N=19; 2 co-expressed PHF6 and 7 TET2 mutations), ii) PHF6-mutated with wild-type DNMT3A (N=25; 23 co-expressed TET2 mutation), iii) TET2-mutated without DNMT3A or PHF6 co-expression (N=169), and iv) wild-type for DNMT3A, TET2, and PHF6 (N=205). Compared to the other groups, PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A were less likely to display leukocytosis (p&lt;0.01) or red cell transfusion need at presentation (p&lt;0.01). At a median follow-up of 18 months, 302 deaths, 78 leukemic transformations, and 44 allogenic stem cell transplants were documented. Univariate analysis for OS disclosed superiority in favor of PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A (median OS 90 months) vs. the other three groups with median OS ranging from 10 months for DNMT3A-mutated patients (HR 20.7, 95% CI 8.1-52.7; p&lt;0.01) to 40 months for TET2-mutated cases with wild-type DNMT3A (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7-7.6; p&lt;0.01). Results were similar for multivariable analysis of LFS, where, remarkably, none (0%) of the 25 PHF6-mutated patients with wild-type DNMT3A experienced leukemic transformation vs. 15-30% risk of leukemic transformation in the other three groups (p&lt;0.01). Multivariable analysis for both OS and LFS, which included other risk factors such as red cell transfusion need, leukocytosis (leukocyte count ≥13 x 109/L) and karyotype, confirmed the independent and favorable impact of PHF6 mutation/wild-type DNMT3A (p&lt;0.01 in both instances). Finally, all-inclusive multivariable analysis of karyotype and mutations, in DNMT3A wild-type patients, confirmed the highly favorable and independent prognostic impact of PHF6 mutation (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.37). Conclusion: The current study proposes a 2-gene genomic signature (PHF6 mutated and DNMT3A wild-type) to identify a unique subset of CMML patients who often present with thrombocytopenia and whose clinical course is characterized by a very low risk of leukemic transformation, resulting in superior overall survival. Additional studies are warranted to validate these findings and include the information in contemporary risk models.

Introduction Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is associated with a 15-30% risk for blast transformation (BT) over 3-5 years. Post-BT survival remains dismal with a median overall survival (mOS) of ~6 months (mo), even with intensive therapies. Although genetic drivers are identified in &gt;40% of BT-CMML cases (Carr, 2021), mechanisms of BT remain to be elucidated. This multicenter study examines risk factors for BT in CMML and predictors of post-BT survival. Methods CMML patients at Mayo Clinic (n = 400, 47%) and MD Anderson Cancer Center (n = 449, 53%) were included with IRB approval. Analyses used clinical and molecular data at diagnosis or first referral in chronic phase (CP) and again at BT. Categorical variables were compared by Chi squared and continuous by Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariate analyses used Cox proportional hazards models with binarization via receiver operator curves. Kaplan-Meier analyses were censored at hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). P &lt; 0.05 was considered significant. Calculations used BlueSky (v10.3.1) or Prism (v10.2.3). Results Of 849 CMML patients (median age 71 years, 32% female, 90% white) included in the study, 133 (16%) underwent BT. In comparison to CP-CMML without BT, those with BT were more likely (p &lt; 0.05) to have had higher WBC counts (15.1 vs 11.4 x109/L), higher absolute monocyte counts (2.9 vs 2.2 x109/L), lower platelet counts (84 vs 102 x109/L), have circulating immature myeloid cells (52% vs 37%), and be classified as myeloproliferative (MP)-CMML (58% vs 44%) or CMML-2 (33% vs 17%) at diagnosis/first referral in CP. More mutations were detected in BT-CMML than in CP-CMML (mean 3.2 vs 2.8, p = 0.002). Mutations in RAS (NRAS, KRAS, BRAF, CBL, PTPN11; 51% vs 40%, p = 0.02) and signaling (CSF3R, FLT3, JAK2, SH2B3; 15% vs 7%, p = 0.004) pathway genes were more frequent in BT-CMML. Conversely, there were fewer BT-CMML patients with the favorable ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype compared to CP-CMML (22% vs 33%, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis identified MP-CMML (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5, p = 0.04), CMML-2 (HR 2.4, p &lt; 0.001), and the presence of ≥4 somatic gene mutations (HR 1.8, p = 0.002) as risk factors for BT whereas the ASXL1WT/TET2MTgenotype was protective (HR 0.45, p = 0.002). The ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype was also protective in the MP-CMML (HR 0.49, p = 0.04) and RAS-mutated (HR 0.35, p = 0.005) subgroups. Amongst BT-CMML cases, the median time to BT was 10 mo from diagnosis/referral. Compared to their CP assessment, patients in an overlapping Mayo Clinic BT-CMML cohort (n = 156, median age 69 years, 35% female) were more likely to have NPM1 (24% vs 3%, p &lt; 0.001) and IDH2 (14% vs 1%, p = 0.01) mutations at BT. Amongst cases with paired molecular evaluations (n = 44), 7 (16%) acquired new mutations, including FLT3-ITD (n = 2) and NPM1 (n = 2). Conversely, 6 (14%) lost mutations, including TET2 (n = 3), SRSF2 (n = 2), CBL, NRAS, or PTPN11 (n = 1 each). There were no differences in variant allele fractions in driver genes present at CP and BT. Abnormal karyotypes were more prevalent at BT than in CP (60% vs 34%, p &lt; 0.001), and 26 (25%) patients with a normal karyotype in CP acquired structural (65%) and/or numerical (69%) changes at BT, including 6 (23%) that acquired a complex karyotype. Acute myeloid leukemia defining translocations were seen in 4 (4%) cases: 2 with t(8;21) and 1 each with inv(3) and t(10;11)(KMT2A::TET1). After considering mutation and karyotype changes, only bone marrow blasts ≥30% (HR 1.7, p = 0.04) were independently prognostic for OS after BT (mOS 4 mo). Compared to supportive care (n = 50, mOS 1.3 mo), OS was improved by hypomethylating agents (HMA, n = 14, mOS 16 mo, HR 0.3, p &lt; 0.001) or induction chemotherapy (n = 56, mOS 8 mo, HR 0.3, p &lt; 0.001), but not by HMA + venetoclax (n = 11, mOS 6 mo, HR 0.7, p = 0.4). Allogeneic HCT (n = 28) improved mOS to 46 vs 3 mo (p &lt; 0.001). Amongst 4 patients with paired whole genome sequencing before and after BT, 3 had increased copy number alterations (including 2 with loss of heterozygosity, 2 with gains, and 3 with deletions) while the 4th acquired novel likely pathogenic somatic mutations (MUC4, BAX, WNK2). Conclusions Survival in CMML after BT remains exceptionally poor. In this multicenter cohort, MP-CMML, CMML-2, and the presence of ≥4 somatic gene mutations were identified as risk factors for BT, with the ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being protective. Following BT, bone marrow blast burden ≥30% was an independent adverse predictor of survival.